The Purge MarchExplicit

In case any questions about the metadata come up: #4169989

Yeah I think these should help clear it up more - a few points to support this:

1. I think this translation from the YouTube description can be considered official, since they've credited a specific translator (who I'd assume is part of the MILGRAM team) in the description

2. Here's a source that supports this name order, for a different song - but it's for like the same character also managed by MILGRAM project: https://www.universal-music.co.jp/milgram/products/uicz-5158/

3. All the other ranked maps for MILGRAM also use this same given/family name order rather than the more conventional family/given name order (I realize this is kinda a weak point, but still felt it should be mentioned)

I'll close this for now, but feel free to reopen if you think it should still be investigated more. Will add this post to the metadata references. I appreciate the carefulness with this though!

yea i think that sauce is gud. i came from a time when we were still stupid stringent with metadata lol

cool, thanks for checking back on this!

Looks like there is now another ranked map of this song: https://osu.ppy.sh/beatmapsets/2053476#mania/4311281

Artist field has the vocalists name in the opposite order in the other set.

Tbh I think the points I mentioned still are valid, but also with ranked consistency I assume the other order should be valid as well. Im leaning toward changing it to be consistent with the other set.

Would like some more opinions from the BNs on this set though, so reopening.

Both versions are valid. The one on the ranked set is the order it’s romanized as. The version used here is from supplied from an official source.

Thus it’s up to you to choose what you prefer imo.

I personally prefer keeping it as official as possible, so I personally would lean towards the one by universal.

Yeah actually, I agree probably keeping it close to officially intended is probably better. Will leave as-is then.

passed CR and added it.

may be just me but Kaede's diff is as hard as top diff so I'd like to use same bg on them

would like to go with what the GDers decided. thanks for the suggestion but will keep as-is

Ok, yeah i was considering that before as well, but on the fence. So yeah i guess ill apply it then lol

hmmm... if anything i was leaning more in the + direction.

can leave it open for more opinions

after discussion we've decided current is ok

ty!

its in standard too lol

alternatively might be funny to delete 01:39:469 and just make this a 4 measure break - that also seems to fit

I want to keep them for contrast - I used manually inserted break times in the calm parts (01:35:991-01:42:947) to make it feel more relaxed, but I intentionally skipped the break between 01:34:252-01:35:991 to create some tension through the silence.

fixed

updated

removed unused green lines by using mapping tools

updated

thanks for catching this. Updated in all diffs!

for GD mappers, please update before making other changes

applied this btw

added

Uploaded the updated standard diffs.

forgot that I was playing with 50% music sound while the effect sound is 80% xd

Uploaded the updated standard diffs.

added

Resolving, ty!

Ok yeah, checked with Star Stream and yeah won't be needed. Removed them

Uhhh.. I have no idea why I put these tbh lol. But yeah I agree with you - removed them. Thanks :3

yay!

Ty ^.^

Good idea but I kinda prefer the more full break here. So will keep as-is.

Hmm ok thanks for checking that. Yeah when I tried doing the timing manually by ear I was getting a later offset like you. But I tried something new (based on waveform) for figuring out offset and I was questioning it - yeah I guess it didn't work lol.

Anyway, adjusted it manually again and I think +20ms sounds right to me. Fixed!