EvilElvis wrote:

[hard]
00:56:592 (4) - nc oke
yea i love this diff

[Bigextracollab]
01:03:735 (3) - consider moving it like this : sure thing
02:59:449 (3) - move it to 299|235 for making better triangle [[[Charles stuff]]]
02:59:592 (1,2,3) - well, i kinda disliked flow here, something like this will flows much better [[[Charles stuff]]]

good luck, i can't found more

jesus1412 wrote:

[apoplexy_]

01:21:163 (3,4) - These parts are almost guaranteed 100's first few tries, I think you might need to move the note away from the slider start. The 1/4 jump to the slider is probably what causes the player to assume the note needs to be hit earlier. Can't really see what you mean by the assumptions but moved it a bit anyway.
01:28:020 (3,4) - ^ Okay
01:31:163 (1,1) - I feel like these sliders are very easy to 100. Gonna see what I have to do here, after more inputs from other modders and players.
01:31:735 (1) - This slider is held a little long to be comfortable with the following jump which makes it hard to 300. You could slightly increase SV or decrease the size of the jump or possibly flip the slider horizontally. I'll see what others say about these. Considering your words in mind.
01:34:878 (3,4) - Same as earlier. mhm
03:00:878 (1) - Straighten out this slider, it's too slow to have a dent. charles stuff

I don't have a clue how this map is playable but it works. I got an S first try, just those god damn sliders. Looking at the map in editor I expected to have to mod the living shit out of this, but from a playability prospective there's not much that needs changing.

nold_1702 wrote:

Hi inverness!
I know you hate wall mod but I did,I apologize for this.

[General]

easy_ and hard_ are both mapped by inverness,their kiai times are supposed to be the same therefore. Probably bug, so fixed.

[apoplexy_]

-There are totally 4 unsnapped slider end found by AIMod,please check it and fix. HanzeR stuff but fixed

inverness

00:27:449 (1) - I am kind of pickky sorry ;_; As we can listen,there's a 'bomb'(drum) in the background music here, it gives players a feeling of 'go straight'.Therefore, this slider cruve is too much ,you may want to do what you did on 00:20:592 (1) or 00:24:020 (1) for the sake of better feeling. I guess...

00:37:735 (1) - A minor suggestion here,I really do not get why this circle goes too far comparing the pervious circle , spacings between 00:34:306 (1,1,1,1) are supposed to be constant and straight forward in my opinion.Besides,there's almost no any sound from 00:36:128 to 00:37:628 ,I don't get why you put reflected circle therefore.If I were you,I would put them like this(you may like it): Variations in beat placements, I don't really like the way they're going constant in such a pretty long timespan (5 seconds of stagnant spacing is idk, boring and uncreative for me somehow)

00:53:878 - There is a hard drum sound stands out,but you just put a slider end on it which makes player feel uncomfortable (actually,players would perfer click on hard drum at least in my opinion)I think you may want to put a 1/2 long slider at 00:53:592 and put a circle at 00:53:878 . Reason I didn't use circle to stand out with the drum is because the drum is offbeat (it starts in 3/3) and mapping circles on it feels pretty weird :/ Same reason to similar patterns all over the map.

00:53:949 (5,6,7,8,9,10) - Yeah I understand this stream.It is quite cool but it has space to improve.As we can listen,00:53:949 (5,6) - sounds stronger than the coming notes after circle(6), therefore the spacing between (5) and (6) [or even circle(4) if you applied my pervious suggestion] is/are supposed to be bigger than that of 00:54:092 (7,8,9) .Also add new combo on 00:54:092 if you applied this suggestion for the sake of warning players about the spacing change. Nice!

01:00:592 (4,5,1) - Same as what I mentioned at 00:53:878 .The music plays a strong drum at 01:00:735 .Sound of 01:00:592 is just soft comparing with 01:00:592.What you do now make the strong drum being passive.So,would you mind to remove 01:00:592 and also add a circle at 01:00:592 and 01:00:735? Sure thing!

