Nope. Earthbound is a perfect game. The faults lie with you.Patcheresu wrote:
I love the game like Dwanye Johnson loves his daughters in movies but it has faults.Ivalset wrote:
There are actually no faults in Earthbound. Not one.
1. Whoever thought that a separate battle theme just for hippies obviously had TROLOLOL on the mind. I'm looking at you, Itoi.
2. Somethings could have been handled better and some music was just stupid. Like most of the ordinary battle themes are downright mocking. They not only copy other songs but they don't make a good track when they did it.
3. I have discovered a HUGE bug that if done properly, let's you skip the 5th and 6th dungeons and not even know that there was a key item in the sewers. What kind of jerk listens in on phone calls made for museum curators anyway? If you just avoid the phone conversation that ties in to Venus, the Plague-Infested Rat, and the signature then the game won't tell you what you did wrong unless Hint Man would offer his services.
forum
Worst Game You've Ever Played
posted
Total Posts
686
SILENCE!
As you can clearly see I have no respect for MODERATION. True power lies in ADMINISTRATION! I just treat mods like I treat regular users. Because as long as you aren't a stick in the mud you will soon realize you can't ban me or otherwise for just being informal. Now administrators? Guess what happened to deviantart when people were given administrative rights? How DARE you dislike MY work! BANHAMMER!
Now onto Earthbound.
I perfer Mother. I perfer Mother vastly. Why?
Mother 1 is a lot darker.
Mother 1 presents the kind of challenge you'd expect from Shin Megami Tensei. And I love me some SMT.
Mother 1 has a protagonist who can be somebody other than a healer. So what if he doesn't have a special move? Can Ness send his enemies into the 4th dimmension? At the cost of around 8 pp? I think not. Also Ninten learns PK Beam. That's awesome.
It really touched my heart when Teddy died. It was his death that hardened my resolve to scale Mount Itoi the second time.
The dance was great, as well as the relationship choice that had no actual effect on the story.
Also, Loid/Lloyd's shining moment. I wonder if he ever got over the fact that Teddy's death was partially his fault. Teddie was already ER ready and then his body got hit by a tank missile explosion. He spent his last moments telling the party to live on and for Lloyd to be brave.
In Earthbound Zero he recovers.
In Mother 1 he dies.
This is voiced by the fact that checking him and talking to him will reveal nothing but an empty text box. Why do you think he got his ultimate weapon so fast? He just went from a knife to a good sized sword then he died.
That was more touching than an old man whisking away the foreign kid for a lesson in spiritual enlightenment.
As you can clearly see I have no respect for MODERATION. True power lies in ADMINISTRATION! I just treat mods like I treat regular users. Because as long as you aren't a stick in the mud you will soon realize you can't ban me or otherwise for just being informal. Now administrators? Guess what happened to deviantart when people were given administrative rights? How DARE you dislike MY work! BANHAMMER!
Now onto Earthbound.
I perfer Mother. I perfer Mother vastly. Why?
Mother 1 is a lot darker.
Mother 1 presents the kind of challenge you'd expect from Shin Megami Tensei. And I love me some SMT.
Mother 1 has a protagonist who can be somebody other than a healer. So what if he doesn't have a special move? Can Ness send his enemies into the 4th dimmension? At the cost of around 8 pp? I think not. Also Ninten learns PK Beam. That's awesome.
It really touched my heart when Teddy died. It was his death that hardened my resolve to scale Mount Itoi the second time.
The dance was great, as well as the relationship choice that had no actual effect on the story.
Also, Loid/Lloyd's shining moment. I wonder if he ever got over the fact that Teddy's death was partially his fault. Teddie was already ER ready and then his body got hit by a tank missile explosion. He spent his last moments telling the party to live on and for Lloyd to be brave.
In Earthbound Zero he recovers.
In Mother 1 he dies.
This is voiced by the fact that checking him and talking to him will reveal nothing but an empty text box. Why do you think he got his ultimate weapon so fast? He just went from a knife to a good sized sword then he died.
That was more touching than an old man whisking away the foreign kid for a lesson in spiritual enlightenment.
Chill out buddy, you don't even know who I am.Patcheresu wrote:
SILENCE!
