00:39:897 (4,5,1) - flow is a bit bruh
idrk what kind of aesthetics you're going for here so can't help provide suggestion lol. maybe leverage the circular flow from 00:39:897 (4,5) - more?
I don't think it's particularly strange given the flow of 4 and 5
might feel that way if I only look at 5...
00:48:158 (1,2) - this rhythm is a bit sus because other instances there are always some kind of strong sound on 00:48:376 (2) - . I think some rhythm like 01:59:461 (1,2,3) - is more fitting?
01:53:809 (3,4) - same here
00:49:688 (4,5) - idk these feel excessive 02:00:991 (4,5) - at least are a bit more chill, but i think both should just not be 1/8 or at least hitsound them or something
At first I used two circles but I wanted to express the intensity of the vocals.
I would like to keep it if possible.
00:49:797 (5) - added whistle
00:56:645 (5,6,1,2,3) - , 01:03:384 (4,5,6,1,2,3) -
would appreciate if you'd make these rhythms follow the vocals just like you did in the 2nd chorus.
It would make it way more intuitive to play.
01:52:069 (3,4,5,6) - this doesn't really fit imo. I feel like you're going for vocals here but 01:52:069 (3,4) - is obviously weaker than 01:52:287 (5,6) - . Swap spacing around?
02:08:374 (2,3,4) - very weird imo because 02:08:374 (2,3) - these are two spaced circle on weaker vocals but when theres a sharp increase on 'gomen' it's a click and hold reverse slider 02:08:591 (4) -
When playing this section, it's important to move the aim slightly upward when clicking the reverse slider at 02:08:591 (4), and then aim at the next circle at 02:08:917 (5). This way, by doing this, I believe the strength of the vocals is fully expressed.
02:16:860 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - since the drums/song is doing something notably different from 02:09:904 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - , I feel like some more variation in patterning and/or rhythm here would be cool