01:00:878 (1,1,1) - Awesome ww.It would be more awesome if you add whistle on these 3 sliders (not end nor head,but slider)
If you agreed what I said,may you please apply the same thing at 01:14:592 (1,1,1) I understand what you mean, but I wanted to utilize sliderwhistles only on drill parts in this map (such as 00:51:449 - etc).

01:05:735 (4) - If you agreed what I said of placing objects on hard drum,you may also want to change this Nah I didn't ):

01:10:306 (1) - This slider end is UNSNAPPED.It should snap on 4/8 (01:10:467) but not on 2/3.Snapping it on wrong timeline makes it unrankable. Fixed ww

01:12:592 (4) - Same as 01:00:592 , this slider place on soft sound and end on strong sound which makes player feel weird,I would rather remove it and place two notes at 01:12:592 and 01:12:735 But I've been placing these patterns all over the map and I think they'll get along with it already? Aside that, I would like to keep them the way they are :/

[hard_]

00:47:163 (9,10,1) - Ehhh...If it was an insane or even an extra diff,this kind of spacing is acceptable but it isn't,it is only a hard,4.0x spacing is too big for a hard.If there's a better option to place them,I think you would not space them that huge. Some players told me that these kickstreams were a good warmup before the 1/6 kiai D: I'll keep it the way it is now

03:18:020 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - This pattern should not appear in a hard diff for 2 reasons:
A)Readbillibty reason:It is hard to determine whether the (4,5) (6,7) (8,9) are 1/4 or 1/2 I didn't place any 1/6s (yes the kiai is in compound timing so there are no 1/4 wwww) at all in this diff so players wouldn't think that these are 1/6s, besides I made this pattern 03:10:306 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - so yeah they'll realize that
B)Movement Diffculity reason:It is hard to move like this(anti jump start from 4 till 5 and a massive jump to 6 and anti jump again...) Not really an issue I guess (at least to most playtesters I asked, average players) also I wanted to make the diff progressed harder and harder by time X)

02:26:163 (4) - Ah... pattern is too hard and also spacings between 1,2,3 and 4 are supposed to be the same,now you put 1,2,3 as same spacing with a sudden jump at 4 is unconsistenty.May you try this?: But I liked it D: I'm keeping it for now.

02:44:592 (1) - For me,this slider should end at 02:45:235 as the 'weeeeeem' sound lasts much longer and why you map this slider shape and this slider is just due to that 'weeeeem' sound.I did the change,you may want to see and apply weeeeeeem! why not

02:47:163 (5) - same as 02:26:163 (4),try this? I want to create this fun "jump-hold" experience so I decided to put the ~hold~ slider a bit farther for it B)

03:03:449 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - keep stacking in a scetion shows that you are lazzyyy..I don't know if you are,but it is not a good idea to space them like this in my opinion.Try this? If you look closely, the way I do triplets progresses along the map, easier first, harder then. I believe hitting >3 1/3 circles in a normal spacing is kinda frustrating to average players so I decided to stack it.

[Easy]

01:10:306 (2) - wow what did you do in an easy diff , inverness><" This slider is invisible as the while slider is covered by the pervious slider(1).You should fix it in order to get this map ranked.(Even am I think it really fits but it is really not rankable obviously)

Please also fix 02:46:306 (2) - haha sure!

02:36:020 (3,4,5) - I think it would be a good idea for hard diffs but it is the easiest diff of this mapset,anti-jump doesn't exist.Stacking them make the pattern better to read for newbie. It's not an antijump, it's a manual stacking lol

Axarious wrote:

[General]
amzin
[easy_]

