1. Advanced (2 stars, 209 notes)
2. Easy (1.44 stars, 128 notes)
3. Hard (3.19 stars, 343 notes)

shurito1sao wrote:

hey m4m
Easy
00:18:640 (1,2,3) - its a bit to hard for an easy hard to read. It's 60 degree turn, and still easier than a normal blanket =))
same for this one 00:42:640 (1,2) -
same here 01:40:202 - Don't you think repeating a pattern can make it feel easier?
for an easy 01:44:887 - a spinner needs atleast a 4 white ticks recovery for an easy diff. Fixed
:O what did u use 01:52:390 - Do not use stacks in a easy It won't be hard if you use the same rhythm following with 01:46:390 (2,2)
why on the red ticks 01:52:952 - i hear a sound on the white tick to. ^
nc 01:57:265 (3) - No
same goes for this spinner 02:09:358 - read ^ It's 4 big white tick (3 measure)
Advanced
try to use OD 4 and AR 5,5 I think AR 5.5 will show too much object and make some bad overlap. And OD 4 is for easy to normal, but I make this diff for advanced players
try not to use to much of 00:26:890 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - it will become a bit boring and hard for a 1,98 star Repeating a pattern is a way to make a diff easier, but I will try to be more creative
try to have the white tick clickable 01:47:140 - You can set the speed to 25-50% and mute the sample volume to hear. It's no clear sound at that white ticks but the red ticks
same for this one 01:50:131 - ^
these SV isnt needed if u only have a spinner 02:06:640 - delete them in all diff if u didnt use them I do not use them for SV. I use them for hitsound volume
Hard
this is a bit to hard to read 00:37:952 (4,5,6) - Nothing's special here...

Yahuri wrote:

From my queue!

First: make the white combo darker. It mentions here https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/Kiai_Time that you aren't supposed to do that cuz it blinds your eyes, especially in kiai time. Oh yes, I wasn't blinded because I map with beatmap skin

Advanced
I don't see anything technically wrong, but like you said earlier, I think more creative patterns would be nice. Try putting the straight sliders at different angles cuz most of em are horizontal, which may be why the map seems "boring". I fixed some, when trying to keep the pattern

Hard
In comparison to Advanced, this one is better in terms of creativity.
02:06:265 (7) - overmapping? fixed
02:00:640 (1) - only one weirdly shaped slider? I think you should add more. I don't like weird shaped things. Just add them if it fit the music better

Good luck!
also keeno is awesome One of the vocaloid producers I like most

[-Deemo-] wrote:

M4M from my queue (since you put a map with easier diffs, my mod get's really picky sorry):

[Easy]
00:21:640 (1,2) - Make blanket more inward, it stand out a bit since all the other blankets were dead in the center prior to this Just a bit fixed
01:48:640 (1,2) - Make 2 more open, this blanket looks a lot tighter than 01:45:640 (1,2) - looked Done
01:52:390 (2,3) - Considering there is a slight pause, I don't think you should stack this, because beginners might like click too soon and they'll just break their combo Yep I don't think they can FC an easy diff at the first try. So why don't we make something that follow the rhythm of the notes before best?
01:54:265 (5,1) - The .02 DS that its missing make it look awkward, cuz they are so close compared to 4,5 Fixed
01:57:640 (1,2) - Maybe blanket closer together? Done
02:03:265 (3,2) - It's so close that I don't think it should be like this, also 3 might be confusing since it's under a slider Fixed

[Advanced]
I can't mod things when they look like triplets x.x

[Hard]
00:12:640 (1,3) - Maybe move 3 a bit more down, the blanket at that level looks awkward in my opinion This is it's way I like
00:20:140 (5) - Maybe move middle node a little to the left to make it less tight looking Fixed in another way
00:32:890 (7,1) - Maybe move 1 just slightly up so that it doesn't slightly touch 7? Done
00:33:265 (8,2) - Same ^ ^
00:34:390 (3) - ^ in a sense ^
01:44:890 (2) - In my opinion, you shouldn't have a repeat on this, and on 01:45:265 - you should have a note since I find that this is a pretty strong beat, and it should really have like a mini jump to start the chorus Done
02:06:640 - I find it strange that this clearly is a slower part but it has the same slider multiplier as the kiai Why should it be slower?
02:16:015 (10,1) - That 1/16 note separation though lol Nah, I just want to start spinning with a circle

Sorry that my mod is kinda gross, I'm not that good at modding easier diffs. But you're maps flow really well and the patterns are pretty clean so you shouldn't have too much trouble getting this ranked Anyways GL on your map~

Mod Pop Culture cuz my low diff sucks compared to yours ;-;

McLaren12 wrote:

Greetings from #modreqs!

