Nerova Riuz GX wrote:

Chu's Easy

Mod

Song Setup 與其他難度差異最大的一個，請修正
音效音量從頭到尾全部都是50%。盡量配合音樂調整音量大小，不要固定。

1. Easy難度因性質問題，請避免使用重疊。
2. 重疊：00:39:353 (6,7,1) - 01:32:478 (1,2,3,4) - 01:55:603 (1,2,3) - 01:58:103 (6,7) - 02:01:228 (4,5,6,7) - 03:22:478 (1,2,1) - 03:31:540 (3,4,1) - 03:32:790 (2,3,1) - 03:40:290 (1,2) - 03:41:540 (4,5) - 改掉一些了 有一些改掉的話感覺有點怪(X
3. 01:00:446 (6) - 不要紅線開頭，換別的 好
4. 01:27:165 - 這個點空白有點奇怪，因為相對而言這個空白點的人聲很密集 +圈
5. 01:39:978 (6) - NC在此較佳，不要NC在01:41:540 (1) - OK
6. 02:15:290 (6) - NC，02:17:790 (1) - 還原 O
7. 02:19:978 (4) - NC K
8. 02:23:728 (4) - 這個滑條太長，對比於整張圖太突兀，同時又包含太多的音，建議改掉。相同問題者：03:04:978 (1) - 我覺得還好耶OAO
9. 02:54:978 (6) - NC，02:57:478 (1) - 還原 女子
10. 03:19:509 (1) - 再給多一點spinner結束後的準備時間，整張圖大多的spinner都是兩格1/1 HAO
11. 03:27:634 (1,2,3) - 以Easy性質而言，不適合使用這種來回又完全遮擋的排列 女子白勺
12. 03:40:290 (1,2,3) 、03:41:540 (4,5,6) 、03:42:790 (7,8) - 三者的音放置完全不同，建議統一 改兩個一樣
13. 03:45:290 (2) - 前面的滑條都是一個點，只有這裡是兩個點，建議刪除 K

Nerova Riuz GX wrote:

因為實在太長了所以我把每個難度的Mod都收進box裡面
要回Mod也請先把除了自己以外的東西先刪掉然後回在quote裡面!!!!!!!!!!
回Mod回在外面根本世界級長度 (ry
自行斟酌著用吧我好累

紅色=務必修改 or 高度建議，如果不打算修改的話也請給個理由

General

metadata部分請務必修改，否則是絕對不會過的

1. 128kbps的位元速率......我壓給你一個192kbps的，offset可能要重來，這個
2. 這個是收錄於 pop'n music Sunny Park original soundtrack vol.2 的長版。Title: ポチコの幸せな日常（Long Version）
3. Romanised Title: Pochiko no Shiawase na Nichijou (Long Version)
4. Tags: 必須要加上GD作者的ID。請加入StarForYou arronchu1207
5. Source請保持空白，不要填 pop'n music sunny park. 因為這首歌是長版，並非機台版本。
6. 建議的tags: わんわんコア pupcore pon daichi watanabe jubeat saucer fulfill reflec beat groovin'!! upper pop'n music sunny park original soundtrack vol.2 nuko yuzuki konami bemani
7. 所有的Widescreen support都不要勾選，因為沒有SB
8. Letterbox during breaks考慮不要勾 (所有難度都要相同設定)
9. 你確定要打開倒數計時？(所有難度都要相同設定)
10. 最好加上Combo Colours
11. 請問資料夾裡面的 22.png 是要做什麼用的? 沒有SB也不是skin素材，無用處的話請刪除
12. 建議BG大小: 1024*768 (for 4:3) or 1366*768 (for 16:9)。建議修正。
13. 記得經常注意AiMod.

Hard

Mod

Hard雖說是Hard，可以超過DS的限制，但是還是得依靠DS作圖，不能隨心變換。

1. 00:09:978 - 到 00:11:540 - ，把調整音量用的綠線對準1/1白線
2. 00:09:978 (1) - 1/4來回更合適
3. 00:12:478 (1,2,3,4,5) - 突然改變DS的大小，重新來過
4. 00:15:134 (1) - Ctrl+H，然後疊到00:14:821 (5) - 底下，配合中間的暫停
5. 00:17:165 (4,5,6,7,8) - DS
6. 00:17:478 (5) - 考慮NC
7. 00:19:978 - 太空
8. 00:27:946 (9,10) - 為了中間不要太空，考慮先滑條再Circle的組合
9. 00:29:821 (3,4,5) - 一個hold slider占掉五個音，是錯誤的hold slider。當hold slider連續好幾個接起來使用時，以偶數個音為佳，同時又以4或8等等4的倍數的音最常見。而且1/4的部分只需要從00:30:134 - 開始就可以了。
   可能的排列方式舉例
   
10. 00:37:165 (4) - 結尾壓到長白線。不懂請往上看Normal
11. 00:38:728 (1,2) - 分開，不要有任何重疊
12. 00:47:478 - 加circle
13. 00:47:478 - 多餘的綠線。如果timing是從別的難度原封不動移植過來，請檢查有沒有無用的綠線並刪除。
14. 00:48:415 (1) - 考慮疊到下個滑條的開頭
15. 00:49:978 (1,2,3,4) - 注意每個滑條與下一個開頭前後的距離，調整為盡量一致
16. 00:53:103 (1) - 考慮利用暫停優勢，疊到上一個circle底下
17. 00:55:603 - 全部都跟人聲的話會使某些部分太空虛，加點東西補償。空格一般不會空超過1/1的大小。
18. 00:57:321 (1,2,3) - 再分開一點點，不要貼著
19. 01:01:540 (2,3,4) - 注意前後距離
20. 01:11:071 (5) - 結尾壓線
21. 01:11:540 (6,7) - 這兩個考慮利用暫停
22. 01:18:728 (3,4) - 分開，不要貼著
23. 01:22:165 (5) - 結尾壓線
24. 01:24:978 - 太空了，空閒時間太長變成放著損血無益處，多利用
25. 01:32:165 (4) - 結尾壓線
26. 01:49:978 (1,2,3,4) - 注意距離
27. 01:53:728 - 太空了
28. 02:14:821 (3,4,5) - 考慮利用暫停
29. 02:56:540 (7,8,9) - 沒有理由重疊，也沒有對上DS。考慮換用橫的拉展開來。
30. 02:58:571 (6,7) - DS錯誤
31. 03:01:540 (7,1) - 考慮利用暫停
32. 03:06:228 (3,4,5) - 注意距離
33. 03:06:228 (3,4,5,6) - 1/3底下作圖
34. 03:17:946 (1,2,3) - DS
35. 03:25:603 - 太空
36. 03:28:571 (3,4) - 考慮利用暫停
37. 03:41:853 (3,4,5,1) - DS
38. 03:44:821 (1,2,1,2) - 可以拉大

Light Insane

Mod

主要是可以跳的地方沒有跳，卻選在雖然可以跳但是卻沒那麼重要的地方
metadata有問題，請修改
Light Insane同Hard，DS注意

1. 00:10:446 (4,5) - 稍微太遠了
2. 00:10:603 (5) - NC
3. 00:15:134 (1) - Ctrl+H，疊到上一個circle底下
4. 00:19:978 - 要馬加spinner，要馬break time，自己選
5. 00:28:259 (1) - 疊到8底下
6. 00:30:603 (9,1) - 距離太近
7. 00:51:853 (9) - NC
8. 01:08:415 (7) - 請拉到和前面六個成一直線
9. 01:14:978 - 一樣
10. 01:41:540 (2,5) - blanket
11. 01:47:478 (5,6,7,8) - 再排整齊，每個的距離不一
12. 01:48:103 (9) - NC
13. 02:04:196 (2) - 無意義的circle，無法帶出語音(因為對不上)。要馬空白要馬前一個換成滑條。
14. 02:09:353 (1) - 疊到3下面
15. 02:16:071 (7) - NC
16. 02:49:821 (1,2) - blanket
17. 02:55:603 (3,4) - blanket
18. 03:01:228 (10) - NC
19. 03:01:853 - 一樣
20. 03:16:123 (3,4) - 和 03:17:061 (4,5) - 的時間差不同，不能用相同的距離，不然根本看不出來
21. 03:23:103 (4) - NC
22. 03:24:821 (5,1) - 這個距離，沒問題?
23. 03:26:071 (1) - 結尾只彎折一點點倒不如不要折，看起來很不美觀
24. 03:38:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 排起來
25. 03:41:072 (1,2,3,4) - bad flow，同時也不是一個blanket，建議修掉
26. 03:43:103 (5,6) - DS

Insane

Mod

1. 00:10:603 (9) - NC
2. 00:13:103 - 加東西
3. 00:17:165 (4,5,6) - 三連要開始也應該從00:17:165 - 開始，而不是00:17:321 -
4. 00:22:321 (5,6) - blanket
5. 00:26:228 (1,2,3) - bad flow
6. 00:28:259 (5) - 重疊上一個
7. 00:29:821 (6) - NC
8. 00:32:321 (6) - NC
9. 00:37:165 (5) - 結尾壓長白線
10. 00:48:728 (2,3) - blanket
11. 01:12:165 (5,6,7,8) - 散開，擠成一團不好讀
12. 01:12:478 (8) - NC
13. 01:23:259 (1) - 疊到上一個4
14. 01:23:415 (2) - 疊到下一個1
15. 01:24:821 (6) - NC
16. 01:26:853 (3) - 要轉就轉，不要轉就不要轉，那麼吝嗇幹嘛
17. 01:27:321 (4) - NC
18. 01:47:478 (1,2,3,4) - 別黏再一起，不順
19. 01:57:165 (3,4,5) - 排好
20. 02:11:071 (7) - NC
21. 02:24:196 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - 根本沒必要用到那麼長的連打
22. 02:36:774 (8,9,10,11,12,13) - 不美觀的轉折，要轉彎請分兩次滑條轉連打
23. 02:43:728 (1,2) - blanket
24. 03:01:853 - 到 03:19:353 - ，一下子跟人聲一下子跟背景音樂，兩者切換得太突然，不搞糊塗才是神
25. 03:03:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 完全無意義二連，跟不到音樂。
26. 03:23:103 (4) - NC
27. 03:24:509 (5,1) - blanket
28. 03:26:853 (5) - 拉到下面和03:26:071 (1) - 做一個blanket
29. 03:29:821 (7) - NC
30. 03:32:321 (1) - 別挑戰所有人對於滑條的美學極限
31. 03:38:728 (5) - NC
32. 03:43:571 (7) - NC

Extra

Mod

1. 00:13:337 - 為什麼這個點要放東西，完全多餘
2. 00:22:321 (5,6) - blanket
3. 01:07:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 把短滑條當成單點，然後重新抓好距離。目前的距離分配在遊玩上完全不順
4. 01:16:540 (2,3) - blanket
5. 01:22:634 (1,2,3,4,5) - 距離無法拉出重點，尤其是34間的距離容易錯認4的時間點
6. 01:28:728 (1,2) - blanket
7. 01:38:103 (3) - 可能會有來回箭頭遮擋
8. 01:44:665 (6,7,1,2) - 這速度變化太大了吧
9. 01:53:571 (6,7) - blanket
10. 02:12:321 (1,3) - blanket
11. 02:26:853 (2,3,4,5,1) - 沒有良好的距離分配，51之間最需要距離但卻最短
12. 02:48:571 (8) - NC
13. 03:15:290 (2,3,4) - 角度統一

我再不睡覺的話絕對會吐血
就這樣了吧
GL

1. Uncheck "Letterbox during breaks"
   

1. 00:31:853 (2,3) - Nazi, It can be confusing for newbies
2. 00:57:946 (2,3,4) - weird pattern, can be better.
3. 01:00:603 (7) - I see lots of maps with the same pattern, but too down, try to replace this slider.
4. 01:06:228 (1) - move to x-264 y-308
5. 03:11:853 (1) - what's the purpose of this slider? is weird

1. 00:16:853 (2) - make a better blanquet with 00:16:228 (1) -
2. Blanquet between the head of 01:24:978 (3) - and 01:26:228 (1) - is not good, you can move 01:24:978 (3) - a bit down.
3. 02:17:321 (1) - make a blanquet with the head of 02:16:540 (4) -
4. 02:40:290 (3) - make a better blanquet with 02:40:915 (4) -
5. 03:39:821 (1) - You can make a better slider
   

1. 00:38:728 (1,2) - try to make more like 00:37:790 (2,3,4) -
2. You can add notes at 00:55:603 - 00:55:759 - 00:55:915 - , You are following to much the voice
3. 01:39:978 (1,2,3) - These notes are not good as well, specially 01:40:603 (3) -
4. 01:45:603 (3,4) - try to move a bit down.
5. 02:11:853 - 02:12:009 - 02:12:165 - add notes
6. 02:15:446 (7,8) - space between 02:15:446 (7) - and 02:15:915 (8) - is not good
7. 02:17:321 (1,2) - ^ same as above
8. 02:24:821 (1) - make a better blanquet with 02:24:665 (6) -
9. 02:45:603 (3,1) - not beautiful pattern, move the tail of 02:46:228 (1) - a bit down
10. 03:31:071 (5) - make a better blanquet
11. 03:37:165 (5) - too close at 03:36:696 (3) -
12. 03:38:571 (4,2) - move 03:39:040 (2) - a bit down
    

