Oh I am so sorry!ShadowzI wrote:
Please be a bit more constructive with your commentsshe wrote:
Nice name you got there, -WhiteWolf-
It would be better if permissions are listed on every position.-libili wrote:
SPOILERVery Simple!
i think it should be the best if the privilegues are separated.
Like this:
Host Privileges.
Maps/Mods Privileges.
example:
(1., 2. means slot)
1. -libili (Owner) - I'm able to kick players, but not changing map/mods. I can take host back to me, if I want.
2. theowest (host) - Is able to change map/mods, but not able to kick players.
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
What happens if host leaves?
1. free
2. theowest (host) - still stay host, it only changes that he get the ability of owner!
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
What happens if host comes back?
1. -libili (Owner) - I'm getting owner back. This is for the case that i'm gettingg timed out or so. (Btw. only owner is able to change name/password of room)
2. theowest (host) - The ability to kick players, will disappear
3. Shadowsoul (player) - same privileges like before
4. Kanna (player) - same privileges like before
5. deeerp (player) - same privileges like before
can you edit ur post with an example like that? :3
That's better than making more things difficult that you're focused at the room creator.Drace wrote:
I think it'd be much simpler and convenient if the host stays as it is, and works as it is now.
Instead, they should introduce a new tag for the person choosing the song. Like the host has a crown, the song selector will have like the osu cookie, or a music note. So when you right-click someone, you'll have "transfer host privileges" and "transfer song privileges".
The song selector can transfer his or her songs privileges and the host can choose the songs selector at any time.
Seems much less roundabout then creating a creator tag with more power than host, just my 2 cent
this ^kriers wrote:
A multiplayer room should include 2 roles:
1. A host who has all rights over his room (can also be transfered to other players)
2. A map selecting privilege to be handed out between other players (works like current host, but without the rights of kicking players/locking slots)
+ the possibility for the host to take back that privilege for himself if needed.
I mentioned 3rd point with something like this in mind.
I totally agree!Axel wrote:
We should be able to right click somebody and pick the option saying "Let user Change song"
but the game mode and all that isn't changeable
In the example of host rotation lobbies sometimes a player goes afk without saying anything and the lobby is stuck because you can't change the host.Wishy wrote:
1- Makes sense.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.
Only supporting 1-.
I see this causing a lot of congestion with tons of rooms being open. If you leave your room the lobby owner privileges should be transferred to whoever is in the top most slot (like it currently does)jabberwockey wrote:
That's a good point too... so I guess everyone agrees the room doesn't disappear when the creator leaves . u .Arnold0 wrote:
Support too
I think it's better if they can't be transfered, and the room don't close if he leaves (Like this it the creator of the room have an internet crash he can come again in his room when reconnected)
Wishy wrote:
1- Makes sense.
2- This is meh, don't give host to "ppp4284717848" and you won't have any problem.
Only supporting 1-.