My mod

SPOILER

*Not sure about the current hitsound, it sounds a little weird in my opinion at some stages. soft or normal may sound a little bit better Changed Custom Hitsound set

Easy

02:12:452 (1) - Is a little long, id end it at 02:15:640 then map the rest of the song I just follow the vocal. And I like it more

Advanced

00:57:640 - Spinner here perhaps? => No where are good to end that spinner. Otherwise, I keep that playfree for storyboard
01:27:265 (5) - Suggestion - Move to x:267 y:139 At first I map like that, then I see the flow 01:26:140 (3,4,5,1) is not good. Then I fixed
02:12:452 (1) - Like in easy, it's a little long. You could end it at 02:14:890 then map the rest of the song Same as easy

Hard

00:23:796 (7) - May be me, but this note sounds a little weird being here Id remove I think it's ok. It still follows the music
00:47:702 (7) - Add NC Why
01:10:390 (3) - Not really a fan of the pause here, moving to x:311 y:122 may be better My map has jumps. If I do that, the space 01:10:390 (3,4) will not be far enough for players to realize that and click 01:10:765 (4) at 01:10:577 => Combo break
02:00:640 (1) - Remove finish Why? It sounds good, in both easy and normal

Sorry if it was small, you did really well with this map. Hope I could help!

Come[Back]Home wrote:

Took a quick look at your map, and its really cool~ :3
Ill just point out suggestions, feel free to reject them all haha =w= => Feel free to get no kds haha =w=

Easy

00:12:640 (1,2,3) This looks nice, yeah, but i think (3) is a bit too close too (1) Maybe you could get some distance in it by moving the middle sliderpoint of (3) a bit to the right? I like the way it blanket with 00:12:640 (1). However, I still keep the DS
00:34:390 (2) Moving this one a bit up would be nice, since it will go better with 00:34:390 (2) Okay, although it look like no overlapping
01:18:640 (1) I think you could decurve this a bit. It looks weird as it is now Done
01:27:640 (1) ^ I will keep this, I think this curving is the best
01:52:390 (2,3) Dont stack them like that, in Easy its too confusing for new palyers I spectated some new player (<50pp) play this. Some click too soon, some not, but most of them still gained x300. Otherwise, I want it to have something that feel like a normal diff. However, I don't think a player which play this game the first time can FC some map, even when it's just 0.5 stars, so if they retry, this stack can be remembered.

-Only thing i noticed is that you have not used many curvy 1/4 sliders (As far as i know) It doesnt affect the quality of the map, but i still missed them I think it's hard to use short curve sliders.
Awesome diffs otherwise

Advanced

00:24:640 (1,2) They are a bit too close to each other Yes, I want them to be like that
01:18:640 (1) Decurve it a bit? No, I want to see the wave clearly
01:22:390 (3) ^ ^
01:54:640 (1) The sliderslide sound is kinda anooying on this one, doesnt fit Same music with 01:55:390 => same hitsound
01:56:140 (3) ^ I can't see what doesn't fit. Otherwise, my hitsound for each object is the same in every diff
02:11:890 (4) This one should end here 02:12:077 since theres nothing here 02:12:265 There is a long vocal, it end at 02:12:265 "Te~~i~ku" ^^

-Diff itself is cool, but it think its a bit too hard compared to Easy The Easy use most 1/1, one 2/1, two 1.5/1. one stack. The Advanced use both 1/1 (~60%) and 1/2 (~40%), many stacks, and still keep DS consistent. And if you FC Easy, I don't think you can't pass Advanced
Otherwise cool diff

Hard

00:21:265 (7,1) Why the weird ds change? My fault. I don't know why it became this, at first I mapped it a 1/3 slider
00:22:952 (4,5) ^ I think it look OK, better than keeping DS

Awesome diff and awesome Map! Im just unsure about the spread between Easy and Advanced. Otherwise it seems fine!
Good Luck :3

FCL wrote:

M4M from #modreq
My map, my map in case you have lost it https://osu.ppy.sh/u/4715762

• [Easy]

1. 01:38:890 (4) - move on 304;68 for a smooth flow To (304,70 instead)
2. 01:41:140 (3,1) - I think that the red dot (1) must be parallel to (3). Try to do this by moving (4) Okay
3. 01:52:390 (2,3) - idk, maybe stack it's not a good idea After some mod, I still keep it, just because I have spectated some newbie
4. 01:57:265 (3) - suggest blanket, it's better I don't feel like blanket here

• [Advanced]

1. 00:32:702 (6,7) - move on 364;220 for better flow I did something else, using your suggestion
2. 00:37:952 (3,4) - I do not think that such an arrangement looks beautiful. I propose to move them to 280;200 I like it to be like that, so I just fix a little
3. 00:37:952 (3,4) - This slider is located a little crooked. Move on 404;284 ??? Wrong paste
4. 01:04:952 (4,5) - This form also looks ugly. make like this Fixed in another way
5. 01:08:702 (6,7) - do in the form of bending will be better I don't like thing bended in the same direction
6. 01:46:952 (4) - ctrl+J I like mine
7. 01:55:390 (2) - small irregularity. Move on 408;172 Okay

• [Hard]

1. 00:27:452 (10) - I think that this circle should be on x=392 Wow, such good eyes! But that is what I want
2. 01:26:515 (6) - move on 432;244 for better flow Okay
3. 01:42:640 (1) - this slider creates ugly overlap with (8). Move it a little to the right It's not visible in gameplay (Unless you play with EZ ^^)
4. 01:57:077 (10) - This slider creates a lot overmap (01:57:171, 01:57:358 and 01:57:546) I don't think it's overmapped, since it's not harder than the other parts. If you turn sample volume to 0%, you still can hear something at blue ticks

Good luck!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

P/s

I've never forgot doing any mod, if I had said I would do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. See the date modified?