-Sh1n1- wrote:

[General]

1. Uncheck "Letterbox during breaks"

[Chu's Easy]

I was searching maps with the same BPM and lots of maps have 0.80 SV

1. 00:31:853 (2,3) - Nazi, It can be confusing for newbies
2. 00:57:946 (2,3,4) - weird pattern, can be better.
3. 01:00:603 (7) - I see lots of maps with the same pattern, but too down, try to replace this slider.
4. 01:06:228 (1) - move to x-264 y-308
5. 03:11:853 (1) - what's the purpose of this slider? is weird

[Starfy's Normal]

1. 00:16:853 (2) - make a better blanquet with 00:16:228 (1) -
2. Blanquet between the head of 01:24:978 (3) - and 01:26:228 (1) - is not good, you can move 01:24:978 (3) - a bit down.
3. 02:17:321 (1) - make a blanquet with the head of 02:16:540 (4) -
4. 02:40:290 (3) - make a better blanquet with 02:40:915 (4) -
5. 03:39:821 (1) - You can make a better slider

[Hard]

1. 00:38:728 (1,2) - try to make more like 00:37:790 (2,3,4) -
2. You can add notes at 00:55:603 - 00:55:759 - 00:55:915 - , You are following to much the voice
3. 01:39:978 (1,2,3) - These notes are not good as well, specially 01:40:603 (3) -
4. 01:45:603 (3,4) - try to move a bit down.
5. 02:11:853 - 02:12:009 - 02:12:165 - add notes
6. 02:15:446 (7,8) - space between 02:15:446 (7) - and 02:15:915 (8) - is not good
7. 02:17:321 (1,2) - ^ same as above
8. 02:24:821 (1) - make a better blanquet with 02:24:665 (6) -
9. 02:45:603 (3,1) - not beautiful pattern, move the tail of 02:46:228 (1) - a bit down
10. 03:31:071 (5) - make a better blanquet
11. 03:37:165 (5) - too close at 03:36:696 (3) -
12. 03:38:571 (4,2) - move 03:39:040 (2) - a bit down

Mod only 3 diff because the song is too long x_x orz, but my mate will mod the other diffs in the second mod so don't worry. I like the song, is so cute :3 Good Luck

-Sh1n1- wrote:

[Starfy's Normal]

1. 00:16:853 (2) - make a better blanquet with 00:16:228 (1) - Fixed
2. Blanquet between the head of 01:24:978 (3) - and 01:26:228 (1) - is not good, you can move 01:24:978 (3) - a bit down. Fixed
3. 02:17:321 (1) - make a blanquet with the head of 02:16:540 (4) - Fixed
4. 02:40:290 (3) - make a better blanquet with 02:40:915 (4) - Fixed
5. 03:39:821 (1) - You can make a better slider Not specific

Mio_chan wrote:

[General]
(Long Version) 要刪除，除非有官方資料支持

1.- No more than 3min of drain

[Colours]
Combo1 : 255,214,89
Combo2 : 24,197,171
Combo3 : 196,157,77
Combo4 : 249,142,158

[Colours]
Combo1 : 255,214,89
Combo2 : 24,197,171
Combo3 : 196,157,77
Combo4 : 249,142,158

[Colours]
Combo1 : 255,214,89
Combo2 : 24,197,171
Combo3 : 196,157,77
Combo4 : 249,142,158

dististik wrote:

Starfy's Normal

1. 00:21:853 (2,3,4) - The overlapping sliders here feel a bit awkward Hum I don't think so actually
2. 00:28:415 (5) - Move this note somewhere more visible Not really specific, where should I put on then?
3. 02:03:728 (1) - RNC Fixed
4. NC huh?

Mio_chan wrote:

根據規則，你mod了我的Hard和Insane，我會mod你12.5分鐘，向上取整為4個難度

黑色mod是建議
藍色mod是強烈建議更改，或是要留意的地方
紅色mod是unrankable
綠色mod是純粹意見

[General]
(Long Version) 要刪除，除非有官方資料支持

[Extra]
HP Drain也太高了吧…7.5太可怕，6或7較合理 - 保持7.5
00:15:134 (1) – Ctrl + G? - 已修正
00:19:978 -00:20:603 – 加circle? - 加入休息時間
00:18:728 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6) – 降低hitsound聲量，或用soft hitsound - 已修正
00:53:571 (1) – 用低SV? 因為這裡只有人聲 - 我還是保持原本
01:07:946 (4) – 離(3) 遠一點好像好read一點，大概在x:200 y:84 - 不懂 我的是(6)不是(4)...
01:47:478 (1,2,3,4) – ctrl +G on 01:47:634 (2,4) -?, 我覺得這幾個滑條擠得太近，至少不要overlap及每個slider之間都有一點空白位置 - 已修正
01:58:103 (6) – NC?, 後面相似的pattern都要跟著改 - 已修正
02:09:821 (1) – 跟00:53:571 (1)相似 - 我還是保持原本
02:13:571 (7) – NC - 已修正
02:30:603 (9) – NC - 已修正
02:31:853 (9) – NC - 已修正
02:34:353 (5) – NC - 已修正
02:35:603 (7) – NC - 已修正
02:48:415 (7) – 放在x:200 y:280? - 已修正
02:48:571 (8) –NC - 已修正
03:00:603 (5) – NC - 已修正
03:02:790 - 03:19:353 我覺得這裡的notes放得太密了，不大適合這裡的音樂，1/3 和1/4 也用得很沒規則，玩起來有點亂，另外強烈建議刪減1/4 例如 03:12:321 (3,4,5) – ，再另外我覺得這裡spacing太低 - 我也很想改這邊可是我真的不知道要如何改@@
03:04:873 (1,2,3) – bad flow ，我覺得這樣會好點 - 已修正

SPOILER

03:07:478 (1,2) – 你在這裡沒有MAP人聲，但其他有人聲的地方你都跟人聲MAP，所有怪怪的 - 這邊是跟音樂
03:24:978 (7) –NC - 已修正

[Light Insane]
整體上HP AR 可以降低一點點，HP6 AR 8? - 我自己本身也有在打圖 所以原本的就可以了
00:09:978 (1,2,3,4,1) – 你確定這是Light Insane…? slider jump真的很難 - FIXED
00:13:103 (5,6,7) – 這也太難了 - 不會很難 這算正常八...
00:50:603 (3,4,5) – spacing 太近了，用回正常的spacing就可以 - FIXED
00:51:853 (1,2,3,4) – 轉做兩個repeat兩次的1/4slider? - 不好吧..
00:57:634 (5) – NC - FIXED
01:07:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) –轉做這樣?

SPOILER

- FIXED
01:47:165 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) – 真的太難了 - 真的不會=W=
01:49:040 (2) – 放去 x:388 y:76 - FIXED
01:53:103 (3,4,5,6) – 我覺得這4個notes同spacing會好點，有小jump也可以 - 保持
02:29:040 (6,7) – spacing - FIXED
03:17:478 (5) – NC- FIXED
03:38:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) – 同01:07:478- FIXED

[Insane]
這個diff跟Extra太相似了吧
00:29:353 (3,4,5) – 加跳? - FIXED
01:04:899 (4) – 因為stacking leniency 的緣固，這個circles移位了，嘗試修改一下spacing防止這個情況 - FIXED
01:09:821 (6) –放太近了 - FIXED
01:36:852 (5) – NC - FIXED
01:48:103 (5) – NC - FIXED
02:24:353 (5,6) – Ctrl + G - FIXED
02:49:353 (3,4,5) – 差距也差太大了吧，這不是Extra 0.0 - FIXED
03:02:790 - 03:19:353 跟 Extra一樣 - 一樣就沒梗了W
03:07:399 (5) – NC - FIXED

[Hard]
AR 最高8就好了，我建議7.5 ，HP再低點? - 保持
你這個難度的spacing有點怪，時常突然大了或少了0.1~0.2x，建議修改回一樣，整齊一點

00:38:728 (1,2,3) – 不好看，(1)和(2)太貼近了 - FIXED
00:51:228 (1,2,3,4) –不太建議用kick slider，全部減少一個返回? - 這樣沒對到音樂
00:52:478 (5,6,7) – 用repeating slider代替? - 我個己開DT打那邊用3個NOTE比較適合
00:55:603 –加個slider? 在00:55:915 –完結 - FIXED
01:22:634 (6,7,8) – spacing用回正常就好了 - FIXED
01:32:634 (5) – NC - FIXED
01:38:571 (6) – NC - FIXED
01:43:728 (5) – NC - FIXED
01:47:478 (1,2,3,4) – 和00:51:228 (1,2,3,4)相似 - 同之前
01:59:665 (2) – 指向上? - FIXED
02:02:165 (2) – spacing - FIXED
02:11:853 – 同00:55:603 - FIXED
02:18:728 (1) – spacing 錯誤 - 加了個NOTE
02:23:728 (1,2,3) – 用slider代替? - 保持
02:43:103 (4) – spacing - 沒問題啊@@
02:48:728 (1,2,3) – 同02:23:728 (1,2,3) - 保持
02:50:603 (3) – 重疊得難看，不要重疊吧 - FIXED
02:59:978 (1,2,3,4) – 同00:51:228 (1,2,3,4) - 同之前
03:02:790 - 03:19:353 – 那些1/3滑條如03:06:228 (3,4,5,6) -對於Hard玩家來說太難讀了，不要有太多spacing 變化這裡，而且Combo太長，建議短一點 - spacing有更改其餘保持
03:11:853 (1,2) –用1/3 map - FIXED
03:16:123 (3) – 真的很難read - FIXED
03:19:196 (1) – 不要在1/2後就有notes，早點完吧 - FIXED
03:23:103 (3) – 減少一個返回? - 少一個會很奇怪 用DT打就知道了
03:25:603 – 同00:55:603 - FIXED
03:41:853 (3,4,5) – spacing

dististik wrote:

Hey, I'm from my modding queue~ Firstly, I'd like to say that I adore this song and I'm so glad someone is mapping it!

Hard

1. I'm probably wrong about this, but the difficulty gap may be a bit too wide in between your Normal and your Hard. To put some retrospect in, I usually warm on Insane level songs and pass them with little combo breaks, and this is what I got warming up on this difficulty. Still super enjoyable but you may want to bridge the gap a bit.
2. 01:24:978 - I personally feel like a spinner would fit well here. - FIXED
3. 01:36:228 (1,2,3,4) - This breaks the flow of your map terribly. When playing it caught me super off guard and if I was someone commonly playing on a 3 star level I know I would have failed here.- FIXED
4. 01:43:884 (6,7,8) - Same as above for the placement of (8).

- FIXED

Light Insane- FIXED

1. http://i.imgur.com/5JrjXBl.jpg
2. 00:23:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - These jumps feel super random - you mean some regular jump @@?
3. 01:07:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This slider stream threw me off big time - FIXED
4. 01:18:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The way that the circles in this section overlapped with each other felt awkward when playing - FIXED
5. 01:29:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This jump pattern threw me off when playing - i think it's fine
6. 01:47:478 (5,6,7,8) - Sliders here killed me. I don't really have a better idea as to how this could be mapped but think of something please. - FIXED

The Insane and Extra go a bit beyond my playing abilities, so I will stop here. As of now Hard is your best difficulty and the one I had the most fun playing. The Light Insane suffers from a ton of break in flow; as soon as I got used to how a certain section should be played you threw something new at me and my HP dropped to zero in no time flat. I tried playing the Light Insane twice without NF and just ended up realising that it just wasn't working out. It needs a LOT of buffing to get ranked from here, but I'm excited to see if it gets the rank~!

That's all from me~! Good luck on getting approved!!!

Neku okazaki wrote:

1.- No more than 3min of drain

Im only going to mod the other 3 diffs

[Insane GD]
01:25:915 - Add something - FIXED
03:31:696 (4,5,6,7) - oh, you can try other thing :l - these are like the jump like03:32:790

Try this:

[Colours]
Combo1 : 255,214,89
Combo2 : 24,197,171
Combo3 : 196,157,77
Combo4 : 249,142,158

[Insane]
I love it ... Star! Star!