As you can clearly see I have no respect for MODERATION. True power lies in ADMINISTRATION! I just treat mods like I treat regular users. Because as long as you aren't a stick in the mud you will soon realize you can't ban me or otherwise for just being informal. Now administrators? Guess what happened to deviantart when people were given administrative rights? How DARE you dislike MY work! BANHAMMER!
I am probably the second most laidback mod on these forums.
also i have administrator access
Let me recap:Ivalset wrote:
Chill out buddy, you don't even know who I am.Patcheresu wrote:
SILENCE!
As you can clearly see I have no respect for MODERATION. True power lies in ADMINISTRATION! I just treat mods like I treat regular users. Because as long as you aren't a stick in the mud you will soon realize you can't ban me or otherwise for just being informal. Now administrators? Guess what happened to deviantart when people were given administrative rights? How DARE you dislike MY work! BANHAMMER!
I am probably the second most laidback mod on these forums.
also i have administrator access
I don't care WHO you are, I will treat you just like I treat regular users, but people I can ask questions to as well.
I am not prejudiced to mods. I just don't like jokers who do things like that male or female. Earthbound will not ever be the best RPG ever. Giygas is not that disturbing. I'm too busy wailing on him to care just what the fetus freak looks like. And furthermore*shot*
Actually, I'm pretty sure you are! There was absolutely no reason to bring up my moderator position in the first place.Patcheresu wrote:
I am not prejudiced to mods.
And plus, nobody even said Earthbound was the best RPG.
You were saying?Ivalset wrote:
There are actually no faults in Earthbound. Not one.Patcheresu wrote:
And whoever said Earthbound is the worst game ever and didn't provide any evidence is mean. It has its faults but at least it has good things about it.
Yes, I said it has no faults and it is a perfect game.
It is not the best RPG.
It is not the best RPG.
Favorite is Earthbound by far.
But the worst? Any of the DW Empires series. So boring.
But the worst? Any of the DW Empires series. So boring.
Oh I see what you did thar. You'd rather have someone who's down to Earth than something that has no flaws.Ivalset wrote:
Yes, I said it has no faults and it is a perfect game.
It is not the best RPG.
Superman 64 was pretty horrible.... Hmm...... That's all I can think of right now XD
Have you PLAYED it.
If you are asking if I played Superman 64? Yeah I haved, worst trade EVER lolPatcheresu wrote:
Have you PLAYED it.
I see, some people just put the worst games ever without playing them or troll us. Thank you.
I need to track down a copy of Superman 64. Should be legendary 
MetalMario201 wrote:
I need to track down a copy of Superman 64. Should be legendary
Don't do itttttt.... lol it might be cheap at local game stores that would still sell n64 games... I think I gave mine away for another game but that was a long time ago.... now that we have the internet i actually read reviews, and watch videos before I buy it
Patcheresu wrote:
Topic is derailing. Cut it out Ms. Animu.
Another horrible game that I played would be Crime Scene DS, I think it sucks... maybe some other people like it... It's just horrible lol
NO. And your grammar sucks balls in multi-langual.Pokebis wrote:
[attachment=0:0bf09]Pheonix Wright 4komo.jpg[/attachment:0bf09]Patcheresu wrote:
Topic is derailing. Cut it out Ms. Animu.
PS:
Si vos can lego is , vacuus a reddo , vos have meritus a aurum astrum.