I've never forgot doing any mod, if I had said I would do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. See the date modified?

Fluttershy552 wrote:

Request from my Modding Queue

Easy:

Everythings Fine with this Diff.

Advanced:
01:00:640 (1,2) - Make them to Curves? No, I don't want too much curve at the same time
01:07:390 (3) - Same ^ Okay
01:16:390 (3) - Same Again ^ No
01:19:390 (3,5) - Here to No
01:30:452 - Missing Note I don't really care about that note, because 01:27:640 (1,2) - make people notice the voice
01:31:577 - Same ^ No strong notes, can ingnore
01:34:015 (2) - Something Like this Maybe? But I like mine more


01:36:077 - Note here? Still following vocal
01:36:452 - Same ^ Still following vocal
01:39:077 - Want to put one here to? (Your Choice) Still following vocal
01:42:452 - Same ^ Still following vocal
01:55:952 - Same ^ I think the vocal is still loud enough

Hard:

00:21:265 (7) - I find it doesn't fit to the rhythm ??? Maybe it's overmapping, but it fit the music
00:30:640 (1,3,5) - Maybe Curves or Maybe only the 5? I want them to be parallel
00:35:515 (7) - Same ^ Did something else
01:02:140 (5) - Something like this? I don't like

01:13:390 (3) - Maybe a Curve? Did something else
01:24:640 (1,3) - Same ^ I like them to be straight
01:31:390 (3) - Same Again ^
01:59:140 (5) - Same ^ Same

-----------------
Thats From me

Good Luck ^^

Doyak wrote:

Hi! 1:1 req

[General]
* BPM should be 80 instead of 160. It's nothing different in terms of mapping, but 80bpm is appropriate in terms of the music itself. You can just double the slider velocity after adjusting it. I don't think it 80 bpm. 2 drum sounds a measure are usually use for strong music, but drum at 2nd and 4th beats of the mesure sound weird. So I choose 160
* This is not important usually, but seems that you like to make some clean, symmetrical patterns. So I just let you know - that you can make sliders like on Easy 00:21:640 (1) - even better. If you Ctrl+G it, you can see the slider tail (where the reverse arrow is) is at little higher position than the slider head. You can adjust them more preciesly. They are not so important, because it's hard to see without editor. However, I will fix some

[Easy]
* AR4 feels a bit high imo for this diff imo, the movement is very small and there are not many objects so maybe AR3? I think AR 4 keep 3 visible objects, that won't make players to click wrong
* 01:52:390 (2,3) - This stack is not recommended on Easy diff. I highly recommend to seperate them out. I like it, and I think I will keep it afer watching some new players play this map
* 02:12:452 (1) - I recommend to map this out, since there are proper vocals and drums to map. Not reallt a map out, but changed the spinner

[Advanced]
* Why not name this diff as Normal? That's the default way to make standard diff names unless there needs more names. I changed it from Normal to Advanced, just because the diff is harder than other normal diffs
* AR6 seems too high here too, I recommend 5. No, too "crowded"
* 02:12:452 (1) - Same is Easy, why not map it out? Same as Easy

[Hard]
* 00:39:265 (8,9,10) - This sounds like 1/3. If you wanna follow the vocal, 00:39:546 (10) - should be removed. I don't thinhk it's 1/3, because I map with 25-50% speed of the song
* 01:20:890 (9,10,11) - Same ^
* 02:12:640 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Reducing ds and volume doesn't make sense imo, since the song is pretty consistent there. I want to notice that the song is not nearly ends
* 02:16:038 (1) - I don't recommend this (too close to 02:16:015 (10) - ) It should be recognized as unsnapped after you adjust bpm to 80 though. I suggest to start it from 02:16:108 - Don't chang bpm

Overall, the mapset looks cool Good luck!

1. hitsounds issue... for Easy diff, better follow the hitsound like what i mentioned on Advanced and Hard diff

1. remove those ranking letters
2. idk whether you stole it or make it by yourself on the slider ball. if you stole it, make a new one or credit someone

