peppy is supporting.
You actually have chance to have this implemented.
You actually have chance to have this implemented.
forum
More privileges for room creator in multiplayer
posted
Total Posts
98
that is my dreamGabe wrote:
peppy is supporting.
You actually have chance to have this implemented.
1- Makes sense.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.
Only supporting 1-.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.
Only supporting 1-.
If the creator leaves then?
Then it'll be just like before.
You should be able to pass the creator privileges to someone else then too.
Then it'll be just like before.
You should be able to pass the creator privileges to someone else then too.
ann_old
Topic Starter
My dream tootheowest wrote:
that is my dreamGabe wrote:
peppy is supporting.
You actually have chance to have this implemented.
Suspicious username aside, this is to make sure that everyone has peace of mind when playing in multiplayer, because they can always take the host privileges back.Wishy22 wrote:
1- Makes sense.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.
Only supporting 1-.
maybe room disappears? unless the creator passes that power to someone else first.Saten wrote:
If the creator leaves then?
Then it'll be just like before.
You should be able to pass the creator privileges to someone else then too.
that's evil :< I think the name of the room should change to the most trusted person.silmarilen wrote:
maybe room disappears? unless the creator passes that power to someone else first.Saten wrote:
If the creator leaves then?
Then it'll be just like before.
You should be able to pass the creator privileges to someone else then too.
Topic Starter
I kind of agree with this.silmarilen wrote:
maybe room disappears? unless the creator passes that power to someone else first.Saten wrote:
If the creator leaves then?
Then it'll be just like before.
You should be able to pass the creator privileges to someone else then too.
i don't. creator privileges should end with the creator. passing it on seems senseless. there is still the host spot to do anything of any importance
Topic Starter
I meant with the room disappearing but ending with host privileges sounds okay too.....except the room gets the same problems all over againdeadbeat wrote:
i don't. creator privileges should end with the creator. passing it on seems senseless. there is still the host spot to do anything of any importance
Oh! It's exactly what i wanted. I'll support this.
do remember that this is for the creator of the room, not the most important person in the room. all privileges that the creator has should be non-transferable. even if the creator leavesShoily wrote:
I meant with the room disappearing but ending with host privileges sounds okay too.....except the room gets the same problems all over againdeadbeat wrote:
i don't. creator privileges should end with the creator. passing it on seems senseless. there is still the host spot to do anything of any importance
SUPPORT.
Topic Starter
True, I agree with them being non-transferable, but then what will happen to the room if the creator leaves? ( If we are assuming in this situation the room doesn't disappear after the creator leaves and all the people in the room are d-bags) People will just mess around in the room again. I just wish I knew a better solution to this other than "room disappears" because that's not too good a solution either.deadbeat wrote:
do remember that this is for the creator of the room, not the most important person in the room. all privileges that the creator has should be non-transferable. even if the creator leaves
Support too 
I think it's better if they can't be transfered, and the room don't close if he leaves (Like this it the creator of the room have an internet crash he can come again in his room when reconnected)
I think it's better if they can't be transfered, and the room don't close if he leaves (Like this it the creator of the room have an internet crash he can come again in his room when reconnected)
Topic Starter
That's a good point too... so I guess everyone agrees the room doesn't disappear when the creator leaves . u .Arnold0 wrote:
Support too
I think it's better if they can't be transfered, and the room don't close if he leaves (Like this it the creator of the room have an internet crash he can come again in his room when reconnected)
Something like that is called reserving a slot. It could like hold the slot for around 3-5 minutes or so before it ends up being transferred to someone else.Arnold0 wrote:
Support too
I think it's better if they can't be transfered, and the room don't close if he leaves (Like this it the creator of the room have an internet crash he can come again in his room when reconnected)
My idea is, before the creator leaves the room, he should be given a choice whether you want to stay or really leave the room. If stay is chosen (Like, he wants to go to options, changing skins, or something), then that privilege will be held temporarily. And I guess privileges shouldn't be held if the internet crashes.
But anyways, I kinda want to support this.
maybe you want to give everyone a chance to choose their own song, then some loser chooses big black with full mods.Wishy22 wrote:
1- Makes sense.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.
Only supporting 1-.
maybe the previous person you made host passed the host to another user.
supporting everything
Topic Starter
That sounds like a REALLY good ideaXierra wrote:
Something like that is called reserving a slot. It could like hold the slot for around 3-5 minutes or so before it ends up being transferred to someone else.
