MinNin wrote:

Ashton wrote:

Three dudes in speedos?

Mmmm

Bulge fanservice!

i mean i'm not gay but it'd be pretty hot no homo

Hydreigon wrote:

abraker wrote:

Yea you can defend ranked all you want. However you cant deny that that there is still ongoing effort to prevent abuse. Recent effort to fix veto abuse is one example. Last restructure was when QAT got changed to NAT. I bet ranked roles will go through another restructuring in about a year and a half.

abraker wrote:

Yea you can defend ranked all you want. However you cant deny that that there is still ongoing effort to prevent abuse. Recent effort to fix veto abuse is one example. Last restructure was when QAT got changed to NAT. I bet ranked roles will go through another restructuring in about a year and a half.

Ashton wrote:

No system that is not run by people is going to fix the ‘constant turmoil’ or whatever

ColdTooth wrote:

>the ranked system will always be changing

so does that means critical hit will actually have bns modding it this year? or next decade?

Ashton wrote:

ColdTooth wrote:

>the ranked system will always be changing

so does that means critical hit will actually have bns modding it this year? or next decade?

How much BNs did you end up asking?

Your map seems like one some will be interested in. Pimp and Andrea are the first ones that come to mind but its a clean map with an old mapping style and some bns love maps like that

But yeah, even if youve already asked every single bn and they all said they arent interested youd need to wait for new ones to come in. Its really shitty that is the case but its not like we can start forcing bns to nominate maps they arent onterested in even if they are solid

ColdTooth wrote:

Ashton wrote:

ColdTooth wrote:

>the ranked system will always be changing

so does that means critical hit will actually have bns modding it this year? or next decade?

How much BNs did you end up asking?

Your map seems like one some will be interested in. Pimp and Andrea are the first ones that come to mind but its a clean map with an old mapping style and some bns love maps like that

But yeah, even if youve already asked every single bn and they all said they arent interested youd need to wait for new ones to come in. Its really shitty that is the case but its not like we can start forcing bns to nominate maps they arent onterested in even if they are solid

I actually asked pimp, since he's my friend, but he would only bubble if I found a second BN. Every single BN's profile I have looked at, ~70% of them they don't mod tech, or just prefer anime music over anything. I think I overall asked ~5 BNs, and they all just said no.

I have one more BN I can ask but right now I'm not in the grandest of moods to even do something like this, and they are currently closed so I can either wait (that and I need to wait for my new headphones to come in...) or I can just hope a BN in the future can look at the map and give it some thought.

Seriously, trying not to offend the BN team here but goddamn it's really annoying to find the right person, especially when they're all closed.

Ashton wrote:

ColdTooth wrote:

Ashton wrote:

ColdTooth wrote:

>the ranked system will always be changing

so does that means critical hit will actually have bns modding it this year? or next decade?

How much BNs did you end up asking?

Your map seems like one some will be interested in. Pimp and Andrea are the first ones that come to mind but its a clean map with an old mapping style and some bns love maps like that

But yeah, even if youve already asked every single bn and they all said they arent interested youd need to wait for new ones to come in. Its really shitty that is the case but its not like we can start forcing bns to nominate maps they arent onterested in even if they are solid

I actually asked pimp, since he's my friend, but he would only bubble if I found a second BN. Every single BN's profile I have looked at, ~70% of them they don't mod tech, or just prefer anime music over anything. I think I overall asked ~5 BNs, and they all just said no.

I have one more BN I can ask but right now I'm not in the grandest of moods to even do something like this, and they are currently closed so I can either wait (that and I need to wait for my new headphones to come in...) or I can just hope a BN in the future can look at the map and give it some thought.

Seriously, trying not to offend the BN team here but goddamn it's really annoying to find the right person, especially when they're all closed.

Don't take my word for it but honestly I wouldn't consider critical hit a tech map. If it is one, it's a very soft one because I think tech refers to the mapping style moreso than the song.

Zelzatter Zero wrote:

Uh guys, does the current event about Monstrata getting banned because of saying Cheri's bg low-quality counted as mapping drama?

Ashton wrote:

I thiught monstrata isnt banned?

abraker wrote:

beatmapsets/1182288/discussion/-/generalAll#/1648982 - Mapper is criticized for using self drawn "low quality" background

MinNin wrote:

people literally have their bg dim on max, why do they care about a bg

ColdTooth wrote:

someone's just gunna get triggered by one simple thing and tries to force a change

MinNin wrote:

people literally have their bg dim on max, why do they care about a bg

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

Monstrata more than likely does 100% dim. Why does he even care about the "quality" of a bg if he won't see it anyway?