1. 00:18:265 (6) - remove slider whistle + add clap on tail + remove whistle on tail
2. 00:24:452 (6) - remove whistle + add clap
3. 00:29:140 (5) - add clap on 2nd part
4. 00:30:265 (7) - add clap on tail
5. 00:35:140 (4) - 2nd part clap
6. 00:36:452 (6) - clap + remove whistle
7. 00:41:140 (5) - 2nd part clap
8. 00:42:265 (6) - make it like 1/2 slider + tail should be clap
9. 00:46:952 (4,5) - (4) clap + remove whistle, (5) 2nd part clap
10. 01:05:140 (5) - 2nd part clap
11. 01:06:265 (7) - clap on tail
12. 01:11:140 (4) - 2nd part tail
13. 01:12:452 (6) - remove whistle + clap needs to be added
14. 01:17:140 (5) - 2nd part clap
15. 01:18:265 (7) - 1/2 slider please + add clap on tail
16. 01:23:140 (5) - 2nd part clap
17. 01:42:640 (1) - remove whistle and finish
18. 01:49:952 (4) - 2nd part, remove whistle + add clap
19. 01:55:390 (2) - forgot to add finish on head
20. 01:56:140 (3,4) - 2nd part, remove whistle + add clap. while (3) last and (4) need to add clap
21. 01:58:577 (3) - clap on head, not whistle
22. 02:06:452 (1) - i don't think you need finish here
23. 02:10:390 (1,2,3,4,1,1) - i don't think you need to lower the volume down here. make it in constant (same) volume like others since it's not even an end of the song
24. 02:12:452 (1) - remove finish and whistle
25. 02:16:015 (1) - start the spinner at 02:15:640 - and remove whistle + clap

1. there are some notes that are using Additions + Sampleset into soft. change all of them into Auto, since you made all hitsounds into soft
2. 00:30:452 (9) - remove whistle + add clap
3. 00:35:327 (6) - clap
4. 00:36:452 (9) - remove whistle + clap
5. 00:42:452 (9) - ^
6. 00:46:952 (5,6) - (5) clap, (6) 2nd part clap
7. 00:48:452 (10) - clap
8. 01:05:327 (6) - clap
9. 01:06:452 (11) - clap
10. 01:11:327 (7) - clap
11. 01:12:452 (11) - clap + remove whistle
12. 01:17:140 (5) - tail clap
13. 01:18:452 (10) - clap + remove whistle
14. 01:23:327 (5) - clap
15. 01:29:327 (5) - clap
16. 01:36:077 (7,9) - clap
17. 01:36:640 (1) - ohh wow. you didn't even add finish for the others, so remove this finish
18. 01:41:327 (6) - clap
19. 01:42:452 (11) - clap
20. 01:45:265 (4,5) - i think it's fine for you to remove whistle here
21. 01:50:140 (5) - tail clap
22. 01:51:452 (9) - clap + remove whistle
23. 01:55:015 (2,3) - i heard that there are cymbal sound here, so add finish on head only
24. 01:55:765 (4) - clap on tail
25. 01:56:327 (6,7) - clap + remove whistle on (7)
26. 01:56:983 - you better add a note here and do something on the other notes
27. 02:01:577 (4) - remove whistle + add clap
28. 02:03:265 (1) - clap on tail
29. 02:16:108 (1) - ok, why do you have to lower the volume of the spinner? make it louder, since it's not like "fade out" ending part here + remove that whistle

-Hakurei- wrote:

hi. i'll mod Advanced + Hard only

[General]

1. hitsounds issue... for Easy diff, better follow the hitsound like what i mentioned on Advanced and Hard diff

[Skin Check]

1. remove those ranking letters Why should I do that? They can be seen in breaktime
2. idk whether you stole it or make it by yourself on the slider ball. if you stole it, make a new one or credit someone No, the idea of that sliderball is from the skin "Citricide V1" or something I see from one of my friend mixed skins. But I don't really like it, so I remaked it in the way I prefer

[Advanced]

1. 00:18:265 (6) - remove slider whistle + add clap on tail + remove whistle on tail Done
2. 00:24:452 (6) - remove whistle + add clap Done
3. 00:29:140 (5) - add clap on 2nd part Done
4. 00:30:265 (7) - add clap on tail Done
5. 00:35:140 (4) - 2nd part clap Done
6. 00:36:452 (6) - clap + remove whistle Done
7. 00:41:140 (5) - 2nd part clap Done
8. 00:42:265 (6) - make it like 1/2 slider + tail should be clap Done
9. 00:46:952 (4,5) - (4) clap + remove whistle, (5) 2nd part clap Done
10. 01:05:140 (5) - 2nd part clap Done
11. 01:06:265 (7) - clap on tail Done
12. 01:11:140 (4) - 2nd part tail Done
13. 01:12:452 (6) - remove whistle + clap needs to be added Done
14. 01:17:140 (5) - 2nd part clap Done
15. 01:18:265 (7) - 1/2 slider please + add clap on tail Done
16. 01:23:140 (5) - 2nd part clap Done
17. 01:42:640 (1) - remove whistle and finish Done
18. 01:49:952 (4) - 2nd part, remove whistle + add clap The drum sound is not as loud as guitar. And clap here sounds weird
19. 01:55:390 (2) - forgot to add finish on head ?? I don't know why should I add Finish on the head.
20. 01:56:140 (3,4) - 2nd part, remove whistle + add clap. while (3) last and (4) need to add clap I fixed (3) only, with me (4) is ok
21. 01:58:577 (3) - clap on head, not whistle Done
22. 02:06:452 (1) - i don't think you need finish here Not folllow the music, but I think it sounds good
23. 02:10:390 (1,2,3,4,1,1) - i don't think you need to lower the volume down here. make it in constant (same) volume like others since it's not even an end of the song My fault
24. 02:12:452 (1) - remove finish and whistle Done
25. 02:16:015 (1) - start the spinner at 02:15:640 - and remove whistle + clap No, I'm following the vocal