My idea is, before the creator leaves the room, he should be given a choice whether you want to stay or really leave the room. If stay is chosen (Like, he wants to go to options, changing skins, or something), then that privilege will be held temporarily. And I guess privileges shouldn't be held if the internet crashes.
But anyways, I kinda want to support this.
Topic Starter
But you gave me your heartMacacito wrote:
i dont have stars to give
Topic Starter
bumping this \o\
Sounds great.
supportShoily wrote:
revive \o\
btw is it still "host" or "creator" would be an other feature?
This would be pretty cool to have.
Topic Starter
btw is it still "host" or "creator" would be an other feature?I think creator could be another feature.
you made this request for the creator of the room....
are you changing it to host now?
are you changing it to host now?
Topic Starter
lol no oopsdeadbeat wrote:
you made this request for the creator of the room....
are you changing it to host now?
I didn't actually understand his question
but host is transferable and creator shouldn't be (as i read in posts above) so?deadbeat wrote:
you made this request for the creator of the room....
are you changing it to host now?
I think it would be a great idea for the creator to differ from the host. Each should have their own unique priveledges. A lot could be done with MP as it is to make it more of an awesome party fest
Topic Starter
ReVeNg3r wrote:
but host is transferable and creator shouldn't be (as i read in posts above) so?deadbeat wrote:
you made this request for the creator of the room....
are you changing it to host now?
I am still not getting your question XD
I am requesting that the creator should get these privileges, and they should be non-transferable.
she_old
It would be pretty awesome to be able to let a friend pick songs and let myself kick people without mapsKaoru wrote:
I think it would be a great idea for the creator to differ from the host. Each should have their own unique priveledges. A lot could be done with MP as it is to make it more of an awesome party fest
Topic Starter
bumping
We should be able to right click somebody and pick the option saying "Let user Change song"
but the game mode and all that isn't changeable
but the game mode and all that isn't changeable
Support~
Sometimes benefit of the doubt can backfire on the host...
This feature would be great to have!
Sometimes benefit of the doubt can backfire on the host...
This feature would be great to have!
I think I've already posted in this request before but I'll do it again now :
It's simple, sometimes I create a room and guys on it want to choose maps. But sometimes, one of them choose unenjoyable maps for me because it's too hard and I can't play it. In that case, it's too late, because the guy have host so I can't change map back for something I can play, and I can't kick it or anything because he got all privileges.
So yes, being able to keep some plrivileges while permit other person to chosse the map would be nice
It's simple, sometimes I create a room and guys on it want to choose maps. But sometimes, one of them choose unenjoyable maps for me because it's too hard and I can't play it. In that case, it's too late, because the guy have host so I can't change map back for something I can play, and I can't kick it or anything because he got all privileges.
So yes, being able to keep some plrivileges while permit other person to chosse the map would be nice
Nice idea
what about this : Ther Room Creator rules all over the room itself
Support
Support
Please be a bit more constructive with your commentsshe wrote:
Nice name you got there, -WhiteWolf-
Anyways this is quite an important concept in many multiplayer games (revolveing around pvp and fps but meh).
The Host of the room is like a designated master and such but when they allows people to chose maps and/or modes he shouldn't lose their intial control.
Take smash bros for example. The concept is the first player has final say with most of the option but with stuff like map select (includes the option of randomly picking a person, people chose maps based on order, loser, winner ect ect.) allows other player to have small privilege without ursurping the 1st player control (well you can but then you'll be penalized in real life [online does not have that option thankfully]).
Though in truth I would just love it if simply the host can allow other people to choose maps and mod without losing privilege. They are the one to still start the game and they have the ability to rewoke the map choosing rights if no one agrees with the map. At the end of every round the host gets the option to choose the maps and mod or choose another person to.
Also a tangent idea, maybe an option that allows the host to pick a random person to pick a map every game would be nice to (you know to be fair and such).
I didn't even play multiplayer mode but I think that this is crucial for a enjoyable multiplayer experience so support.
You should be able to move these privileges from the original host to someone else too.
she_old
-libili
Very Simple!
i think it should be the best if the privilegues are separated.
Like this:
Host Privileges.
Maps/Mods Privileges.
example:
(1., 2. means slot)
1. -libili (Owner) - I'm able to kick players, but not changing map/mods. I can take host back to me, if I want.
