What's going on with the Futsuu, btw?
forum
GlassSkinned - The Flawless Wings of Yatagarasu [Osu|Taiko]
posted
Total Posts
101
Topic Starter
The guy making Futsuu apparently sent it to me already earlier, it just never arrived, I'll ask him again later
[Pw]Forgotten
Muzukashii has two "i"s[Pw]Forgotten wrote:
TurtleStuffs wrote:
If it's good, sure
Finished. Try it ?
http://puu.sh/poGRC/900a44f197.osu
I wonder why the 4 empty diffs appear when you search for BPM>500?
Topic Starter
For sone reason, 0 BPM = whatever BPM
Ayyri
Hello~
NM requested via discord by _DT3.
Keep in mind, these are my suggestions, don't change something I mentioned unless it seems good to you!
If I didn't make a box for something, that doesn't mean I didn't look at it. It just means I didn't find anything wrong with it.
I'm skipping Kantan since I've already modded that.
NM requested via discord by _DT3.
Keep in mind, these are my suggestions, don't change something I mentioned unless it seems good to you!
If I didn't make a box for something, that doesn't mean I didn't look at it. It just means I didn't find anything wrong with it.
General
Make sure the tags match up in all of the difficulties. (Be it standard or taiko.)
I'm skipping Kantan since I've already modded that.
SEE's Futsuu
I will recheck Futsuu when it's actually finished, but here's what I have for now.
00:05:647 - You might want to have the volume lower when the song starts, then gradually make it lower. Because you can barely hear the melody right here, before it fades in. And it kind of just sounds like you're tapping to something that should be there, but it sounds like it's not. (ie. Have it at like 25% here.)
From 00:08:470 - to 00:10:588 - why the need to switch to k? Like I said in the previous point, the melody here is very quiet. I honestly suggest just using d's in this case.
00:11:294 - Here would be a good place to up the volume a bit. Since the melody repeats here. (Maybe like 50% would work. Depends on you. Just going off of my first suggestion here.)
00:16:941 - Like I said above, volume. (75% here.)
00:28:235 - ^ (100%)
00:17:999 - Remove for a small break. (Having a note on every 1/1 tick is not good.
00:19:411 - Same as above. (These removals can be changed, but you get the general idea of them. These are just so the remaining notes are in 3's and don't damage the overall rhythm trying to be conveyed.)
00:21:529 - ^
00:22:941 - ^
00:24:352 - ^
00:24:705 - and 00:25:058 - ctrl+g if you do the above removal.
00:26:470 - Remove. Same reasoning as before.
00:28:235 - Rather than having d-d-d, it's a lot more fitting to have a D. It follows the finish in the background here, rather than trying to follow the echo of it. (You would need to remove00:28:411 - and 00:28:588 - and change 00:28:235 - to D.)
00:29:999 - Remove. Same reasoning as before.
00:31:058 - Why a k instead of a d? Every other time, you've mapped this as a d. (Which makes sense for the faint sound here.) I suggest changing 00:31:058 - to d and removing 00:31:235 - and 00:31:411 - (If you really want a k in this pattern, change 00:30:705 - to a k.)
00:32:470 - ^ (00:32:117 - as k if you wanted that in the pattern.)
00:32:823 - Remove for more emphasis on the repeated faint sound at 00:33:176 -
00:33:176 - Same point as 00:32:470 -
00:40:941 - Change to D. The main melody of the song is starting here. (As well as the bigger impact here.)
00:50:823 - Change to k. This follows the rhythm a lot better than d.
00:52:235 - Change to K. There's a finish in the background here.
00:57:352 - Like the rhythm before, k---d-k sounds good for the sounds here. And this pattern is the same as the last one, and I get that you wanted it to be the opposite, but this one sounds stronger than the last one. And it honestly sounds a lot better having 00:57:352 - as k and ctrl+ging 00:57:705 - and 00:57:882 -
00:05:647 - You might want to have the volume lower when the song starts, then gradually make it lower. Because you can barely hear the melody right here, before it fades in. And it kind of just sounds like you're tapping to something that should be there, but it sounds like it's not. (ie. Have it at like 25% here.)