not trying to troll here but the last game i played and that i hated it was apb
why? frustrating gameplay, might pvp vs some ppl with way more powerful guns then yours, car controls are terrible, screen might freeze when driving and when it unfreezes you are ramming a wall( i am totally serious this happened when i was driving a car with my friend and we were getting chased by cops), missions are really repetitive, and when you are a criminal and you want to do some awesome stuff (stealing a store, or mugging some1) you will always get chased by some cops even if theres nobody around you, criminals notority dont even look like dropping and cops prestige goes down so easily, and this is the first game that i got a blue screen of my life even if i had the required system to play it
but in some way i like it because of the customization ( btw my close and open beta feedback was something like that and i bet it was never read by any realtime world dev D: )
all i hope is that k2 network will improve it since they purchased apb and will relaunch it in 2011
why? frustrating gameplay, might pvp vs some ppl with way more powerful guns then yours, car controls are terrible, screen might freeze when driving and when it unfreezes you are ramming a wall( i am totally serious this happened when i was driving a car with my friend and we were getting chased by cops), missions are really repetitive, and when you are a criminal and you want to do some awesome stuff (stealing a store, or mugging some1) you will always get chased by some cops even if theres nobody around you, criminals notority dont even look like dropping and cops prestige goes down so easily, and this is the first game that i got a blue screen of my life even if i had the required system to play it
but in some way i like it because of the customization ( btw my close and open beta feedback was something like that and i bet it was never read by any realtime world dev D: )
all i hope is that k2 network will improve it since they purchased apb and will relaunch it in 2011
statement that people that have never been fantards will agree with
touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou touhou
But yeah that place would go to Secret of Mana at the same time.
............................................................................WeegeevsWeegee wrote:
But yeah that place would go to Secret of Mana at the same time.
What? I'm just stating the truth. I hate Secret of Mana.
Its on my list of best games 
The major flaw it in was the stupid computer controls which did annoy the heck out of me (I played with friends some of the time)
Apart from that I thought the story/gameplay/graphics were nice for the time~
The major flaw it in was the stupid computer controls which did annoy the heck out of me (I played with friends some of the time)
Apart from that I thought the story/gameplay/graphics were nice for the time~
I am sorry that I did not do enough research.
:(Shootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s. It's not epic enough. Pac-Man, Galaga, and Donkey Kong are excused.
There's plenty of great arcade games from 80s.
I highly agree with this.adam2046 wrote:
There's plenty of great arcade games from 80s.
I stopped reading here.Shootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s.
The worst game i ever played was World Super Police for PS2 that game was Bulls***!
Its looong sold XD
Its looong sold XD
What is wrong with you!?!?! DDDDD:Shootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s.
Vanguard is an awesome game and you'd know it if you played itShootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s. It's not epic enough. Pac-Man, Galaga, and Donkey Kong are excused.
(c) 1982 so yep it's from the 80s
Commander Keen, I never got to know how it worked... even though I bought it....
It's a great game gtfo.Max300 wrote:
Commander Keen, I never got to know how it worked... even though I bought it....
Kingdom Hearts: 358/2.
Boring shit.
Boring shit.
[lucky:d44b3]Worst Game Ever[/lucky:d44b3]
I know at least two exceptions to this:Two wrote:
Tip: movie/tv show-> game always sucksAzure_Kyte wrote:
Dual Sympathy did suck, yes it did. Good thing I try before I buy.
Lord of the Rings: Return of the King
Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay
anyway, back on topic
Worst Game Ever:
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
It had a sucky version of Return of the King's engine, and felt too scripted. 'nuff said.
get outNexus Reaper wrote:
Kingdom Hearts: 358/2.
Boring shit.
out
30 second Hero. no kidding.
Personally, I think the fiighting system is really confusing and you are only allowed to finish a stage within 30 secs.
Personally, I think the fiighting system is really confusing and you are only allowed to finish a stage within 30 secs.
You get in a random battle, you kill the enemies, and you get exp. That's pretty simple IMO. And the levels last longer then 30 seconds. (Excluding the Knight levels) And the humor in the game is pretty good, so I don't really see this as a worst game.CHOFF wrote:
30 second Hero. no kidding.
Personally, I think the fiighting system is really confusing and you are only allowed to finish a stage within 30 secs.
Ragnarok DS, I bought this game because I love Ragnarok Online and saw how this game is worst.
Mate seriously. That game lasts and it requires more than simple skill. It's not entirely reliant on its multiplayer (good) the story is long and challenging for fools like you (good) and it isn't generic and combines all the features of a classic Zelda game on DS.E-Hooker wrote:
Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Shittest control system ever, and having to go back to the temple...goddamn.
Oh I seerust45 wrote:
You get in a random battle, you kill the enemies, and you get exp. That's pretty simple IMO. And the levels last longer then 30 seconds. (Excluding the Knight levels) And the humor in the game is pretty good, so I don't really see this as a worst game.
