Penguin wrote:

This theory makes no sense. What does "friendly vote" even mean?

Penguin wrote:

First off, my vote was RVS, so you're accusation of me is completely baseless.

Penguin wrote:

Secondly, there's a huge interpretable difference between what I said and what kere said. I was merely explaining to you that I was RVSing. Meanwhile, kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us.

Penguin wrote:

Based on your reaction to what I've been saying, it seems like you are trying to find small and random accusations, which make no sense, so that you can put others in the spotlight while keeping the attention off of yourself.

Penguin wrote:

First off, my vote was RVS

Penguin wrote:

Meanwhile, kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us.

abraker wrote:

Penguin wrote:

This theory makes no sense. What does "friendly vote" even mean?

it means that one votes the other of the same party to fend off suspicion

abraker wrote:

Your claim that your vote was RVS may as well be a lie

abraker wrote:

Penguin wrote:

Secondly, there's a huge interpretable difference between what I said and what kere said. I was merely explaining to you that I was RVSing. Meanwhile, kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us.

I dont see it. How should I come to such conclusion?

abraker wrote:

Nice try but it's going to take more than that to bounce back suspicion toward me. The way you reply and the way you react is evidence. The small and random accusations you speak of is nothing more than you trying to get me off your back.

abraker wrote:

Also here is a good example in how you reply and react tells me you are scum. You panicking lowers your logical ability. So much so that you fail to find contradictions in your own writing. Observe:

Penguin wrote:

First off, my vote was RVS

Penguin wrote:

Meanwhile, kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us.

So did you vote because of RVS or did you vote because you think kere seems to be trying to act innocent and friendly to deceive us?

abraker wrote:

Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read

abraker wrote:

Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read

abraker wrote:

Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read

Westonini wrote:

abraker wrote:

Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read

Why do you think so? Is it because he stayed calm and collective while under fire? I'm not asking this to accuse Penguin or anything, but I believe most would react the way he did. Townie or not.

Penguin wrote:

Vote: abraker

abraker wrote:

Main reason is because Penguin did not vote me after all that and remained on Husa. Give mafia a reason to vote someone and they will take it, and that will be their excuse when the lynched does turn town.

Penguin wrote:

I don't buy the whole "beer" thing at all too lmao. Sounds like you're stretching for excuses.

Penguin wrote:

I was expecting an actual reason for your "scum bait". A simple vote isn't sufficient enough to determine a scum read. Now just seems like you're trying to make an excuse to cover up for your scum-like behavior before.

Westonini wrote:

Wait, but he did vote for you.

abraker wrote:

Oh wait he did. I'll reply again when I have the beer out of my system :\

abraker wrote:

At this point I want to hear more from Death, cravenfiner, and Husa

abraker wrote:

Westonini wrote:

Wait, but he did vote for you.

abraker wrote:

Oh wait he did. I'll reply again when I have the beer out of my system :\

abraker wrote:

At this point I want to hear more from Death, cravenfiner, and Husa

Westonini wrote:

By the way, if someone doesn't reach 5 votes to be lynched by Feb 8th, does no one get lynched or does the person with the most votes get lynched?

abraker wrote:

That's how the mafia works

Penguin wrote:

It'd be cool if people discussed what has happened in this game so far.

abraker wrote:

Westonini wrote:

By the way, if someone doesn't reach 5 votes to be lynched by Feb 8th, does no one get lynched or does the person with the most votes get lynched?

If it's a tie, first voted person in tie gets lynched
otherwise the one with most votes

Sakura wrote:

if the day reaches deadline before a majority is reached, the day will end with a No Lynch."

Penguin wrote:

abraker wrote:

Westonini wrote:

By the way, if someone doesn't reach 5 votes to be lynched by Feb 8th, does no one get lynched or does the person with the most votes get lynched?

If it's a tie, first voted person in tie gets lynched
otherwise the one with most votes

Sakura wrote:

if the day reaches deadline before a majority is reached, the day will end with a No Lynch."

I'm pretty sure you're incorrect. Unless I am misinterpreting something, idk

GuyInFreezer wrote:

abraker is this your first game ever

abraker wrote:

Penguin wrote:

It'd be cool if people discussed what has happened in this game so far.