From 00:08:470 - to 00:10:588 - why the need to switch to k? Like I said in the previous point, the melody here is very quiet. I honestly suggest just using d's in this case.
00:11:294 - Here would be a good place to up the volume a bit. Since the melody repeats here. (Maybe like 50% would work. Depends on you. Just going off of my first suggestion here.)
00:16:941 - Like I said above, volume. (75% here.)
00:28:235 - ^ (100%)
00:17:999 - Remove for a small break. (Having a note on every 1/1 tick is not good.
00:19:411 - Same as above. (These removals can be changed, but you get the general idea of them. These are just so the remaining notes are in 3's and don't damage the overall rhythm trying to be conveyed.)
00:21:529 - ^
00:22:941 - ^
00:24:352 - ^
00:24:705 - and 00:25:058 - ctrl+g if you do the above removal.
00:26:470 - Remove. Same reasoning as before.
00:28:235 - Rather than having d-d-d, it's a lot more fitting to have a D. It follows the finish in the background here, rather than trying to follow the echo of it. (You would need to remove00:28:411 - and 00:28:588 - and change 00:28:235 - to D.)
00:29:999 - Remove. Same reasoning as before.
00:31:058 - Why a k instead of a d? Every other time, you've mapped this as a d. (Which makes sense for the faint sound here.) I suggest changing 00:31:058 - to d and removing 00:31:235 - and 00:31:411 - (If you really want a k in this pattern, change 00:30:705 - to a k.)
00:32:470 - ^ (00:32:117 - as k if you wanted that in the pattern.)
00:32:823 - Remove for more emphasis on the repeated faint sound at 00:33:176 -
00:33:176 - Same point as 00:32:470 -
00:40:941 - Change to D. The main melody of the song is starting here. (As well as the bigger impact here.)
00:50:823 - Change to k. This follows the rhythm a lot better than d.
00:52:235 - Change to K. There's a finish in the background here.
00:57:352 - Like the rhythm before, k---d-k sounds good for the sounds here. And this pattern is the same as the last one, and I get that you wanted it to be the opposite, but this one sounds stronger than the last one. And it honestly sounds a lot better having 00:57:352 - as k and ctrl+ging 00:57:705 - and 00:57:882 -
Pw's Muzukashii
From 00:05:647 - to 00:28:235 - check Futsuu for what I said about volume in these parts.
00:24:529 - , 00:24:882 - , and 00:25:235 - sound like they've been accidentally moved back two ticks. They aren't following anything, so I would move those three notes to the previous white ticks. (00:24:352 - , 00:24:705 - , and 00:25:058 - )
00:27:352 - Remove, there's a move important note to be following at 00:27:529 - Since you've been following it up until now.
00:27:529 - Add a d.
00:27:705 - Remove. Same reason as above.
00:28:058 - Move to 00:27:882 - same reasoning as before.
00:28:764 - , 00:29:117 - , and 00:29:470 - move forward to the previous white ticks.
00:29:646 - Remove this finisher. Nothing really calls for this here. (At 00:28:235 - it was justified. But here, no.)
00:30:176 - , 00:30:529 - , and 00:30:882 - Same point as before.
00:31:058 - Same point as before.
00:31:588 - Move to 00:31:411 - same reason as all the other times. (The rhythm that these moves are following, is a lot stronger than what you seem(?) to be trying to follow.)
00:31:764 - Same point as before here too.
00:32:294 - , 00:32:646 - , and 00:32:999 - You know what I'm going to say.
00:33:176 - Here too.
If you apply all of the above removals, you might want to remove some notes within 00:27:529 - to 00:33:176 - to it's not just tedious 1/1 tapping.
