SICK feat. Natsuki Karin (Cut Ver.)

00:38:675 - should be charted as doublet since you placed a note for the tune change at 00:34:835 -

(new timing)

00:39:635 (39635|3,39875|1) - what about making these 2 note rice in order to separate 00:39:635 - from 00:40:115 - ? i know that you're following the drum roll like 00:44:195 (44195|1) -, but in this way you'll emphatize better that high-pitched 00:40:115 (40115|2,40355|0) - sound

also you should make 00:39:635 - and 00:40:115 - in doublets

(new timing)

00:40:595 (40595|3) - i dont really get why you placed this ln, if it was for the vocals you should add it at 00:32:915 (32915|0) - too, but honestly you're focusing on the heavy pitched kicks;

For this you should remove that ln and add a single note for 00:40:715 -
same thing happens at 00:44:435 (44435|2) -

(new timing)

01:17:555 (77555|1) - it's better to remove in order to keep the same pitch in all the roll from 01:17:075 - to 01:18:035 - , also because that doublet it's lower compared with 01:17:075 - and 01:18:035 - .

(new timing)

01:18:995 (78995|2) - its weird, i think that you should just make it rice and move the tail of 01:18:755 (78755|1) - at 01:19:235 -

(new timing)

00:12:468 (12468|0) - should be stacked in the 3rd column with 00:12:207 (12207|2) - for the vocals

even 00:12:729 (12729|2,12990|1) - should be stacked for the vocals

(new timing)

01:16:355 (76355|0,76835|1) - what about removing these notes ? aimed to lighten up a little bit the left hand and at the same time emphatize better 01:16:595 (76595|2,76595|0) -

(new timing)

00:11:686 - / 00:20:033 - what about making this offset doublets ? would be cool to match with the normal diff

(new timing)

00:20:033 (20033|3,20207|2,20381|0) - should be charted like this 00:11:686 (11686|3,11860|0,12033|3,12207|0) -

(new timing)

00:57:515 (57515|1,57635|0,57755|3) - are kinda odd to me, for these drums you always used an ln then 4 linear 1/4 notes (like 00:49:715 (49715|0,49955|3,50015|2,50075|1,50135|0,50195|3,50195|2) - )

dont mind too much the diff snap in the right it's the old offset
(new timing)

00:58:835 - / 00:59:315 - should be charted as doublet to match with 00:58:355 -

(new timing)

00:49:235 - missing doublet for snare

(new timing)

01:01:715 (61715|3,61835|2,61955|1,62075|0,62195|1,62315|2,62435|3) - i think that can be improved, the way you charted this out it's really linear, do something like this:

(new timing)

from 01:03:635 - to all forward the chart it's unrankable for RC because you involve patterns that require 4 column being played at the same time:

offset involved in this issue: 01:03:635 - / 01:04:595 - / 01:05:075 - / 01:05:795 - / 01:06:515 - / 01:06:755 - / 01:08:435 - / 01:08:915 - / 01:09:635 - / 01:12:275 - / 01:12:755 - / 01:13:475 - / 01:14:435 - / 01:15:155 - / 01:16:115 - / 01:16:595 - / 01:18:995 - / 01:22:835 - / 01:26:435 - / 01:30:275 -

00:32:915 - / 00:40:595 - / 00:44:435 -

these patterns are really too tricky to being played in a hard diff, the solution would be chart the voice in this way:

• before a doublet a single ln (ex1)

• before a triplet a normal note (ex2)

• (ex1):
  

• (ex2):
  

(new timing)

01:17:075 - to 01:18:515 - it's weird to play the idea it's good but it can be improved:

you can hear that 01:17:075 (77075|0) - it's more pitched than 01:17:315 (77315|2,77395|1,77475|2) - , etc... :

also from 01:18:035 - to 01:18:515 - should be charted with 1/6

(example n1): invert the patterns (with lns)

(example n2): use 1/6 & 1/2 toghether (without lns)

mhhjhj nachos, (new timing)

01:31:595 (91595|3,91715|2,91835|0,91955|3,91955|1,92075|0,92075|2,92195|1,92315|3) -

it's 1/6, do something like #4171151

(new timing)

00:25:221 - to 00:30:995 -, this section it's odd to play, since you start with a fade in of hihats pattern then suddendly a full ln wall.

i think that you can improve it by following the voice fade out and not the instrumental in order to keep costant the flow of the notes

what about this ?

