ReVeNg3r wrote:

deadbeat wrote:

you made this request for the creator of the room....
are you changing it to host now?

but host is transferable and creator shouldn't be (as i read in posts above) so?

Kaoru wrote:

I think it would be a great idea for the creator to differ from the host. Each should have their own unique priveledges. A lot could be done with MP as it is to make it more of an awesome party fest

she wrote:

Nice name you got there, -WhiteWolf-

ShadowzI wrote:

she wrote:

Nice name you got there, -WhiteWolf-

Please be a bit more constructive with your comments

-libili wrote:

SPOILER

Very Simple!

i think it should be the best if the privilegues are separated.

Like this:

Host Privileges.
Maps/Mods Privileges.

example:

(1., 2. means slot)

1. -libili (Owner) - I'm able to kick players, but not changing map/mods. I can take host back to me, if I want.
2. theowest (host) - Is able to change map/mods, but not able to kick players.
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before

What happens if host leaves?
1. free
2. theowest (host) - still stay host, it only changes that he get the ability of owner!
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before

What happens if host comes back?
1. -libili (Owner) - I'm getting owner back. This is for the case that i'm gettingg timed out or so. (Btw. only owner is able to change name/password of room)
2. theowest (host) - The ability to kick players, will disappear
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before

can you edit ur post with an example like that? :3

1. Start the game.
   This shouldn't be available to the host so the others can wait for the creator to return.
2. Select 1 user to be a host to choose a beatmap.
   The creator can still select a beatmap unless the host is currently choosing.
3. Change the room details.
   Room name, password, mods, slots.
4. Kick players.
   That includes the host. XD
5. Locks slots.
   Nothing important.
6. Change a user's team color
   When the gameplay is by team.

1. Can change the beatmap
   Unless the creator is currently choosing
2. Can kick players
   Only if the room creator is not at the room

1. The ability to get ready or leave the room.

119410501 wrote:

Consider it as done

Drace wrote:

I think it'd be much simpler and convenient if the host stays as it is, and works as it is now.

Instead, they should introduce a new tag for the person choosing the song. Like the host has a crown, the song selector will have like the osu cookie, or a music note. So when you right-click someone, you'll have "transfer host privileges" and "transfer song privileges".

The song selector can transfer his or her songs privileges and the host can choose the songs selector at any time.

Seems much less roundabout then creating a creator tag with more power than host, just my 2 cent

kriers wrote:

A multiplayer room should include 2 roles:

1. A host who has all rights over his room (can also be transfered to other players)
2. A map selecting privilege to be handed out between other players (works like current host, but without the rights of kicking players/locking slots)

+ the possibility for the host to take back that privilege for himself if needed.

I mentioned 3rd point with something like this in mind.

Axel wrote:

We should be able to right click somebody and pick the option saying "Let user Change song"

but the game mode and all that isn't changeable

Wishy wrote:

1- Makes sense.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.

Only supporting 1-.

jabberwockey wrote:

Arnold0 wrote:

Support too

I think it's better if they can't be transfered, and the room don't close if he leaves (Like this it the creator of the room have an internet crash he can come again in his room when reconnected)

That's a good point too... so I guess everyone agrees the room doesn't disappear when the creator leaves . u .

Wishy wrote:

1- Makes sense.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.

Only supporting 1-.