oh finally, it's here, thank god...
4n3c wrote:
feel like this should be linked here for future reference even though it's already public
bn/qat member report form
peppy wrote:
Sparhten wrote:
if so whats to stop people from just quitting qat/bng and doing the same thing?
Nothing. And completely banning it is not our goal here. See the second half of the original post which attempts to make this distinction.
peppy wrote:
Sparhten wrote:
if so whats to stop people from just quitting qat/bng and doing the same thing?
> Nothing. And completely banning it is not our goal here. See the second half of the original post which attempts to make this distinction.
BluGalaxian wrote:
Thank you, osu! team! This exploitation was handled in the most fit way possible if you ask me.
Linada wrote:
there is zero way to know if a mapset is a commission tho, mapper just have to not tell and nobody will know
Come[Back]Home wrote:
Wait what? People actually took money to map something? ......
woahsia wrote:
How will this be enforced in more vague cases? For example a member of the BNG or QAT can just set a donation goal on stream, and then when he reaches the goal he will make a map from a song that will be chosen from a poll that is voted on by followers. Does this still count as doing a commission as it is technically not done directly and would be unknown without proper context?