1. Fosters (2,72 stars, 70 notes)
2. Hard (2,21 stars, 56 notes)
3. Lumael's Normal (1,68 stars, 44 notes)

1. 00:28:823 (3,1) - What are you think about moving spinner a bit more away from 00:28:823 (3) - this slider to give beginners less stressful gameplay?

1. 00:06:698 (3,1) - I think you need here bigger spacing to emphasise that's stronger sound here.
2. 00:12:323 (3,4,5) - 00:24:323 (6,7,8) - these stacks seem to be a bit unexpectable because there's no that important triple sound here. I think you should use 2x1/2 instead.
3. 00:16:073 (1) - It seems like you have emphasised every sound like this but not this one. I prefer to increase this spacing.

1. 00:02:573 (1,2) - this stack/overlap seems a bit weird in comparsion to the rest of this map. It should be spaced more.
2. 00:14:385 (4,1) - 00:11:573 (1,2) - there's the same kind of vocal. you should stack 00:14:385 (4,1) - these objects too. // 00:23:385 (4,1) - 00:26:573 (3,4) - here too i guess

Venix wrote:

hi hi

What are you think about making sliderslide sound muted? It sounds very noisy at beginning. ok

[Simple]

1. 00:28:823 (3,1) - What are you think about moving spinner a bit more away from 00:28:823 (3) - this slider to give beginners less stressful gameplay?

[Advanced]

1. 00:12:323 (3,4,5) - 00:24:323 (6,7,8) - these stacks seem to be a bit unexpectable because there's no that important triple sound here. I think you should use 2x1/2 instead. I can hear the vocals there, let's see if someone else complains about it,
2. 00:16:073 (1) - It seems like you have emphasised every sound like this but not this one. I prefer to increase this spacing. It is already emphasized.

[Fosters]

1. 00:02:573 (1,2) - this stack/overlap seems a bit weird in comparsion to the rest of this map. It should be spaced more. I did it cuz the low piano sound
2. 00:14:385 (4,1) - 00:11:573 (1,2) - there's the same kind of vocal. you should stack 00:14:385 (4,1) - these objects too. // 00:23:385 (4,1) - 00:26:573 (3,4) - here too i guess but why? xD

short and good map, good luck~

1. Não deveriam todas as sections usar o sampleset custom?
2. 00:05:948 - Essa nota aqui não devia ter hitsound, deveria usar Sampleset de drum
3. 00:06:323 (3) - Não seria melhor clap em vez de whistle? Ele tem um som bem podre em muitas skins, e independente dessa parte, acho que o clap combina bem mais com a batida da música
4. 00:07:073 (1) - Drum me soa melhor que Normal também. Ou então deixa no auto e usa finish + whistle
5. Expliquei melhor na dificuldade do Lumael, mas eu acho que esse mapa poderia ser bem mais valorizado com a adição de whistles em vários toques de pianos que estão sem hitsound, checa lá e vê se está de acordo, isso se aplica a todas as dificuldades

1. 00:09:323 (4) - Tem um whistle aqui no sliderend que não faz sentido pra mim, acho que foi misplaced
   Algumas coisas opcionais sobre o hitsound. Não são omg must have, mas eu acho que a presença deles acrescenta bastante no mapa, já que existem muitos ticks brancos sem hitsound que poderiam ter hs e valorizariam demais a música
2. 00:10:073 (1) - Whistle no final do sliderend me parece válido
3. 00:12:323 (5) - Podia ter um whistle no sliderstart, que tem o mesmo som do 00:11:573 (3), que está whistled
4. 00:15:323 (3) - Mesma coisa
5. 00:19:448 (2) - Whistle no sliderend
6. 00:21:323 (4) - ^
7. 00:22:073 (1) - ^
   Enfim, dá uma analisada e vê se você concorda. Eu acho que tá tudo bem não colocar eles, mas esse piano sempre tem um toque que se destaca na música nesses ticks brancos, e alguns estão sendo enfatizados com o whistle, enquanto outros não estão, e isso é meio estranho. Colocando tais whistles não deixam o mapa "overhs'd", então eu acho que é pretty fine fazer as mudanças

