Drakkhen
It was a stupid sort of boring.
It was a stupid sort of boring.
forum
Worst Game You've Ever Played
posted
Total Posts
686
I am sorry that I did not do enough research.
:(Shootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s. It's not epic enough. Pac-Man, Galaga, and Donkey Kong are excused.
There's plenty of great arcade games from 80s.
I highly agree with this.adam2046 wrote:
There's plenty of great arcade games from 80s.
I stopped reading here.Shootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s.
The worst game i ever played was World Super Police for PS2 that game was Bulls***!
Its looong sold XD
Its looong sold XD
What is wrong with you!?!?! DDDDD:Shootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s.
Vanguard is an awesome game and you'd know it if you played itShootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s. It's not epic enough. Pac-Man, Galaga, and Donkey Kong are excused.
(c) 1982 so yep it's from the 80s
Commander Keen, I never got to know how it worked... even though I bought it....
It's a great game gtfo.Max300 wrote:
Commander Keen, I never got to know how it worked... even though I bought it....
Kingdom Hearts: 358/2.
Boring shit.
Boring shit.
[lucky:d44b3]Worst Game Ever[/lucky:d44b3]
I know at least two exceptions to this:Two wrote:
Tip: movie/tv show-> game always sucksAzure_Kyte wrote:
Dual Sympathy did suck, yes it did. Good thing I try before I buy.
Lord of the Rings: Return of the King
Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay
anyway, back on topic
Worst Game Ever:
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
It had a sucky version of Return of the King's engine, and felt too scripted. 'nuff said.
get outNexus Reaper wrote:
Kingdom Hearts: 358/2.
Boring shit.
out
30 second Hero. no kidding.
Personally, I think the fiighting system is really confusing and you are only allowed to finish a stage within 30 secs.
Personally, I think the fiighting system is really confusing and you are only allowed to finish a stage within 30 secs.
You get in a random battle, you kill the enemies, and you get exp. That's pretty simple IMO. And the levels last longer then 30 seconds. (Excluding the Knight levels) And the humor in the game is pretty good, so I don't really see this as a worst game.CHOFF wrote:
30 second Hero. no kidding.
Personally, I think the fiighting system is really confusing and you are only allowed to finish a stage within 30 secs.
Ragnarok DS, I bought this game because I love Ragnarok Online and saw how this game is worst.
Mate seriously. That game lasts and it requires more than simple skill. It's not entirely reliant on its multiplayer (good) the story is long and challenging for fools like you (good) and it isn't generic and combines all the features of a classic Zelda game on DS.E-Hooker wrote:
Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Shittest control system ever, and having to go back to the temple...goddamn.
Oh I seerust45 wrote:
You get in a random battle, you kill the enemies, and you get exp. That's pretty simple IMO. And the levels last longer then 30 seconds. (Excluding the Knight levels) And the humor in the game is pretty good, so I don't really see this as a worst game.
Actually, I didn't finish the 1st level and I really can't pass that level.
I'm sorry if I judged the game without further observation/fniishing the game or whatever. hehe
I see the CDi Zelda games listed there which, while not very good, are much better than other games I've played and managed to hold my interest for the 2 hours it takes to play through them when you don't know what the hell to do. And the cutscenes are rich.Azure_Kyte wrote:
[lucky:fe019]Worst Game Ever[/lucky:fe019]
to put this into perspective for you:LaVolpe024 wrote:
Mate seriously. That game lasts and it requires more than simple skill. It's not entirely reliant on its multiplayer (good) the story is long and challenging for fools like you (good) and it isn't generic and combines all the features of a classic Zelda game on DS.E-Hooker wrote:
Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Shittest control system ever, and having to go back to the temple...goddamn.
phantom hourglass is the only video game i've ever returned, ever
i couldn't even do a fucking spin attack that's how god-awful the controls were.
i enjoy zelda because it offers a challenge, but even the tutorial dungeon made me scratch my head a few times
[/quote]to put this into perspective for you:
phantom hourglass is the only video game i've ever returned, ever
i couldn't even do a fucking spin attack that's how god-awful the controls were.
i enjoy zelda because it offers a challenge, but even the tutorial dungeon made me scratch my head a few times[/quote]
Then why didn't you just say "I'm awful at Phantom Hourglass, therefore I hate it?"
It's supposed make you scratch your head, that's the goddamn challenge. If you were more practical and patient then you'd have enjoyed the game more. I bet (by the looks of it) that you gave up quite easily. As for the controls, they may not suit some but controls are never versatile enough to suit every player. And one more thing, you could change some controls to suit you. Take some time and look around. Not every game is as linear as you want it to be.
phantom hourglass is the only video game i've ever returned, ever
i couldn't even do a fucking spin attack that's how god-awful the controls were.
i enjoy zelda because it offers a challenge, but even the tutorial dungeon made me scratch my head a few times[/quote]
Then why didn't you just say "I'm awful at Phantom Hourglass, therefore I hate it?"
It's supposed make you scratch your head, that's the goddamn challenge. If you were more practical and patient then you'd have enjoyed the game more. I bet (by the looks of it) that you gave up quite easily. As for the controls, they may not suit some but controls are never versatile enough to suit every player. And one more thing, you could change some controls to suit you. Take some time and look around. Not every game is as linear as you want it to be.
