#collab modding queueI am welcome for all of you to post another map again. Just post if you like this modding, with labelled and linked this song, written that
we have modded one map before in this queue.[Easy]
00:15:640 (1) - I somehow think it is not blanketed, could you mind check it once?
00:19:765 (2) - avoid this pattern, becasue new players will play 00:18:640 (1,3) - and skip the circle 2
00:34:390 (2) - why use 1.5 beat slider, downbeat is here, 00:34:765 - I strongly suggest not to follow the vocal but beats.
00:36:640 (1) - ^, strong beat here 00:37:390 -
00:36:640 (1,3) - avoid overlapping/ stacking in Easy, new players may think it is circle rather than slider.
01:01:390 (2) - player may skip this and play 1,3 only. avoid it.
01:18:640 (1) - this shape is necessary? I think S slider is not suitable for short slider
01:23:140 (3,4) - better change to 1/1. because 01:23:515 - skipped this beat, optional.
01:33:452 - 01:34:952 - no beat sound here, better change to 1/1? again, suggest to follow the beats
01:45:265 (3) - strong beat is here 01:45:077 - not 01:45:265 - , maybe you can use 1/2 beat slider here
01:52:390 (2,3) - avoid stacking. it is Easy diff.
|||||01:52:390 (2,3) - suggest change to 1.5 reverse here
02:02:140 (2) - strong beat: 02:02:890 - , extent to white then?
02:06:452 (1) - spinner should start at 02:06:640 - , heavy beat here. Or you can use a circle-before-spinner pattern.
[Hard]
00:21:265 (7) - this 1/6 beat really soft, even 1/2 is more stronger, then better map 1/2
00:26:890 (7,8,9,10) - 01:02:890 (6,7,8,9) - too much circle in a row, as it is really hard to play for not an experience player.
00:34:202 - a stong downbeat, maybe clickable thing here
I somehow think some of them are unsuitable stack, just like 00:38:140 -
00:37:202 (2) - this overlap is okay becasue there is a strong beat at 00:37:296 - .
but not 00:38:140 - , therefore un-stack this (rhythm is okay)
00:40:390 (3) - I think you can think of a improvement. I think it is not a suitable circle, becasue this pattern, 00:40:390 (3,4) - usually use for emphasise 00:40:390 (3) - , but according to vocal here, you should not emphasis here as it is not necessary to do so.
00:42:265 (8) - please consider to del it, becasue the sound here really low.
00:43:765 (4,1) - do not reverse it and add a 1 beat slider at 00:44:140 - , seems like following vocal
01:02:890 (6,7,8,9) - same reason, mentioned above.
01:06:640 (1) - still think slider is better, becasue the rhythm here is weird, hard to explain
01:10:765 (4,5,6,7) - same
01:13:390 (3) - still not a natural drawing, maybe it is still too short for S shape slider
01:45:265 (4,5) - I will del it to emphasize 01:45:640 - , and also it is a misleading ds, if you agree to it, just basicallt add a nc at 01:45:265 (4) - then problem solved. of course, I prefer del them
01:51:640 (1,2,3) - somehow not a good flow, maybe try this?
02:05:890 - here should be start for another slider, just feeling, hard to explain
02:12:640 (1,2) - I think this part use slider is more suitable for circle, just feeling, you know feeling is hard to explain. maybe this part is relatively calm, then maybe I will think like this. Especially 02:15:640 (9,10) -