Dual Sympathy did suck, yes it did. Good thing I try before I buy.
Tip: movie/tv show-> game always sucksAzure_Kyte wrote:
Dual Sympathy did suck, yes it did. Good thing I try before I buy.
I had fun with Spider-Man 2 on the PS2. That game didn't suck.Two wrote:
Tip: movie/tv show-> game always sucksAzure_Kyte wrote:
Dual Sympathy did suck, yes it did. Good thing I try before I buy.
Bart Versus Space Mutants ?Ever17 wrote:
A Simpsons game for the Sega Genesis, I didnt even understand it lol.
This game isn't exception to this rule. =w=Two wrote:
Tip: movie/tv show-> game always sucks
Lemon Water wrote:
Mother 2
I was being sarcastic ~Patcheresu wrote:
Care to explain WHY?
Topic is derailing. Cut it out Ms. Animu.Lemon Water wrote:
I was being sarcastic ~Patcheresu wrote:
Care to explain WHY?
Okay.Patcheresu wrote:
Topic is derailing. Cut it out Ms. Animu.
There are actually no faults in Earthbound. Not one.Patcheresu wrote:
And whoever said Earthbound is the worst game ever and didn't provide any evidence is mean. It has its faults but at least it has good things about it.
I love the game like Dwanye Johnson loves his daughters in movies but it has faults.Ivalset wrote:
There are actually no faults in Earthbound. Not one.Patcheresu wrote:
And whoever said Earthbound is the worst game ever and didn't provide any evidence is mean. It has its faults but at least it has good things about it.
That's why it came with a player's guidePatcheresu wrote:
3. I have discovered a HUGE bug that if done properly, let's you skip the 5th and 6th dungeons and not even know that there was a key item in the sewers. What kind of jerk listens in on phone calls made for museum curators anyway? If you just avoid the phone conversation that ties in to Venus, the Plague-Infested Rat, and the signature then the game won't tell you what you did wrong unless Hint Man would offer his services.
Nope. Earthbound is a perfect game. The faults lie with you.Patcheresu wrote:
I love the game like Dwanye Johnson loves his daughters in movies but it has faults.Ivalset wrote:
There are actually no faults in Earthbound. Not one.
1. Whoever thought that a separate battle theme just for hippies obviously had TROLOLOL on the mind. I'm looking at you, Itoi.
2. Somethings could have been handled better and some music was just stupid. Like most of the ordinary battle themes are downright mocking. They not only copy other songs but they don't make a good track when they did it.
3. I have discovered a HUGE bug that if done properly, let's you skip the 5th and 6th dungeons and not even know that there was a key item in the sewers. What kind of jerk listens in on phone calls made for museum curators anyway? If you just avoid the phone conversation that ties in to Venus, the Plague-Infested Rat, and the signature then the game won't tell you what you did wrong unless Hint Man would offer his services.
Chill out buddy, you don't even know who I am.Patcheresu wrote:
SILENCE!
As you can clearly see I have no respect for MODERATION. True power lies in ADMINISTRATION! I just treat mods like I treat regular users. Because as long as you aren't a stick in the mud you will soon realize you can't ban me or otherwise for just being informal. Now administrators? Guess what happened to deviantart when people were given administrative rights? How DARE you dislike MY work! BANHAMMER!
Let me recap:Ivalset wrote:
Chill out buddy, you don't even know who I am.Patcheresu wrote:
SILENCE!
As you can clearly see I have no respect for MODERATION. True power lies in ADMINISTRATION! I just treat mods like I treat regular users. Because as long as you aren't a stick in the mud you will soon realize you can't ban me or otherwise for just being informal. Now administrators? Guess what happened to deviantart when people were given administrative rights? How DARE you dislike MY work! BANHAMMER!
I am probably the second most laidback mod on these forums.
also i have administrator access
Actually, I'm pretty sure you are! There was absolutely no reason to bring up my moderator position in the first place.Patcheresu wrote:
I am not prejudiced to mods.
You were saying?Ivalset wrote:
There are actually no faults in Earthbound. Not one.Patcheresu wrote:
And whoever said Earthbound is the worst game ever and didn't provide any evidence is mean. It has its faults but at least it has good things about it.
Oh I see what you did thar. You'd rather have someone who's down to Earth than something that has no flaws.Ivalset wrote:
Yes, I said it has no faults and it is a perfect game.
It is not the best RPG.
If you are asking if I played Superman 64? Yeah I haved, worst trade EVER lolPatcheresu wrote:
Have you PLAYED it.
MetalMario201 wrote:
I need to track down a copy of Superman 64. Should be legendary
Patcheresu wrote:
Topic is derailing. Cut it out Ms. Animu.
NO. And your grammar sucks balls in multi-langual.Pokebis wrote:
[attachment=0:0bf09]Pheonix Wright 4komo.jpg[/attachment:0bf09]Patcheresu wrote:
Topic is derailing. Cut it out Ms. Animu.
............................................................................WeegeevsWeegee wrote:
But yeah that place would go to Secret of Mana at the same time.
:(Shootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s. It's not epic enough. Pac-Man, Galaga, and Donkey Kong are excused.
I highly agree with this.adam2046 wrote:
There's plenty of great arcade games from 80s.
I stopped reading here.Shootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s.
What is wrong with you!?!?! DDDDD:Shootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s.