[Hard]

1. there are some notes that are using Additions + Sampleset into soft. change all of them into Auto, since you made all hitsounds into softI don't know why they became soft?
2. 00:30:452 (9) - remove whistle + add clap Done
3. 00:35:327 (6) - clap Done
4. 00:36:452 (9) - remove whistle + clap Done
5. 00:42:452 (9) - ^ Done
6. 00:46:952 (5,6) - (5) clap, (6) 2nd part clap Done
7. 00:48:452 (10) - clap Done
8. 01:05:327 (6) - clap Done
9. 01:06:452 (11) - clap Done
10. 01:11:327 (7) - clap Done
11. 01:12:452 (11) - clap + remove whistle Done
12. 01:17:140 (5) - tail clap Done
13. 01:18:452 (10) - clap + remove whistle Done
14. 01:23:327 (5) - clap Done
15. 01:29:327 (5) - clap Done
16. 01:36:077 (7,9) - clap Done
17. 01:36:640 (1) - ohh wow. you didn't even add finish for the others, so remove this finish No I added in every diff, not fit the music but better than the music
18. 01:41:327 (6) - clap Done
19. 01:42:452 (11) - clap Done
20. 01:45:265 (4,5) - i think it's fine for you to remove whistle here I like the whitle sounds
21. 01:50:140 (5) - tail clap Done
22. 01:51:452 (9) - clap + remove whistle Done
23. 01:55:015 (2,3) - i heard that there are cymbal sound here, so add finish on head only No, the cymbal sound is light, and add Finish sound a bit annoying
24. 01:55:765 (4) - clap on tail Done
25. 01:56:327 (6,7) - clap + remove whistle on (7) Done
26. 01:56:983 - you better add a note here and do something on the other notes I ignore it to notice the vocal
27. 02:01:577 (4) - remove whistle + add clap Done
28. 02:03:265 (1) - clap on tail Done
29. 02:16:108 (1) - ok, why do you have to lower the volume of the spinner? make it louder, since it's not like "fade out" ending part here + remove that whistle Done

you need to improve hitsounds more for this. GL!

1. 00:18:265 (6) - you missed clap on tail and remove that whistle on tail
2. 00:24:452 (6) - clap
3. 02:00:640 (1) - unnecessary finish
4. 02:01:577 (3) - first part should be clap, not whistle
5. 02:12:452 (1,1) - remove those useless timing since it's not getting softer for the music

1. 00:30:452 (9) - clap, not whistle
2. 02:00:640 (1) - unnecessary finish
3. 02:12:452 (7) - clap, not whistle
4. 02:12:640 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - yep. remove those timings since it's not getting softer for the music

-Hakurei- wrote:

ahem, you missed something from what i mentioned there. NO KUDOS!!! Oops O_o Why do most of this had not been mentioned????

[Advanced]

1. 00:18:265 (6) - you missed clap on tail and remove that whistle on tail
2. 00:24:452 (6) - clap Oh god, I remember I've done this. Why it's not????
3. 02:00:640 (1) - unnecessary finish I don't think you had mentioned it. Whatever, I will keep this finish, because I love that
4. 02:01:577 (3) - first part should be clap, not whistleDone
5. 02:12:452 (1,1) - remove those useless timing since it's not getting softer for the music No, I think it would be better if I lower the spinner sound.

[Hard]

1. 00:30:452 (9) - clap, not whistle Done
2. 02:00:640 (1) - unnecessary finish Like in Advanced
3. 02:12:452 (7) - clap, not whistle Done
4. 02:12:640 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - yep. remove those timings since it's not getting softer for the music Again, you hadn't mentioned it. And I love the way it be, so I will keep

• - bolded difficulties are the ones that I modded

Kyle Y wrote:

#collab modding queue

I am welcome for all of you to post another map again. Just post if you like this modding, with labelled and linked this song, written that we have modded one map before in this queue.