I thought the controls for Phantom Hourglass were alright. I got as far as the Heavy Metal part of the game (which is a very misleading title which tends to set you up for disappointment if you're like me) and I got to a spot where I needed Bombchus
and I had no idea where to get a Bombchu bag
rather than Gamefaqs it, I pretty much gave up entirely on the game. Which is a shame, because my favourite Zelda is Wind Waker and this one, while nothing like it, is technically a sequel
and I had no idea where to get a Bombchu bag
rather than Gamefaqs it, I pretty much gave up entirely on the game. Which is a shame, because my favourite Zelda is Wind Waker and this one, while nothing like it, is technically a sequel
Prince of Persia: The Fallen King for DS. It is truly the worst game I have ever played. An action/platformer controlled only through the touch screen. Why? There are six buttons and a D-pad on the DS! Why not use those!? 
...
I'm sorry, I can understand using the touch screen for magic but why use it for running, jumping, and fighting as well? It just makes the game fell scripted. Plus harden magic is almost impossible to use.
... I'm sorry, I can understand using the touch screen for magic but why use it for running, jumping, and fighting as well? It just makes the game fell scripted. Plus harden magic is almost impossible to use.
Hatsune Miku_old
umad broLaVolpe024 wrote:
Then why didn't you just say "I'm awful at Phantom Hourglass, therefore I hate it?"
It's supposed make you scratch your head, that's the goddamn challenge. If you were more practical and patient then you'd have enjoyed the game more. I bet (by the looks of it) that you gave up quite easily. As for the controls, they may not suit some but controls are never versatile enough to suit every player. And one more thing, you could change some controls to suit you. Take some time and look around. Not every game is as linear as you want it to be.
just because you like infuriating games doesn't mean i want to throw away 35 fucking dollars on a game that bored me and was frustrating after 3 hours
+1awp wrote:
I thought the controls for Phantom Hourglass were alright. I got as far as the Heavy Metal part of the game (which is a very misleading title which tends to set you up for disappointment if you're like me) and I got to a spot where I needed Bombchus
and I had no idea where to get a Bombchu bag
rather than Gamefaqs it, I pretty much gave up entirely on the game. Which is a shame, because my favourite Zelda is Wind Waker and this one, while nothing like it, is technically a sequel
I liked Wind Waker too.
The best EGA graphics out there :3GRaYstreetN wrote:
This game is gorgeous...
Hmm I recall Call of Duty 3 being rather terrible.
Can't recall why exactly, but that probably adds to how forgettable it was.
Can't recall why exactly, but that probably adds to how forgettable it was.
osu!
wait what
wait what
the worst ever gamedfuzz1987 wrote:
Mario is missing
ITS A DISGRACE TO MARIO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSHMDoR8BRA
+1
Pokemon Heart Gold and Soulsilver.
New Pokemon games will never take away my love for 8-bit goodness.
New Pokemon games will never take away my love for 8-bit goodness.
Every single TV show video game in existence.
Or, if you don't fly with that:
-The new Spyro games
-The new Crach Bandicoot games
And my Least-favorite:
"RS: Riding Spirits"
Worst copy of Gran Turismo I have EVER, EVER seen. Stupid control of a motorbike with crappy menus and confusing instructions makes this game SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOterrible awful GOD DAMN HORRIBLE!
Or, if you don't fly with that:
-The new Spyro games
-The new Crach Bandicoot games
And my Least-favorite:
"RS: Riding Spirits"
Worst copy of Gran Turismo I have EVER, EVER seen. Stupid control of a motorbike with crappy menus and confusing instructions makes this game SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Also, I am going to say Superman 64. I actually played that game a lot. The last thing I remember before I slipped into insanity was some mission where I had to escort Lois Lane out of a factory. At set intervals, we would be jumped by a bunch of thugs or robots or something. I can't remember. All I remember is the way I had to protect Lois was to freeze her with my ice breath into a giant block of ice so the thugs could not punch her, and then proceed to beat them in a horribly clunky manner. I had to do this over and over for God knows how long. Then as soon as she thawed out, 50 guys would come out of nowhere and punch her to death.Ivalset wrote:
There are actually no faults in Earthbound. Not one.
All I remember of that game is flying through rings for about half an hour at a time and delaying Lois's death by forcing hypothermia upon her.
In the end, I did what Superman usually does to solve all his problems. I threw the game into the fucking sun.
If it hasn't been mentioned yet, that gameshow with Howie Mandell where you arbitrarily select ah! Deal or No Deal, that's what it's called.
Due to a bug in the source code, the game always selects the same seed value in its randomization. What this means is, every time you boot the game up, the winning briefcase is always in the same location on the first round. I'm not sure if subsequent rounds are properly pseudo-random (it would make sense if it seeds off execution time, but hey, it could be another bug!) but that one offence is bad enough.
Also anyone who is willing to pay money for a pseudo-random number generator disguised as a "game" where you arbitrarily pick cells of numbers with no possibility of strategy damn well deserves a broken pseudo-random number generator.
Due to a bug in the source code, the game always selects the same seed value in its randomization. What this means is, every time you boot the game up, the winning briefcase is always in the same location on the first round. I'm not sure if subsequent rounds are properly pseudo-random (it would make sense if it seeds off execution time, but hey, it could be another bug!) but that one offence is bad enough.
Also anyone who is willing to pay money for a pseudo-random number generator disguised as a "game" where you arbitrarily pick cells of numbers with no possibility of strategy damn well deserves a broken pseudo-random number generator.