Vanguard is an awesome game and you'd know it if you played itShootinglight wrote:
Any arcade game from the 1980s. It's not epic enough. Pac-Man, Galaga, and Donkey Kong are excused.
It's a great game gtfo.Max300 wrote:
Commander Keen, I never got to know how it worked... even though I bought it....
I know at least two exceptions to this:Two wrote:
Tip: movie/tv show-> game always sucksAzure_Kyte wrote:
Dual Sympathy did suck, yes it did. Good thing I try before I buy.
get outNexus Reaper wrote:
Kingdom Hearts: 358/2.
Boring shit.
You get in a random battle, you kill the enemies, and you get exp. That's pretty simple IMO. And the levels last longer then 30 seconds. (Excluding the Knight levels) And the humor in the game is pretty good, so I don't really see this as a worst game.CHOFF wrote:
30 second Hero. no kidding.
Personally, I think the fiighting system is really confusing and you are only allowed to finish a stage within 30 secs.
Mate seriously. That game lasts and it requires more than simple skill. It's not entirely reliant on its multiplayer (good) the story is long and challenging for fools like you (good) and it isn't generic and combines all the features of a classic Zelda game on DS.E-Hooker wrote:
Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Shittest control system ever, and having to go back to the temple...goddamn.
Oh I seerust45 wrote:
You get in a random battle, you kill the enemies, and you get exp. That's pretty simple IMO. And the levels last longer then 30 seconds. (Excluding the Knight levels) And the humor in the game is pretty good, so I don't really see this as a worst game.
I see the CDi Zelda games listed there which, while not very good, are much better than other games I've played and managed to hold my interest for the 2 hours it takes to play through them when you don't know what the hell to do. And the cutscenes are rich.Azure_Kyte wrote:
[lucky:fe019]Worst Game Ever[/lucky:fe019]
to put this into perspective for you:LaVolpe024 wrote:
Mate seriously. That game lasts and it requires more than simple skill. It's not entirely reliant on its multiplayer (good) the story is long and challenging for fools like you (good) and it isn't generic and combines all the features of a classic Zelda game on DS.E-Hooker wrote:
Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
Shittest control system ever, and having to go back to the temple...goddamn.
umad broLaVolpe024 wrote:
Then why didn't you just say "I'm awful at Phantom Hourglass, therefore I hate it?"
It's supposed make you scratch your head, that's the goddamn challenge. If you were more practical and patient then you'd have enjoyed the game more. I bet (by the looks of it) that you gave up quite easily. As for the controls, they may not suit some but controls are never versatile enough to suit every player. And one more thing, you could change some controls to suit you. Take some time and look around. Not every game is as linear as you want it to be.
+1awp wrote:
I thought the controls for Phantom Hourglass were alright. I got as far as the Heavy Metal part of the game (which is a very misleading title which tends to set you up for disappointment if you're like me) and I got to a spot where I needed Bombchus
and I had no idea where to get a Bombchu bag
rather than Gamefaqs it, I pretty much gave up entirely on the game. Which is a shame, because my favourite Zelda is Wind Waker and this one, while nothing like it, is technically a sequel
The best EGA graphics out there :3GRaYstreetN wrote:
This game is gorgeous...
the worst ever gamedfuzz1987 wrote:
Mario is missing
ITS A DISGRACE TO MARIO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSHMDoR8BRA
Also, I am going to say Superman 64. I actually played that game a lot. The last thing I remember before I slipped into insanity was some mission where I had to escort Lois Lane out of a factory. At set intervals, we would be jumped by a bunch of thugs or robots or something. I can't remember. All I remember is the way I had to protect Lois was to freeze her with my ice breath into a giant block of ice so the thugs could not punch her, and then proceed to beat them in a horribly clunky manner. I had to do this over and over for God knows how long. Then as soon as she thawed out, 50 guys would come out of nowhere and punch her to death.Ivalset wrote:
There are actually no faults in Earthbound. Not one.
Reminds me of Pokémon Emerald! Technically it seeded from execution time but this wasn't nearly enough if you were obsessed with shinies/high IVs/whatever. Squadrons of nerds obsessed with spoiling the game for others came up with methods of using a stopwatch to guarantee getting a poke with certain stats. They've been attacking the higher quality RNGs on the DS games ever since.awp wrote:
If it hasn't been mentioned yet,that gameshow with Howie Mandell where you arbitrarily selectah! Deal or No Deal, that's what it's called.
Due to a bug in the source code, the game always selects the same seed value in its randomization. What this means is, every time you boot the game up, the winning briefcase is always in the same location on the first round. I'm not sure if subsequent rounds are properly pseudo-random (it would make sense if it seeds off execution time, but hey, it could be another bug!) but that one offence is bad enough.
Also anyone who is willing to pay money for a pseudo-random number generator disguised as a "game" where you arbitrarily pick cells of numbers with no possibility of strategy damn well deserves a broken pseudo-random number generator.
Platformers only suck if you aren't any good at it.Neo@lex wrote:
Earthbound, Super Metroid and pretty much every Megaman platformer.
hataz be hatin'Neo@lex wrote:
Super Metroid
wait you've played that?mathexpert9981 wrote:
my least favorite game is plumbers don't wear ties.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyaF_gCKWsI
Post Ps1, right? Cause how could you hate the original trilogy? Just, how?ddrXero64 wrote:
and any Spyro game