Easier said then done, come on guys, you can do it 
forum
Make this post the most viewed osu topic ever.
posted
Total Posts
45
dream on
didn't even take 2 hours for this to end up in osu!trashcan. nice
haha
lets play robeats
lets play Etterna instead ;pPositoniX wrote:
lets play robeats
I think it's easier to beat cookiezi instead.
yup, it will take 7 years to get 10k here and by then that thread of ITT2 will be about 1.5 million views
Surely there's another thread out there somewhere with more... hm...
Yup! Your thoughts on the user above you FG is 850k views.
Asking person below is 543k
Ban game is 327k
Oh, that's just in OT...
The post you IRL thread in GD is 1.78 million views
There's a russian thread with 2.7 million views tho
Someone might find more... but in the words of Flanster...
Flanster wrote:
dream on
nO, rObEtLights wrote:
lets play Etterna instead ;pPositoniX wrote:
lets play robeats
Trash. Stock SM is so much better because Etterna is really buggy. I only have it because they have packs that you can only download within the Etterna client.Lights wrote:
lets play Etterna instead ;pPositoniX wrote:
lets play robeats
I'm glad you have the patience for SM- I do not.johnmedina999 wrote:
Trash. Stock SM is so much better because Etterna is really buggy. I only have it because they have packs that you can only download within the Etterna client.Lights wrote:
lets play Etterna instead ;pPositoniX wrote:
lets play robeats
pretty sure only views from osu accounts count as views, and since osu is super strict over multi accounting i doubt that viewbots existsamX500 wrote:
are viewbot a thing on forums thread?
You'd have a higher chance at this if you ask 4chan.
On second thought, don't do that.
On second thought, don't do that.
I think this topic will be not the most viewed osu topic ever meow
woof
Unless you make a bot to make your account automatically visit this thread.PositoniX wrote:
pretty sure only views from osu accounts count as views, and since osu is super strict over multi accounting i doubt that viewbots existsamX500 wrote:
are viewbot a thing on forums thread?
To do that we would need to know how view are counted when viewed by only one individual. I suppose that a view is only counted when there is a new post to view. If that is the case, this thread would also need to have a huge amount of post to allow a single user to get tons of view and the amount of view gotten by that one user can never exceed the total number of post. If they were two users, they could chain comment and viewing but that would likely get a banhammer and a thread deletion once the mod notices a thread that gets so many view per day.eblf2013 wrote:
Unless you make a bot to make your account automatically visit this thread.PositoniX wrote:
pretty sure only views from osu accounts count as views, and since osu is super strict over multi accounting i doubt that viewbots existsamX500 wrote:
are viewbot a thing on forums thread?
view count is counted by individual account. It's unique view count. Also accounts like google's spider bots dont work in OT. Thats why you cant search anything in OT from google.
Congratulations on getting your wish, my little friend!!!
can you imagine trying to load a thread like that on the new website? haha i'd rather commit toaster bath
abraker wrote:
Thats why you cant search anything in OT from google.
What Did Abaker Mean By This?
osu woman
Wait... I thought you couldn't see off-topic if you weren't logged in
maybe google is evolving and getting smarter... we've been compromisedabraker wrote:
Wait... I thought you couldn't see off-topic if you weren't logged in
This is a breach in OT's national security!
I suggest making a thread with the goal of the least viewed.
That should be easy
What is your strategy of stopping people from viewing it?abraker wrote:
That should be easy
Locking it almost instantly?Flanster wrote:
What is your strategy of stopping people from viewing it?abraker wrote:
That should be easy
Well if I sad that, then it would become an anti-strategy. This means people will look for it and view it on purpose. I got an idea tho. I'm gonna make a leaderboard of people with least viewed threads. Thread needs to be at least a month old and not on first page before it can be counted. Also threads won't be linked so not to encourage people to mess up the count.
In addition to bumping.abraker wrote:
Also threads won't be linked so not to encourage people to mess up the count.
>GMT probs
the curseabraker wrote:
>GMT probs
is it possible to make a thread invisible? because that'd be a sure-fire way to do it
Some deleted threads are marked for admins only i think.Lights wrote:
is it possible to make a thread invisible? because that'd be a sure-fire way to do it
^ technically not invisible tho
well, better than public visibilityabraker wrote:
^ technically not invisible tho
it's called the wastelands
it was once legend, but was confirmed to exist. A lot of threads the mods kill lay there. Some were innocent. Some were not. It's a place that bears no justice.
it was once legend, but was confirmed to exist. A lot of threads the mods kill lay there. Some were innocent. Some were not. It's a place that bears no justice.
No threads are innocent.
I'd like to dispute this notion. this thread is innocent. no wrongdoing whatsoeverDeath wrote:
No threads are innocent.
yet...
You think so? There are some dark things under the table of every thread.Lights wrote:
I'd like to dispute this notion. this thread is innocent. no wrongdoing whatsoeverDeath wrote:
No threads are innocent.
It's RUSSIAN HACKER!!!!!!!!!!ColdTooth wrote:
There's a russian thread with 2.7 million views tho
...abraker wrote:
What else can it lick?