[Easy]
00:15:640 (1) - I somehow think it is not blanketed, could you mind check it once? I don't think it affects playtime, but I will notice this
00:19:765 (2) - avoid this pattern, becasue new players will play 00:18:640 (1,3) - and skip the circle 2 Have you ever spectate new players play my map? (Maybe they will do that if I use AR 2,3 ^^)
00:34:390 (2) - why use 1.5 beat slider, downbeat is here, 00:34:765 - I strongly suggest not to follow the vocal but beats. I follow both, but the vocal more, so I just make it a red slider point
00:36:640 (1) - ^, strong beat here 00:37:390 - Use the same with previos. If you use different rhythm, new players will feel confused
00:36:640 (1,3) - avoid overlapping/ stacking in Easy, new players may think it is circle rather than slider. That's why I use AR 4. But I will notice this
01:01:390 (2) - player may skip this and play 1,3 only. avoid it. Fixed
01:18:640 (1) - this shape is necessary? I think S slider is not suitable for short slider I like it to be like that
01:23:140 (3,4) - better change to 1/1. because 01:23:515 - skipped this beat, optional. I just want to emphasis the vocal a bit
01:33:452 - 01:34:952 - no beat sound here, better change to 1/1? again, suggest to follow the beats Same sound => must be the same composing with 01:32:890 (1), or EVERY player will feel lost and confused
01:45:265 (3) - strong beat is here 01:45:077 - not 01:45:265 - , maybe you can use 1/2 beat slider here It's will be hard to do anything with 01:45:265. ignore silder end circle
01:52:390 (2,3) - avoid stacking. it is Easy diff. No
|||||01:52:390 (2,3) - suggest change to 1.5 reverse here Boring
02:02:140 (2) - strong beat: 02:02:890 - , extent to white then? Not as strong as 02:02:702. Otherwise, I skip it at 01:58:390 - 01:59:890 - 02:01:390, so player will be confused if I add that note
02:06:452 (1) - spinner should start at 02:06:640 - , heavy beat here. Or you can use a circle-before-spinner pattern. I want all of my spinner follow vocal. If I start this at 02:06:640 they will hear the instrumental instead
[Hard]
00:21:265 (7) - this 1/6 beat really soft, even 1/2 is more stronger, then better map 1/2 The hum doesn't has real beat
00:26:890 (7,8,9,10) - 01:02:890 (6,7,8,9) - too much circle in a row, as it is really hard to play for not an experience player. So?
00:34:202 - a stong downbeat, maybe clickable thing here What downbeat?????
I somehow think some of them are unsuitable stack, just like 00:38:140 -
00:37:202 (2) - this overlap is okay becasue there is a strong beat at 00:37:296 - .
but not 00:38:140 - , therefore un-stack this (rhythm is okay) Fixed
00:40:390 (3) - I think you can think of a improvement. I think it is not a suitable circle, becasue this pattern, 00:40:390 (3,4) - usually use for emphasise 00:40:390 (3) - , but according to vocal here, you should not emphasis here as it is not necessary to do so. This is the way I do to emphasis the drum instead of the vocal
00:42:265 (8) - please consider to del it, becasue the sound here really low. Low, not nothing. If I don't put anything there, player can feel lost
00:43:765 (4,1) - do not reverse it and add a 1 beat slider at 00:44:140 - , seems like following vocal Fixed
01:02:890 (6,7,8,9) - same reason, mentioned above. This time I think my way is better
01:06:640 (1) - still think slider is better, becasue the rhythm here is weird, hard to explain So I will keep mine
01:10:765 (4,5,6,7) - same Use the same sound with 01:12:077 (9,10,11)
01:13:390 (3) - still not a natural drawing, maybe it is still too short for S shape slider I think this is beautiful, and a longer sider are rare to see in nowaday maps
01:45:265 (4,5) - I will del it to emphasize 01:45:640 - , and also it is a misleading ds, if you agree to it, just basicallt add a nc at 01:45:265 (4) - then problem solved. of course, I prefer del them Confusing
01:51:640 (1,2,3) - somehow not a good flow, maybe try this? I used to use that. But then I think my new way has a better flow. However, players normally go like this: http://puu.sh/khFo7.png

SPOILER

02:05:890 - here should be start for another slider, just feeling, hard to explain I know this break some "mapping theory", but this is based on my feeling
02:12:640 (1,2) - I think this part use slider is more suitable for circle, just feeling, you know feeling is hard to explain. maybe this part is relatively calm, then maybe I will think like this. Especially 02:15:640 (9,10) - Feeling is just what we like and what we don't, right?

Frey wrote:

ummm.from pm request?

• General

1. For accuracy and avoiding being the same with the full version, I suggest you add cut version into Tags Done
   
   
   Advanced
2. Why Advanced? That‘s generally used for the diff between Normal and Hard. This one should be called Normal A serios modder asked me this before... Okay :3
3. 00:18:640 (1) - for consistency， you should keep it in 1.0x ds Done
4. 02:06:452 (1) - not very suitale to add a finish, cuz you didn't use that hitsound in higher diff at the same time point. Fixed
   
   
   Hard
5. actually a custom name would be better than (Hard), you can do it cuz it's the highest diff, the Rule writes I've already known, but I couldn't find one. Maybe I should ask the next modder...
6. 00:42:452 (9) - unify the ds? Done
7. 01:56:983 - miss a beat? however if you want to fix this, then it seems you have to change this part 01:56:890 (9,10) -

Ah, I aim to ignore that beat to emphasis the vocal

Clean map. Hype

RyoKazuka wrote:

Im sorry, but I just saw something

x Hard

01:18:640 (1) - fix the distance spacing please

Excellent flow
and so neat !

star
I fell in love with the song

Xinely wrote:

• 
  General

1. skin problem This is quetionable, and I was unable to catch you :(

• 
  Easy

1. AR 3 please, AR 4 isnt good for Easy since it's usually for Normal.. also OD 2 since OD 3 is too hard for beginners OK, I will set AR to 3. But still OD 3. With me, OD 3 is the best for easy
2. 01:18:640 (1) - this slider's curve looks so forced, imo you can smoother it a bit for having smoother flow as well http://puu.sh/kI7wv.jpg No, because they no need to move the cursor like that, and I like my curving
3. 01:27:640 (1) - same here, just try to smoother it a bit https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3806485 Done
4. 01:42:640 - start the greenline at 01:42:733 - please. the guitar sound at 01:42:640 - is strong and need a loud volume Done
5. 01:52:390 (2,3) - change to 3/2 slider repeat like you use usually (i mean this one 01:49:390 (2) - ) since 3/2 gap of 01:52:390 (2,3) - might confuse the beginner, you never use it before so it feels quite unexpected Everybody notices this lmao. Goodbye the shape I love the most (
6. 02:02:140 (2,3) - ^ No, the rhythm changed
7. 02:00:640 (1,2) - both are same with 01:18:640 (1) - , try smoother them a bit No
8. 02:06:452 (1) - this spinner definitely better ended in 02:09:640 - because the music (if you do so you only can start map in 02:11:140 - as easy needs full measure of recovery time) Done

• 
  Normal Change the difficulty's name to Advanced again At first I didn't aim to map a normal diff like this

1. 00:19:765 (3,4) - they're quite hard to play for normal as you need tap twice for them and tap once again for next slider.. just change these circles into 1 slider
2. 00:26:890 (5,6,1,2,3,4,5) - a bit long rhythms, you should give a little break (1/1 gap), i would suggest to remove 00:28:952 (4) - No longer Normal
3. 00:30:265 (7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - same as above, i'd suggest remove 00:31:952 (4) -
4. 00:42:265 (7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - same as above, i'd suggest remove 00:43:952 (4) -
5. 01:06:265 (7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - same as above, i'd suggest remove 01:07:952 (4) -
6. 00:38:140 (4,1) - the score hit of (4) (like 100 or 300) covers on (1)'s tail which is a bit questionable for me. if i were you i'd like to avoid it I think the slider is long enough for players to realize and hold instead of click, then it's OK
7. 01:13:952 (4) - 01:19:952 (4) - yeah same as what i have said for much times, i would remove this because of rhythms.. too many 1/2 imo
8. 01:18:640 (1) - 01:22:390 (3) - and same as Easy, just try smoother the slider a bit.. too curvy so it ruins the flow Done, in a new slider kind
9. 01:42:265 (5) - just personal reference if i prefer to make zig zag flow here so i'd suggest move this to 216,128 Changed in a new way
10. 01:49:952 (4,6) - maybe if you want to make blanket looks neater, it would be great Don't know how to
11. 01:56:140 (3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - omg.. dont make beginners would die because of much 1/2.. at least give 1 or 2 of 1/1 gap please This time, maybe I should keep the diff's name till the end, and keep my eyes on the prize

• 
  Hard

1. 00:14:890 (6) - just nazi but 1,41x is out of from your consistency spacing I like increasing space when it's 1/1 or longer
2. 00:20:890 (6) - smooth the tail a bit to left please , too forced to play No, I want to keep things symmetric
3. 00:21:265 (7) - this is not 1/3, just 1/2 from 00:21:265 - to 00:21:452 - The instrumental sound would not say the same
4. 00:23:890 (8) - clap on repeat to hitsound drum background music too Done
5. 00:27:265 (9,10) - maybe change to slider, just look 4 circles in row played a quite hard imo I want to keep that hard tho
6. 00:35:515 (7) - just my personal taste, try hear the music on that, imo adding whistle in slider's body would give same music effect as the background ~ (y)
7. 00:45:452 (9,10,1) - 1/4 snap with 1,3x spacing is quite rude to play.. at least try use lower spacing with 0,8x No, I think it look asymmetric
8. 01:03:265 (8,9) - same as 00:27:265 (9,10) - I think mine follow the music better
9. 01:11:140 (6,7) - 01:07:390 (4,5) - same as above Just fix 01:07:390 (4,5)
10. 02:12:640 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - WEIRD spacing really, try make consistent please, music is still going to loud and being louder It just weird, not annoying, I think

quite good map altho i feel still need a few of good mods

good luck for now ~

Regraz wrote:

M4M.
Sorry for late!
[Easy]
Fine but 01:09:640 (1) - I still feel like that these red-line curved sliders are not appropriate, they make the players forced to change slide directions of cursor while the music is all smooth. Regular sliders would be better imo. ? I don't think the music here is all smooth

[Advanced name to Normal pls] My diff is a bit hard and use some pattern that should not be used in normal diffs
00:41:140 (5,7) - Too curved slider, smoothen them. For me they look fine
Cool.