Try this:

[Colours]
Combo1 : 255,214,89
Combo2 : 24,197,171
Combo3 : 196,157,77
Combo4 : 249,142,158

[Extra]
Im not a good std modder but like the other diffs:

[Colours]
Combo1 : 255,214,89
Combo2 : 24,197,171
Combo3 : 196,157,77
Combo4 : 249,142,158

Hollow Wings wrote:

Starfy's Normal

1. 00:19:978 (3) - don't do that complex slider style with too much self-overlapped part in lower diff, which will confuse noobs very much. same to 00:27:478 (4) - , 00:44:353 (5) - , 01:22:478 (3) - , 02:44:196 (4) - Hmmm I think I need to consider about it

Hollow Wings wrote:

m4m

General

1. give same settings for letterbox to every diffs.FIXED
2. 03:07:764 (1) and 03:12:764 (2) unsnapped in Insane diff.FIXED
3. why normal-hitclap2.wav has only right audio track?FIXED

Extra

1. 我先看了一遍，觉得只能做一些general的mod，因为觉得这图的梗大同小异，就不一一赘述了。
2. 很多梗的想法是好的，只是欠缺了表现的手段：此图大多以奇数连打，短滑条和随机跳组成，所以这些也是需要在做图中重点把握的。
3. 关于节奏：
4. 虽然主要跟vocal来下节奏了，然而大多数情况下无视鼓点的mapping几乎是不太可能做到的，比如01:14:665 (3,1) - 的undermap其实并没有什么必要，不如说那个地方的电音很容易做出一些比较有意思的梗。在下节奏的时候可以不只是盯着一条轨下，在不同轨之间来回切换更能更好地表现曲子（这也是std模式局限性能尽力发挥出优势的途径之一），类似的还有01:25:603 (11,1) - 等。不太懂呢@@
5. 关于排版：
6. 00:24:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 以这个随机跳为例，我不知道你为什么要那么摆，看上去更像是只是为了大跳而大跳。对我来说此处的ds应该是渐小而不是渐大，无论从电音的pitch还是vocal的emotion角度来说都是这样。另外，比如01:10:603 (2,3,4,5,6) - 这里其实更适合大跳，而不是在副歌中途并不太激昂的地方。——因为排列随机，所以更要注意ds的控制是否合曲。 - 已修正
7. 00:15:603 (2,3,4,5,6) - 这个跳你摆了五角星，然而00:16:071 (5,6) - 处强烈的anti-flow并没有非常明显的曲子里的音来支持，由于这五个音是连在一起的所以此处用fluent的flow来说能更好的表现曲子才对。类似的地方还有00:37:165 (6,7) - 之类的，具体可以由曲子本身旋律的变化来决定。——在摆随机排列的时候，flow也是十分重要的表现曲子的要素。不知這樣行不行
8. 01:09:196 (4,5,6,7,8,1) - 1/2大跳后衔接1/1跳的时候更要格外注意ds的控制，此处由于1/2跳和1/1跳的间距几乎差不多，如果不是特意做某些特殊的梗的话还是避免这样的排版存在。不知這樣行不行呢
9. 另外，排列完全随机是会影响到一定的读图，所以建议还是多看一些rank了的图来积累一些梗，了解常规的做法之后再去探索自己所希望的图的样子。
10. 看了下insane，light insane和hard也是差不多一样的问题，可以自己对照着摸索一下。

[/list]

idk if you can keep on your works to ranking section, maybe just asking more opinions on it.

good luck.

Hollow Wings wrote:

m4m

Chu's Easy

1. 00:33:415 (3,1) - that heavy anti-flow's really not recommended to be set in the lowest diff. OK
2. 01:33:728 (3,4) - better not stack here. 02:02:478 (6,7) - , 03:28:259 (3,4) - , 03:40:290 (1,2) - as well.
   01:33:728 (3,4) NO ,other fixed

1. uhh no custom combo colour in chu's easy ?
2. hard diff

   AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Snapping
   
   Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
   00:53:097 - snap to 00:53:103
   02:03:730 - snap to 02:03:728

1. 00:16:228 (6) - nc
2. 00:22:321 (5) - nc
3. 00:23:728 (1,2,3) - this play better
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:26:853 (4,5) - uhh spacing might be too close , kinda feel awkward , move (5) to x40 y216
5. 00:32:321 (4,5) - spacing not really good here this one could use more spacing , try place like this
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:37:009 (5,7) - not good overlap , try this
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:56:071 (1,2,3) - try place like this for better flow
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:24:665 (4) - try place this at x232 y144 for better flow here 01:24:353 (3,4,5) -
9. 02:06:853 (1,2,3,4) - I think antijumps not fit here, better spacing them
10. 02:47:946 (4,5) - , 02:48:259 (6,7) - better spacing them like what you did here 02:47:634 (2,3) - it make sense more

1. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Snapping
   03:12:764 (2) - Unsnapped circle.
   
   Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
   00:53:097 - snap to 00:53:103
   02:03:730 - snap to 02:03:728

2. 00:22:165 (4) - try place this at x180 y40 for better flow
3. 00:38:728 (1,2,3,4) - I think antijumps not fit here, better spacing them
4. 00:50:759 (9,10) - try place like this for better flow
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:24:196 (3) - try place this at x208 y128 for better flow
6. 01:25:915 - should map this beat cus it sound so strong
7. 01:53:103 (4,5,6) - try place like this for better flow
   SPOILER

   
8. 02:18:571 (8) - try place this at x128 y188 for better flow
9. 02:26:384 (1,2,3) - I think antijumps not fit here, better spacing them
10. 02:28:415 (4,5,6) - should make consistent so the flow here is better

1. hmm..I think this doesn't looks like light insane or anything because the way you use flow which not really like easy to read imo flow should be a bit easier to read than insane , try not to do something like this 00:12:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - , 00:23:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - , etc it really hard to read also you might need to make spacing a bit more consistent so it will be more like light insane

2. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Snapping
   
   Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
   00:53:097 - snap to 00:53:103

3. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Spinner Length
   02:29:353 (1) - This spinner is 625 ms long, which is shorter than 750 ms; check that it gets at least 1000 on auto. I'm too lazy to check lol

4. 00:31:696 (2) - x372 y312 for better flow and consistent spacing here 00:31:228 (1,2,3) -
5. 00:57:634 (1,2,3,4) - antijumps might be hard to read here, better spacing them
6. 01:22:478 (1,2,3,4) - ^
7. 02:13:571 (1,2,3,4,5) - antijumps might be hard to read here, better spacing them or stacking instead
8. 02:52:165 (3) - try place this at x72 y160 for better flow and consistent spacing here 02:51:696 (2,3,1) -
9. 03:27:946 (2) - ctrl+g for better flow here 03:27:321 (1,2) -
10. 03:42:946 (4) - try place this at x124 y292 for better flow and consistent spacing here 03:42:790 (3,4,5) -

xChangJo wrote:

Normal:

- 00:12:478 (3) - Make the blanket with 00:11:853 (2) a little better. Can you tell me how?
- 00:29:978 (3) - Fix the stack with 00:28:415 (5). Stacked already
- 00:41:540 (4) - This slider sound a little weird for me (I think is better to replace for a circle + slider or another pattern). I can't see any reason that is weird
- 00:52:478 (5,6,7,1,2,3,1) - I really like this pattern but maybe is a little hard for a normal. I think not really that hard lol
(well I don't know I think is better if you ask to another person or change for the pattern that you use in the second chorus).
- 01:04:509 (3) - Try to move this note a little down. I think no need, the distance is enough
- 01:41:228 (4) - Make the blanket with 01:40:290 (2) a little better and fick stack with 01:38:728 (5). How to blanket it already lol And stack is quite weird
- 01:51:228 (3) - Move this note a little down. [/color]
- 01:59:978 (3) - Eliminated the reverse arrow and add a circle. Nope I'm deliberate to do this
- 02:23:728 (1) - Fix the blanket with 02:24:665 (2). I think the blanket is really enough http://puu.sh/hO9vS/23e115b87e.jpg

1. 00:16:228 (6) - nc - fixed
2. 00:22:321 (5) - nc - fixed
3. 00:23:728 (1,2,3) - this play better - fixed
   SPOILER

   [img]http://puu.sh%20-%20fixed/hKy1P/791603def2.png[/img]
4. 00:26:853 (4,5) - uhh spacing might be too close , kinda feel awkward , move (5) to x40 y216
5. 00:32:321 (4,5) - spacing not really good here this one could use more spacing , try place like this - fixed
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:37:009 (5,7) - not good overlap , try this - fixed
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:56:071 (1,2,3) - try place like this for better flow - fixed
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:24:665 (4) - try place this at x232 y144 for better flow here 01:24:353 (3,4,5) - - fixed
9. 02:06:853 (1,2,3,4) - I think antijumps not fit here, better spacing them - fixed
10. 02:47:946 (4,5) - , 02:48:259 (6,7) - better spacing them like what you did here 02:47:634 (2,3) - it make sense more - fixed

1. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Snapping
   03:12:764 (2) - Unsnapped circle. - fixed
   
   Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
   00:53:097 - snap to 00:53:103 - fixed
   02:03:730 - snap to 02:03:728 - fixed

2. 00:22:165 (4) - try place this at x180 y40 for better flow - fixed
3. 00:38:728 (1,2,3,4) - I think antijumps not fit here, better spacing them - fixed
4. 00:50:759 (9,10) - try place like this for better flow - fixed
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:24:196 (3) - try place this at x208 y128 for better flow - fixed
6. 01:25:915 - should map this beat cus it sound so strong - fixed
7. 01:53:103 (4,5,6) - try place like this for better flow - fixed
   SPOILER

   
8. 02:18:571 (8) - try place this at x128 y188 for better flow - fixed
9. 02:26:384 (1,2,3) - I think antijumps not fit here, better spacing them - fixed
10. 02:28:415 (4,5,6) - should make consistent so the flow here is better - fixed

1. hmm..I think this doesn't looks like light insane or anything because the way you use flow which not really like easy to read imo flow should be a bit easier to read than insane , try not to do something like this 00:12:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - , 00:23:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - , etc it really hard to read also you might need to make spacing a bit more consistent so it will be more like light insane - fixed all the antijumps

2. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Snapping
   
   Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
   00:53:097 - snap to 00:53:103 - fixed

3. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Spinner Length
   02:29:353 (1) - This spinner is 625 ms long, which is shorter than 750 ms; check that it gets at least 1000 on auto. I'm too lazy to check lol - fixed

4. 00:31:696 (2) - x372 y312 for better flow and consistent spacing here 00:31:228 (1,2,3) - - fixed
5. 00:57:634 (1,2,3,4) - antijumps might be hard to read here, better spacing them - fixed
6. 01:22:478 (1,2,3,4) - ^ - fixed
7. 02:13:571 (1,2,3,4,5) - antijumps might be hard to read here, better spacing them or stacking instead - fixed
8. 02:52:165 (3) - try place this at x72 y160 for better flow and consistent spacing here 02:51:696 (2,3,1) - - fixed
9. 03:27:946 (2) - ctrl+g for better flow here 03:27:321 (1,2) - - fixed
10. 03:42:946 (4) - try place this at x124 y292 for better flow and consistent spacing here 03:42:790 (3,4,5) - - fixed

really thanks for the mod
because this is my first map that i want to rank
i will fix all the problem in my next map OWO
and i will remember all your advice of my map.
i fixed all the anti jump that you had mention, so hope you can keep help me to mod my map @@
thanks a lot for your modding

xChangJo wrote:

Hi from my modding Queue, nice mapset and too cute song

Mod

Hard:

- 00:26:696 (3) - Stack with 00:25:915 (9). - FIXED
- 00:30:212 (5,7) - This notes are too hide in this pattern for a hard, maybe separated a little (?). - maybe not
- 00:53:103 (1) - I think this slider sound a little weird with the voice.hit sound is GX's work @@
- 01:11:228 (6) - New Combo. - FIXED
- 01:45:603 (3,4) - Move this notes a little down for don't hide with 01:44:978 (1) - FIXED, and I don't think the jump with 01:46:071 (1) go to kill the players >.< - this is a slider OWO
- 02:21:071 (5) - Stack with 02:19:821 (1). - FIXED
- 02:55:603 (3,4,5) - this pattern is too unexpected when I play, and the rest of the map don't use similar pattern. - FIXED

Light Insane:

- 00:09:978 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6) - I think you need to make this a bit easy, because that part is more hard than the intro in the insane.
(is too unexpected for a player who only play the hard difficult too) - FIXED
- 01:27:321 (1) - Stack the end with 01:26:853 (3). - FIXED

Insane:

- 00:48:728 (2,4) - Why not make a blanket with 00:49:196 (3).why need to blanket @@?
- 02:16:696 (10,11,12,13) - this pattern break the flow too hard.other modder mod this part like this so what can i change do you got a collapse text?
- 03:01:384 (2) - Why not blanket with 03:00:837 (4) - FIXED, the same for 03:01:540 (3).maybe not this note
- 03:32:321 (1) - Make this slider more beatifull (?) - FIXED

Xinchii wrote:

嗨你好 From queue ~

好大致上的改進方向HW跟LK說了 , 所以我就不說廢話了
做個單Diff的mod騙kd會不會感覺很偷懶阿ㄏㄏ

[General]

1. Starfy's Normal的LetterboxInBreaks忘記關惹
   
2. 喔還有 , custom colour也不一樣 , 統一一下ㄅ

[Insane]