1. 00:02:573 (3) - Ó faltou hs aqui. Mesmo sendo um tom mais fraco do piano, você acabou usando hs no slider seguinte, então tem que acertar isso ai

1. 00:05:573 (2) - Esse som aqui é um finish e não um whistle bb
2. 00:18:698 (7) - Abaixa isso aqui 1px pra deixar alinhado com o slider anterior

1. where did you get the video from? at the end of it appears this thing https://puu.sh/xYRI0/038750a66d.jpg maybe consider to cut this part as it is pretty weird to see an advertisment like this while playing (well ok you finish playing then but still it's weird imo) in addition consider to cut the last 3-4 seconds as the blank part feels mostly useless tbh and it's a bit "too" long

1. http://puu.sh/xYRR4/c2ad70b397.png only 00:01:073 (1) - has S:C1 and the sliderslide is taken in consideration but starting from 00:05:948 (2) - you have S (sampleset not rank lol) and effectively it ignores the sliderslide all you have to do is to change the sampleset to S:C1 so the sliderslide will be taken in consideration

1. 00:04:823 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - the pattern itself feels pretty cramping speaking of flow structure i meant its flow feels a bit forced imo to make it more smoothlier you can do something like this https://puu.sh/xYTJD/26a4ec2222.jpg

1. 00:09:323 (4) - seems like you accidentally added a hitwhistle on its tail

1. 00:02:573 (3) - you've just missed a hitwhistle on sliderhead

1. 00:05:573 (3,1) - swap NC? the new stanza is on 00:05:573 (3)- as i can see here // 00:05:573 (3,1,2) - speaking about spacing here maybe the spacing between (3) - and (1) - should be less than (1) - and (2) -'s spacing as the very intensified vocal lands on 00:06:323 (2) - and not on 00:05:948 (1) - practically you still can make jump between (3) - and (1) - but (1) - and (2) -'s spacing should be higher than the previous pair of hitobjects

1. 00:16:073 (1) - i have no idea what are you exactly following: vocal or piano if you follow mostly the vocal having the rhythm structured by 1/4 polarity like this https://puu.sh/xYUrg/ffd53d8986.jpg would be nice as the vocal lands mostly on 1/4 here (there is 1/2 too ugh...)

1. 00:20:573 (4,5,6) - i feel like its spacing is more higher in comparison with 00:08:573 (4,5,6) - why don't use the same spacing here too? it's the same intensity here

1. as simple is structured as an normal diff and advanced diff as advanced, this is supposed to be a hard diff but seems like it got mostly structured as an insane diff due to: jumps like 00:10:073 (1,2,3) - for instance they can be cooled down a bit just because to be playable enough for advanced players as the diff is supposed to be a hard one, not an insane one (likely is kind of diff spike)

Pulse wrote:

[General]

1. Não deveriam todas as sections usar o sampleset custom? n sei a byby tb disse isso mas eu queria o muted slider slide só pra parte do piano
2. 00:05:948 - Essa nota aqui não devia ter hitsound, deveria usar Sampleset de drum colkoquei sampleset drum mas o finish é necessário
3. 00:06:323 (3) - Não seria melhor clap em vez de whistle? Ele tem um som bem podre em muitas skins, e independente dessa parte, acho que o clap combina bem mais com a batida da música eu gosto do whistle padrão ai, acho q combina melhor com o som pléc de fundo
4. 00:07:073 (1) - Drum me soa melhor que Normal também. Ou então deixa no auto e usa finish + whistle o finish normal combina melhor imagino
5. Expliquei melhor na dificuldade do Lumael, mas eu acho que esse mapa poderia ser bem mais valorizado com a adição de whistles em vários toques de pianos que estão sem hitsound, checa lá e vê se está de acordo, isso se aplica a todas as dificuldades eu n quero colocar whistle na mesma parte q tem clap, acho q combina melhor deixar sem mesmo. até pq os whistle seguem mais a vocal sem ser na parte do piano.

