abraker wrote:
Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read
abraker wrote:
Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read
abraker wrote:
Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read
Apparently I missed this post and I posted the literally same thing. rippoWestonini wrote:
Why do you think so? Is it because he stayed calm and collective while under fire? I'm not asking this to accuse Penguin or anything, but I believe most would react the way he did. Townie or not.abraker wrote:
Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read
Penguin wrote:
Vote: abraker
abraker wrote:
Main reason is because Penguin did not vote me after all that and remained on Husa. Give mafia a reason to vote someone and they will take it, and that will be their excuse when the lynched does turn town.
I tried to correct myself right after it. It's not like I didn't see it until now. Definitely was not thinking straight.Penguin wrote:
I don't buy the whole "beer" thing at all too lmao. Sounds like you're stretching for excuses.
you are rightPenguin wrote:
I was expecting an actual reason for your "scum bait". A simple vote isn't sufficient enough to determine a scum read. Now just seems like you're trying to make an excuse to cover up for your scum-like behavior before.
Westonini wrote:
Wait, but he did vote for you.
abraker wrote:
Oh wait he did. I'll reply again when I have the beer out of my system :\
I agree with this.abraker wrote:
At this point I want to hear more from Death, cravenfiner, and Husa
abraker wrote:
Westonini wrote:
Wait, but he did vote for you.abraker wrote:
Oh wait he did. I'll reply again when I have the beer out of my system :\
Hiabraker wrote:
At this point I want to hear more from Death, cravenfiner, and Husa
If it's a tie, first voted person in tie gets lynchedWestonini wrote:
By the way, if someone doesn't reach 5 votes to be lynched by Feb 8th, does no one get lynched or does the person with the most votes get lynched?
abraker wrote:
That's how the mafia works
So far it's just me accusing of everyone being mafia, getting drunk, and having a logical short circuit.Penguin wrote:
It'd be cool if people discussed what has happened in this game so far.
abraker wrote:
If it's a tie, first voted person in tie gets lynchedWestonini wrote:
By the way, if someone doesn't reach 5 votes to be lynched by Feb 8th, does no one get lynched or does the person with the most votes get lynched?
otherwise the one with most votes
I'm pretty sure you're incorrect. Unless I am misinterpreting something, idkSakura wrote:
if the day reaches deadline before a majority is reached, the day will end with a No Lynch."
Some games have have different rules. Maybe last one I played had it differentPenguin wrote:
abraker wrote:
If it's a tie, first voted person in tie gets lynchedWestonini wrote:
By the way, if someone doesn't reach 5 votes to be lynched by Feb 8th, does no one get lynched or does the person with the most votes get lynched?
otherwise the one with most votesI'm pretty sure you're incorrect. Unless I am misinterpreting something, idkSakura wrote:
if the day reaches deadline before a majority is reached, the day will end with a No Lynch."
It's prob my 5th or 6th. It's been several months since my last oneGuyInFreezer wrote:
abraker is this your first game ever
again, I don't believe the "drunk" excuseabraker wrote:
So far it's just me accusing of everyone being mafia, getting drunk, and having a logical short circuit.Penguin wrote:
It'd be cool if people discussed what has happened in this game so far.
Darn.abraker wrote:
It's prob my 5th or 6th. It's been several months since my last one
Go ahead and go through my previous games if you'd likeGuyInFreezer wrote:
Darn.abraker wrote:
It's prob my 5th or 6th. It's been several months since my last one
Here I thought I could get an easy read.
You didn't even explain how you were scum testing until GuyInFreezer and Westo asked you. I believe that you were just trying to do damage control because you realized that your arguments made no sense and that you were looking very scummy. By saying that you think I'm a safe town read, you were trying to get me to dismiss my suspicions about you. Trying to make me feel safe with you or something. Plus, when you did tell us how you scum tested, it wasn't even a solid scum test.abraker wrote:
Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read
Normally you wouldn't do that until time is almost up. You don't want to lay all your cards on the table from the beginning, otherwise mafia scum will just adapt to everything.Penguin wrote:
You didn't even explain how you were scum testing until GuyInFreezer and Westo asked you.
Trust me, that's not even close to damage control. I can't even consider that as damage control. Real damage control comes when you are one vote away from lynch and you got a possible mafia who can vote you for game victory, so you need to get one of the townies off your back asap. I speak from experience: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5855775Penguin wrote:
I believe that you were just trying to do damage control because you realized that your arguments made no sense and that you were looking very scummy
Felt like that was the best way to end that. I had no more need to go out on the offensive against youPenguin wrote:
By saying that you think I'm a safe town read, you were trying to get me to dismiss my suspicions about you. Trying to make me feel safe with you or something
You can't possible do any solid test this early in the game. Everything is just to feel the waters, get info about how people react. It's the only thing you can do day 1 besides staying quiet.Penguin wrote:
Plus, when you did tell us how you scum tested, it wasn't even a solid scum test.
The second time was not an excuse, but a recap of what happened. I have no need to push an excuse that doesn't benefit me whatsoeverPenguin wrote:
You brought up that you've been "drinking" to us twice now too. Seems like you're subtly trying to make excuses.
