1. 01:19:112 (4) - I think it would be worthwhile making this beat clickable since all the other big drum beats near here are
2. 02:01:842 (1) - I think you can reflect this pause in the song better, for example a slow SV, 3/4 slider, stacking on top of 02:02:247 (1) - etc, you could even try a combination
3. 03:22:680 - There is such a big beat here, why did you skip it?
4. 05:10:356 (1,2,3) - Using a lower spacing would be nice here to better reflect the lowered intensity in the song

Kisses wrote:

1. 01:19:112 (4) - I think it would be worthwhile making this beat clickable since all the other big drum beats near here are I think it's more of just an addition in the song, given how the vocals are in this part as well, the 3 main drum beats are at 01:18:139 (1,1,1) - in regards to why there are larger gaps at 01:20:734 (1,2,3,4) - it's to slow down the song a bit
2. 02:01:842 (1) - I think you can reflect this pause in the song better, for example a slow SV, 3/4 slider, stacking on top of 02:02:247 (1) - etc, you could even try a combination slowed down the slider even more
3. 03:22:680 - There is such a big beat here, why did you skip it? this verse and section is havily focused on vocals, so it emphasizes the ending of vocals at 03:22:518
4. 05:10:356 (1,2,3) - Using a lower spacing would be nice here to better reflect the lowered intensity in the song reduced spacing

Gabe wrote:

anything else to add here?

Nao Tomori wrote:

00:32:085 (4,1) - and so on, could you make these symmetrical things symmetrical so that it looks nicer I wanted to make them differ more, because the subsequent slider is on a stronger point in the music, so it moves in a different direction as to where it came from, thus making it symmetrical might affect that

00:40:518 (1) - doesnt really match the curve of the stream so it looks weird, open it up a bit adjusted it

00:46:193 (3,4) - the visual spacing here is tiny, it is kind of out of place but in terms of sliderhead they are quite far apart, with the previous slider moving away, it doesn't really seem so tiny visually? But I'll see if anyone points it out

00:50:572 (6,1,2) - the song has pretty clear syncopated emphasis here, since you map vocal oriented rhythm in other places this should be adjusted swapped the objects around

01:01:923 (4) - nc cuz new sound comes in? ok

01:18:139 (1) - think you could represent this section better just by following the held out synth rather than trying to do vocals as well, that way you highlight what makes it unique better. kinda feels too off from what I did though

01:25:923 (1,2) - ctrl g for vocal? changed 01:26:247 (2) - position instead

01:28:518 - i dont see why you use such high spacing for the really calm part, i think drastically lower sv and spacing would be better so that it feels really different from the surrounding parts... with the background music still being as intense as the previous section, I just intended to lower density, but keep the same speed

03:17:328 (1) - this is pretty awkward, a triple into 03:17:491 - would work way better imo keeping more faithful to the long sliders in this section

03:22:680 - this 1/1 gap is weird... how about a slider instead lol I stacked instead

03:35:328 (7,8,1,2,3) - i dont think this pattern fits because the song repeats the same phrase at 03:35:328 - and 03:35:977 - but you pattern puts 03:35:653 (1,2,3) - as equal and separate from 03:35:328 (7,8) - even though 03:35:328 (7,8,1) - is the musical phrase changed pattern

04:46:680 (7,8,1) - this random line jump between patterns plays really weirdly cuz you have a really strong back and forth movement set up and there isnt anything in the song actually dividing the two patterns it's 2 phrases of 2 bars of the build up, which makes up for the 2 patterns being similar but separate

[]

ur bg is kinda low rez, can you try and get a better one lol I see what I can find

Uta wrote:

hp 7 seems like a really hard, especialy with the overly complex rhythm. maybe 6 dropped to 6.1

"japanese anime" to tags done

00:15:869 - just a suggestion but would be cool if you separate spinner after spinner like some map I think a spinner all through it makes it the most complete atm

00:40:842 (2,3,4,5) - claps here and then 00:41:166 (1,2,3,4) - plus claps on each head sounds nice sure

01:09:301 - maybe add a slider here for the vocal emphasis just like what you did on 01:09:707 (3) - (are you sure that its 1/6 coz i think the vocal is 1/4 no?) I repeated the slider to 01:09:383 - seems like the other slider was supposed to be 3/4 yeah


01:55:761 - 01:56:734 - hs here and then maybe a finish on 01:57:058 (1) - added whistle, normal clap and finish respectively

02:08:410 - seems like this clap is inconsistent with the rest it's just the the rest without it don't coincide on the white line

00:25:761 (6,7) - distance is a bit over the top since everything else doesnt and it creates unpleasant feeling while playing, nerf abit nerfed I guess

01:12:950 - i abit dislike this part since its filled with high density jumps when the song is already calmed down comparing to others, see if you can maybe nerf stuff with sliders and not spamming circles I changed the pattern and reduced spacing, I think the circle-slider composition is fine as is

01:25:112 (4,5,6) - the angle of the jumps here seems to be transferred unwell, instead of 90 degrees angle can you maybe turn a bit sharp so that it would be more pleasant changed the direction of 01:25:274 (5,6,7,8) -

02:47:815 (2,3,4) - nerf this jump because song's tensity is decreasing, also being consistent with any other jumps in this part. same here 02:54:950 (4,5,6) - the problem is that 02:56:734 - this spart that shouldve been give more emphasis because of that clap sound so the logic of jumps is conflicted they aren't exactly jumps but just equal spaced patterns but either way I scaled down 02:47:815 (2,3,4) - slightly and made the spacing of 02:56:572 (5,1) - more pronounced for the emphasis

04:57:220 (1,2) - because of slider leniency the distance here is underwhelming, maybe more space 04:57:545 (2) - ok

tatatat wrote:

Isn't this metadata.... wrong? https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1621929

Even so

"If the same song exists in the Ranked section already, the metadata should be followed unless it breaks other rules in the Ranking Criteria or the Official Sources state something completely different."

I was already in this thread and I didn't even know it. Holy moly.

Chippy wrote:

Song title is wrong
https://osu.ppy.sh/beatmapsets/561679#osu/1420353