[Advanced]

1. 00:02:573 (3) - Ó faltou hs aqui. Mesmo sendo um tom mais fraco do piano, você acabou usando hs no slider seguinte, então tem que acertar isso ai

[Fosters]

1. 00:05:573 (2) - Esse som aqui é um finish e não um whistle bb como assim lindo, whistle é melhor q finish ai d:

Adorei
boa sorte bj te amo

ByBy wrote:

random mod

general

1. where did you get the video from? at the end of it appears this thing https://puu.sh/xYRI0/038750a66d.jpg maybe consider to cut this part as it is pretty weird to see an advertisment like this while playing (well ok you finish playing then but still it's weird imo) in addition consider to cut the last 3-4 seconds as the blank part feels mostly useless tbh and it's a bit "too" long It seems fine, it is part of the video series, so is no problem at all

1. http://puu.sh/xYRR4/c2ad70b397.png only 00:01:073 (1) - has S:C1 and the sliderslide is taken in consideration but starting from 00:05:948 (2) - you have S (sampleset not rank lol) and effectively it ignores the sliderslide all you have to do is to change the sampleset to S:C1 so the sliderslide will be taken in consideration I want the muted slider slide only for the piano part, I guess this is fine.

advanced

1. 00:02:573 (3) - you've just missed a hitwhistle on sliderhead

1. 00:05:573 (3,1) - swap NC? the new stanza is on 00:05:573 (3)- as i can see here // 00:05:573 (3,1,2) - speaking about spacing here maybe the spacing between (3) - and (1) - should be less than (1) - and (2) -'s spacing as the very intensified vocal lands on 00:06:323 (2) - and not on 00:05:948 (1) - practically you still can make jump between (3) - and (1) - but (1) - and (2) -'s spacing should be higher than the previous pair of hitobjects

NC Is like that cuz I am emphasizing the drum part as a whole, this is a Hard diff so i don't think I should be putting jumps like that. The drum section is already emphasized with a big spacing than the other onws so it's fine.

1. 00:16:073 (1) - i have no idea what are you exactly following: vocal or piano if you follow mostly the vocal having the rhythm structured by 1/4 polarity like this https://puu.sh/xYUrg/ffd53d8986.jpg would be nice as the vocal lands mostly on 1/4 here (there is 1/2 too ugh...) Made it more simple.

1. 00:20:573 (4,5,6) - i feel like its spacing is more higher in comparison with 00:08:573 (4,5,6) - why don't use the same spacing here too? it's the same intensity here

ok

fosters

1. as simple is structured as an normal diff and advanced diff as advanced, this is supposed to be a hard diff but seems like it got mostly structured as an insane diff due to: jumps like 00:10:073 (1,2,3) - for instance they can be cooled down a bit just because to be playable enough for advanced players as the diff is supposed to be a hard one, not an insane one (likely is kind of diff spike) Advanced is supposed to be an hard while this one is supposed to be harder than the hard one but not necessarily an insane snce this song doesnt fit a insane diff, I'll change the diff names to avoid misunderstanding.

solid map
gl!

Thanks you both!