01:38:117 - Decrease the volume here, since the sounds are rather quiet. (25/50%)
01:49:058 - Increase the volume here. (50/75%)
You're skipping an important note at 01:49:058 - (Which is where the background noises kick in.) So you might want to consider having a pattern like moving 01:48:705 - to 01:49:058 -
01:59:999 - Increase the volume here. (75/100%)
02:11:029 - Move to 02:11:117 - You've never used a double until now, so this seems like a rather odd pattern. (Also it sounds a lot better at 02:11:117 - )
02:32:293 - Remove the finisher here. Nothing really calls for it here.
02:36:705 - , 02:37:234 - , 02:38:117 - 02:38:646 - , 02:39:529 - , 02:42:881 - , 02:43:764 - , and 02:44:293 - Nothing calls for these finishers. Remove them.(You even broke your finish pattern at 02:38:999 - , 02:40:940 - , and 02:44:646 - )
02:45:176 - Change to D. There's a actual finish sound in the background here, and you've mapped to this before.
02:54:529 - Remove for a small break in the long pattern here. (Since you have two triplets in it.)
03:19:058 - Change to D. There's a finish sound here, and you've mapped this previously.
03:29:999 - and 03:30:175 - ctrl+g. This follows the rhythm better, and follows your other patterns of d-d-k before the two k-d-k's.
00:24:529 - , 00:24:882 - , and 00:25:235 - sound like they've been accidentally moved back two ticks. They aren't following anything, so I would move those three notes to the previous white ticks. (00:24:352 - , 00:24:705 - , and 00:25:058 - )
00:27:352 - Remove, there's a move important note to be following at 00:27:529 - Since you've been following it up until now.
00:27:529 - Add a d.
00:27:705 - Remove. Same reason as above.
00:28:058 - Move to 00:27:882 - same reasoning as before.
00:28:764 - , 00:29:117 - , and 00:29:470 - move forward to the previous white ticks.
00:29:646 - Remove this finisher. Nothing really calls for this here. (At 00:28:235 - it was justified. But here, no.)
00:30:176 - , 00:30:529 - , and 00:30:882 - Same point as before.
00:31:058 - Same point as before.
00:31:588 - Move to 00:31:411 - same reason as all the other times. (The rhythm that these moves are following, is a lot stronger than what you seem(?) to be trying to follow.)
00:31:764 - Same point as before here too.
00:32:294 - , 00:32:646 - , and 00:32:999 - You know what I'm going to say.
00:33:176 - Here too.
If you apply all of the above removals, you might want to remove some notes within 00:27:529 - to 00:33:176 - to it's not just tedious 1/1 tapping.
01:38:117 - Decrease the volume here, since the sounds are rather quiet. (25/50%)
01:49:058 - Increase the volume here. (50/75%)
You're skipping an important note at 01:49:058 - (Which is where the background noises kick in.) So you might want to consider having a pattern like moving 01:48:705 - to 01:49:058 -
01:59:999 - Increase the volume here. (75/100%)
02:11:029 - Move to 02:11:117 - You've never used a double until now, so this seems like a rather odd pattern. (Also it sounds a lot better at 02:11:117 - )
02:32:293 - Remove the finisher here. Nothing really calls for it here.
02:36:705 - , 02:37:234 - , 02:38:117 - 02:38:646 - , 02:39:529 - , 02:42:881 - , 02:43:764 - , and 02:44:293 - Nothing calls for these finishers. Remove them.(You even broke your finish pattern at 02:38:999 - , 02:40:940 - , and 02:44:646 - )
02:45:176 - Change to D. There's a actual finish sound in the background here, and you've mapped to this before.
02:54:529 - Remove for a small break in the long pattern here. (Since you have two triplets in it.)
03:19:058 - Change to D. There's a finish sound here, and you've mapped this previously.
03:29:999 - and 03:30:175 - ctrl+g. This follows the rhythm better, and follows your other patterns of d-d-k before the two k-d-k's.
Ono's Oni
I think this is my favorite difficulty.
00:16:941 - You might want to have the volume a bit quieter here. (I've said this for all the other difficulties too.) Refer to Futsuu for the timestamps, if you need them.
