m4m from your queue
Good Luck o/
Salvation
- 00:22:680 (3,4,5) - the wide angle here makes the emphasis on 00:23:004 (5) - fall kinda flat imo. I think a sharper angle could work better here.
- 00:51:869 (6) - I think a lower SV on this slider would help a lot with representing the sudden absence of instrumentals here. Would also lend a bit more emphasis on the next note.
- 01:01:599 (3,4) - the transition here is kinda sloppy tbh. I think more could be done here to represent the 1/1 gap, like stacking the two objects so the lack of movement indicates 1/1 as an example.
- 01:27:383 - should be clickable tbh, since it has the intensity of all the other circles.
- 01:31:112 (1) - would look a bit nicer if it was angled a bit more away from 01:30:626 (4) - .
- 01:44:734 (3,4,5) - in a section that has a lot of things going on, you should probably map more than just the vocals here. You even mapped a triple here 01:43:923 (5,6,1) - so that suggests you also thought of this. There are also some "rolling" sounds here so maybe map a short reverse slider on 01:44:734 (3) - as a small suggestion?
- 02:01:842 (7) - I think a low SV slider works really well here to empasize the "scratchy" sound + the silence.
- 02:12:626 (1) - has little emphasis since its in the middle of a linear stream. I recommend changing the angle again like you did for 02:12:301 (8) - .
- 02:19:112 (1) - I think the reverse is pretty out of place here. 02:19:437 - deserves to be clickable like you did here 01:30:139 (2) - .
- 04:02:896 (1) - ^same
- 02:44:247 (6,7,1) - kinda hard to tell the rhythm here even with the NC usage. Maybe bring 02:45:058 (1,2,3) - a bit closer.
- 02:56:410 - Could also be clickable imo.
- 03:03:220 (1,2) - Kills the buildup by reducing the density. Better to remain as circles imo.
- 05:22:031 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - seems a bit too intense for a section thats calmer than most of the song. Maybe map some sliders instead?
- 05:24:626 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - ^
Good Luck o/