Performance Points feedback and suggestions (osu!mania)

posted
Total Posts
628
show more
Staiain
The hype continues, waiting for server implementation :')
Nanatsu
PLZ INCLUDE RANDOM MODE RANK SCORE TOO
MAAAAAAAAAAAAAS
DT nooooooooooooo

So terrible...
PyaKura

_S u w a k o_ wrote:

PLZ INCLUDE RANDOM MODE RANK SCORE TOO
How would you make it work with everyone playing the same map with different patterns everytime ? :c
Kamikaze
I'm against random being ranked, because it messes up mapper's work too much. It changes patterns that are supossed to be tricky into just random placed which makes it easier (not in all cases obv). I would love to see mirror mod ranked though, it would be perfect for 2p players and on one-hand bias maps
Halogen-

Tristan97 wrote:

So I know this may have already been discussed to an extent, but if the different keymodes are suppossed to be treated as different modes, then why are there not separate rankings for each keymode? That would help solve a lot of discrepancies with rankings and such.
I've wondered this myself. It seems like there's still some merit in valuing higher keymodes, but I don't understand why.

_S u w a k o_ wrote:

PLZ INCLUDE RANDOM MODE RANK SCORE TOO
Random is something that absolutely should never be ranked. Pattern deviations can cause one person's attempt at a map to be easier than someone else's. That kind of deviation has no place in ranking.
Nanatsu
if u guys thinks about fair, i think mirror mode would be fit and reasonable.

and the mirror is exist in hardrock mode. ( even they don't use it for mirror pattern )
Mwallx
Umm... Saw this thread casually.
I don't know much about other things but my opinion is that autoconvert must be unrankable.
As a player for years I can say that at least 95% autoconvert is not qualifyied to be rankable.
And about score,I think it's necessary to intensify the condition of combo.I met uncountable times
that situations like I was 96% 1 miss being beaten by 98% 30miss. It's just ridiculous.
Thanks for reading ._.
PyaKura
Scoring system is set in stone now, there's no way they're gonna change it. As for autoconverts this has been said and repeated again and again but they somehow want to keep them ranked >.>
Shoegazer
The only legitimate type of "random" mod should be mirror in my opinion, as the hand bias levels would be the same, just switched onto different hands. Using any other deviation of patterns would make the file's patterns too different from the original to really be compared legitimately. Little off-topic, but why isn't there a Mirror option for o!m anyway? Feels a little odd to have a random mod but not mirror.

also DT PP hype
Staiain
Any news on the DT PP front?
EtienneXC

Staiain wrote:

Any news on the DT PP front?
Demane

Staiain wrote:

Any news on the DT PP front?
Elementaires

Staiain wrote:

Any news on the DT PP front?
PyaKura

Staiain wrote:

Any news on the DT PP front?
Frustration

Staiain wrote:

Any news on the DT PP front?
Sillyveon
Posting this because this bug is not fixed. Yesterday I asked morisan7 to try Pipe Dream on 8K because it has a 6.22 star rating and offers approximately 400p with an A rank. I've compared his score to other people who has similar scores, and I noticed that some changes have been implemented to the pp system.

morisan7's score - 90.95% (194pp)


someone's score - 90.83% (399pp)


It seems like people who have tried this song recently do not get the same pp as the ones before. Please look into this problem, thank you.
Kamikaze
Good thing you've brought that up. In standard you guys have disabled pp from tag maps because of "pp abuse", basically one touchscreen player getting 555pp from one of the maps. So why do we still have autoconverts when you can get 350pp from some of them, and you get shit like pipe dream that gets 200pp for ss nomod and 650pp for s on 8k? That's clearly more abusing than one 555pp play, isn't it? And we do we HAVE to play autoconverts to be able to fight for top ranks? That's nonsense.
PyaKura
autoconverts

lol
abraker

Staiain wrote:

Any news on the DT PP front?
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply