hm if you are not going to make it limited to having similar sets for the same song coming from your last post, then wouldn't the problem still be pretty problematic?
While there is people who is not gonna cared or abused the system that much to a degree to do such a thing but if the problem is these mapsets then as you see here for a recent example with you vetoing sotarks set now that he has 3 sets of the same song going to rank similar gds of the ones on the original set and it isn't like the gders themselves cannot just host the set either, causing your attempt, to not turn out as pretty and while I do not know what is in turn for them in the future, i don't imagine this coming out the way 1 would want it to
While there is ways to limit it, it just seems like the way you approaching it is only making the problem worst then it actually improves the situation because now we have even more bloated content and these guidelines won't do a damn thing to them and adding more is prune to harm others who has nothing to do with this
@mun wouldn't that simply be solved by sotarks himself to just let the gders host the set, since if those sets aren't allowed to be rank for being similar, then wouldn't that go against any other person who just so happen to have a similar mapping style that wants to ranked that set for such reasons, there isn't much you can really do on that and things like hitsound for such a short set can easily be done quickly in a matter of 30mins or possibly less and same for bg.
While this would make ranking those sets a bit harder for the people who abuses it, but at the same time when you have people such as sotarks who can easily whipped up the gds needed and have the bns for it, it isn't a big enough brick wall to keep it from still being as problematic and as said before, it just harms others in the process of doing these things
Maybe I am misunderstanding it so forgive me as I am just skimming through but I just don't really see how this will go through without just interfering too much with mapping freedom in general rather than mainly the sets that people have the more concern with ^^;
(also forgive my grammar I typed this up pretty quickly)
While there is people who is not gonna cared or abused the system that much to a degree to do such a thing but if the problem is these mapsets then as you see here for a recent example with you vetoing sotarks set now that he has 3 sets of the same song going to rank similar gds of the ones on the original set and it isn't like the gders themselves cannot just host the set either, causing your attempt, to not turn out as pretty and while I do not know what is in turn for them in the future, i don't imagine this coming out the way 1 would want it to
While there is ways to limit it, it just seems like the way you approaching it is only making the problem worst then it actually improves the situation because now we have even more bloated content and these guidelines won't do a damn thing to them and adding more is prune to harm others who has nothing to do with this
@mun wouldn't that simply be solved by sotarks himself to just let the gders host the set, since if those sets aren't allowed to be rank for being similar, then wouldn't that go against any other person who just so happen to have a similar mapping style that wants to ranked that set for such reasons, there isn't much you can really do on that and things like hitsound for such a short set can easily be done quickly in a matter of 30mins or possibly less and same for bg.
While this would make ranking those sets a bit harder for the people who abuses it, but at the same time when you have people such as sotarks who can easily whipped up the gds needed and have the bns for it, it isn't a big enough brick wall to keep it from still being as problematic and as said before, it just harms others in the process of doing these things
Maybe I am misunderstanding it so forgive me as I am just skimming through but I just don't really see how this will go through without just interfering too much with mapping freedom in general rather than mainly the sets that people have the more concern with ^^;
(also forgive my grammar I typed this up pretty quickly)