2. theowest (host) - Is able to change map/mods, but not able to kick players.
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
What happens if host leaves?
1. free
2. theowest (host) - still stay host, it only changes that he get the ability of owner!
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
What happens if host comes back?
1. -libili (Owner) - I'm getting owner back. This is for the case that i'm gettingg timed out or so. (Btw. only owner is able to change name/password of room)
2. theowest (host) - The ability to kick players, will disappear
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
can you edit ur post with an example like that? :3
i think it should be the best if the privilegues are separated.
Like this:
Host Privileges.
Maps/Mods Privileges.
example:
(1., 2. means slot)
1. -libili (Owner) - I'm able to kick players, but not changing map/mods. I can take host back to me, if I want.
2. theowest (host) - Is able to change map/mods, but not able to kick players.
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
What happens if host leaves?
1. free
2. theowest (host) - still stay host, it only changes that he get the ability of owner!
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
What happens if host comes back?
1. -libili (Owner) - I'm getting owner back. This is for the case that i'm gettingg timed out or so. (Btw. only owner is able to change name/password of room)
2. theowest (host) - The ability to kick players, will disappear
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
can you edit ur post with an example like that? :3
omg best idea ever but i cant give you stars im all out 
It would be better if permissions are listed on every position.-libili wrote:
SPOILERVery Simple!
i think it should be the best if the privilegues are separated.
Like this:
Host Privileges.
Maps/Mods Privileges.
example:
(1., 2. means slot)
1. -libili (Owner) - I'm able to kick players, but not changing map/mods. I can take host back to me, if I want.
2. theowest (host) - Is able to change map/mods, but not able to kick players.
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
What happens if host leaves?
1. free
2. theowest (host) - still stay host, it only changes that he get the ability of owner!
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
What happens if host comes back?
1. -libili (Owner) - I'm getting owner back. This is for the case that i'm gettingg timed out or so. (Btw. only owner is able to change name/password of room)
2. theowest (host) - The ability to kick players, will disappear
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
can you edit ur post with an example like that? :3
Also, I've included my suggestions.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Room Creator
- Start the game.
This shouldn't be available to the host so the others can wait for the creator to return. - Select 1 user to be a host to choose a beatmap.
The creator can still select a beatmap unless the host is currently choosing. - Change the room details.
Room name, password, mods, slots. - Kick players.
That includes the host. XD - Locks slots.
Nothing important. - Change a user's team color
When the gameplay is by team.
1. The creator's slot cannot be occupied when he/she left the room.
2. If the creator has joined another room, the "creator" permission will be sent to the host.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Host
- Can change the beatmap
Unless the creator is currently choosing - Can kick players
Only if the room creator is not at the room
---------------------------------------------------------------
Player
- The ability to get ready or leave the room.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and by the way, I also support this even I don't have any stars to give.
I think it'd be much simpler and convenient if the host stays as it is, and works as it is now.
Instead, they should introduce a new tag for the person choosing the song. Like the host has a crown, the song selector will have like the osu cookie, or a music note. So when you right-click someone, you'll have "transfer host privileges" and "transfer song privileges".
The song selector can transfer his or her songs privileges and the host can choose the songs selector at any time.
Seems much less roundabout then creating a creator tag with more power than host, just my 2 cent
Instead, they should introduce a new tag for the person choosing the song. Like the host has a crown, the song selector will have like the osu cookie, or a music note. So when you right-click someone, you'll have "transfer host privileges" and "transfer song privileges".
The song selector can transfer his or her songs privileges and the host can choose the songs selector at any time.
Seems much less roundabout then creating a creator tag with more power than host, just my 2 cent
That's better than making more things difficult that you're focused at the room creator.Drace wrote:
I think it'd be much simpler and convenient if the host stays as it is, and works as it is now.
Instead, they should introduce a new tag for the person choosing the song. Like the host has a crown, the song selector will have like the osu cookie, or a music note. So when you right-click someone, you'll have "transfer host privileges" and "transfer song privileges".
The song selector can transfer his or her songs privileges and the host can choose the songs selector at any time.
Seems much less roundabout then creating a creator tag with more power than host, just my 2 cent
Any user can always create another room or just ask the current host of the room to return to him/her the privileges.
this ^kriers wrote:
A multiplayer room should include 2 roles:
1. A host who has all rights over his room (can also be transfered to other players)
2. A map selecting privilege to be handed out between other players (works like current host, but without the rights of kicking players/locking slots)
+ the possibility for the host to take back that privilege for himself if needed.