• 00:25:221 - to 00:26:331 -
  

• 00:26:331 - to 00:29:092 -
  

• 00:29:092 - to 00:30:995 -
  

00:14:816 (14816|1,14816|2,15077|3) - missing 1/6 hihat roll here like 00:10:642 (10642|2,10729|0,10816|3,10903|1) -

(new timing)

00:12:729 (12729|3,12794|0,12860|1,12925|2,12990|3) - unsnapped hihats, should be charted like 00:21:077 (21077|0,21142|2,21207|1,21338|2) -

(new timing)

00:20:555 (20555|1) - move this note to the 4th column to match the structure with 00:12:207 - and then move 00:20:816 (20816|3) - to the 2nd one

(new timing)

00:33:155 - im not a fan of blank columns when there's no musical reason behind, little suggestion:

(new timing)

00:36:995 (36995|2) - similar thing of #4171169, move the mentioned note on the 2nd column to fill it a little bit

(new timing)

00:38:435 (38435|0,38435|3) - why it isnt stacked with a note behind and after like all the other doublets? in this way the left hand it's heavier than the right hand; in order to balance that follow this:

(new timing)

00:44:075 (44075|2,44255|2,44375|2,44555|2,44675|2,44915|2,45155|2,45275|2) - / 00:44:255 (44255|3,44435|3,44555|3,44795|3,44915|3) - little anchors,

look at this fix-example:

the green part it's not stacked to let it breath a little bit, you should do it only after every difficult sections

(new timing)

00:46:355 - to 00:47:315 - it's really tricky compared with the rest of the chart, it looks like the top diff:

• 00:46:235 (46235|3,46355|3,46475|3,46595|3,46775|3,46955|3,47135|3,47255|3) - /00:46:655 (46655|2,46775|2,46895|2,47075|2,47195|2,47315|2) - / 00:46:415 (46415|0,46595|0,46715|0,46835|0,47015|0,47135|0,47255|0) - | anchors that go brrr

• 00:46:595 - / 00:47:255 - why are this doublets

lemme suggest this pattern

in this way you'll totally avoid 3 (1/4) += notes in the same row

(new timing)

00:48:275 - to 00:50:195 - pretty subjective thing:

what about use only the doublets at 00:48:755 - / 00:49:235 - / 00:49:715 - and keep all the other single notes ? the ones i mentioned are offsets that involve the voice or/and the cymbal.

(new timing)

00:50:435 - this note it isnt charted in the extreme diff, what about removing from here or adding in the Modoku diff ?

(new timing)

00:51:155 (51155|1,51155|0,51235|0,51235|3,51315|3,51315|2,51395|1,51395|0,51635|2,51635|3,51715|3,51715|1,51795|1,51795|0,51875|0,51875|2) - why are these note trickier in the insane diff compared with the modoku one?

also the two patterns are different:

to fix this first of all you should switch the pattern from insane <-> modoku,
then in the modoku diff just use the 2 stacked note variant, 3 it's too much

(new timing)

00:52:595 (52595|0) - is this note for the vocal, because if not it should be rem oved, if instead it's you should add a normal note here at 00:53:555 -

(new timing)

00:53:795 (53795|1) - move this note to the 4th column for playability, your current pattern it's heavy on the left hand cause 00:53:795 (53795|1,53915|1) - / 00:53:915 (53915|0,54035|0) -

(new timing)

00:56:915 - ik that's intentional but while playing it's really feelable that something it's missing, also all around that note can be improved, lemme suggest this:

• (yellow) added the snare and the note
• (orange) each pattern it's [2-2-2-1] [4 notes] (except for sections where it can be too tricky (pink))
• (green lines) are situated in the (pink) sections, the pattern it's semplificated in order to gain stability

(new timing)

00:58:115 (58115|0,58115|1,58195|0,58195|2,58275|3,58275|2,58355|3,58355|0,58435|2,58435|1) - it's really close to being tricky as the modoko diff

00:58:515 (58515|0,58595|0,58675|3,58755|3) - are still fine since are easy to hit for me, but the first mentioned section have to be nerfed

(new timing)

00:59:795 - to 01:00:995 - i noticed that sometimes the 3 anchor note breaks because there are too many:

in this way you'll polish a little bit

(new timing)

01:01:475 - im not a fan of that 4 note anchor, also in that pattern the left hand it's used really few times, let me suggest this pattern:

(new timing)

01:02:555 (62555|3,62555|2,62615|0,62615|1) - have a lower pitch compared with 01:02:435 (62435|2,62435|3,62495|0,62495|1) - , what about making them single note? or at least 01:02:615 (62615|1,62615|0) - to match with the triplets before

(new timing)

01:03:635 - to 01:17:075 -, this section it's really really similar to the top diff, and it's even trickier compared:

(ex: 01:04:595 - ):

(ex: 01:10:115 - ):

they're really really similar

i suggest to:

• polish it to keep it similar like from 01:18:995 - to 01:28:115 - which it's easier and more linear to play
• remove any tipe of 1/6 jacks
• dont use 1/4 full ln notes (i mean like 01:13:715 (73715|2,73775|3,73835|1) - / 01:06:035 (66035|1,66095|0,66155|3) - )

