Reading the proposal, it seems to me that the potential loopholes of this proposal is within the proposed guideline itself. You need to iron out the wording, defined and objectively leaning.
abraker wrote:
solution is simple: fix ppdennischan wrote:
I agree with Yaspo and Maridius that something should be done about the excess amount of pp maps in the same set.
I find it ridiculous that we need to limit map designs because of a broken calculator. This should not happen.
Because thus far it has been one bandaid fix after another. A real solution to fixing pp has yet to be proposed. What you are failing to understand is that when pp is fixed this proposal will look archaic and as a desperate attempt. Its a short sighted solution.MiGGo wrote:
abraker wrote:
solution is simple: fix ppdennischan wrote:
I agree with Yaspo and Maridius that something should be done about the excess amount of pp maps in the same set.
I find it ridiculous that we need to limit map designs because of a broken calculator. This should not happen.
pp will never be perfect and it doesnt matter how many times pp is "fixed" there will always be someting to exploit and abuse. Stop blaming the pp system for mappers exploiting it, the pp doesnt exploit itself. Grow a backbone please and add this guideline so mapsets that deserve to be unranked jump map compilations stay in the graveyard.
Avoid having too many similar sections across difficulties in the same set.
Don't rank difficulties that were removed due to a veto without making adjustments.
Don't oversimplify extra difficulties.
Second, usually mapsets with a lot of difficulties tend to have shorter songs, which means that the play count will stack up quickly.
-Liban- wrote:
things
-Liban- wrote:
I think you're only doing this out of self interest trying to get rid of pp maps.
MaridiuS wrote:
Against the argument off "this will limit the freedom of mappers" well sorry it may but, maps are being ranked for the sake of the community not just the individual mapper that wants to rank it, you're not disallowed to map the song if your heart wills it.
MiGGo wrote:
pp will never be perfect and it doesnt matter how many times pp is "fixed" there will always be someting to exploit and abuse. Stop blaming the pp system for mappers exploiting it, the pp doesnt exploit itself. Grow a backbone please and add this guideline so mapsets that deserve to be unranked jump map compilations stay in the graveyard.
Pachiru wrote:
yaspo's proposal is interesting
there is no point having 5 insane with the same concept, same rhythm pattern, same difficulty and same movement. i don't think it would restrict mapset too hard tbh
yaspo wrote:
Similar maps of the same songs on different sets [...] require a full set to be made and more nominations, this evens out the amount of potential bloat causes
clayton wrote:
various things
clayton wrote:
things