Zelzatter Zero wrote:

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

Monstrata more than likely does 100% dim. Why does he even care about the "quality" of a bg if he won't see it anyway?

Actually the whole situation is not that serious. Monstrata was just joking about the bg quality without being acknowledged that the Cheri drawn this herself. After that he changed his comment into constructive criticism. He even confirmed that the joke was made by looking at bg preview for like 0.5 second.

abraker wrote:

you've been playing since 2010 so your opinion is not relevant /s

Ashton wrote:

Additionally, Monstrata kept babbling on Twitter Donald Trump style about the situation despite saying the discussion "never had to happen".

Flanster wrote:

When they mad its not a swimsuit bg

McEndu wrote:

Bump

abraker wrote:

Not too drama intensive, but I think is still a worthy addition

Map is deemed to be too stamina intensive even for top players. Mapper argues difficulty shouldn't be used to judge map quality
beatmapsets/812539/discussion/1704294/general#/446564

Li Syaoran wrote:

beatmapsets/1151389/discussion/-/generalAll#/1708181

map's bg was seen as "disrespect to the original artist" as it's an edited version of the original bg. mapper argues that it's to represent the music.

q9za wrote:

Li Syaoran wrote:

beatmapsets/1151389/discussion/-/generalAll#/1708181

map's bg was seen as "disrespect to the original artist" as it's an edited version of the original bg. mapper argues that it's to represent the music.

That argument is one of the dumbest shit I've ever seen. Just why even bring it up, the mapper trying to make the BG fit with the song.

Zelzatter Zero wrote:

q9za wrote:

Li Syaoran wrote:

beatmapsets/1151389/discussion/-/generalAll#/1708181

map's bg was seen as "disrespect to the original artist" as it's an edited version of the original bg. mapper argues that it's to represent the music.

That argument is one of the dumbest shit I've ever seen. Just why even bring it up, the mapper trying to make the BG fit with the song.

agree. Like, there's even someone try to crop the portrait image (the original one is still SFW) to import into the game for the sake of song appropriation so why can't this be?

At least it's not unrelated to the song like Sotarks' Gold Dust.

Aiseca wrote:

Mapping and politics ain't different.

abraker wrote:

comment thread ended with a fizzle, but gonna document it for sake of keeping track of bg issues cause they seem to pop up more often these days and I get the feeling that might end up leading to something bigger eventually

Hydreigon wrote:

bg drama is getting more popular now that it even could have its own separate thread lel.


but on-topic, as an artist, I'm fine with people making little edits like that, as long as they still credit the artist and its not a huge edit that affects the entire drawing.

renzthegreat wrote:

cute compilation, will bookmark

levesterz wrote:

lol
gigantic otn is not inappropiate then?

Zelzatter Zero wrote:

Imagine having bunches of eroge songs ranked and still veto a map for having inappropriate lyrics.

kinda double standard for me

eblf2013 wrote:

It seems like as long the song has safe lyrics, it doesn't matter if it comes from the 177013 anime adaptation even.

Li Syaoran wrote:

wait 177013 has an anime adaptation?

Li Syaoran wrote:

eblf2013 wrote:

It seems like as long the song has safe lyrics, it doesn't matter if it comes from the 177013 anime adaptation even.

wait 177013 has an anime adaptation?

Li Syaoran wrote:

beatmapsets/1114770/discussion/-/generalAll#/1572249

song is too inappropriate for osu!. mapper argues that other maps have inappropriate songs too

ColdTooth wrote:

Li Syaoran wrote:

beatmapsets/1114770/discussion/-/generalAll#/1572249

song is too inappropriate for osu!. mapper argues that other maps have inappropriate songs too

that map got ranked and i still think it's inappropriate, and im the one that mapped surprise buttsecks and ranked it in 2014

Li Syaoran wrote:

ColdTooth wrote:

Li Syaoran wrote:

beatmapsets/1114770/discussion/-/generalAll#/1572249

song is too inappropriate for osu!. mapper argues that other maps have inappropriate songs too

that map got ranked and i still think it's inappropriate, and im the one that mapped surprise buttsecks and ranked it in 2014

i mean ig it is considering 99% is about sex

Aiseca wrote:

It's 2020. People needs to find something to work with ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Ashton wrote:

People literally writing essays..

Zelzatter Zero wrote:

Ashton wrote:

People literally writing essays..

I literally don't even know how human have ability to read this whole stuff...