1. Hard (4.52 stars, 171 notes)
2. Insane (5 stars, 315 notes)
3. Normal (3.03 stars, 126 notes)

DiamondCrash wrote:

First of all, great job.

General;

I think you should remove the "OST" from the title; if you're gonna change it, make sure you follow this to avoid any beatmap duplication an' all.
That mp3 is much longer than what you've mapped, you might wanna crop it and full submit. How? :/

Air Crash;

Got a couple of unsnapped notes here, check AIMod to see where they are. (press ctrl shift a in editor) K.
No background?
00:18:416 (1) - Perhaps remove some of the finishe here? At least get rid of the one on the repeat, but you could get rid of the one on the end too. Seems fine to me.
00:19:923 (1) - See above. See Above.
00:24:443 (1) - ^ ^
00:25:950 (1) - ^ ^
00:49:870 (1) - This repeat is hidden in the hitburst of 2 for a while, it's kinda hard to see. I don't think it's technically unrankable, but for the sakes of playability, I'd change it. And Again, I'm clueless (NO Idea) of changing it to other pattern
00:55:897 (1,2,3) - Hm. I'd do something like this if I were you. Delete 2, move 1 to the next red tick, and stack a circle where 1 used to be. Done
01:45:809 - Add a timing section here to end the kiai. Wouldn't that counts as useless Timing Section

Plant Food;

Got a couple of unsnapped notes here, check AIMod to see where they are.
00:02:030 (1,2,3,4,5) - I'm... not really sure what this is following in the music. (And the same for the repeats.) What?
00:42:242 (1,1,1,1) - Less new combo spam The Draining Hell won't work If I did.
01:06:351 (1,1,1,1) - ^ ^
01:45:809 - Add a timing section here to end the kiai. Wouldn't that counts as useless Timing Section

Till next week!

'k call me back and I'll have another look.

1. 00:05:043 (2,3,4,5,6) - For consistency, you can just copy-paste 00:02:030 (1,2,3,4,5) here and rotate them all selection-centre, it will result like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:08:622 (1) - Why this spinner is left unhitsounded? I highly suggest to add finish here, as it fits a lot
3. 00:12:389 (1) - Here also, add finish to slider's start as it's a new part of the song
4. 00:22:936 (1) - (optional) I personally feel the finish is better to be placed here (as it's downbeat), but it's fine because there's a loud boom sound as well on (6)
5. 00:23:690 (5,6,7,8,9) - I highly recommend to unstack this - stack looks abrupt here in play mode. idk, maybe alter into a moving stream like this?
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:28:963 (1,2,3,4) - (optional) I like how they play if they're surrounding (6), instead of a zig-zag pattern here:
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:30:470 (1) - Maybe finish hitsound on slider's start here?
8. 00:34:990 (1) - I highly recommend to start this spinner 1/4 earlier, as the music actually goes there
9. 00:36:497 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Finish is obviously required on (1), orz... Also, it's quite fun to play with hitsound volume dynamics here: 30% -> 25% -> 20% -> 15% -> 30% or etc, just experiment around (: - This suggestion applies for next parts like this
10. 00:42:242 (1,1,1) - ...do you really need this new combo spam here? o.o - New combo spam affects how the HP Drain will be, they're fine to play, but consider this as you have a lot of NC spams here
11. 00:45:538 (1,3) - (optional) Try this shape? It can avoid overlap with your next 00:47:045 (1) imo:
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 00:51:565 (1,2) - I highly recommend to split (1) as a 2/1 slider followed by a note 1/1 after, mainly because you need a clap on 00:51:942. Also, (optional) why don't you curve these two to create something more flowy ><
13. 01:06:351 (1,1,1) - Again with the new combo spam thing here
14. 01:08:893 (3) - Do you really need to curve the slider like this? Just curve it normally encircling (2) is better imo
15. 01:14:167 (1,2,3) - (optional) I like your sliders here, but it can be arranged to something more flowy without even changing the slider's curve imo:
    
    SPOILER

    
16. 01:16:239 (2) - Why not stack the slider's end to (4) o.o
17. 01:23:207 (1) - Finish should be here (in the downbeat)
18. 01:40:159 (2,3,4) - Sliders like here isn't rankable anymore (just look at the posts on AngelHoney's F.I for example), however as far as I know this can be fixed with:
    
    SPOILER

    
19. 01:42:324 (5,1,1,1) - Again with the new combo spam, and this is just... out of place imo ):

1. 00:00:335 (1) - No finish hitsound here? orz
2. 00:02:030 (2) - You have a lot of slider shaped like this, why? Although it plays fine, but it can be improved imo, such as by encircling your next (2). This suggestion applies for next parts like this
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:14:272 (1) - Also here, why don't you continue to fully encircle (2) instead? Looks much tidier imo
4. 00:15:591 (1) - I highly recommend to face this slider to the right (to avoid overlap)
5. 00:17:286 (2) - Eh... You don't need the clap on the slider's repeat, I guess xD
6. 00:24:443 (1,2,3) - (optional) Try this one here?
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:28:963 (1) - Slider starting here doesn't follow anything imo, I prefer to use a 1/2 slider starting on 00:29:152
8. 00:30:470 (1,1) - Minor stuff, but both aren't centered (just make sure the 3rd slidertick is centered, barely noticeable though)
9. 00:36:497 (1) - (optional) Break this apart as a 2/1 slider + circle + 2/1 slider rather than a 4x repeating 2/1 slider? (you can just arrange them in a symmetrical position, though)
10. 00:43:089 (3,4) - Actually it's more accurate to place the 1/1 slider on 00:43:278 (4), therefore you can arrange like:
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 00:48:363 (5) - (optional) Add clap here also if you wish, to build more power from the hitsound
12. 00:54:579 (1) - Again here, why no finish hitsound on slider's start o.o
13. 01:00:606 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Refer to my suggestion on [Insane] about hitsound volume dynamics here
14. 01:14:167 (1,2,3) - (optional) Hmm, I personally don't like how this part goes too linear, I think you can put something more flowy here with bezier curves:
    
    SPOILER

    
15. 01:30:741 (1) - No finish again here? It plays good after a spinner ><
16. 01:41:665 (2,3,4) - Isn't it more accurate to use a repeating 3/2 slider as you did before? Well, rhythm like this is playable as well, though

SkyDevil wrote:

Crash owo Mod~

Hard
00:06:374 No new combo needed (K)
00:12:777 ^ (nouph)
00:30:482 HOW. ARE. THESE. SLIDERS. POSSIBLE?. THEY. HAVE. NORMAL. DOTS. (I haxed. :3)
01:42:808 No new combo needed :3

Insane
00:23:702 Stacking these looks bad in playing mode :c please put them somewhere else :c
00:29:729 ^
01:27:740 put new combo here, or else it would get too long (K)