Vroom vroom~
I'm an old player, and hosted tons of games. Be careful or I'll eat your soul--- I mean... wait no that's right.Sakura wrote:
No confirmation?
Vote: LadySuburu
Never played with you before
Lincolm wrote:
@LadySuburu : no RVS?
Why?LadySuburu wrote:
Lincolm wrote:
@LadySuburu : no RVS?
I rarely RVS.
pieguy1372 wrote:
don't do anything stupid plz
That's what im asking YOULincolm wrote:
Where is facepalm emo...
Do you want bring Jester in LyLo, seriously?
I like how people ended the day inbetween the time I went to bed, and the time I got home from work.BRBP wrote:
Vote: LadySuburu
Last online 28 hours ago, lol.
It lowers the number of people who could potentially be scum to 3 from 4.Lincolm wrote:
@LS : Why prefer NoLynch?
I don't see how it's possible to literally confirm someone in this setup.Lincolm wrote:
So, if I do something now that can confirm one of the townie, what do you think of it?
A little bit risky or not?
NevermindBRBP wrote:
But I don't understand how you can confirm anyone in this setup.
On what basis made you do this actually?BRBP wrote:
Vote: LadySuburu
Last online 28 hours ago, lol.
I completely forget this. Welp...BRBP wrote:
oh...
I guess we shouldn't do it anymore? Why would we take a risk that you actually are scum and end the game by voting LS, when the scum could just shoot you the night after you're confirmed? I guess it would help if we no lynch and scum refused to do any kills N2 and forward.
How do you know he was inactive in 28 hours?BRBP wrote:
I was stupid. I thought the night was 24 hours (when it was actually something like 30+) and assumed there was no kill because LS was inactive that time. I didn't realize that it's beneficial to scum to do a no kill before LS said so.
Have you heard of http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=...and_they_all_lived_happily_ever_after?Lincolm wrote:
If scum performed NoKill, there is a chance tomorrow will be NoKill also. What is the guarantee scum will kill tomorrow? Like I said before, if scum performed NoKill, NoLynch today only to prevent scum from NoKill action today, but there is no guarantee he will kill.
Lincolm wrote:
It doesn't matter for me if we want to lynch today or tomorrow.
These two together bug me a bit. If you think LyLo is better for scum than town, why doesn't it matter to you if we lynch today or tomorrow?Lincolm wrote:
Still, IMO LyLo is better for scum rather than town.
At least, this was what I thought.
NoHItter: I think he's town, but he's smart enough to pull off what he's doing if he were scum. (As I stated before.) He's not confirmed, but if he's scum I doubt we will win. The NoHItter scum possibility is mainly why I want to go to LyLo.Lincolm wrote:
@LS and BRBP : Read please. I mean, what do you think about other people.
Never heard (or read that) before. Read that, kinda stupid, but seems my theory about MyLo's better is right.LadySuburu wrote:
Have you heard of http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=...and_they_all_lived_happily_ever_after?
I already said it twice, I'm sure NH is 100% town.LadySuburu wrote:
These two together bug me a bit. If you think LyLo is better for scum than town, why doesn't it matter to you if we lynch today or tomorrow?
MyLo have 3 towns. The chance of scum quickhammer is greatly decreased rather than LyLo. In the MyLo, the discussion generates more rather than LyLo. As I see, LyLo usually ended fast rather than MyLo (I have seen twice MyLo condition, but not in the game, once in the MyLo (in this web, as my second game mafia)).LadySuburu wrote:
@Lincolm: Why do you prefer Mylo to LyLo (and think it's better for scum in Lylo than town?)
That's very stupid read. Why I prefer confirm NH as town today WHEN I could kill him at night?BRBP wrote:
My 'choice' would probably be Lincolm. It's possible you were willing to risk bringing LS to L-1 because you're scum and already know NH is town and knew he wouldn't hammer. When I pointed out that it's not really helpful to risk it like that when the scum could just kill him the night after, you said you forgot. Nothing too scummy, but it's the best lead I have at the moment.
Even a town want to find the scum. I don't get you logic. Your logic basically already "Lincolm is 100% scum". Tell me again how I just fake scumhunting.BRBP wrote:
At least it would look like you're trying to help town / you're town, and it wouldn't cause any problems for you later if you were scum, since you could just kill him if we decide to no lynch.Lincolm wrote:
That's very stupid read. Why I prefer confirm NH as town today WHEN I could kill him at night?
Lincolm wrote:
Your logic basically already "Lincolm is 100% scum".
BRBP wrote:
Nothing too scummy, but it's the best lead I have at the moment.
Happily ever after is a detterant to scum continuing to not send a kill in. If they want to kill then we get what we want, and if they don't, then they don't win.Lincolm wrote:
Now is very stupid. Everyone said NH is town, why we are going to LyLo?
I don't even know why "Oh let's NL" when everyone agree there is one town is towniest.
If you suggest "Let's Happily Ever After", do you guarantee scum want to do it?
I already know what it means. I asked before, which theory do you think, scum forgot to send kill or action NoKill? I assumed by your answer is the latter, because you thought this can be ended with Happily Ever After.LadySuburu wrote:
Happily ever after is a detterant to scum continuing to not send a kill in. If they want to kill then we get what we want, and if they don't, then they don't win.