1. 00:44:592 (1) - Might look better with a red point angle bend rather than a curve. :> I prefer to keep the curve here, due I've been using two straight sliders already, smh
2. 00:49:735 (2,3) - Blanket fix, rotate (2) 1 degree around selection center so (3) has 0.99x/1.00x distance snap OR move (3) to x:97 y:238 for 0.98x/1.02x distance snap. sure fam why not
3. 01:18:878 (1,2) - Blanket fix, rotate (2) -2 degrees around selection center and move to x:224 y:228. Maintains 1.00x/1.00x distance snap. cool yo
4. 01:30:878 (3,1,2) - Blanket fix, rotate (1) -3 degrees around selection center and move to x:265 y:188. Maintains 1.00x/1.00x distance snap. sure thing fam
5. 02:00:878 (3,4) - Blanket fix, rotate (4) 2 degrees around selection center and move to x:260 y:188. Slider (4) will have 0.98x/1.00x distance snap, may require additional changing. cool enough so ye
6. 02:30:878 (1,2) - Highly recommend having two white points after the red's ending to get a better blanket. worth a try
7. 02:37:735 (1,2) - Not parallel, maybe use (1) and reverse and scale the slider up with ctrl shift s. huh? it's good o.0
8. 02:51:449 (1,2) - Highly recommend having two white points after the red's ending to get a better blanket. tuned the blanket the other way around tho

[hard_]

1. 00:32:592 (3,4) - Blanket fix, rotate (4) 2 degrees around selection center. the good
2. 01:36:449 (2,3) - Blanket fix, rotate (2) -1 degree around selection center. yeah sure
3. 02:02:592 (4,5,1) - Fix blankets, I suggest moving (5) to x:91 y:276 and (1) to x:188 y:334. I find this better
4. 02:09:878 (4,1) - Blanket fix, rotate (1) 1 degree around selection center. sure
5. 02:17:163 (1,2,3) - Link Make (3) bend around the head of (1) more? done
6. 02:20:592 (1,2) - Blanket fix, move (2) to x:190 y:180. I don't really see that but eh
7. 03:00:878 (7,1) - Move (1) to x:276 y:294, maybe. k
8. 03:15:878 (2,3) - Blanket fix, rotate (3) -4 degrees around selection center. that's nice
9. 03:18:020 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - (4,5) are 0.19x apart while (6,7) and (8,9) are 0.13x apart. Maybe move (5) to x:279 y:20 or something. idk but I'd keep this for now

[kyversible-insane_]

1. 01:24:878 (1,1) - Move 01:25:735 (1) - to x:482 y:36 to blanket with the tail of 01:24:878 (1) - . fixed, shouldn't be a pretty big deal

[apoplexy_]

1. 00:53:735 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Stream looks a little crooked, probably intentional, though. yeah it is
2. 01:34:878 (3,4,1) - Definitely comboable but it's hard to hit. it was jesse's suggestion back then so I'd stick to that

Kaguya Hourain wrote:

Hellol

General

1. *thumbs up*

easy_

1. You sure you need AR4? o.o now it's ar4.5 elellelele
2. Maybe add sb for your name like you did with every other diff? nah I'll leave it the way it is now
3. 00:49:735 (2,3) - I WILL BLANKET MOD THE SHIT OUT OF THIS DIFF CUZ YOU KNOW WHY sure
4. 01:08:592 (1,2) - Not sure if this is even rankable lol it is, it's easy enough to distinguish the sliders
5. 02:00:878 (3,4) - BLANKET I can't even check that it's way too far lol but k
6. 02:17:163 (1,1) - I don't like those they feel too boring, probably circles or double sliderpairs or something yada yada
7. 02:27:020 - Too much going on in the music to skip this beat here
8. 02:33:878 - Same
9. 02:40:735 - Yes I like the idea of pattern delays because it could help players feel the pattern and the beats more
10. 02:44:592 (1,2) - Daaaaaaaayum it's K jajajja
11. 03:03:449 (4,5) - Blanket yo ye
12. Why the spacing inconsistencies? DS is so 1997ly dull