I mentioned 3rd point with something like this in mind.
Support.
I totally agree!Axel wrote:
We should be able to right click somebody and pick the option saying "Let user Change song"
but the game mode and all that isn't changeable
Support
Or maybe host should just be able to give the authority of change songs to other players while holding host privileges
Haven't played Multi that much.... But I kinda support this~
I like your Idea :-)
Renske_old
I've been waiting for this ever since I started playing in MP.
Definitely needed.
Definitely needed.
Revive. This would make MP funner, and stop afk hosts from killing rooms.
I read through a few pages but didn't see the main suggestion I had that brought about the bumping of this thread. If its already been suggested and I missed it, sorry.
p/4650105#p4650105
"2) Set map difficulty. Can't go over or under a certain amount of stars. This could also be used to sort through the MP lobby to find a room with a suitable difficulty for you. The master host could change it at will."
I'd love to go into MP and sort rooms by star difficulty. It can be VERY difficult to find a room with just the right rating with the way the system is currently and even if you do, that can change quickly. This would help.
p/4650105#p4650105
"2) Set map difficulty. Can't go over or under a certain amount of stars. This could also be used to sort through the MP lobby to find a room with a suitable difficulty for you. The master host could change it at will."
I'd love to go into MP and sort rooms by star difficulty. It can be VERY difficult to find a room with just the right rating with the way the system is currently and even if you do, that can change quickly. This would help.
me want
In the example of host rotation lobbies sometimes a player goes afk without saying anything and the lobby is stuck because you can't change the host.Wishy wrote:
1- Makes sense.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.
Only supporting 1-.
I see this causing a lot of congestion with tons of rooms being open. If you leave your room the lobby owner privileges should be transferred to whoever is in the top most slot (like it currently does)jabberwockey wrote:
That's a good point too... so I guess everyone agrees the room doesn't disappear when the creator leaves . u .Arnold0 wrote:
Support too
I think it's better if they can't be transfered, and the room don't close if he leaves (Like this it the creator of the room have an internet crash he can come again in his room when reconnected)
this would help A LOT when you accidentally pass host to someone who is AFK
This is a great idea!
Im tired of all the jerks that are hijacking peoples rooms :<
Im tired of all the jerks that are hijacking peoples rooms :<
s u p p o r t e d
why isnt this a thing already???
No words can describe how happy this would make me.. +Support
+SupportThat would be a nice idea. Maybe with channel ranks like teamspeak.
Wishy wrote:
1- Makes sense.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.
Only supporting 1-.
sorry for necroing but
YES, we definitely need more privileges for multilobby. here are a list of problems i'll list out, and if you guys have any, i'll add to the list:
1. creator can get kicked out of their own multilobby
2. host can hog host in a HOST ROTATE lobby
3. host can be afk for long periods of time
4. someone chooses ultra beginner miiro in a 3 - 5* hr lobby, but right after, next host chooses 7* honesty. i feel like creator should set a limit on what the sr is.
5. my personal, but maybe have an option to turn off score multipliers when playing with mods. i know it'll be unfair, but i play with ez in lobbies sometimes and i'm not on the top because score multipliers.
6. creator can't take host back
7. creator should be able to turn off force start. i like to be nice and allow people to download their maps.
8. please have an option to hide chat in lobby
9. increase from 16 to 20 because i never got why 16 out of all numbers was chosen
YES, we definitely need more privileges for multilobby. here are a list of problems i'll list out, and if you guys have any, i'll add to the list:
1. creator can get kicked out of their own multilobby
2. host can hog host in a HOST ROTATE lobby
3. host can be afk for long periods of time
4. someone chooses ultra beginner miiro in a 3 - 5* hr lobby, but right after, next host chooses 7* honesty. i feel like creator should set a limit on what the sr is.
5. my personal, but maybe have an option to turn off score multipliers when playing with mods. i know it'll be unfair, but i play with ez in lobbies sometimes and i'm not on the top because score multipliers.
6. creator can't take host back
7. creator should be able to turn off force start. i like to be nice and allow people to download their maps.
8. please have an option to hide chat in lobby
9. increase from 16 to 20 because i never got why 16 out of all numbers was chosen