So far it's just me accusing of everyone being mafia, getting drunk, and having a logical short circuit.

abraker wrote:

It's prob my 5th or 6th. It's been several months since my last one

GuyInFreezer wrote:

abraker wrote:

It's prob my 5th or 6th. It's been several months since my last one

Darn.
Here I thought I could get an easy read.

abraker wrote:

Ok got the reaction I wanted
Penguin is a safe town read

Penguin wrote:

You didn't even explain how you were scum testing until GuyInFreezer and Westo asked you.

Penguin wrote:

I believe that you were just trying to do damage control because you realized that your arguments made no sense and that you were looking very scummy

Penguin wrote:

By saying that you think I'm a safe town read, you were trying to get me to dismiss my suspicions about you. Trying to make me feel safe with you or something

Penguin wrote:

Plus, when you did tell us how you scum tested, it wasn't even a solid scum test.

Penguin wrote:

You brought up that you've been "drinking" to us twice now too. Seems like you're subtly trying to make excuses.

abraker wrote:

Penguin wrote:

You didn't even explain how you were scum testing until GuyInFreezer and Westo asked you.

Normally you wouldn't do that until time is almost up. You don't want to lay all your cards on the table from the beginning, otherwise mafia scum will just adapt to everything.

abraker wrote:

Penguin wrote:

I believe that you were just trying to do damage control because you realized that your arguments made no sense and that you were looking very scummy

Trust me, that's not even close to damage control. I can't even consider that as damage control. Real damage control comes when you are one vote away from lynch and you got a possible mafia who can vote you for game victory, so you need to get one of the townies off your back asap. I speak from experience: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/5855775

abraker wrote:

Penguin wrote:

You brought up that you've been "drinking" to us twice now too. Seems like you're subtly trying to make excuses.

The second time was not an excuse, but a recap of what happened. I have no need to push an excuse that doesn't benefit me whatsoever

abraker wrote:

At this point I want to hear more from Death, cravenfiner, and Husa

abraker wrote:

everyone, please subscribe to this thread so you dont forget it exists

abraker wrote:

GuyInFreezer wrote:

abraker wrote:

It's prob my 5th or 6th. It's been several months since my last one

Darn.
Here I thought I could get an easy read.

Go ahead and go through my previous games if you'd like

https://forums.tuuba.moe/viewtopic.php?id=3
https://forums.tuuba.moe/viewtopic.php?id=137
https://forums.tuuba.moe/viewtopic.php?id=161
https://forums.tuuba.moe/viewtopic.php?id=264
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/625397
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/552912

cravenfiner wrote:

i havent said much since im new at this and not great at investigations

abraker wrote:

the ones who talk the most always seem to talk themselves to the grave the fastest

funny how that happens

abraker wrote:

the ones who talk the most always seem to talk themselves to the grave the fastest

funny how that happens

abraker wrote:

That's how the mafia works

abraker wrote:

the ones who talk the most always seem to talk themselves to the grave the fastest

funny how that happens

Penguin wrote:

In my experience, the ones who talk themselves into the grave are, for the most part, actually scum.

Husa wrote:

need more information qwq

keremal wrote:

anything can be sus on first two days tbf

sakura wrote:

i will randomize roles for every player in the game until there's at least 50% town players and at least 1 anti town player, i will continue to randomize until at least something's balanced and/or fun

• 
  Voting: abraker, Death, keremal, Penguin
  Not voting: cravenfinder, Westonini, GuyInFreezer, Husa

abraker wrote:

it's high probability we will end up lynching town day 1
If it's a townie power role that ends up lynched, that is a whole lot of bad
If we don't, day 2 it will be 5 vs 2 instead of 4 vs 2

I'm ok with no-lynch for now

abraker wrote:

Well it's not so simple. Even if someone can investigate, only they will know the person's role.

abraker wrote:

Also how sure are you are you there is a third party on this game?

cravenfiner wrote:

hope death notices so keremal doesnt get lynched

Westonini wrote:

cravenfiner wrote:

hope death notices so keremal doesnt get lynched

Isn't Death the one getting voted on by keremal? Death voted to lynch Penguin. Either way we'd need a majority vote for a lynch anyways.

Death wrote:

Vote: No Lynch

"Votes in play" includes no lynch votes, right? Otherwise, I'm dead lol

abraker wrote:

ok I think now is the best time as any to make up a secret code that only town people will understand
that way the cop can tell town what's up