1. 00:19:978 - 因為這段空白比較短 , 我覺得不太需要Break time @@ (其他Diff同樣建議)我都加上NOTE跟SLIDER了
2. 00:37:790 (3) - 太靠近(1)的尾巴了 , 不太整齊 , 可以往旁邊移一些已修改
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:39:353 (5) - 這個音跟(3)是同樣強度的 , 但是(3)有個反跳的梗這邊沒有會覺得不太平衡
   還是建議改放個大一點的跳已修改
4. 00:40:290 (3,4) - 這邊之後的雙擊跟Ex難度不一樣 , 沒有跳梗來配合 , 所以玩的時候挺拘束的 , 而且紅線上的鼓拍也讓人很想敲
   比較建議把
   00:40:290 (3,4) - , 00:40:915 (4,5) - , 00:41:540 (4,5) -
   00:45:290 (3,4) - , 00:45:915 (4,5) - , 00:45:540 (4,5) -
   這幾個點分別做成1/4的短滑條 , 配合這個間距這樣的手感我個人覺得比較好 , 也跟Ex的節奏做個分別
   同時也配合這幾個點的Vocal有一點拉長的感覺 (我猜你是跟Vocalㄏㄏ)已修改(對啊我跟VOCAL @@
5. 00:59:821 (1) - Slider到長白線就可以停了 , 那邊有一個比較重的鑼聲 , 反而藍線上沒任何聲音
6. 01:01:696 (3,4,5,6,7) - 為啥特地排的這ㄇ擠 ? 音樂好像也沒什ㄇ變已修改
   覺得擠
7. 01:11:228 (1,3) - 前面的梗還滿對稱中線的 , 這邊就放中線上吧 , 繼續對稱感覺比較整齊不會有歪一邊的感覺
   可以的話(2)也一起移動ㄅ已修改
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:14:978 - 跟00:19:978 - 一樣 , 消Break time?已修改
9. 01:22:790 (3,4) - 這2個調換位置如何loool ?已修改(很不錯
10. 01:36:228 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 這邊的話 , 迴轉之後的(1,2,3,4)我個人會喜歡跟欠面慢慢錯開的擺放已修改
    
    SPOILER

    
    一方面好讀 , 另一方面玩的時候感覺比較活潑些
    可以參考看看
11. 01:40:603 (5) - 放個NC配合你的梗ㄅ已修改
12. 01:41:228 (1) - 可以的話這顆也擺跳吧 , 跟01:40:603 (5) - 的跳還有背景音樂作呼應會有4拍一跳的段落感很嗨
    不過倒不如說後面都Jump了這個點反而不跳很奇怪已修改
13. 02:59:040 (2,3,4) - 我還是不太鳥解為啥這邊要縮間距@__@已修改
14. 03:15:915 (4) - 這顆Slider是在1/6拍的地方結束喔 ---> 03:16:123 - <---這邊:3
    同時節拍換了 , 請使用NC作為提醒已修改
15. 03:17:478 - ㄜ這邊應該加個Note就可以回到1/4了03:17:634 (1) - 我刪掉了
    參考:
    
    SPOILER

    
    目前的設法會有點不對拍的地方:
    ---03:17:790 - 這邊的白線有個鼓聲NOTE刪掉了
    ---03:17:946 - 就我聽起來 , Vocal是從這邊開始的已修改

Good luck ~!

1. 00:11:853 (4,5,6) - 這裡的音樂和00:11:228 (1,2,3) - 滿像的, 怎麼不是用同一種節奏? 00:12:087 - 可以在加一顆note
2. 00:32:478 (1) - 這裡不用nc吧
3. 00:34:353 (3,4,5,6) - 這裡排版怎麼突然縮起來了 我看你前面都是用大跳
4. 00:37:321 (7,2) - 壓到了有點醜啊, 彎個角度擺到下面一點?
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:39:978 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - 這個部分很容易讀錯orz 老實說我也不知道要怎麼改才比較好 (當然後面也是)
6. 00:49:978 (1,2) - 沒必要疊在一起吧?
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:06:228 (1,2,3) - 這裡spacing變小了, 但後面01:07:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - 突然間間距很大有點反應不太過來, 建議你01:06:228 (1,2,3) - 可以做個跳
8. 01:11:071 (5,6) - 這裡應該是跳點吧...怎麼突然變小了
9. 01:19:978 (1,2) - 這裡照理來講沒有理由突然間距變小 可以這樣改
   
10. 01:30:603 (3,4,5,6) - 這裡也是不應該突然變小才對
11. 01:43:415 (6) - 這個可以移到左下角去 左下角滿空的而且滿flow的
12. 01:51:384 (6) - 沒nc?
13. 02:19:665 (6,7,1) - 可以稍微等距一下
14. 02:25:290 (3) - 略醜 建議你順時針轉90度
15. 02:58:103 (3,4,5) - 一樣 不應該突然變小間距的
16. 03:22:321 (1) - 因為03:22:478 - 有一個很大聲的鼓點所以我覺得你應該要把這slider拆成1/2跟一個note

1. 00:11:853 (4,5,6) - 這裡的音樂和00:11:228 (1,2,3) - 滿像的, 怎麼不是用同一種節奏? 00:12:087 - 可以在加一顆note已修改
2. 00:32:478 (1) - 這裡不用nc吧已修改
3. 00:34:353 (3,4,5,6) - 這裡排版怎麼突然縮起來了 我看你前面都是用大跳已修改
4. 00:37:321 (7,2) - 壓到了有點醜啊, 彎個角度擺到下面一點?已修改
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:39:978 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - 這個部分很容易讀錯orz 老實說我也不知道要怎麼改才比較好 (當然後面也是)這邊是對Vocal的
6. 00:49:978 (1,2) - 沒必要疊在一起吧? 已修改
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:06:228 (1,2,3) - 這裡spacing變小了, 但後面01:07:478 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - 突然間間距很大有點反應不太過來, 建議你01:06:228 (1,2,3) - 可以做個跳已修改
8. 01:11:071 (5,6) - 這裡應該是跳點吧...怎麼突然變小了已修改
9. 01:19:978 (1,2) - 這裡照理來講沒有理由突然間距變小 可以這樣改已修改
   
10. 01:30:603 (3,4,5,6) - 這裡也是不應該突然變小才對已修改
11. 01:43:415 (6) - 這個可以移到左下角去 左下角滿空的而且滿flow的已修改
12. 01:51:384 (6) - 沒nc? 已修改
13. 02:19:665 (6,7,1) - 可以稍微等距一下已修改
14. 02:25:290 (3) - 略醜 建議你順時針轉90度已修改
15. 02:58:103 (3,4,5) - 一樣 不應該突然變小間距的已修改
16. 03:22:321 (1) - 因為03:22:478 - 有一個很大聲的鼓點所以我覺得你應該要把這slider拆成1/2跟一個note這樣配合03:22:712 (2,3) - 會很奇怪

Snow Note wrote:

Re-Mod light insane

[Light Insane]
音量方面不要超過75%,不然很吵 (例如 00:53:571 開始的段落
平常段落的音量不要低於50% (像是 02:37:478 開始的段落
音量統一一下,不要一時30%,一時90%... (差太遠了

00:17:478 (7,8) - 換成4個圓圈會比較好,因為這裡全都是重音已修改
00:23:728 (1) - 形狀怪怪的..一直線就好了已修改
00:36:384 (2) - 形狀怪怪的..一直線就好了已修改
00:36:853 (3,4) - 弧度太低了,不如弄成直線吧已修改
00:49:978 (1,2,3,4,5) - 這個排列不順手已修改
00:57:321 - 這個位置應該是圓圈已修改
01:04:978 (1,2,3,4) - 這個節奏和歌曲不合已修改
01:08:571 (1,2,3) - 把(1)的尾和(2)(3)弄成直線已修改
01:20:290 (3) - 上移一格已修改
01:56:228 - 這個段落的節奏和上一個相似的段落不同節奏也不一樣@@?
02:00:603 (5) - 形狀怪怪的..一直線就好了已修改
02:09:821 (2) - (滑條頭)不用突然增加音量這要改變滑條速度
02:28:415 (2,3,4) - 距離上一個物件太近已修改
02:29:392 - 把這個Break的開始點位到02:29:978已修改
02:42:165 (4) - 右移一格,上移一格已修改
02:58:571 (5,7) - 把它弄成平行已修改
03:00:603 (9) - 右移一格已修改
03:01:228 (1,2,3) - 距離上一個物件太近已修改
03:17:373 - 加個note已修改
03:26:071 (1,2,3,4) - (flow)不順手的排列已修改

如果想要提升質量的話,光是mod是沒有什麼用的
最好的方法就是當Mapping上準提升後再回來ReMAP

1. recheck all stacks. i think several stack pattern is not correcty (do you check "stacking" in editor-option?)
2. 00:11:696 (2) - i prefer to delete
3. 00:26:540- add a note. very strange
4. 00:57:946 (2) - i prefer circle pattern to slider
   
5. 00:58:571 (3) - NC
6. 01:05:446 (2,3) - why not combine into 1 slider?
7. 01:17:790 (6,7) - i recommend to make genter curve
8. 01:34:353 (3,1) - i found several overlappings like this. the overlapping on slider-start is hard to see. especially hard-diff, i recommend to fix them
9. 01:39:978 (1,2,3,4) - you can make better flow, imo
10. 01:46:462 (2) - delete. unnecessary, imo
11. 01:52:790 (2,3) - this stack is confusing
12. 02:07:321 (1) - end at 02:08:415
13. 02:21:071 (5) - delete
14. 03:02:790- follow this strong sound. why not end 03:02:321 (2) - at 03:02:790-
15. 03:11:853 (1,2,3) - too hard to find rhythm because of spacing. recheck spacing and i suggest to follow 1/1 rhythm like this
    
16. 03:43:884 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - too large spacing for hard, imo

1. 00:58:571 (5,1) - i prefer slider for following vocal
2. 02:14:821 (5,1) - ^
3. 01:05:915 (1,6) - swap NC
4. 01:06:228 (5,6) - symmetric slider is better
5. 01:53:728 (1) - end at 01:55:290
6. 02:28:728 (5) - why not Ctrl+G?
7. 02:50:290 (2,5) - this overlapping is hard to see
8. 02:54:118- add a note?
9. 03:12:321- i recommend to follow this drum sound
10. 03:33:571 (1,5) - this overlapping is hard to see

1. 00:51:228 (1,4) - just a suggetion. why not rotate more?
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:58:572 (5,1) - i recommend to increase spacing
3. 02:14:821 (5,1) - ^
4. 03:28:571 (5,1) - ^
5. 01:04:977 (5,1) - swap NC?
6. 01:11:228 (1,3) - stack correctly
7. 01:15:290 (2,3) - this jump is hard to find rhythm
8. 02:54:821 (1,2,3) - awkward flow
9. 03:07:478- i recommend to follow this drum sound
10. 03:12:321- add a note. follow drum sound
11. 03:15:915 (1) - very hard to find rhythm. simple vocal following is better, imo
    
12. 03:45:290 (1,2) - i prefer to keep "from left to right" pattern by the same way as 03:43:884 (1,2,1,2,1,2) -

1. 01:06:228 (1) - it is better to make 1/2 rhythm not 1/1 at this part
2. 01:22:478- circle is better, imo
   
3. 01:51:227 (5,1) - swap NC?
4. 03:06:436 (7,8) - keep spacing 1.93x

1. 00:39:353 (6,7,1) - for easy, stack x3 is so confusing
2. 00:41:228- clap?
3. 00:37:478 (3) - NC
4. 00:56:540 (5,1,2,3,4) - too difficult for beginner. for easy, circle rush on red line is hard to find rhythm
5. 01:03:728 (4) - NC
6. 01:27:165 (5,6) - avoid overlapping. for easy, confusing layout should be avoided as much as possible
7. 01:32:478 (1,2,3,4) - this stack pattern is so confusing for beginner
8. 01:55:290 (4,1) - swap NC
9. 01:58:103 (5,6,1) - avoid overlapping
10. 02:01:228 (4) - NC
11. 02:06:696 (2) - start at white line 02:06:540
12. 02:52:321 (3) - u~m, i prefer slider
    
13. 03:11:853 (1) - in this part, i highly recommend to keep 1/1 rhythm (white line's rhythm) . please end at 03:12:478
14. 03:19:509 (1) - start at 03:19:978- it is better to follow drum sound than vocal
15. 03:40:603 (2,3) - why not blanket correctly
16. 03:43:103 (6) - end at 03:43:571- in the same way as 03:41:853 (4) -

1. 00:41:540 (4,1) - u~m, not good flow
2. 01:05:603 (2) - why not start at 01:05:446? i prefer to follow vocal at this part
3. 01:34:509 (4) - in this part, keeping 1/1 rhythm is better, imo
   
4. 01:51:228 (3) - touched life-bar!
5. 02:57:478 (1,4) - blanket correctly~
6. 03:05:290 (2,3) - combine into 1 slider. in this part, relax mapping is suitable
7. 03:10:290 (2,3,4) - suggetion
   
8. 03:12:478~03:17:478- in this part, i recommend 1/1 mapping (don't avoid white line)
9. 03:24:040 (3) - NC

RandomEffect wrote:

[Starfy's Normal]

1. 00:41:540 (4,1) - u~m, not good flow But I can't think better solution
2. 01:05:603 (2) - why not start at 01:05:446? i prefer to follow vocal at this part Feeling is a bit of strange if I follow the vocal
3. 01:34:509 (4) - in this part, keeping 1/1 rhythm is better, imo That's ok, imo
   
4. 01:51:228 (3) - touched life-bar! It doesn't matter
5. 02:57:478 (1,4) - blanket correctly~ Fixed
6. 03:05:290 (2,3) - combine into 1 slider. in this part, relax mapping is suitable I'll consider about it
7. 03:10:290 (2,3,4) - suggetion I'll consider about it
   
8. 03:12:478~03:17:478- in this part, i recommend 1/1 mapping (don't avoid white line) humm too strange
9. 03:24:040 (3) - NC Fixed

cute song <3
~Good Luck~

RandomEffect wrote:

[Chu's Easy]

1. 00:39:353 (6,7,1) - for easy, stack x3 is so confusing fixed
2. 00:41:228- clap? Oh I missed this one lollll fixed
3. 00:37:478 (3) - NC ok
4. 00:56:540 (5,1,2,3,4) - too difficult for beginner. for easy, circle rush on red line is hard to find rhythm Change to sliders
5. 01:03:728 (4) - NC ok
6. 01:27:165 (5,6) - avoid overlapping. for easy, confusing layout should be avoided as much as possible deleted that circle
7. 01:32:478 (1,2,3,4) - this stack pattern is so confusing for beginner fixed
8. 01:55:290 (4,1) - swap NC ok
9. 01:58:103 (5,6,1) - avoid overlapping fixed
10. 02:01:228 (4) - NC ok
11. 02:06:696 (2) - start at white line 02:06:540 fixed
12. 02:52:321 (3) - u~m, i prefer slider fixed
    
13. 03:11:853 (1) - in this part, i highly recommend to keep 1/1 rhythm (white line's rhythm) . please end at 03:12:478 ok
14. 03:19:509 (1) - start at 03:19:978- it is better to follow drum sound than vocal ok
15. 03:40:603 (2,3) - why not blanket correctly fixed
16. 03:43:103 (6) - end at 03:43:571- in the same way as 03:41:853 (4) - ok

1. recheck all stacks. i think several stack pattern is not correcty (do you check "stacking" in editor-option?)
2. 00:11:696 (2) - i prefer to deleteFIXED
3. 00:26:540- add a note. very strangeFIXED
4. 00:57:946 (2) - i prefer circle pattern to sliderFIXED
   
5. 00:58:571 (3) - NCFIXED
6. 01:05:446 (2,3) - why not combine into 1 slider?FIXED
7. 01:17:790 (6,7) - i recommend to make genter curveFIXED
8. 01:34:353 (3,1) - i found several overlappings like this. the overlapping on slider-start is hard to see. especially hard-diff, i recommend to fix themFIXED
9. 01:39:978 (1,2,3,4) - you can make better flow, imoFIXED
10. 01:46:462 (2) - delete. unnecessary, imoFIXED
11. 01:52:790 (2,3) - this stack is confusingFIXED
12. 02:07:321 (1) - end at 02:08:415FIXED
13. 02:21:071 (5) - deleteFIXED
14. 03:02:790- follow this strong sound. why not end 03:02:321 (2) - at 03:02:790- FIXED
15. 03:11:853 (1,2,3) - too hard to find rhythm because of spacing. recheck spacing and i suggest to follow 1/1 rhythm like thisFIXED
    
16. 03:43:884 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - too large spacing for hard, imoFIXED

1. 00:58:571 (5,1) - i prefer slider for following vocali think it's fine
2. 02:14:821 (5,1) - ^
3. 01:05:915 (1,6) - swap NCFIXED
4. 01:06:228 (5,6) - symmetric slider is betterFIXED
5. 01:53:728 (1) - end at 01:55:290FIXED
6. 02:28:728 (5) - why not Ctrl+G?FIXED
7. 02:50:290 (2,5) - this overlapping is hard to seeFIXED
8. 02:54:118- add a note?not good in here
9. 03:12:321- i recommend to follow this drum sound03:12:478 - here got a drim sound to so i wont change it
10. 03:33:571 (1,5) - this overlapping is hard to seeFIXED

1. 00:51:228 (1,4) - just a suggetion. why not rotate more?FIXED
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:58:572 (5,1) - i recommend to increase spacingFIXED
3. 02:14:821 (5,1) - ^FIXED
4. 03:28:571 (5,1) - ^FIXED
5. 01:04:977 (5,1) - swap NC?FIXED
6. 01:11:228 (1,3) - stack correctlyFIXED
7. 01:15:290 (2,3) - this jump is hard to find rhythmFIXED
8. 02:54:821 (1,2,3) - awkward flowFIXED
9. 03:07:478- i recommend to follow this drum soundFIXED
10. 03:12:321- add a note. follow drum soundFIXED
11. 03:15:915 (1) - very hard to find rhythm. simple vocal following is better, imoFIXED
    
12. 03:45:290 (1,2) - i prefer to keep "from left to right" pattern by the same way as 03:43:884 (1,2,1,2,1,2)FIXED -

1. 01:06:228 (1) - it is better to make 1/2 rhythm not 1/1 at this partFIXED
2. 01:22:478- circle is better, imoFIXED
   
3. 01:51:227 (5,1) - swap NC?FIXED
4. 03:06:436 (7,8) - keep spacing 1.93xFIXED

CptSqBany wrote:

Hello! :3

[Pochiko]

00:12:478 (1,4) - the touch, ugh..fixed
00:13:806 (3,4) - put 4 lower, because its ugly that wayfixed
00:56:228 (1,2,3) - it's ugly, because its not straightmaybe not
01:05:134 (1,2) - Ctrl+Gok...
01:05:603 (1,2) - ^ok...
01:09:353 (4) - NC?of course
01:25:524 (7) - curve it more to the right, to match the stream patternok...
02:17:321 (1,2,3) - It doesn't fit here. Like.. It hurts in the ears when you hear something like this. Make 1,2 a long slider or somethingmatch with vocal
02:34:899 (8,9) - slider here?just 02:34:977 (9) one
03:03:103 (2) - NC?of course
03:07:399 (1) - remove NC, (2) - NCof course
03:12:321 (1) - ^fixed

[Insane]

00:11:123 (8,1) - wut? Stack it..dont get it =w=
00:11:853 (3,4,5,6) - What is that shape?00:11:854 (3,4) - ctrl + H, ctrl + J and DS
also 00:11:853 (4) - remove this touch with (2) sliderfixed
00:13:337 - something wrong is with (10) here...fixed
00:17:478 (7) - NCfixed
01:00:212 (2,3) - that stack doesnt fit here imofixed
03:05:134 (1,2,3) - Not straightwut, is straight LOL
03:04:821 - Man, decide if you are using 1/4 or 1/6.. like.. 03:05:134 (1,2,3) - wtf is this?...
03:05:603 (4,5,6) - DSfixed
I would remap that part ^


Hope you liked it! GL!

monstrata wrote:

[pochiko]

00:09:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - these streams are barely audible... mapping them is kinda odd. i'd just do like 1/4 repeat sliders or something more passive ok them, fixed.
00:52:478 (1,2,3) - I'm kinda surprised you didnt make these jumps bigger xD. sure lets make it bigger XD
00:56:540 (4,5,6) - I think the DS from 5>6 should be bigger than 4>5 for better emphasis.yap, ur right
01:06:540 (4,5,6,7) - Spacing here too. Try and map larger jumps to white ticks instead of red ticks if you want to follow the emphasis of the song.fixed
01:22:478 (5) - NC here would be cool.cool
01:33:103 (5,6,7,8) - Not really getting why these are so spaced compared to 01:33:728 (1,2,3) - . I feel like spacing concept here is a bit weird and just done for difficulty.this part im want to make this DS bigger than smaller, so i make 01:33:728 (1,2,3,4) bigger

[expert]

00:16:853 (2) - NC for clarity.sure
00:24:196 (1,2) - Swap NC's. NC'ing on white ticks are better like 00:24:353 - sure
01:09:509 (2,3,4) - This angle felt kinda awkward for the jump.fixed

Something i tried

03:00:603 (9) - Hmm, I would NC here tbh.yap NC here
03:06:228 (6) - And NC here for downbeat. 03:11:228 (6) - Here too, applies to other parts too. NC pattern isn't very consistent here.fixed
03:28:571 (5,2) - Maybe dont overlap xd.of course XD
03:38:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - NC spam~ Since you did that for 01:07:478 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - yap, fixed it

[insane]

00:13:963 (2,3,4,5) - This didn't flow too well for me. Try 00:14:197 (4) - 443||188 since it makes the transition smoother.fixed
00:22:790 (6,7) - Here would be a good place for a jump. You could also add an NC here on 7. fixed
00:28:415 (2,3,4,5) - Sounds really overmapped for me xP. You ahve harder diffs, you don't have to map 1/4's that are barely audible on Insane imo xDdelete 00:28:493 (3,4,5) notes and change 00:28:415 (2) - spot
00:37:165 (1) - I would split this into a 1/2 slider and a Circle on 00:37:478 - for the downbeat (and NC there instead).fixed
00:40:290 (3,4,1,2) - I think stacking these doubles will be easier for people playing this difficulty. Space them on higher diffs instead xD. Having to play doubles + move (because they are spaced) makes these patterns extra difficult. make every 00:40:290 (3,4,1,2) DS bigger
02:47:790 (2,4) - Better to not overlap imo, it doesn't look that nice ;Csure
02:54:743 (6,8) - These sound overmapped. I think it's better if you delete them and rearrange this rhythm since this is Insane and not one of your Extrasfixed

[hard]

00:15:915 (3,1,2) - This spacing is going to confuse people because 3>1 is 1/2, but 1>2 is 1/1.sure, fixed the DS
00:30:603 (7,8) - Jump instead of stack? for emphasis.fixed
00:50:915 (4) - This slider doesn't really fit the pattern like the other 3 sliders. It's too close to slider 3.change 4 to 2 notes
00:52:478 (5) - I would NC here/sure
01:40:290 (2,3,4) - The jump from 2>3 felt kinda random. But 3>4 could definitely have a jump for emphasis.fixed
01:41:071 (6,1) - Don't overlap? xdi fixed this part , so no overlap :3
01:45:915 - Not going to map this?nope, i play this diff with DT it's fine for no note here :\
02:09:821 (4) - I would NC here since the Kiai begins here.
02:17:321 (1,2,3,4,5) - Rhythm felt a bit weird.fixed it

Try this instead!

checked a few diffs. good luck!

Man your mod is awesome
thanks for your mod

moonlightleaf wrote:

3min 8diff , 真多....☆

Aeril wrote:

Well since you accepted the M4M on your queue I can now start your mod ;3 Don't think I'm going to find much though after monstrata modded this a bit
BTW the Pochiko diff is so much fun to play!

[Pochiko]

1. 00:12:946 (4,5) - increase the spacing here maybe? maybe not
2. 00:13:571 (3,4,5) - this looks better imo as a straight triple + slider but doesnt really matter https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4249971 nope
3. 01:48:415 (11,12) - I feel like it would do better if these were switched or atleast the spacing from 10 to 11 was increased switch it
4. 03:19:561 (1) - shouldnt the spinner end at 03:21:853 - ? yap, fixed
5. 03:26:071 (1,2,3) - it feels really awkward to curve upwards like that after the jump, maybe CTRL+J and move the blanket to the other side? do something similar

[Expert]

1. 01:42:634 (2) - i feel this would flow better curved the other way fixed
2. 02:39:665 (3,1) - increase spacing? yap
3. 03:19:457 (1) - shouldnt the spinner end at 03:21:853 - ? fixed

[Extra]

1. 00:40:290 (3,4) - why are these doubles not stacked like in Expert and Pochiko? ty different style on every diff XD
2. 02:48:415 (7) - maybe stack this on the slider after? i think is fine
3. 03:19:457 (1) - shouldnt the spinner end at 03:21:853 - ? (Master at copy paste >:3) all spinner fixed LOL
4. 03:34:821 (8) - maybe stack on slider after? nope

Welp that's it, other than it looking a bit messy I didn't find many playability problems Since there wasn't really that many things I had to find you only have to mod 4 diffs on my mapset if you want at most. I had a lot of fun playing this map and hope it goes far. Bye bye~ !

moonlightleaf wrote:

M4M here

[Hard]

3.7啊,有点高

00:12:790 (3,4) - 降星可以改滑条,4-5 1.3x 也不是不可以的 5有高音或者就1.0x fixed

SPOILER

00:14:821 (5,1) - 这个是要叠还是不叠,很难看,而且和前面4挨着了 這已經是疊在一起的了...

00:26:540 (3,4) - 建议3删 4放前面9上 参考00:36:228 (1,2,3,4) - do something similar

00:33:571 (8,1) - 这要包不包的 挺难受,试试别的排版 fixed

SPOILER

00:36:384 (2) - 太远了fixed

00:57:946 (2,3) - 对于hard 这俩个单点挺不友好的 换2滑条?fixed

01:12:478 (4,5,6,7) - 目前这个排版不是很顺,试试↓ (会升0.01星 我自己在DT我這HARD的時後覺得這樣擺打得很順 所以我不打算改

SPOILER

01:14:821 (1) - 转盘很不合适 前面那个也是 那要改甚麼= =

01:17:790 (6,7) - 1.9x... 试试换单点+滑条折返 fixed

01:20:368 (2) - 不好看 我会摆这样 fixed

SPOILER

01:29:978 (1) - 位置不好,按照曲线的话 大概这里会非常好 改了之後比較難打 還是原來的打起來比較順

SPOILER

01:34:353 (3,4) - 旋转30度 放这里试试 不錯!