00:40:941 - Change to D. There's a finish sound in the background here, as well as the rhythm is changing. (Also you followed it at 01:03:529 - )
I don't really agree with your use of K's at like 00:52:588 - or 00:53:293 - the kicks aren't that emphasized. (I'd still suggest a D at 00:52:235 - and removing 00:52:323 - but that isn't exactly following with your K's. But you did follow this type of sound at 01:03:529 - )
Within the second half of the first kiai (01:14:823 - to 01:26:117 - ) You've changed how many finishers you're using it's the same rhythm, but you've changed it to doubles as well. Which seems pretty weird. (It'd be nice to know your reasoning behind that if you decide to not do anything about it/you think it's fine as is.)
01:40:058 - Decrease the volume here. (Refer to Muzukashii.)
03:19:058 - Change to D, and remove 03:18:970 - there's a finish sound here.
03:51:528 - I can honestly say I dislike ending on a slider. I think it would be more impactful to shorten the slider to end at 03:52:587 - and have a finisher at 03:52:940 - (D or K. Up to you, if you agree.)
00:16:941 - You might want to have the volume a bit quieter here. (I've said this for all the other difficulties too.) Refer to Futsuu for the timestamps, if you need them.
00:40:941 - Change to D. There's a finish sound in the background here, as well as the rhythm is changing. (Also you followed it at 01:03:529 - )
I don't really agree with your use of K's at like 00:52:588 - or 00:53:293 - the kicks aren't that emphasized. (I'd still suggest a D at 00:52:235 - and removing 00:52:323 - but that isn't exactly following with your K's. But you did follow this type of sound at 01:03:529 - )
Within the second half of the first kiai (01:14:823 - to 01:26:117 - ) You've changed how many finishers you're using it's the same rhythm, but you've changed it to doubles as well. Which seems pretty weird. (It'd be nice to know your reasoning behind that if you decide to not do anything about it/you think it's fine as is.)
01:40:058 - Decrease the volume here. (Refer to Muzukashii.)
03:19:058 - Change to D, and remove 03:18:970 - there's a finish sound here.
03:51:528 - I can honestly say I dislike ending on a slider. I think it would be more impactful to shorten the slider to end at 03:52:587 - and have a finisher at 03:52:940 - (D or K. Up to you, if you agree.)
Hope the map gets finished soon.
I may need to give the rest of my map to someone else because I don't have enough inspiration, but hopefully not.
I may need to give the rest of my map to someone else because I don't have enough inspiration, but hopefully not.
Finally I can check it.
Download: http://puu.sh/q9aIb/a8421b670f.7z
Yeah, would be nice if our names are into the tags.
Thank you for your mod!Ayyri wrote:
Ono's OniI think this is my favorite difficulty.
00:16:941 - You might want to have the volume a bit quieter here. (I've said this for all the other difficulties too.) Refer to Futsuu for the timestamps, if you need them. Yeah, I think we can do that. Accelerating the volume up from part to part.
00:40:941 - Change to D. There's a finish sound in the background here, as well as the rhythm is changing. (Also you followed it at 01:03:529 - ) Possible, but normaly I do not use finishers at the beginning at a stanza as I use them (as the name indicates) to rather finish a stanza instead of starting it. In the kiai I used it because, it is coherent with the upcoming finishers and scattered through the whole kiai.
I don't really agree with your use of K's at like 00:52:588 - or 00:53:293 - the kicks aren't that emphasized. (I'd still suggest a D at 00:52:235 - and removing 00:52:323 - but that isn't exactly following with your K's. But you did follow this type of sound at 01:03:529 - ) The thing is, I do not follow the song strictly as I am improvising a lot in general. Yes, I can go for a normal k instead of finishers, but without, the 1/4 dons are not really set in retribution. The finishers in the kiai belong to another part of the song, and make it be more emphasized, as D are louder than the previous K.