Actually, I didn't finish the 1st level and I really can't pass that level.
I'm sorry if I judged the game without further observation/fniishing the game or whatever. hehe
I see the CDi Zelda games listed there which, while not very good, are much better than other games I've played and managed to hold my interest for the 2 hours it takes to play through them when you don't know what the hell to do. And the cutscenes are rich.Azure_Kyte wrote:
[lucky:fe019]Worst Game Ever[/lucky:fe019]
to put this into perspective for you:LaVolpe024 wrote:
Mate seriously. That game lasts and it requires more than simple skill. It's not entirely reliant on its multiplayer (good) the story is long and challenging for fools like you (good) and it isn't generic and combines all the features of a classic Zelda game on DS.E-Hooker wrote:
Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Shittest control system ever, and having to go back to the temple...goddamn.
phantom hourglass is the only video game i've ever returned, ever
i couldn't even do a fucking spin attack that's how god-awful the controls were.
i enjoy zelda because it offers a challenge, but even the tutorial dungeon made me scratch my head a few times
[/quote]to put this into perspective for you:
phantom hourglass is the only video game i've ever returned, ever
i couldn't even do a fucking spin attack that's how god-awful the controls were.
i enjoy zelda because it offers a challenge, but even the tutorial dungeon made me scratch my head a few times[/quote]
Then why didn't you just say "I'm awful at Phantom Hourglass, therefore I hate it?"
It's supposed make you scratch your head, that's the goddamn challenge. If you were more practical and patient then you'd have enjoyed the game more. I bet (by the looks of it) that you gave up quite easily. As for the controls, they may not suit some but controls are never versatile enough to suit every player. And one more thing, you could change some controls to suit you. Take some time and look around. Not every game is as linear as you want it to be.
phantom hourglass is the only video game i've ever returned, ever
i couldn't even do a fucking spin attack that's how god-awful the controls were.
i enjoy zelda because it offers a challenge, but even the tutorial dungeon made me scratch my head a few times[/quote]
Then why didn't you just say "I'm awful at Phantom Hourglass, therefore I hate it?"
It's supposed make you scratch your head, that's the goddamn challenge. If you were more practical and patient then you'd have enjoyed the game more. I bet (by the looks of it) that you gave up quite easily. As for the controls, they may not suit some but controls are never versatile enough to suit every player. And one more thing, you could change some controls to suit you. Take some time and look around. Not every game is as linear as you want it to be.
I thought the controls for Phantom Hourglass were alright. I got as far as the Heavy Metal part of the game (which is a very misleading title which tends to set you up for disappointment if you're like me) and I got to a spot where I needed Bombchus
and I had no idea where to get a Bombchu bag
rather than Gamefaqs it, I pretty much gave up entirely on the game. Which is a shame, because my favourite Zelda is Wind Waker and this one, while nothing like it, is technically a sequel
and I had no idea where to get a Bombchu bag
rather than Gamefaqs it, I pretty much gave up entirely on the game. Which is a shame, because my favourite Zelda is Wind Waker and this one, while nothing like it, is technically a sequel
Prince of Persia: The Fallen King for DS. It is truly the worst game I have ever played. An action/platformer controlled only through the touch screen. Why? There are six buttons and a D-pad on the DS! Why not use those!? 
...
I'm sorry, I can understand using the touch screen for magic but why use it for running, jumping, and fighting as well? It just makes the game fell scripted. Plus harden magic is almost impossible to use.
... I'm sorry, I can understand using the touch screen for magic but why use it for running, jumping, and fighting as well? It just makes the game fell scripted. Plus harden magic is almost impossible to use.
Hatsune Miku_old
umad broLaVolpe024 wrote:
Then why didn't you just say "I'm awful at Phantom Hourglass, therefore I hate it?"
