Sulfur wrote:

first

Expert

1. 00:28:631 (2) - Dont really understand what this slider supposed to follow :/ something similar to what you did at 00:31:173 (1,2) - would works a lot better follows the wub like 00:23:207 (2) -
2. 00:43:715 (1) - Maybe you could split this 1/2 into 1/4 and a note for that snare on red tick an thats stop-n-go thing would be more apparent kinda think current works better to build some suspense and fits drop in intensity
3. 00:46:258 (1,2,3) - this pattern is kinda underwhelming tho :c As a player you kinda expect 00:46:427 (2) - to be spaced out a bit more, imo something similar to this would work a bit better it's only a kick so underwhelming is fine
4. 00:51:681 (5,1,2,1,2) - not a big fan of this pattern, because you keeping this back-n-forth motion in the same direction prominent synth on 00:52:020 (2) - feels kinda underemphasized. Maybe try something similar to this think it just fits that part well and the big spacing change also seperates it

Insane

1. 00:24:563 (2,3) - perhaps you could 00:24:902 (3) - just to somewhat indicate that its 1/2 gap. Same thing with 01:40:495 (2,3) - should be okay to ready + slider leniency
2. 01:58:800 (1,2) - probably maybe some sort of subjective but i thing ssomething like this looks just a tiny bit better both look fine to me but I'd like to keep it since it shows the whole "repeating sound thing" better imo

Hard

1. 00:43:715 (2) - maybe split into two circles just so u have prominent synth+snare at 00:43:885 - clickable same as higher diffs
2. 01:24:224 - i really think this kick should be clickable, it feels kinda awkward when its mapped as a sliderend (and you mapping it as a circle 01:29:648 (1,2,3,4,5) - here anyway) bit dense and piano focus in this part
3. 02:08:122 (2) - maybe try a different from 02:07:783 (1) - slidershape to somewhat show that its like a different pitch and stuff just looks weird and don't really do that anywhere else

Normal

1. 00:43:716 (2,3) - maybe 1/2 sliders instead of those or something, it feels super awkward to skeep over 00:43:885 - and 00:44:393 - too dense in comparison imo

Cant find literally anything in easy ;_;

Hope it helps, good luck

Yasaija 714 wrote:

Hi

Easy

1. 00:29:817 (2) - 00:29:987 - Why do not you try making a right angle according to the sound? dont get this
   00:24:393 (2) - this like
2. I think that the curve of the slider is dirty
   
3. 01:23:376 (2) - Why distance 0.8? fits well here and still fine to read
4. 01:46:766 - You should pick up the sound of the cymbal here can't really do that without ignoring the other thing
5. 01:51:173 (2) - In Easy it is a slider that I can not see

Normal

1. AImod points out 02:00:664 (1) - 02:09:308 (2) - fixed
2. 00:11:681 (4,1) - Why distance 0.9? sv transition
3. 00:43:885 - 00:44:393 - Can you pick up the sound here? current works fine already
4. 01:19:648 (1,2,3,4) - Since Easy and rhythm are the same, I think that it is okay to pick up a little sound prefer piano focus
   01:20:156 - 01:21:512 - here

Hard

1. 01:33:207 (5,2) - I think that you can avoid overlap fixed

Insane

1. 00:56:258 (2,3,4,5) - Since it is kiai, why not try spreading the distance? low spacing works better for these sounds imo
   00:23:715 (2,3,4,5) - About this
2. 01:04:054 (1,1) - I think it is better to stack with the same combo
3. 01:34:902 (2) - I think that it is better to continue 1/3 sound weird with the kick on 01:35:071 -
4. 01:57:614 (1,1) - As this map uses a lot of stacks, how about stacking here too? really prefer current

Expert

1. 00:11:004 (1) - Patternwise Ctrl+G? like to change it here for transition
2. 00:41:512 (1,1) - stack is better current looks nicer with pattern before
3. 01:34:902 (2) - Same as Insane

Very amazing map!
Good luck!

Kencho wrote:

[General]

1. I think Insane diff is more like Light Insane, and Expert diff is more like Insane mh current makes sense to me since expert uses lots of heavy sv changes and harder to read stuff, so the name is more fitting imo

[Easy]

1. 00:06:936 (1) - Since there is no SV change, DS shouldn't change as well? i used lower ds before since the rhythm gaps are much bigger
2. 00:54:902 (4) - There is not much difference between 1.0x and 0.9x DS, so I don't recommend change SV just for 1 slider here. yes,
   fixed
3. 01:24:393 (3) - Same as 00:06:936 (1) - changed cause it's different from 6second thing
4. 01:36:258 (1) - Should be 1.0x DS here? yes

[Normal]

1. 00:12:190 (1) - DS a bit close, should be 1.0x.
2. 00:35:241 (3) - DS a bit too far, should be 1.0x.
3. 00:41:004 (5) - ^
4. 00:45:749 (3) - 01:33:546 (1) - 01:40:326 (3) - this one is fine with stacking 01:46:597 (7) - 01:56:936 (4) - 02:08:122 (5,6) - all of these
   others all fixed
5. 00:44:393 - Add a circle here? Sounds weird if empty.
6. 02:00:326 - ^ think it sounds alright since the other sound stands out so much and makes a nicer transition

[Hard]

1. In my opinion, use a circle instead of a slider is better, it can emphasize the beat you want. Same as 01:24:393 (1,2) - which you ignore the white tick beat 01:20:665 - . think this is missing a timestamp but I figured it out, though I think current rhythm fits the part overall a bit better :/

[Insane]

1. 00:24:563 (2) - Use two circles or other patterns instead of a slider? I mean the rhythm structure should be like 00:27:105 (1,1,2) - that you emphasize two downbeats 00:27:444 - and 00:27:614 - . there is only wub on head though which I want to follow, also differentiates it from things like 00:29:817 (1,2) -
   where there is one on both 1/2
2. 01:40:495 (2) - ^ same
3. 01:55:071 (3) - It is better to use two circles instead of a slider as well. changed this to make second clickable
4. 01:59:648 (2,1) - 02:00:665 (1,2) - 02:03:207 (2,1) - 02:06:597 (2,3) - 02:08:800 (1,2) - Stack a bit off. should be all fixed now

[Expert]

1. 00:24:563 (2) - The same problem as Insane diff.
2. 01:40:495 (2) - ^
   same for both

Call me back when you get 12+ sp