I still feel like explaining yourself helps town more.abraker wrote:
Normally you wouldn't do that until time is almost up. You don't want to lay all your cards on the table from the beginning, otherwise mafia scum will just adapt to everything.Penguin wrote:
You didn't even explain how you were scum testing until GuyInFreezer and Westo asked you.
Using that example doesn't prove anything. Damage control is damage control. It doesn't matter that there's a more extreme form of damage control or not.abraker wrote:
Trust me, that's not even close to damage control. I can't even consider that as damage control. Real damage control comes when you are one vote away from lynch and you got a possible mafia who can vote you for game victory, so you need to get one of the townies off your back asap. I speak from experience: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5855775Penguin wrote:
I believe that you were just trying to do damage control because you realized that your arguments made no sense and that you were looking very scummy
I know that the second time wasn't specifically stated as an excuse. My point was that you're hinting at the fact that you're "drunk" and trying to subtly keep is in our minds which would make us think that your scumminess is moot because of your drinking.abraker wrote:
The second time was not an excuse, but a recap of what happened. I have no need to push an excuse that doesn't benefit me whatsoeverPenguin wrote:
You brought up that you've been "drinking" to us twice now too. Seems like you're subtly trying to make excuses.
abraker wrote:
At this point I want to hear more from Death, cravenfiner, and Husa
abraker wrote:
everyone, please subscribe to this thread so you dont forget it exists
I'm going to flat out tell you that I won't read them.abraker wrote:
Go ahead and go through my previous games if you'd likeGuyInFreezer wrote:
Darn.abraker wrote:
It's prob my 5th or 6th. It's been several months since my last one
Here I thought I could get an easy read.
https://forums.tuuba.moe/viewtopic.php?id=3
https://forums.tuuba.moe/viewtopic.php?id=137
https://forums.tuuba.moe/viewtopic.php?id=161
https://forums.tuuba.moe/viewtopic.php?id=264
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/625397
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/552912
Still do tell me what you think about all this though.cravenfiner wrote:
i havent said much since im new at this and not great at investigations
In my experience, the ones who talk themselves into the grave are, for the most part, actually scum. I don't ever have a problem with coming off as scum unless I actually play as scum. You're just more prone to subconsciously doing scummy things when you are scum. That's just me though, so idk.abraker wrote:
the ones who talk the most always seem to talk themselves to the grave the fastest
funny how that happens
abraker wrote:
the ones who talk the most always seem to talk themselves to the grave the fastest
funny how that happens
abraker wrote:
That's how the mafia works
abraker wrote:
the ones who talk the most always seem to talk themselves to the grave the fastest
funny how that happens
Penguin wrote:
In my experience, the ones who talk themselves into the grave are, for the most part, actually scum.
you get info by accusing others or mafia. The price? You are now mafia according to everyone else.Husa wrote:
need more information qwq
keremal wrote:
anything can be sus on first two days tbf
sakura wrote:
i will randomize roles for every player in the game until there's at least 50% town players and at least 1 anti town player, i will continue to randomize until at least something's balanced and/or fun
I agreeabraker wrote:
it's high probability we will end up lynching town day 1
If it's a townie power role that ends up lynched, that is a whole lot of bad
If we don't, day 2 it will be 5 vs 2 instead of 4 vs 2
I'm ok with no-lynch for now
abraker wrote:
Well it's not so simple. Even if someone can investigate, only they will know the person's role.
abraker wrote:
Also how sure are you are you there is a third party on this game?
cravenfiner wrote:
hope death notices so keremal doesnt get lynched
yes, this is true. At the moment, there will not be a lynchWestonini wrote:
Isn't Death the one getting voted on by keremal? Death voted to lynch Penguin. Either way we'd need a majority vote for a lynch anyways.cravenfiner wrote:
hope death notices so keremal doesnt get lynched
That's not how the voting system works. We need a majority (5) to lynch atm. If there's not a majority by the end of the day, no lynch will occur.Death wrote:
Vote: No Lynch
"Votes in play" includes no lynch votes, right? Otherwise, I'm dead lol
the only issue is telling which players are townies and how to get the information to them, since we can't exactly say "hey townies, the code word we're using is 'fubbernugget'." it'd either have to be a system of trusting and half-assed luck, since we can't expose our roles either since then the mafioso would be able to kill everyone.abraker wrote:
ok I think now is the best time as any to make up a secret code that only town people will understand
that way the cop can tell town what's up
Well, if someone has information that without a doubt shows them who mafia is, then it's better to come forth with it imo. I haven't played forum mafia at all, but in IRC mafia, a quiet town is a dead town.keremal wrote:
the only issue is telling which players are townies and how to get the information to them, since we can't exactly say "hey townies, the code word we're using is 'fubbernugget'." it'd either have to be a system of trusting and half-assed luck, since we can't expose our roles either since then the mafioso would be able to kill everyone.abraker wrote:
ok I think now is the best time as any to make up a secret code that only town people will understand
that way the cop can tell town what's up