It's supposed make you scratch your head, that's the goddamn challenge. If you were more practical and patient then you'd have enjoyed the game more. I bet (by the looks of it) that you gave up quite easily. As for the controls, they may not suit some but controls are never versatile enough to suit every player. And one more thing, you could change some controls to suit you. Take some time and look around. Not every game is as linear as you want it to be.
just because you like infuriating games doesn't mean i want to throw away 35 fucking dollars on a game that bored me and was frustrating after 3 hours
+1awp wrote:
I thought the controls for Phantom Hourglass were alright. I got as far as the Heavy Metal part of the game (which is a very misleading title which tends to set you up for disappointment if you're like me) and I got to a spot where I needed Bombchus
and I had no idea where to get a Bombchu bag
rather than Gamefaqs it, I pretty much gave up entirely on the game. Which is a shame, because my favourite Zelda is Wind Waker and this one, while nothing like it, is technically a sequel
I liked Wind Waker too.
The best EGA graphics out there :3GRaYstreetN wrote:
This game is gorgeous...
Hmm I recall Call of Duty 3 being rather terrible.
Can't recall why exactly, but that probably adds to how forgettable it was.
Can't recall why exactly, but that probably adds to how forgettable it was.
osu!
wait what
wait what
the worst ever gamedfuzz1987 wrote:
Mario is missing
ITS A DISGRACE TO MARIO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSHMDoR8BRA
+1
Pokemon Heart Gold and Soulsilver.
New Pokemon games will never take away my love for 8-bit goodness.
New Pokemon games will never take away my love for 8-bit goodness.
Every single TV show video game in existence.
Or, if you don't fly with that:
-The new Spyro games
-The new Crach Bandicoot games
And my Least-favorite:
"RS: Riding Spirits"
Worst copy of Gran Turismo I have EVER, EVER seen. Stupid control of a motorbike with crappy menus and confusing instructions makes this game SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOterrible awful GOD DAMN HORRIBLE!
Or, if you don't fly with that:
-The new Spyro games
-The new Crach Bandicoot games
And my Least-favorite:
"RS: Riding Spirits"
Worst copy of Gran Turismo I have EVER, EVER seen. Stupid control of a motorbike with crappy menus and confusing instructions makes this game SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Also, I am going to say Superman 64. I actually played that game a lot. The last thing I remember before I slipped into insanity was some mission where I had to escort Lois Lane out of a factory. At set intervals, we would be jumped by a bunch of thugs or robots or something. I can't remember. All I remember is the way I had to protect Lois was to freeze her with my ice breath into a giant block of ice so the thugs could not punch her, and then proceed to beat them in a horribly clunky manner. I had to do this over and over for God knows how long. Then as soon as she thawed out, 50 guys would come out of nowhere and punch her to death.Ivalset wrote:
There are actually no faults in Earthbound. Not one.
All I remember of that game is flying through rings for about half an hour at a time and delaying Lois's death by forcing hypothermia upon her.
In the end, I did what Superman usually does to solve all his problems. I threw the game into the fucking sun.
If it hasn't been mentioned yet, that gameshow with Howie Mandell where you arbitrarily select ah! Deal or No Deal, that's what it's called.
Due to a bug in the source code, the game always selects the same seed value in its randomization. What this means is, every time you boot the game up, the winning briefcase is always in the same location on the first round. I'm not sure if subsequent rounds are properly pseudo-random (it would make sense if it seeds off execution time, but hey, it could be another bug!) but that one offence is bad enough.
Also anyone who is willing to pay money for a pseudo-random number generator disguised as a "game" where you arbitrarily pick cells of numbers with no possibility of strategy damn well deserves a broken pseudo-random number generator.
Due to a bug in the source code, the game always selects the same seed value in its randomization. What this means is, every time you boot the game up, the winning briefcase is always in the same location on the first round. I'm not sure if subsequent rounds are properly pseudo-random (it would make sense if it seeds off execution time, but hey, it could be another bug!) but that one offence is bad enough.
Also anyone who is willing to pay money for a pseudo-random number generator disguised as a "game" where you arbitrarily pick cells of numbers with no possibility of strategy damn well deserves a broken pseudo-random number generator.
Adding LotR: Conquest on the PS3.
Generic hack and slash with poor (poor is a gross understatement) AI and no semblance of balance makes for a very bad game.
Though what makes it the worst instead of just bad is the fact that the announcer alone makes me want to hit the wall. With my head.