1. Show me from where you got your metadata
2. I know there are lesbians in the show, but putting lesbians as a tag is not fine. If the song was specifically talking about lesbians or was an lgbt dedicated song then it would make sense, so it would be nice if you remove that tag.
3. 00:32:582 - the green lines in the spinner, starting here, are unsnapped, pls snap them (all diffs)

1. 00:01:073 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - this part is as dense as the hard diff rhythm-wise, pls use a couple of 1/1 sliders in this section and more 1/2 with a repeat so there's more contrast in the spread

1. 00:22:448 (2) - you should move it a bit up so the alignment with (3) is more similar as when you did it at 00:10:448 (2,3) - . Perhaps you could work on both patterns and make the 1/4 slider be centered in the middle rather than being closer to a start/end of the 1/2 slider for a neater design.
2. 00:28:073 (1,3) - improve this blanket plsss

1. 00:02:573 (1,2) - uhh this is the only antijump you make, the diff should be better without it

MkGuh wrote:

Ok but tags are fine, they dont need to be related to the song at all. I even put the series actors in the tags too.

metadata shouldn't be wrong, it is pretty easy to know this was sung by Kari Kimmel and the name is pretty much it too. I dont think we will have problems with it and I cant find good sources.

1. I'd highly recommend you to cut the last part of the mp3/video that is unnecesary because there's nothing important from them, remember that it's not an excuse to use "It seems fine, it is part of the video series, so is no problem at all" It's the same thing as I did for "Pretty Little Liars" set, I mean, there are basically 4 seconds of empty sounds, which could reduce the weight of the mp3 itself, the same goes for the video. (There you go), I've edited them, as you requested it.

1. 00:04:073 (1,2,3) - I wonder why you didn't keep the same kind of distance regarding this objects while 00:01:073 (1,2,3,4) - that here, which is basically the same rhythm you went with x2.0, I'd like to be consistent with both sections.
2. 00:05:198 (1,2,3,4,5) - Come on, you could do this better than the current pattern. I mean the flow, and jump is pretty neat. But I'm pretty sure that this circle could be inside of (2) (3) and (1) just like this, and then when the drums plays the spacing could be increased like this.
3. 00:14:573 (5,6,1,3) - This would make sense if it were a Hard or even an Advanced, but since this is basically like a Hard + ignoring the vocals which you have been following up until this point, but being ignored so suddenly makes an inconsistency which isn't alright at all. You could do either this, or this, up to you. (00:22:073 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Take in mind that you should be consistent with this as well, due that is the same part of the song).
4. 00:16:635 (2,3) - Same goes to this.
5. 00:24:510 - Vocals.

Gero wrote:

Hey!

General

1. I'd highly recommend you to cut the last part of the mp3/video that is unnecesary because there's nothing important from them, remember that it's not an excuse to use "It seems fine, it is part of the video series, so is no problem at all" It's the same thing as I did for "Pretty Little Liars" set, I mean, there are basically 4 seconds of empty sounds, which could reduce the weight of the mp3 itself, the same goes for the video. (There you go), I've edited them, as you requested it.

Fosters

1. 00:04:073 (1,2,3) - I wonder why you didn't keep the same kind of distance regarding this objects while 00:01:073 (1,2,3,4) - that here, which is basically the same rhythm you went with x2.0, I'd like to be consistent with both sections. I am emphasizing only the harder sounds of the piano as u can see, and when the vocals/drums starts to show out I change the focus to the drums and the vocal entonation.
2. 00:05:198 (1,2,3,4,5) - Come on, you could do this better than the current pattern. I mean the flow, and jump is pretty neat. But I'm pretty sure that this circle could be inside of (2) (3) and (1) just like this, and then when the drums plays the spacing could be increased like this. I like it like that, as you said, everything is neat, and I think visual look neat also. (Which doesn't even matter since players don't know anything about aesthetics so who will care while playing?)
   Fixed all the vocals stuff.

Call me back, so I can give your bubble back. Such a shame that ezek is not around anymore.

Metadata:

https://soundcloud.com/karikimmel/where-you-belong <- She linked this SoundCloud from her official site.
http://karikimmel.com
https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/where ... =663069947 <- Taken from her official Youtube account.
Video uploaded by herself where it shows the title and artist.

MkGuh wrote:

What is 24 hours more when you've waited 2 months already, huh?! xD