Do you even need confirmed scum to vote scum? What are you going to do in LyLo if there is a kill and you're survive?LadySuburu wrote:
As I've stated before, I want to nolynch because while I believe NoHItter is town, he is not confirmed.
Then if it is you, how do you tell us what you find in the back? Why not analyze all of the conversation now and tell us what you find?LadySuburu wrote:
Assuming it's not me, of course.
I was talking about re-analyzing conversations after an alignment flip. There's a lot more you can find even in a 1 Scum game.Lincolm wrote:
Then if it is you, how do you tell us what you find in the back? Why not analyze all of the conversation now and tell us what you find?
Do you even need confirmed scum to vote scum? What are you going to do in LyLo if there is a kill and you're survive?I've answered this about three times now at least. If you can't understand my explanation then there's no point in continuing on about it. I'm still going to vote No Lynch.
4 Person - 3 Person agree 1 person is town - why do we even need No Lynch?
I'm talking about what if you're not survive tomorrow. Seems you're sure you're going to survive.LadySuburu wrote:
I was talking about re-analyzing conversations after an alignment flip. There's a lot more you can find even in a 1 Scum game.
And I already said it more than 3 times without your opinion about mine.LadySuburu wrote:
I've answered this about three times now at least. If you can't understand my explanation then there's no point in continuing on about it. I'm still going to vote No Lynch.
I'm pretty sure I've mentioned my death as a possibility multiple times. I'm also pretty sure that all of us have said that NH is very likely the one who would be NK'd.Lincolm wrote:
I'm talking about what if you're not survive tomorrow. Seems you're sure you're going to survive.
And I already said it more than 3 times without your opinion about mine.I disagree about MyLo being better for town than LyLo. I disagree with pretty much all of your reasoning for lynching today.
It doesn't matter for me if we want to lynch today or tomorrow.You've been really rather adamant that we lynch today, and saying the other option is stupid, over and over.
No Lynch is still good idea as this prevent scum to act "no kill", though I'm p sure 100% NoHitter is town for this.Okay, so NL is a good idea, right? You change your mind later, see below.
MyLo have 3 towns. The chance of scum quickhammer is greatly decreased rather than LyLo. In the MyLo, the discussion generates more rather than LyLo. As I see, LyLo usually ended fast rather than MyLo (I have seen twice MyLo condition, but not in the game, once in the MyLo (in this web, as my second game mafia)).Yes, and LyLo gives chance for discussion AFTER MyLo. Yes, Lylo ends quicker than MyLo because if one townie puts a wrong vote out the scum hammers. However, any decent player will wait until they're sure to do that. In addition, having three unconfirmed towns (even IF we think that one of them is extremely likely to be town) is worse than two towns, and a dead townie that we can take their posts for face value. (In MyLo vs LyLo)
And this is really stupid for NoLynch.NH voted No Lynch at start, so I assume he prefers it. (Though, he's being oddly non-vocal in our discussion, starting to poke at my fear of NH scum.)
I prefer lynch now.
I'm pretty sure you know that the one who will perform the kill is mafia, not town. The highest probability is NH, but like I said, what is the guarantee of it? If mafia really performed night kill yesterday, there is a chance he will night kill again. So, Happy Every After? Pretty sure that is idiot when we have one person we can trust as town.LadySuburu wrote:
I'm pretty sure I've mentioned my death as a possibility multiple times. I'm also pretty sure that all of us have said that NH is very likely the one who would be NK'd.
And yet, you're very adamant that our NL will be GOOD for town, WITHOUT any disagreement with my opinion UNTIL NOW. What is your guarantee for that? How do you know what is going to happen tomorrow?!LadySuburu wrote:
You've been really rather adamant that we lynch today, and saying the other option is stupid, over and over.
Read that. The bold.Lincolm wrote:
No Lynch is still good idea as this prevent scum to act "no kill", though I'm p sure 100% NoHitter is town for this.
I said it again, the mafia is performed the kill. And the one who have high chance to get killed is NoHitter and how is the differences with three of us + NoHitter which can provide anything TODAY? You only said NoHitter can be mafia, but YOU HAVE TOWNREAD IN HIM. It doesn't mean, "hey, I ever play with NoHitter, and he is too slick for me". Hey, then why don't try to provide something to the other players that you can trust more?LadySuburu wrote:
Yes, and LyLo gives chance for discussion AFTER MyLo. Yes, Lylo ends quicker than MyLo because if one townie puts a wrong vote out the scum hammers. However, any decent player will wait until they're sure to do that. In addition, having three unconfirmed towns (even IF we think that one of them is extremely likely to be town) is worse than two towns, and a dead townie that we can take their posts for face value. (In MyLo vs LyLo)
NH voted No Lynch at start, so I assume he prefers it. (Though, he's being oddly non-vocal in our discussion, starting to poke at my fear of NH scum.)LadySuburu wrote:
And this is really stupid for NoLynch.
I prefer lynch now.
BRBP wrote:
I don't agree lynching LS is a good idea.