SPOILER

01:36:228 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - try fixed

SPOILER

01:37:790 (2,3,4,5,1) - 虽然5边型,单flow不好 那要怎改 我打起來蠻順的

01:40:290 (2,3) - 我觉得叠都比那样放好 fixed

01:53:103 (3,4,5,6) - 这位置? 我盡量不擺一直線, 因為一直線的NOTE不好打

SPOILER

02:18:103 (3,4) - stack why = =?

02:22:165 (3) - 叠4上 fixed

02:49:040 (4) - 1.9太远了 有修了

03:16:123 (3) - 突然就1/6 有点坑 的確 修了

03:42:790 (2,3,5) - 这种overlap 很不好看 FIXED

这图感觉ds很乱,重音跳也没有固定一个ds,看你的排名估计按照insane方式去摆了,这个是hard,可以善良点

[Insane]

5.3+ > 5.25 Ex标了

00:12:166 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - 56ctrl+g 其他滑条也一并ctrl+g fixed

00:17:478 (1,2) - ^ fixed

00:23:103 (1,2) - 12没必要这么远 然而00:23:571 (4,1) - 才是要加DS的地方 改了

00:24:353 (3,4) - 不錯

SPOILER

00:26:228 (1) - ctrl+g+h 那个样子才顺,参考00:26:540 (2,3,4) - 不錯

00:28:415 (2) - 放后面1上? 這別人MOD的我也覺得這樣就可

00:32:009 (4) - 放 (56,144) ,然后45ctrl+g fixed

00:34:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 这边好乱七八糟,弄整洁点,参考下, 原來的打起來很順了 而且你那樣打起來會變得很不順 你的4 5 DS太小還有3 4 應該變大

SPOILER

00:38:415 (7,1,2,3,4,5) - 这flow你打的习惯吗(卡手吗 這邊的確會卡 已修改

00:55:759 (5) - 钝角跳有点不好,试试叠前面5上00:55:603 (4) - 你可以放(228,104)这样版面好看多 fixed

SPOILER

01:00:446 (3,4,5,6,1) - do something similar

SPOILER

01:04:353 (1,1,2,3,4,1) - 这连打藏的略坑

01:19:509 (8,9,10) - fixed

SPOILER

01:21:228 (1) - fixed

SPOILER

01:24:665 (5,1) - stack fixed

01:29:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 不好看 fixed

01:41:228 (1,2) - 突然就反向断flow了orz 之前俩4边形flow多好啊 fixed

01:54:040 (9,1) - 这俩直滑条好一些, 1->2 flow不好 fixed

01:56:384 (2) - 试试(52,164) 可

02:06:228 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 正5边然后6放中心 fixed 但6換位子擺

02:49:665 (5) - 缩小点DS fixed

03:01:540 (3) - 叠 要不就放右下点(怎么有种非常随意的就放在那里的感觉 有疊了 這邊我本來就打算放來回跳

03:24:353 (4) - 钝角好难受 (25,76)? fixed

03:29:196 (4) - (96,168)folw会好很多 fixed

感觉没有用心做,很随意,排版和flow还能提高一些

话说也有45sp了,为何还是好像新手图的样子 ;w;;;

PS: 给你一个控星的方法: 连续的单点越多星级越高, 跳的距离越大,星级越高

moonlightleaf wrote:

补充 :

[Hard]

00:14:821 (5,1) - 这个是要叠还是不叠,很难看,而且和前面4挨着了 這已經是疊在一起的了... ---那可能我这边bug了,确实我这里没叠,差了几px 并不是1px

01:14:821 (1) - 转盘很不合适 前面那个也是 那要改甚麼= = 比如↓已修改

SPOILER

SPOILER

02:18:103 (3,4) - stack why = =? ---我个人有点卡手啊 照原先这个flow 滑条应该往↙才对, 已修改 疊在一起

01:37:790 (2,3,4,5,1) - 虽然5边型,单flow不好 那要怎改 我打起來蠻順的 已修改

SPOILER

還有我自己做的普面都是以打得順為優先 決不是隨便擺 --嘛,不要在意细节,我不太会打insane,所以自己的图也比较水,而且我个人比较讨厌overlap的,强迫症真可怕 ;w;; LOL

Cheonshi wrote:

Coming from the M4M Q:

my opinion
i actually think should be changed

Insane

• 00:09:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - increase the spacing in the with every new combo by a little would do great feels so compressed
i think this is fine
• 00:47:478 (1) - i think that slider could have a more outstanding shape because of that moan/scream in the music it should have a curve or it should be more highlighted especially when the velocity is lower here it becomes really nice
i wan thinking of this before, and you mod it, so im just going to shange this part to a note

• 01:53:493 - well while playing i didnt notice it but in editor it upsets me that on that sound is nothing probably its fine i just write everything that comes to my mind
so...no change here

• here should be a slider like here 00:47:478 (1) - and not just a circle weird
other modder said that you dont need to match the note/slider to the music vocal everytime so i would just put a note here

• i want a bit more spacing here 02:07:478 (1,2,3,4) - so they at least not overlap i think you had more spacing before like here e.g 00:51:228 (1,2,3,4) -
this should be in red words LOL, fixed it

• i dont know why they are so stacked 02:21:853 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - e.g 03:23:103 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - here is it way better cause is different part of the music, one is going to kiai mode, other is not

• 03:33:571 (1) - that slider stands really out but why? the sliders after and before were normal shaped too and there is no weird sound at that spot at least i dont see it
fixed

• for my taste the final jumps could be a little harder for a diff of that star range not much harder but a little 03:43:884 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - also i dont think the jumps have to get necessarly harder from combo to combo.
fixed

Chorus was fun to play =)

Extra

• 00:47:478 (1) - i really dont get it... i just think a specially shaped slider would fit so perfect... ^

• 00:58:571 (5) - i would start NC here
nope

• 01:04:353 (1,2) - i really would use same spacing as before 01:03:728 (1,2) - not a smaller one
why = =?

• 02:03:728 (1) - same as 00:47:478 (1) -
^

• not really fitting that stream imo 02:04:665 (1,2,3,4) - but fine for a map of that diff

• 02:20:603 (1,2) - same as 01:04:353 (1,2) -
^

• 03:23:103 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - i think even a bigger spacing in that stream would be even more fitting and more fun but more difficult though
yap, fixed

• 03:38:728 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - looks pretty boring compared to other parts where u mapped liked this 02:33:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this looks like a lot more fun like it has more variety
but is different to the music LOL

Breezy wrote:

M4M from your queue!

Expert

00:09:978 (1) - With this stream in particular, you could possibly increase the spacing since it gets louder towards the end. to difficult in the begining

00:11:696 (5) - Move this a little closer so that the pattern looks more square-ish. It looks too tightly spaced where it is right now. fixed

00:21:228 (1) - You could try to map out the lyrics more with circles instead of a long slider, such as how you did a few notes afterwards. but long slider fit here :\

00:24:196 (4) - Center this more to form a better star. just random jump here

00:25:524 (2,3) - Straighten this triple out to match the previous double more. fixed

00:25:759 (4) - Stack this with 00:24:509 (2) fixed

00:26:384 (2) - As a personal preference, you could replace this long slider with a few single notes to match the beat more if you know what I mean. but long slider fit here ....

00:29:665 (5) - Stack this with (1)'s tail, and then slightly adjust the 3 to form a triangle pattern? it would be weird when you play it

00:32:165 (3) - This looks better stacked. fixed

00:32:321 (4,5) - I personally feel that these sliders don't fit in with the song for this difficulty. I would focus more on the fast beat here. fixed

00:35:524 (4,5) - You could angle this triple downwards towards the next note for flow. fixed

00:35:759 (6,7,8,1) - This applies to a few jumps, but you should try to evenly space out the jumps more instead of the random spacing. It doesn't have to be exactly equal, just as long as it isn't too dramatic. Take note of this for any other jump patterns. fixed

00:39:040 (3,4,5) - You should also try not to have notes overlap each other in an awkward way. I would stack a few things (not all) for a neater look, unless it's your own personal preference to do so. I would go back over your map more for any overlapping or stacking issues, it would take too long to point each overlap if it's your own preference. so.... what do you mean here...

00:48:103 - It might be me, but I feel as if you could start a stream around here possibly. fixed

00:52:478 (1) - This note is too far, making the triangle pattern you have uneven. I would move it closer. fixed

01:04:978 (1,2) - Instead of the long sliders, you could focus on the beat that consists of doubles more. so what do i need to change, i think this is fine here

01:12:946 (4) - This last slider ends awkwardly off-beat, I would just make this a single circle note. fixed

01:17:321 (1) - This slider shape doesn't appeal to me, but it's fine if you like the current shape. ok

01:34:665 (7,1) - Blanket this evenly. fixed

02:03:103 (1,2,3,4) - This looks too closely spaced and doesn't look that good. I would spread them out more. fixed

02:04:353 -Start a stream here? You did it before on the previous section of the song similar to this one. nope

02:24:040 (5,6,7,8,9) - This part of the stream doesn't look very nice, I would curve it more. why?

02:26:384 (1) - Try a triple? nope

02:36:228 (1) - The beat gets louder here, it's strange to have the DS lower here. i think is fine cause beat get lower after

02:38:962 (4) - Try a kick slider for this, it would make the spaced stream easier to hit, and it would match the upcoming stream. nope

02:39:353 (1,2,3) - These are angled uncomfortably, I would position these to flow better. change 2 3

02:40:759 (5,1) - Blanket? unnecessery

02:51:384 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - If you listen closely at a slower speed, you can hear that this is a bigger stream and not just triples. but i still hear is triple here...

02:54:040 (9,1) - The beat in the song doesn't go with what you have here, making it awkward to play. Try to do doubles here instead. match vocal here

02:54:509 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - This stream doesn't go with the song. Just replace these instead with kick sliders or notes according to the beat. there are a sound match this stream

03:27:321 (1,2,3,4,5) - Instead of these sliders simply connecting, you could do more complex turns to make this part more funner. fixed

Pochiko

00:15:134 (1) - A triplet could go here, since it's the hardest difficulty. nope

00:23:103 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - A stream instead of triples would fit in better in my opinion. triple is fine

00:39:978 (1) - For this whole section of the song, a long stream would fit in better than these doubles. It's the hardest difficulty after all. streams doesnt match the vocal at all

00:48:103 - Start the stream here? fixed

00:52:478 (1,3) - Stack these? I think it looks/plays nicer. fixed

00:56:306 (2,3) - This triple should start on a red tick, not a white tick. white tick is a single tab = =

01:05:837 (1) - Start a stream here instead of the doubles. nope

01:10:134 (1) - A triplet fits in better here. fixed

01:18:103 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - Triplets should generally start on red ticks, it sounds and plays awkwardly on a white tick, unless the song allows it. Take this into consideration for any other triplets. triple start on white tick is really weird here, and when you play it

01:38:571 (1) - This long slider doesn't match the beat, and it ends up skipping one of the main beats of the song (the large white tick). fixed

01:49:978 - Focus more on the triplets/stream here instead of jumps? It would fit in better with the song. jumps fit here

02:04:353 - Start stream here? not here

02:12:556 (2,3) - Same issue with triplets here. nope

02:24:347 (9,10,11,12) - Curve this more? It looks awkward having it just straightened out like this. this is not a curve LOL

02:25:212 (2,3) - Angle these towards the next note more. fixed

02:26:384 (1) - Triplet? nope

02:38:728 (1) - I would use kick sliders for these spaced streams for better play. nope

02:51:384 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Stream instead of triplets. nope

02:39:821 - Not sure why, but I can't hear the notes anymore at this point. It could be an inherited timing point issue.

03:26:306 (2,3) - Triplet issue with the ticks again. nope

03:36:228 (1) - In a previous section of the song, you mapped this with streams of 5 notes. I'm not sure why you switched to triplets here. cause i dont want every diff is all same thispart

This mapset has a lot of potential. Some things you could work on at your own time are overlapping notes and uneven patterns.

Overall, good job!

1. 00:13:259 (6,1) - I don't get this drastic DS change, moreover why is 00:13:415 (1,2,3) - static? You had such great movement with the previous pattern but you decided to halt it and with such low DS, it makes it awkward to play.
2. 00:14:040 (5) - Seems a bit too curvy, kinda inappropriate with the previous slider.
3. 00:16:228 (1,2) - Since the current hitsounds are not too loud the sliderend is audible even with 5%, you should probably just use a muted hitsound, here's a download link for one http://puu.sh/mquSU/48845e9c9e.wav
4. 00:18:728 (1) - This is waaaay too low, perhaps around 35~45% is better.
5. 00:19:978 (1,2) - Why not make them identical? It fits, just copy 2 and place it instead of 1 at the same position.
6. 00:30:603 (7) - The emphasization needs to be on the sliderend here, not on the sliderhead, either change it to a 1/4 slider or use 2 circles and emphasize the second one, it feels completely wrong now.
7. 00:30:915 (8) - If you do the previous thingy then you should probably remove it and map the triplet
8. 00:53:103 (1,2) - This overlap is irriating, either overlap them properly or don't overlap at all, it gives a bad vibe.
9. 00:56:071 (1,2,3) - Awkward.. Doesn't follow vocals properly and the slider that starts on the red tick isn't any good either. Regardless, the triplet is overmapped and personally I don't feel like it contributes much.
10. 00:56:540 (4,5,6,7,8,1) - I'm sure you could make this pattern look better.
11. 00:57:321 (1,2,3) - I would say that you should either stack them all or have that small different movement, both are cool but you shouldn't mix.
12. 00:59:040 (5) - NC is appropriate here.
13. 01:02:478 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why? This pattern doesn't fit at all, the music doesn't ask for it at all, there are no repeating doubles in the music, you are pushing the wrong pattern onto the music.
14. 01:08:259 (11,12,13,1) - I got a few things to say on this one, first of all, I feel like the object rhythm should be different, either all circles or at the very least have the slider as 2 circles, since it has the most strength, and having the strong note as the sliderend is kinda meh.. Second thing, the movement from the slider 13 to the slider 1 is kinda weird, it doesn't look that good, the curve is just wrong, it's a bit hard to explain, this for example will look better: http://puu.sh/mqvUz/af9e57248a.jpg but since I said that the slider there is not anything good, so consider: http://puu.sh/mqvWJ/60e513820b.jpg, or even http://puu.sh/mqvYi/6e5724639f.jpg. oh and you really need a NC there, perhaps on 9.
15. 01:12:321 (5,8) - Avoid this kind of overlap please
16. 01:14:978 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - An other inappropriate pattern in terms of music, it doesn't follow it very well, actually here those are doubles, or pairs, whatever you might call them, and not groups of three.
17. 01:42:478 (1,2) - That's not really good in my opinion, usually this would be backed up by vocals just like at 01:21:228 (1,2) - 00:36:228 (1,2) - and such, but now it's just not right. Although there's that repeating ringing sound, it repeats midslider so you shouldn't really used a long slider there.
18. 02:09:353 (1,1,2,3) - Why is the spacing is drastically bigger from 00:53:103 (1,2,3,4) - although it is the same pattern? Also, the NC is incosistent here.
19. 02:12:321 (1,2,3) - Just like before, I don't feel like this overmap helps and the slider is no good either.
20. 02:13:259 (7,8,1) - The movement from 8 into the slider is just horrible in my opinion, it feels way too forced and the slider placement is awkward, try something like this: http://puu.sh/mqwyC/8f1325eef7.jpg, don't forget to move the other notes as well.
21. 01:04:353 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - and 02:20:603 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - those seems drastically different, now when I look, 01:04:665 (3,4,5,6,7) - doesn't seem like the best overmap, but overall I feel like the first pattern is much better and interesting. Should they really be that different when you are pretty consistent most of the time?
22. 02:24:665 (13,1) - The movement is great compared to before, but I think the rhythm should be changed here too.
23. 02:26:384 (1,2) - Why not a triple like 01:10:134 (1,2,3) -
24. 02:31:071 (7) - Why is the drum completely ignored here? You could make some transition into the next pattern.
25. Egh I dislike the next section, just one streamy section which makes the map unplayable for most players, could put some more thought there in my opinion.
26. Should probably increase the hitsound volume from here 02:29:978 (1) - even though it is not kiai, it deserves something much higher.
27. 02:41:696 (9) - Even though there are vocals, the music dosen't emphasize the long held one here, so missing the strong instruments inside is awkward, 02:42:321 (1) - is fine because the music supports it.
28. 02:42:165 (10,1) - You should probably change the movement a bit, the circle doesn't go along with the current slider curve and placement.
29. 02:51:618 - I highly suggest mapping this as well.
30. 02:53:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - Drums are quite significant here, follow them properly.
31. 03:22:321 (1) - Long slider is inappropriate, strong instrument in the middle and the you are better putting something to press for the vocals.
32. 03:26:071 (1,2,3) - Did you copy paste the kiais and just change everything slightly? lol ::P

JauiPlaY wrote:

Hey
这里是m4m

[Expert]
00:57:009 (5,1) - 没遮好 fixed
00:57:321 (1,2,3,4,5) - 每次比原曲多一个音听起来挺怪的，考虑降低点音量？fixed
01:02:165 (6,7,1) - 换成一个长slider加个circle会比较好 因為是EXPERT所以不打算換
02:13:571 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^^ fixed
03:21:853 - 音量低点
03:27:321 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^^^^ fixed
加个break好不好啊 家哪邊QWQ?

[Pochiko]
加个break好不好啊 家哪邊QWQ?
01:39:040 (3,5) - 稍微有点没遮好 fixed
03:16:228 (1,2,3,4,1) - 可以考虑加点独特的音效 fixed
03:19:561 (1) - 为啥放这？往前点吧 不知道 沒放好吧ww
摸不动

太吓人太鬼畜

Avishay wrote:

[Pukuchiku] why is Pukuchiku

1. 00:13:259 (6,1) - I don't get this drastic DS change, moreover why is 00:13:415 (1,2,3) - static? You had such great movement with the previous pattern but you decided to halt it and with such low DS, it makes it awkward to play. make 00:13:259 (6,1) - DS bigger
2. 00:14:040 (5) - Seems a bit too curvy, kinda inappropriate with the previous slider. just follow the smooth here, to make it better to play
3. 00:16:228 (1,2) - Since the current hitsounds are not too loud the sliderend is audible even with 5%, you should probably just use a muted hitsound, here's a download link for one http://puu.sh/mquSU/48845e9c9e.wav ty
4. 00:18:728 (1) - This is waaaay too low, perhaps around 35~45% is better. fix to 40%
5. 00:19:978 (1,2) - Why not make them identical? It fits, just copy 2 and place it instead of 1 at the same position. it would be really weird LOL, or i make it wrong :\
6. 00:30:603 (7) - The emphasization needs to be on the sliderend here, not on the sliderhead, either change it to a 1/4 slider or use 2 circles and emphasize the second one, it feels completely wrong now. fixed
7. 00:30:915 (8) - If you do the previous thingy then you should probably remove it and map the triplet fixed
8. 00:53:103 (1,2) - This overlap is irriating, either overlap them properly or don't overlap at all, it gives a bad vibe. dont overlap :p
9. 00:56:071 (1,2,3) - Awkward.. Doesn't follow vocals properly and the slider that starts on the red tick isn't any good either. Regardless, the triplet is overmapped and personally I don't feel like it contributes much. change to 1/1 slider
10. 00:56:540 (4,5,6,7,8,1) - I'm sure you could make this pattern look better. make it to a star shape
11. 00:57:321 (1,2,3) - I would say that you should either stack them all or have that small different movement, both are cool but you shouldn't mix. small movement is fine
12. 00:59:040 (5) - NC is appropriate here. yap
13. 01:02:478 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why? This pattern doesn't fit at all, the music doesn't ask for it at all, there are no repeating doubles in the music, you are pushing the wrong pattern onto the music. fixed
14. 01:08:259 (11,12,13,1) - I got a few things to say on this one, first of all, I feel like the object rhythm should be different, either all circles or at the very least have the slider as 2 circles, since it has the most strength, and having the strong note as the sliderend is kinda meh.. Second thing, the movement from the slider 13 to the slider 1 is kinda weird, it doesn't look that good, the curve is just wrong, it's a bit hard to explain, this for example will look better: http://puu.sh/mqvUz/af9e57248a.jpg but since I said that the slider there is not anything good, so consider: http://puu.sh/mqvWJ/60e513820b.jpg, or even http://puu.sh/mqvYi/6e5724639f.jpg. oh and you really need a NC there, perhaps on 9. fixed, but no NC on 9 cause is weird
15. 01:12:321 (5,8) - Avoid this kind of overlap please of course
16. 01:14:978 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - An other inappropriate pattern in terms of music, it doesn't follow it very well, actually here those are doubles, or pairs, whatever you might call them, and not groups of three. sure, fixed
17. 01:42:478 (1,2) - That's not really good in my opinion, usually this would be backed up by vocals just like at 01:21:228 (1,2) - 00:36:228 (1,2) - and such, but now it's just not right. Although there's that repeating ringing sound, it repeats midslider so you shouldn't really used a long slider there. fixed
18. 02:09:353 (1,1,2,3) - Why is the spacing is drastically bigger from 00:53:103 (1,2,3,4) - although it is the same pattern? Also, the NC is incosistent here. fixed
19. 02:12:321 (1,2,3) - Just like before, I don't feel like this overmap helps and the slider is no good either. fixed like before
20. 02:13:259 (7,8,1) - The movement from 8 into the slider is just horrible in my opinion, it feels way too forced and the slider placement is awkward, try something like this: http://puu.sh/mqwyC/8f1325eef7.jpg, don't forget to move the other notes as well. fixed
21. 01:04:353 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - and 02:20:603 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - those seems drastically different, now when I look, 01:04:665 (3,4,5,6,7) - doesn't seem like the best overmap, but overall I feel like the first pattern is much better and interesting. Should they really be that different when you are pretty consistent most of the time? cause i just dont like that every part is the same, as you can see 01:04:353 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - is a really special part, and i dont want it to be the same at 02:20:603 (1,2,1,2) -
22. 02:24:665 (13,1) - The movement is great compared to before, but I think the rhythm should be changed here too. i think is fine here OWO?
23. 02:26:384 (1,2) - Why not a triple like 01:10:134 (1,2,3) - fixed
24. 02:31:071 (7) - Why is the drum completely ignored here? You could make some transition into the next pattern. if i consider 02:31:071 (7) - that mean i should consider 02:32:009 (6) - 02:32:321 (8) - 02:32:478 (1) - 02:33:571 (7) - and so on ...? i think they are just random beats, if you make these beats to a kickslider or something like that, this part will be really hard to play
25. Egh I dislike the next section, just one streamy section which makes the map unplayable for most players, could put some more thought there in my opinion. make some fixed
26. Should probably increase the hitsound volume from here 02:29:978 (1) - even though it is not kiai, it deserves something much higher. 30% > 50%
27. 02:41:696 (9) - Even though there are vocals, the music dosen't emphasize the long held one here, so missing the strong instruments inside is awkward, 02:42:321 (1) - is fine because the music supports it. fixed
28. 02:42:165 (10,1) - You should probably change the movement a bit, the circle doesn't go along with the current slider curve and placement. fixed
29. 02:51:618 - I highly suggest mapping this as well. but the music is triplet here
30. 02:53:728 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - Drums are quite significant here, follow them properly. i dont know how to map if i follow the drums here QWQ
31. 03:22:321 (1) - Long slider is inappropriate, strong instrument in the middle and the you are better putting something to press for the vocals. other modder have told me this before, but it's really weird to just put a note on 03:22:478 - , or 03:22:321 (1) - change to 1/2 slider and add a note 03:22:478 - , so i just think to match the vocal here, not the beat
32. 03:26:071 (1,2,3) - Did you copy paste the kiais and just change everything slightly? lol ::P nope i just think this beat would fit the music but it seems im wrong :\, fix to 1/1 slider

Good luck!

JauiPlaY wrote:

[Starfy's Normal]
00:26:540 (2,4) - 有点遮到了不好看 I think it is not that ugly LOL
00:55:603 (4) - 我倾向于放到00:55:759 - I think the current one is more appropriate since it follows the strong beat and vocal
00:57:009 - 总觉得这里没东西听起来比较怪 I will consider about it
00:59:665 (2) - 缩短到00:59:821 - Fixed
02:16:540 (4) - 移到02:16:696 - I will consider about it
03:14:040 (6) - 和^上面类似的建议 Same
03:16:071 (5,6,7,8) - 不跟歌词？The vocal is not allow the music orz
没有spinner吗 I think spinner is not that necessary lol

bbj0920 wrote:

https://osu.ppy.sh/s/355068

↑ probably get better mp3 here

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

Is it really necessary to usr a better mp3 owo?
If it is, I will change it

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

btw, is your collab finished?

bbj0920 wrote:

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

Is it really necessary to usr a better mp3 owo?
If it is, I will change it

Yes. tasuke's mp3 is cleaner, louder. Sounds much better to me.

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

btw, is your collab finished?

Working on it.