Within the second half of the first kiai (01:14:823 - to 01:26:117 - ) You've changed how many finishers you're using it's the same rhythm, but you've changed it to doubles as well. Which seems pretty weird. (It'd be nice to know your reasoning behind that if you decide to not do anything about it/you think it's fine as is.) That's something I was thinking about previously as well. While I don't believe the patterns itself are a problem, as they are evenly and coherently placed, I rather believe it is the impact of this part compared to previous one. Previous one had way more finishers, so upcoming one is losing a lot of emphasize here, which loss I tried to minimize by having harder / more 1/4, but looks like it didn't turn that convincingly. Will check that again.
01:40:058 - Decrease the volume here. (Refer to Muzukashii.) It is possible, but I don't really see a reason to do so, as it doesn't really disturb the song itself. I would even say that keeping it is the more proper move here, since the patterns are improvised and hence, should give a clear feedback how it is played.
03:19:058 - Change to D, and remove 03:18:970 - there's a finish sound here. Yeah, I agree. Especially because finisher at 03:07:764 (1) - was standing pretty much alone.
03:51:528 - I can honestly say I dislike ending on a slider. I think it would be more impactful to shorten the slider to end at 03:52:587 - and have a finisher at 03:52:940 - (D or K. Up to you, if you agree.) Good suggestion. Yeah, I kinda had the same issue here. Changed it and expanded slider even a bit futher.
Download: http://puu.sh/q9aIb/a8421b670f.7z
Yeah, would be nice if our names are into the tags.
Topic Starter
Thank god finally ^^OnosakiHito wrote:
Finally I can check it.Thank you for your mod!Ayyri wrote:
Ono's OniI think this is my favorite difficulty.
00:16:941 - You might want to have the volume a bit quieter here. (I've said this for all the other difficulties too.) Refer to Futsuu for the timestamps, if you need them. Yeah, I think we can do that. Accelerating the volume up from part to part.
00:40:941 - Change to D. There's a finish sound in the background here, as well as the rhythm is changing. (Also you followed it at 01:03:529 - ) Possible, but normaly I do not use finishers at the beginning at a stanza as I use them (as the name indicates) to rather finish a stanza instead of starting it. In the kiai I used it because, it is coherent with the upcoming finishers and scattered through the whole kiai.
I don't really agree with your use of K's at like 00:52:588 - or 00:53:293 - the kicks aren't that emphasized. (I'd still suggest a D at 00:52:235 - and removing 00:52:323 - but that isn't exactly following with your K's. But you did follow this type of sound at 01:03:529 - ) The thing is, I do not follow the song strictly as I am improvising a lot in general. Yes, I can go for a normal k instead of finishers, but without, the 1/4 dons are not really set in retribution. The finishers in the kiai belong to another part of the song, and make it be more emphasized, as D are louder than the previous K.
Within the second half of the first kiai (01:14:823 - to 01:26:117 - ) You've changed how many finishers you're using it's the same rhythm, but you've changed it to doubles as well. Which seems pretty weird. (It'd be nice to know your reasoning behind that if you decide to not do anything about it/you think it's fine as is.) That's something I was thinking about previously as well. While I don't believe the patterns itself are a problem, as they are evenly and coherently placed, I rather believe it is the impact of this part compared to previous one. Previous one had way more finishers, so upcoming one is losing a lot of emphasize here, which loss I tried to minimize by having harder / more 1/4, but looks like it didn't turn that convincingly. Will check that again.
01:40:058 - Decrease the volume here. (Refer to Muzukashii.) It is possible, but I don't really see a reason to do so, as it doesn't really disturb the song itself. I would even say that keeping it is the more proper move here, since the patterns are improvised and hence, should give a clear feedback how it is played.
03:19:058 - Change to D, and remove 03:18:970 - there's a finish sound here. Yeah, I agree. Especially because finisher at 03:07:764 (1) - was standing pretty much alone.
03:51:528 - I can honestly say I dislike ending on a slider. I think it would be more impactful to shorten the slider to end at 03:52:587 - and have a finisher at 03:52:940 - (D or K. Up to you, if you agree.) Good suggestion. Yeah, I kinda had the same issue here. Changed it and expanded slider even a bit futher.