Generic hack and slash with poor (poor is a gross understatement) AI and no semblance of balance makes for a very bad game.
Though what makes it the worst instead of just bad is the fact that the announcer alone makes me want to hit the wall. With my head.
Reminds me of Pokémon Emerald! Technically it seeded from execution time but this wasn't nearly enough if you were obsessed with shinies/high IVs/whatever. Squadrons of nerds obsessed with spoiling the game for others came up with methods of using a stopwatch to guarantee getting a poke with certain stats. They've been attacking the higher quality RNGs on the DS games ever since.awp wrote:
If it hasn't been mentioned yet,that gameshow with Howie Mandell where you arbitrarily selectah! Deal or No Deal, that's what it's called.
Due to a bug in the source code, the game always selects the same seed value in its randomization. What this means is, every time you boot the game up, the winning briefcase is always in the same location on the first round. I'm not sure if subsequent rounds are properly pseudo-random (it would make sense if it seeds off execution time, but hey, it could be another bug!) but that one offence is bad enough.
Also anyone who is willing to pay money for a pseudo-random number generator disguised as a "game" where you arbitrarily pick cells of numbers with no possibility of strategy damn well deserves a broken pseudo-random number generator.
reload on wii , this game is too easy get bored , bad rock music and you only can do is shoot the targets . i prefer play the house of dead 2+3 and overkill .
fifa 97 on gameboy, also all CD-I games and more recently, the test drive unlimited 2 beta was just horrible.
Platformers only suck if you aren't any good at it.Neo@lex wrote:
Earthbound, Super Metroid and pretty much every Megaman platformer.
hataz be hatin'Neo@lex wrote:
Super Metroid
It's between Mega Man 64 , Wave Race 64 or the Extreme-G series.
They disappoint me by putting poor ol' Mega in 3D form, and with bad camera angles.
Wave Race 64 gets VERY boring even in the hardest difficulty.
and the Extreme-G series is "Road Rash meets F-Zero & Moto GP" Bleeh.
They disappoint me by putting poor ol' Mega in 3D form, and with bad camera angles.
Wave Race 64 gets VERY boring even in the hardest difficulty.
and the Extreme-G series is "Road Rash meets F-Zero & Moto GP" Bleeh.
Blade Kitten, I don't know why I bought it but Steam tells me I played it for 20 minutes, and I remember being very annoyed and bored after I quit playing.
There has been an amazingly terrible Game Boy COLOR installment of the Commander Keen series.
it was terrible in a bad sense.
it was terrible in a bad sense.
omg looks epic. I was never aware this existed
"I'd rather drink diarrhea sauce than play this game. I'd rather have mecha godzilla take a mecha dump on my ear while simultaneously eating the rotten asshole of a roadkill skunk and down it with beer. This game isn't just a piece of shit, its a whole shit. That's what you get for reaching into the dark depths of the NES library. You might as well be reaching into a dog's asshole...'cuz all you're going to find is shit. WHAT WERE THEY THINKING!?!?!!?"
-the angry video game nerd
my least favorite game is plumbers don't wear ties.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyaF_gCKWsI
-the angry video game nerd
my least favorite game is plumbers don't wear ties.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyaF_gCKWsI
wait you've played that?mathexpert9981 wrote:
my least favorite game is plumbers don't wear ties.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyaF_gCKWsI
I was going to say Superman 64, but noticed i'm not the only one that had to deal with the horrors of wasted video game budget... no.... wasting time in our lives trying to figure out what the hell to do in poorly made levels.
it is..
pokemon crazy hits in ps1...
i just lost my precious money and 10minutes of my life for that game
pokemon crazy hits in ps1...
i just lost my precious money and 10minutes of my life for that game
DDR Mario Mix, Digimon World 4, and any Spyro game. They are all equally bad to me.
Post Ps1, right? Cause how could you hate the original trilogy? Just, how?ddrXero64 wrote:
and any Spyro game
after I saw the avgn review I got it on an emulator I had to try it. Its not really a game imo, though.awp wrote:
wait you've played that?mathexpert9981 wrote:
my least favorite game is plumbers don't wear ties.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyaF_gCKWsI
Switchfoot221
Lord of Arcana [PSP]
Do NOT play this game..... trust me on this.