(new timing)

01:18:035 (78035|2,78035|1,78080|0,78115|3,78140|1) - make this more linear, it's trickier than the top diff

(new timing)

01:21:875 (81875|2,81875|3,82115|3) - it's feels a little bit odd to play, suggestion:

• move 01:22:115 (82115|3) - to the 2nd column
• move 01:22:355 (82355|1) - to the 4th column

in this way you keep switching hands and it'll be cooler to play

(new timing)

01:26:195 (86195|0,86435|1) - consider to move the tail of these two lns to 01:26:915 -, it feels a little bit pretty empty compared with all the rest of the chart.

also idk if it's intentional but at 01:26:555 - / 01:26:675 - there's percussion kicks in the bg that can be charted

(new timing)

01:28:515 (88515|0) - / 01:28:995 (88995|1) - / 01:29:955 (89955|0) - remove this 1/3 minijack, this section it's really linear it doenst have any type of heavy jack.

(new timing)

01:32:595 (92595|1) - missing note for the hihat .

(new timing)

01:32:595 (92595|1) - consider to move up the tail of this ln to the 1/1 grid line

(new timing)

01:33:615 (93615|2,93635|1,93715|3,93735|0) - these 1/12 graces are really weird to play:

• why the one at 01:33:635 - starts before the 1/1 grid line
• 01:33:795 - should be charted as grace too

but honestly i dont think players will listen that difference if you chart them normal doublets, graces are mostly used in sharp sounds like the edm / hihats / (even piano because naturally note placements)

for that i dont think that using grace fits, you should make them normal doublets.

(new timing)

00:32:364 (32364|3) - move the tail of this ln to the triplet

00:40:715 - / 00:41:435 - should be triplets

(new timing)

00:42:935 (42935|1) - this note it's missplaced, the rhythm it's at 00:42:815 -

other missing single notes : 00:43:295 -

(new timing)

00:46:595 (46595|2,46655|1) - this transition it's easier compared with 00:46:955 (46955|3,47015|0) - , also look at this anchor here 00:46:715 (46715|3,46835|3,46955|3,47075|3,47195|3) -:

to improve it we can do something like:

i honestly preferr the second one since it's more playable and it remove the 4 note anchor at the start, but it depends by you the final choice

(new timing)

00:47:555 (47555|2) - should be charted as doublet (suggest note on the 4th column) to match with 00:47:675 (47675|1,47675|0) -

(new timing)

00:47:795 (47795|3,47795|0,47835|2,47835|1) - ik that's intentional, but what about making this more linear by placing at 3|4 columns the first doublet and 1|2 columns the 1/6 ?

(new timing)

00:58:275 - i dont get why you charted this as doublet, the sound it's the same of 00:58:195 (58195|0) -, if you make it single note 00:58:435 (58435|3,58435|1) - would be emphatized better

also 00:58:835 - should be charted as triplet

(new timing)

00:08:034 (8034|3,8294|2) - can be stacked since have the same vowels, even 00:15:860 - / 00:16:120 - | and 00:16:381 - / 00:16:642 - all vowels ends with u, it would be cool being stacked,

00:09:599 (9599|1,9860|0) - / 00:13:512 (13512|0,13773|1) - / 00:17:947 (17947|2,18207|1) - too

(new timing)

00:59:075 - missing doublet, it's like 00:59:555 (59555|2) -

(new timing)

01:04:835 - missing doublets like 01:12:515 -

(new timing)

01:14:510 (74510|1,74510|2,74585|0,74585|3) - i think it's overcharted, the real doublets should be only 01:14:435 - / 01:14:675 - / 01:14:915 -

(new timing)

01:16:355 - to 01:16:595 - it's intentional do dont chart that sounds ?

(new timing)

01:17:075 (77075|3,77155|3,77155|2,77235|2,77315|3) - right hand it's heavy, i'd suggest to move 01:17:155 (77155|3) - in the center to avoid that minijack on the 4th column, in this way you'll balance each sides

(new timing)

01:21:395 (81395|2,81395|1) - make this lns like 01:18:995 (78995|3,78995|0) -

(new timing)

01:26:675 (86675|3) - ghost ln here, it doesnt follow a new vocal like 01:19:235 (79235|2,86675|3) -

(new timing)

01:29:555 - should be charted as triplet since the offset it's involved in a snare sound

01:30:515 - missing hihat

(new timing)

01:32:915 (92915|1) - move this to the 4th column for playability, then 01:33:395 (93395|3) - to the 2nd and 01:33:515 (93515|1) - to the 3rd

(new timing)

01:33:635 - same suggestion of #4171297, graces for squared sounds are really weird to play, also why it have less graces than the insane diff

(new timing)