Hard

1. AR7 might work, otherwise OD to 7. Actually OD to 7 period. OD7
2. Same sb thing nah
3. 00:32:592 (3,4) - Wao the blanket wao!!!!!
4. 01:05:592 (2,3,4,5) - Might get hard to read idk players know there won't be any 1/6 streams already here so it's k
5. 01:27:020 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - Am I the only one that finds this overlap ugly and the next three circles hard to read? I love it
6. 01:33:449 (3,4,5) - Two reverse sliders would fit more
7. 01:34:306 (1,2,3) - Same
8. 01:41:163 (3,4,5) - Same pattern variations doe
9. 01:59:806 (7) - High impact sliderend = no I'll see what I can do
10. 02:24:878 (3,4,5) - Two reverses here as well nah :3
11. 02:32:021 (2,3,4,5,1) - Hard to read maybe? tuned it up a bit
12. 02:42:020 (3,4,5) - This should DEFINITELY change because there is actually a sixtuple in the music there which would really confuse people after all these 1/3s and then suddenly 1/6? it will be more confusing imo
13. 03:09:449 (3,4,5) - Two reverses fit more here too i THINK
14. 03:18:020 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - Scale triangle down maybe, feels a little too distanced. sure

kyversible-insane_

1. OD to 8
2. Shouldn't you add everyone's name on the SB on all parts they mapped? nope it's somewhat O.K.

Extra

1. OD9? DEAD INSIDE
2. I know inv mapped the parts without the sb but it would be nice to apply it there as well fine fine I'll consider this if there are more pointout on this
3. 01:10:592 (2,3,4,5,6) - This might be a little too fast, breaks will ensue here. ctrl+g on 5,6 would be nice nudged 5 a bit so it's not that hard to hit
4. 01:19:735 (1,2,3) - Nice pattern and all but polarity :v Should be slider circle slider circle :v
5. 01:33:449 (1,2,3) - Same for here K
   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. 02:45:449 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Hue hue hue. How about ctrl + g the second combo?
7. 02:46:878 (2,3) - ctrl +g?
8. 03:10:163 (1,2) - You sure you don't wanna just add a circle there and make it like 03:10:592 (4,5,1) - this?
9. I must have missed a lot of moddable things since eh I'm not really great at modding good harder diffs but cool I like it!

Rank this asap croissant ok

Static Noise Bird wrote:

[general_]
The last spinner appears way too soon after the last hitobject, I don't think that's allowed. Rather have it start at the next red tick (applied in normal_ already). it is allowed and I prefer it to be closer as possible to the note somehow
How to mod a perfection?!?! BY HONDA

[ez tbh_]

(CS3 please, nobody likes the big unreal) how about CS2.5?!?!? Not CS3 because it'll mess up spread smh
00:53:163 (2,1) - I don't feel too good about this direction change. put both closer a bit
01:06:878 (2,1) - Fix ur distance. done?!?!
01:15:449 (1,2) - same tbh K
01:37:735 (3,4) - Not sure if this misstack is on purpose, but you should probably stack these. That would also fix the minor distance error between stack is intentional because it will not get autostacked due to 1/1 gap 01:37:735 (4,1)
03:02:592 (3,4) - The big distance?!?! (fix the snap) I like this one TBH
03:13:735 (2) - Feel like the turn should be at the blue tick to match the kick. The kick is not on the downbeat and it would be pretty awkward to repeat the slider here
03:17:163 (3,4) - A simple design suggestion. cool?!?!

[hard_]
03:05:163 (1) - x504 y124 for a nicer overlap ~tbh~ suer

[kyversible-insane_]
00:24:449 (4,5) - Could be combined to a slider. I see no reason for the second circle. I believe Irre is trying to do some pattern variations here by utilizing circles
00:32:592 (1,2,3) - Don't stack 1/1 and 1/2 to a same stack. changed
Kshro will be nowhere so I applied his mods too (fuck u kshro :0) )
02:00:020 (1) - The curve should be opened up just a little bit to give the (2) inside some room. synthetic ecstASY WHEN HER LEGS ARE OEPN
02:54:020 (1,1) - Stack sliderends. Sur

[apoplexy_]
00:53:949 (5,6,7,8,9) - The shape could be prettier. intended (suggested by NOLD (TM)
01:40:163 (1,1) - The jump could be tuned down. I'd say it's quite brutal. fast streams, fast movement, lower spacing will be awkward to hit

Now pls rank.