-Tochi wrote:

• 
  

  General

1. Unused hitsounds: soft-hitfinish.wav mute sound has used in expert and pochiko diff
2. Useless green line(s) over red (no SV changes): 00:09:878 - (All Diffs except Starfy's Normal and Chu's Easy)
3. Volumes on the green and red line should be there same: 00:09:878 - (All Diffs except Starfy's Normal, Chu's Easy, Insane and Light Insane)
4. Inherit (green) timing line is unsnapped in Light Insane diff: 00:52:997
5. Same as above, but in Insane diff: 00:52:997 - 02:03:630
6. Same as above in Hard diff.

fixed all

• 
  

  Pochiko

1. Check AiMod for the unsnapped objects. fixed all
2. 00:10:970 (8,1) - Kinda too long distance, it plays better when the circle is closer to the kickslider. fixed
3. 00:20:345 (2,1) - Avoid this tiny overlap, kinda annoys the reading/beautiful placement lol. fixed
4. 00:23:002 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I guess this is fine since it's the hardest diff, but i recommend you to consider making it smaller spacing since it's a bit too sudden. fixed
5. 00:48:627 (9) - NC here. 00:49:565 - Remove NC, 00:49:878 - Add NC, fits more, the NCs looked kinda random tbh.yea you are right
6. 00:52:689 (3) - Consider making this more visible so it's not hard to read by not stacking it: http://puu.sh/mMYhs/13545c2a3f.jpg other modder just told me to overlap this part, i will consider about it
7. 00:55:346 (6,7) - Convert to a slider so it fits more with the vocal since you follow it here 00:54:720 (4,5) - Feels a bit out of place to have circles here when you just followed the vocal. The sentence in the song isn't done yet, and if you change to instrument, it would be sudden and random to play. Try this if you don't know how to change it: http://puu.sh/mMYye/80f1583b46.jpg
8. 01:05:033 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Consider making the spacing between the 2/4's bigger to avoid confusing, or make the spacing on the 2/4 smaller, so it's more clear that it's 2/4. i dont get it =w=
9. 01:11:439 (2,2) - Stacking these is kinda confusing to read imo, try to move 01:11:908 (2) - to x:66 y:183 like: 02:27:377 (1,2,1,2) - fixed
10. 01:23:158 (1,2) - Ctrl+G? keep
11. 01:32:064 (5,1) - Awkward spacing here since this part is jumpy, i suggest to make it bigger. fixed
12. 03:15:814 (5,2) - Make it symmetrical by copying one of the sliders? keep
13. 03:22:220 (1,2,3) - Way to unexpected due to the spacing, i highly recommend you to make it smaller. fixed

• 
  

  Expert

1. 00:16:128 (1,1,2) - Looks cool, but be aware that it's confusing, consider making it more readable. keep
2. 00:20:971 - Why not add a circle? fixed
3. 00:24:878 (1,2,1) - Way to unexpected due to the spacing, i highly recommend you to make it smaller. At least make it visible like 00:34:878 (1,2,3) - fixed
4. 01:11:128 (1,1,1) - Same as before, make the sliders faster like the first one if you decide to keep it.
5. 02:42:221 (1,2) - Spacing is way too small for this part.fixed
6. 03:28:471 (5,2) - Avoid this tiny overlap, looks more clean like that. fixed

• 
  

  Extra

1. 00:12:378 (1,2,3,4) - Leads to a sldierbreak, try making it smaller. fixed
2. 00:53:940 (3,4,5) - Awkward spacing, make it more consistent for a better flow. fixed
3. 01:23:628 (1,3) - Avoid this tiny overlap so it looks more clean. fixed
4. 01:29:721 (6,1) - Really awkward spacing, please make it more consistent. fixed
5. 02:48:315 (7,1) - Same as above. just a small move here
6. 03:19:253 - Add a circle here instead with the clap, and start the spinner here? 03:19:331 - fixed

Good luck!

DropPopCandy wrote:

Heyo! I've already modded this map (and amazing progress btw) but I was playing the Insane diff and I found a something that confused me, that being the doubles from 00:39:878 (1) to 00:46:674 (6) being really confusing and even now looking at it in the editor I don't understand what rhythm it's going off of. I really love the progress this map has made since last year and I can't wait to see it ranked!

UnLock- wrote:

Hello! I'm come from your queue (Sorry about Late Modding ;_;)

M4M : https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/4823758/

General

1. Offset -20. check with playback rate 25%
2. Off Widescreen Support

fixed all

Pochiko

1. How about add circle in 00:37:612 here? its not overmapping and it make funny rhythm jumps here, a triplet will be weird
2. 00:52:689 (3) - Move to 16 256. it will be make intro's impact strongly fixed
3. 01:05:033 (1,2) - Ctrl G? Idk why you make this flow other modder just fixed here, so keep it
4. I think your map is follow drum sound. so I wonder why you don't insert note in 01:45:815 - here. how about make 1/2 slider in 01:45:658 (6) - here? add a note
5. Its just my suggestion, How about Ctrl G 03:44:252 (1,2) - and 03:45:189 (1,2) - ? if you follow this, this jump pattern will be highlighted but is weird when you play it..

Expert

1. 00:33:315 (7,8) - Ctrl G and move 7 to 344 60. It will be make better flow with 1 slider keep
2. How about add circle in 01:06:284 here? I think current beat is little boring for higher players. keep
3. 01:06:128 - Idk why this part's sv is x2.00 little mistake, fixed it
4. Its just my suggestion. Delete 02:20:190 (3,4) - ,02:20:815 (6,7) - them and Swap NC 02:19:721 (4,1) - here. I know this part has vocal sound but drum is stopped in here. my suggestion will make better sence keep

Uhh.... very long song @~@
Done! sorry for short modding... but your map is very good so I can't found other problem
GL!

RyoKazuka wrote:

so many 5 stars

; w ;

so many peeps modding Insane and above, Hard and Light Insane is left out

Hard's spacing consistency needs more fixing
comparing spaces like this 00:12:358 (1,2) - and 00:14:545 (4,5) - makes Hard very inconsistent while the other parts are normally mapped whit its ' default spacing '
I highly recommend using Distance Snap for this case

i had fixed all the DS before, and i know there is some place that have different DS, but i dont want to change it, if this is unrankable, i will fixed it

In Light Insane

00:09:858 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this is too intense for a slow part like that and also for a ' Light Insane '
consider making these into 2 repeat 1/4 sliders so that it matches with rhythm's intensity
fixed this part
also, in cases like these 00:24:858 (1,2,3) -
I highly recommend you copy the 1st slider and paste it, then rotate it so that it flows and the shape matches, it makes the map tidy as well
fixed this part
In any cases, I see Light Insane is more to Insane because of the intense triplets and quintet
same goes to jumps

but the triplet are fit to music to it wont be a problem when you are playing

I wish you good luck on this set and put my tips into consideration !
PM me if you have anything to ask

[/b]

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

RyoKazuka wrote:

so many 5 stars

; w ;

so many peeps modding Insane and above, Hard and Light Insane is left out

Hard's spacing consistency needs more fixing
comparing spaces like this 00:12:358 (1,2) - and 00:14:545 (4,5) - makes Hard very inconsistent while the other parts are normally mapped whit its ' default spacing '
I highly recommend using Distance Snap for this case

i had fixed all the DS before, and i know there is some place that have different DS, but i dont want to change it, if this is unrankable, i will fixed it

It is not unrankable its just that, I dont really see any reason to do such spacings in Hard

[/b]

thanks for mod

RyoKazuka wrote:

]00:19:858 (3) - I like the idea of blanketing here but 00:21:733 (2) - this slider's tail could be blanket I believe it is blanketed
00:24:233 (2) - this overlaps in-game, Im sorry, im out of suggestions I think it would not affect a lot
00:26:420 (2,4) - also, avoid overlaps like this as well, it makes the map untidy Fixed
00:27:358 (4,5) - In Normal diffs usually, I dont recommend putting a note under a slider, its very unfriendly for new players Readable absolutely
00:38:295 (4,3) - overlaps in game, maybe use this http://sta.sh/012v10o3w4a3 ? if you do so, ctrl g 00:38:608 (1,2) - Fixed some
01:22:358 (3,4) - same reason as above, I appreciate that you made it consistent As well as before, it is readable, even for newbie players

1. 00:11:108 (1) - I would decrease the hitsound volume in this section by at least 10%, it's way too loud
2. Actually, in general, I wouldn't use such drastic hitsound volume changes. Example:Use a 10% change at 00:19:389 (2,1) - since there's only 10% change at 00:20:951 (4,1) - . Same thing at 00:22:670 (6,7) - The finishes already make it sound louder than the previous section, no need to go over the top with a 20% volume increase
3. 00:36:576 (3) - NC here, otherwise your 1/2 spacing at 00:36:108 (1,2) - looks exactly like your 1/1 spacing at 00:36:264 (2,3) -
4. 00:58:451 (1) - I wish you would use a different slider here since it represents your vocal as well and the start of the chorus again. for example, something like this http://puu.sh/noLbG/a06b33ea9f.jpg
5. 01:09:389 (3,4) - 01:16:733 (3,4) - be careful with spacing, these are basically touching
6. 03:06:733 (4) - I think a 1/4 repeat slider would be nice to represent drum and make rhythm more interesting
7. 03:27:201 (1,2,3) - pretty intense part of the song, so I wish you would represent this with bigger spacing

1. Lol, there's nothing light about it. this should really just be called insane
2. 00:13:373 - add a note here
3. 00:25:951 (5,1) - bigger spacing pls, your hard diff even has a larger spacing here
4. 00:49:076 (2,3) - fix stack
5. 00:57:201 (1,2,3,4,5) - even if you're following the instrument, the vocal intensity changes so much here that it feels weird to play. Maybe you could try successively increasing DS between each note http://puu.sh/noMGc/b444ec804c.jpg
6. 01:15:326 (2) - break this into a note+slider so you don't miss drum beat at 01:15:483 -
7. 01:29:858 (1) - why not continue pattern and place this at [72, 320]?
8. 03:06:733 (1,2,3) - hard to tell this is 1/3 rhythm, so it might be better to make this a 1/3 repeat slider

1. and this should really be extra, but since you already have an extra...idk
2. 00:25:326 (4,5,6,7,8,1) - the song intensity feels pretty constant here, so I don't think the jump spacing should keep increasing.
3. since 01:03:608 (1) - and 01:04:233 (3,4) - sound identical, you should use the pattern to represent both
4. 01:13:608 (1,2) - avoid overlap. same at 01:32:358 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) -
5. 02:23:295 (4) - this should be closer to [~270, ~209] for your pattern

MokouSmoke wrote:

from my queue~
[Hard]

1. 00:11:108 (1) - I would decrease the hitsound volume in this section by at least 10%, it's way too loud decrease to 50%
2. Actually, in general, I wouldn't use such drastic hitsound volume changes. Example:Use a 10% change at 00:19:389 (2,1) - since there's only 10% change at 00:20:951 (4,1) - . Same thing at 00:22:670 (6,7) - The finishes already make it sound louder than the previous section, no need to go over the top with a 20% volume increase 00:18:608 (1,2) - follow the vocal and 00:19:858 - follow the music, and you can heard 00:19:858 - has a lower rhythm then other parts, so i decrease from 50 to 20, 00:22:983 - you can heard the down beat at the music here, and its the same with all the rhythm after, so i use 60 here since i use 60 in this pattern
3. 00:36:576 (3) - NC here, otherwise your 1/2 spacing at 00:36:108 (1,2) - looks exactly like your 1/1 spacing at 00:36:264 (2,3) - fixed
4. 00:58:451 (1) - I wish you would use a different slider here since it represents your vocal as well and the start of the chorus again. for example, something like this http://puu.sh/noLbG/a06b33ea9f.jpg the flow will be kinda bad
5. 01:09:389 (3,4) - 01:16:733 (3,4) - be careful with spacing, these are basically touching fixed
6. 03:06:733 (4) - I think a 1/4 repeat slider would be nice to represent drum and make rhythm more interesting maybe a 1/3
7. 03:27:201 (1,2,3) - pretty intense part of the song, so I wish you would represent this with bigger spacing unnecessary since it's a hard diff

[Light Insane]

1. Lol, there's nothing light about it. this should really just be called insane why...? it would be weird with 2 insane
2. 00:13:373 - add a note here for what = =? the music doesnt sound like a triplet here...
3. 00:25:951 (5,1) - bigger spacing pls, your hard diff even has a larger spacing here there is no 00:26:264 (2) - slider in hard diff..., and this part of the hard diff doesnt really got a large spacing
4. 00:49:076 (2,3) - fix stack the stack is purposely
5. 00:57:201 (1,2,3,4,5) - even if you're following the instrument, the vocal intensity changes so much here that it feels weird to play. Maybe you could try successively increasing DS between each note http://puu.sh/noMGc/b444ec804c.jpg fixed, alose fix 02:13:451 -
6. 01:15:326 (2) - break this into a note+slider so you don't miss drum beat at 01:15:483 - fixed
7. 01:29:858 (1) - why not continue pattern and place this at [72, 320]? cant move to 72 320 so i move all the pattern here
8. 03:06:733 (1,2,3) - hard to tell this is 1/3 rhythm, so it might be better to make this a 1/3 repeat slider i would like to use notes instead of slider since this isnt a hard diff

[Insane]

1. and this should really be extra, but since you already have an extra...idk same above
2. 00:25:326 (4,5,6,7,8,1) - the song intensity feels pretty constant here, so I don't think the jump spacing should keep increasing. fixed
3. since 01:03:608 (1) - and 01:04:233 (3,4) - sound identical, you should use the pattern to represent both fixed
4. 01:13:608 (1,2) - avoid overlap. same at 01:32:358 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - fixed
5. 02:23:295 (4) - this should be closer to [~270, ~209] for your pattern fixed

Sorry, I can't really mod the higher diffs, but as a general comment, I'm wondering why you made so many 5.5+ star diffs. Generally, this is done to express a variety of different styles for the same song, but from my perspective, the top 3 diffs use basically the same style with just some slight differences in the spacing. It feels redundant to have so many.
you know there isnt a expert diff and a pochiko diff at first, and something happens with me and the map, so i make more diffs on it, At first expert diff and an remap Extra, and most people likes my remap extra diff, but there is still people like the extra diff, so i change the Remap Extra diff to expert, and why im making a pochiko diff? not much to say, just want to express my mapping.
Although the style is mostly the same, but i want to make the player that have a higher rank to have fun on this map, cause i think it would be really bored to the high rank player if there is only a few diff on a mapset, and the player that have low rank, they are still able to play this map, and even with pp, isnt it good ?
Well anyways, good luck!