00:08:555 - / 00:10:642 - / 00:14:816 - should be charted like 00:16:903 (16903|3,16903|2,16968|0,17033|2,17099|1,17164|3) - / 00:18:990 (18990|3,18990|2,19077|0,19120|3,19164|1,19251|2) - or viceversa

00:11:686 (11686|3,11686|1,11860|0,11860|2,12033|1,12033|0,12207|3,12207|2) - should be charted like 00:20:033 (20033|2,20033|1,20207|0,20207|3,20294|2,20381|0,20381|1,20555|0,20555|3) - or viceversa, the difference here it's that the first one dont have the 1/2 note charted for the hihat, also the first one dont have an anchor of 3 notes (00:20:207 (20207|0,20381|0,20555|0) - )

00:12:729 (12729|3,12729|1,12794|2,12990|1) - should be charted like 00:21:077 (21077|1,21142|3,21207|0,21273|2,21338|1) -

and 00:21:599 (21599|2,21599|3) - should be charted like 00:13:251 (13251|0,13251|3) -

00:38:915 (38915|2,38915|1,39035|2,39155|1,39275|1,39395|2) - / 00:33:635 (33635|1,33635|2,33755|2,33875|1,33995|1) - is this on purpose? i mean this type of stacking it's different compared to the others

00:46:415 (46415|1,46655|1,46775|1,46955|1,47075|1,47255|1,47375|1,47555|1,47795|1) - big anchor there, also i have other suggestion for this micro sections:

• 00:46:235 (46235|0,46355|0) - it's unconfy to hit
• instead of following a 1/1 doublet pattern what about following the high pitched snares ?

example to resolve this :

00:40:115 (40115|2,40295|1,40355|2,40475|2,40535|1,40595|2,40715|1,40835|2,40895|1,40955|2) - ik that's intentional but i suggest to make this pattern more linear, even because the gap with the hard section

00:42:755 (42755|2,42815|3) - and 00:43:235 (43235|3,43295|0) - should be charted at the opposite in order to keep the consistency

00:48:275 - to 00:50:195 - ik that's intentional pt2, but in order to avoid a little bit the gap with the hard diff make this section easy and more linear like this:

it's even more cooler if we can remove 00:49:175 - / 00:49:295 - to create a gap but lets see if with other mod we can lower the sr

00:54:035 - to 00:55:955 -, ik that's intentional pt3, but what about making 00:54:355 (54355|2) - a rice note since it's equal to 00:54:195 (54195|1) - and move the tail of 00:54:035 (54035|3) - 00:54:355 - to avoid that 1/8 release gap?

also why 00:54:835 (54835|1,54995|1) - / 00:55:315 (55315|1,55475|1) - are stacked? 00:54:355 (54355|2) - have the 1/1 above empty.

00:56:135 - missing note for the kick drum

also 00:56:915 - you should focus this snare because the pitch it's really high, for this it's better to make something like this

00:58:115 - to 00:59:795 - it's filled by trills and the middle anchor goes crazy (00:59:155 (59155|1,59395|1,59555|1,59715|1,59915|1,60155|1,60395|1) - )
my suggestion to fix it:

i keep the triangles to point out the guitars solo and used a linear pattern for the kicks

mhjhjhjhjvv nachoshvhvc

00:59:795 - to 01:01:475 - what about doing something more trickier ? it would be cool also because it's really easy compared with the section before:

in this case i used intentionally the snares and the anchors to emphatize better the percussions, but it depends by you

01:01:715 - to 01:02:675 - the right hand it's heavier than the left
(01:01:715 (61715|2,61715|3,61835|3,61955|2,62075|3,62135|2,62315|3,62435|2,62555|3,62615|2,62715|3) - )

let me suggest this pattern:

in this way you'll:

• emphatize better the trills (triangles)
• remove ghost notes (orange x)
• rearrange/balance the distribution of notes in all columns (red box)

from 01:03:635 - to 01:17:075 - it's really really unbalanced imo :

sometimes it's too tricky for its diff:

• 01:06:995 -
  

• 01:12:275 -
  

(what are these note charted on, 01:12:335 (72335|2,72395|0,72455|1,72575|1) - are ghostnote)

• 01:14:675 -
  

(same of the above brackets)

or sometimes it's easier compared with the hard diff:

-01:08:435 -

tldr: find a middle way to fit better these transitional drums

01:06:875 - missing drum sound
01:10:595 - should be charted as doublet

01:20:915 - should be charted as triplet since there's a finisher snare

01:28:355 (88355|2,88475|1) - / 01:28:835 (88835|1,88955|2) - / 01:29:795 (89795|2,89915|1) - / 01:31:595 (91595|2,91715|1,91835|3,91955|2,91955|0,92075|3,92075|1,92195|2,92315|0) - should be charted as 1/6

01:33:395 - missing sound

also wanted to suggest this pattern

in order to emphatize the last snare (the last note)