Download: http://puu.sh/q9aIb/a8421b670f.7z
Yeah, would be nice if our names are into the tags.
Um, I will add in the names into the tags after I am back from vacation (and probably update it too then cause now the BSS if messing me up)
[Pw]Forgotten
thank you Mod, Updated.Ayyri wrote:
Hello~
NM requested via discord by _DT3.
Keep in mind, these are my suggestions, don't change something I mentioned unless it seems good to you!
If I didn't make a box for something, that doesn't mean I didn't look at it. It just means I didn't find anything wrong with it.GeneralMake sure the tags match up in all of the difficulties. (Be it standard or taiko.)
I'm skipping Kantan since I've already modded that.Pw's MuzukashiiFrom 00:05:647 - to 00:28:235 - check Futsuu for what I said about volume in these parts.
00:24:529 - , 00:24:882 - , and 00:25:235 - sound like they've been accidentally moved back two ticks. They aren't following anything, so I would move those three notes to the previous white ticks. (00:24:352 - , 00:24:705 - , and 00:25:058 - )
00:27:352 - Remove, there's a move important note to be following at 00:27:529 - Since you've been following it up until now.
00:27:529 - Add a d.
00:27:705 - Remove. Same reason as above.
00:28:058 - Move to 00:27:882 - same reasoning as before.
00:28:764 - , 00:29:117 - , and 00:29:470 - move forward to the previous white ticks.
00:29:646 - Remove this finisher. Nothing really calls for this here. (At 00:28:235 - it was justified. But here, no.)
00:30:176 - , 00:30:529 - , and 00:30:882 - Same point as before.
00:31:058 - Same point as before.
00:31:588 - Move to 00:31:411 - same reason as all the other times. (The rhythm that these moves are following, is a lot stronger than what you seem(?) to be trying to follow.)
00:31:764 - Same point as before here too.
00:32:294 - , 00:32:646 - , and 00:32:999 - You know what I'm going to say.
00:33:176 - Here too.
If you apply all of the above removals, you might want to remove some notes within 00:27:529 - to 00:33:176 - to it's not just tedious 1/1 tapping.
01:38:117 - Decrease the volume here, since the sounds are rather quiet. (25/50%)
01:49:058 - Increase the volume here. (50/75%)
You're skipping an important note at 01:49:058 - (Which is where the background noises kick in.) So you might want to consider having a pattern like moving 01:48:705 - to 01:49:058 -
01:59:999 - Increase the volume here. (75/100%)
02:11:029 - Move to 02:11:117 - You've never used a double until now, so this seems like a rather odd pattern. (Also it sounds a lot better at 02:11:117 - )
02:32:293 - Remove the finisher here. Nothing really calls for it here.
02:36:705 - , 02:37:234 - , 02:38:117 - 02:38:646 - , 02:39:529 - , 02:42:881 - , 02:43:764 - , and 02:44:293 - Nothing calls for these finishers. Remove them.(You even broke your finish pattern at 02:38:999 - , 02:40:940 - , and 02:44:646 - )
02:45:176 - Change to D. There's a actual finish sound in the background here, and you've mapped to this before.
02:54:529 - Remove for a small break in the long pattern here. (Since you have two triplets in it.)
03:19:058 - Change to D. There's a finish sound here, and you've mapped this previously.
03:29:999 - and 03:30:175 - ctrl+g. This follows the rhythm better, and follows your other patterns of d-d-k before the two k-d-k's.
http://puu.sh/qkXR7/9af8d236fc.osu
Topic Starter
Reviving this one day with different people for GDing
Will this be further mapped, it would probably be really loved when it's rnaked
Topic Starter
I am gonna revive it sometime early next year with a completely remapped versiondestroyerwilly wrote:
Will this be further mapped, it would probably be really loved when it's rnaked
Topic Starter
Aaand we're back! I'll try to get stuff done as soon as possible!
Topic Starter
Will be finished soon and might be harder by thenNikitane0 wrote:
Insane toooooooo easy.
When i download it, its an .osu file and i cant change it please send help!
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.