[Hard]
00:33:640 (1,2) - http://puu.sh/l2G7e/eed46385ed.jpg Use a reverse slider and a note instead here to emphasize the vocal. Also to make it differentiated from previous notes at 00:32:890 (7,8) - Changed in another way.
01:44:890 (2,3,4,5) - Really hard to read with the jump and there's no indication.I spectated players, they can play this well in compare with other parts
01:54:640 (1,2,3,4) - There 3/4 rhythms sounds weird. I dont see them anywhere else I like them, emphasis the vocal
02:05:140 (5,6) - Start a slider at 02:06:077 and ends at 02:06:452 so you can follow the vocal at 02:06:077 I don't like sliders start at invisible sound
You use some slider jumps but personally they are a little random. Maybe it's better to re-consider them. Sometimes I make something randomly to make the map more lively ^^

Good Luck!

Hoen wrote:

General

1. I advise you to rename the Advanced difficulty, Advanced is a little easier than the hard but still a kind of Hard. I will keep it, because I make it like that
2. 02:24:640 - I think you should extend this part of the darkness... It is strange to suddenly return to normal. No, end the map at 02:18:640 is good enough for me
3. You should make another difficulty between normal and hard.It has enough difference between them No. If people can easily FC the advanced difficulty, they will pass the hard one

Advanced

1. 02:02:140 (4) - NC Why?
2. 00:20:140 (5) - Nc ^

Kuo Kyoka wrote:

Lyrics thấy màu mè quá cứ để nó giống như một màu vậy thôi


còn khúc cuối, black.png kéo dài nó ra, vì để nó end giữa chừng mất tự nhiên lắm


bài này calm, khuyên chữ một màu thôi, nhiều màu cũng không nó đẹp hơn mà chỉ có xấu đi thôi

good luck then

Kuo Kyoka wrote:

cần giúp đỡ gì về SB thì t giúp cho
mà sửa lại màu chữ đi

monstrata wrote:

[Hard]

00:19:202 (2,5) - Ehh fix this stack. It's kinda hard to see cuz the edge of the circle for your skin looks out of focus xP. I don't think so, in playing time we won't actually see the stacking
00:21:640 (1,2) - I like the rhythm you used for 00:18:640 (1,2) - better because 00:22:015 - doesn't really map to anything noticeable in the music, while the slider-end definitely does Done
00:34:015 (2,4) - Stack them properly. Done
00:40:015 (2,3) - Pretty big jump xP. Tbh i'm starting to notice some emphasis issues with your map. You choose to put a jump here, but don't create emphasis on 00:38:140 (5,6) - 00:44:702 (7,8) - 00:46:202 (3,4) - So emphasis usage is kind of inconsistent. Yes, I think the music is emphasized itself, and people can notice it just after a few seconds. So maybe the jump here is not so hard. I would reduce this jump.
01:23:890 (8,9) - Some nice drums here if you want to use circles instead of sliders. Done
01:30:265 (9,1) - Emphasis here but not 01:36:452 (9,1) - 01:39:452 (9,1) - I think the rhythm changes a bit there
01:45:265 (4,5) - I found these quite hard to read, but i see what you're trying to do. ahh xP I woulda done something like this: but maybe spacing is a bit big for you idk No need to fix here. I see players pass this in the first play

~

01:56:140 (5) - Not really any audible drum here to begin the circle sequence xP. 01:55:765 (4,5) - I'd make this a 1/1 slider isntead. Fixed in another way
02:10:015 - Weird to ignore this note xP since you map it for 02:12:640 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - I think the rhythm are not the same

[Normal]

00:19:952 (4) - Weird that you follow this 1/2 note... its not really noticeable, but you neglect more noticeable 1/2;s that follow main melody like 00:13:202 - 00:16:202 - For me, the piano sound there is really noticeable
00:30:265 (7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Rhythm is really quite dense here xP. You could be more selective about what 1/2's you choose to follow. I don't know what should I neglect, because I think all of them are 'loud'. Otherwise, I don't think this is too hard. I saw players with ~100pp can FC this diff in the first try when I am the host in multiplayer(Actually I want this diff to be harder, not so easy like this)

Compare Advance > Easy Rhythm and you start to see gaps forming in rhythm use

01:08:702 (6) - Doesn't seem all that necessary... Okay
01:22:202 - But here would have been nice. I would try to follow 1/2's that align with the main melody of the song, and not 1/2's that are like stray drum beats/vocals that don't have a recurring rhythm. Done
01:23:890 (6,7) - Like here, 1/2 sliders would be nice to capture the drums, but other places the 1/2 sliders don't feel too necessary, like 01:26:140 (3) - where yes, there is technically a beat on the red tick, but you don't miss a lot by choosing to skip over it. Done
01:52:952 (4,5,6) - Weird rhythm for me D: I would do 1/1 slider and then a 1/2 slider instead. I follow the guitar like 01:46:952 (4) -

[Easy]

00:36:640 (1,3) - Fix this stack. Done

Good Easy.


So altogether i think, more emphasis consistency in Hard, and Advanced needs some rhythm reworking imo because its a really big density jump from Easy. Good luck!