Friggin Drake Shades everywhere on every mission >.>
not only that, the graphics are bad and the game play is repetitive with the same boring monsters
I'd rate this game a 1/10.....
Time to complete a mission: somewhere around 1hr
Time to kill one Drake Shade if you even manage to survive: about 45 minutes
Total Drake Shades on a map: about 4 or so
Do NOT play this game..... trust me on this.
Friggin Drake Shades everywhere on every mission >.>
not only that, the graphics are bad and the game play is repetitive with the same boring monsters
I'd rate this game a 1/10.....
Time to complete a mission: somewhere around 1hr
Time to kill one Drake Shade if you even manage to survive: about 45 minutes
Total Drake Shades on a map: about 4 or so
atari 2600 with a bunch of games, gave the thing away, because all those games sucked.
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
Terrible, repetitive gameplay, and crappy camera angles. Only got it because it came free with Halo 3.
Terrible, repetitive gameplay, and crappy camera angles. Only got it because it came free with Halo 3.
ARE YOU MAD MAN? FINAL FANTASY 7 WAS AWESOME!RL Link wrote:
Final Fantasy 7
*finishes rant*
E.T. for the Atari.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2o3mlg5AxQ
Topic Starter
u mad, fanboy? FFVII was not good; terribly unrelatable characters, nonsense story with forced drama, summons took too long, and it has not aged well at all. Materia was the best thing about that game.Ahegaokin wrote:
ARE YOU MAD MAN? FINAL FANTASY 7 WAS AWESOME!RL Link wrote:
Final Fantasy 7
*finishes rant*
Worst FF will always be II, though.
Smurf: Rescue in Gargamel's Castle
Your greatest challenge: A hurdle.
Your greatest challenge: A hurdle.
In all honesty, I've played quite a bit of shitty games in my time, but the one that just stunk the most was Bart Simpson Vs. the World for the NES. It was the same song throughout the game, the jump physics were terrible, Bart bought his shoes from the same store as Luigi (I.E. there was little to no traction), and the story made about as much sense as LSD for the PS1.
I like how LSD is clearly explained and was accompanied by a book with explanations in English.
Big rigs: Over the Road Racing D:
I haven't played many bad games. I must be spoiled. I scour my mind and I can only recall games I would actually recommend to people.
However,
However,
That's the only game in the series between 1-11 that I haven't beaten. I just can't do it.Mogsworth wrote:
Worst FF will always be II, though.
One of the worst games ever rated. 03.XX%. No physics at all, you can climb up the mountains without losing any mph, you are stuck on the floor whatever happens, and the win rate is 100% because the trucks stop before the finish line. I saw a vid like 4 hours ago.Doddo wrote:
Big rigs: Over the Road Racing D:
are you crazy? Big Rigs was hilarious for like 15 solid minutes. There were secret controls tucked into the game that the developers forgot to disable (granted the released product is a debug build). There's no terminal velocity when going in reverse so you can accelerate to speeds in excess of 1000000 km/h and do so even quicker by using the secret handbrake button (spacebar iirc). From there you could teleport around the map._Gezo_ wrote:
One of the worst games ever rated. 03.XX%. No physics at all, you can climb up the mountains without losing any mph, you are stuck on the floor whatever happens, and the win rate is 100% because the trucks stop before the finish line. I saw a vid like 4 hours ago.Doddo wrote:
Big rigs: Over the Road Racing D:
that game had me laughing so much
awp wrote:
are you crazy? Big Rigs was hilarious for like 15 solid minutes. There were secret controls tucked into the game that the developers forgot to disable (granted the released product is a debug build). There's no terminal velocity when going in reverse so you can accelerate to speeds in excess of 1000000 km/h and do so even quicker by using the secret handbrake button (spacebar iirc). From there you could teleport around the map.
that game had me laughing so much
And that is that.
that was written by a 12 year old by the looks of it
Judging by the lack of punctuation and simplistic sentence structure, I'd say you are correct.
I have this owoPierate wrote:
Also it doesn't seem to run properly on my comp I wanted to break the speed of light in reverse