If it's good, sure
Muzukashii has two "i"s[Pw]Forgotten wrote:
TurtleStuffs wrote:
If it's good, sure
Finished. Try it ?
http://puu.sh/poGRC/900a44f197.osu
Thank you for your mod!Ayyri wrote:
Ono's OniI think this is my favorite difficulty.
00:16:941 - You might want to have the volume a bit quieter here. (I've said this for all the other difficulties too.) Refer to Futsuu for the timestamps, if you need them. Yeah, I think we can do that. Accelerating the volume up from part to part.
00:40:941 - Change to D. There's a finish sound in the background here, as well as the rhythm is changing. (Also you followed it at 01:03:529 - ) Possible, but normaly I do not use finishers at the beginning at a stanza as I use them (as the name indicates) to rather finish a stanza instead of starting it. In the kiai I used it because, it is coherent with the upcoming finishers and scattered through the whole kiai.
I don't really agree with your use of K's at like 00:52:588 - or 00:53:293 - the kicks aren't that emphasized. (I'd still suggest a D at 00:52:235 - and removing 00:52:323 - but that isn't exactly following with your K's. But you did follow this type of sound at 01:03:529 - ) The thing is, I do not follow the song strictly as I am improvising a lot in general. Yes, I can go for a normal k instead of finishers, but without, the 1/4 dons are not really set in retribution. The finishers in the kiai belong to another part of the song, and make it be more emphasized, as D are louder than the previous K.
Within the second half of the first kiai (01:14:823 - to 01:26:117 - ) You've changed how many finishers you're using it's the same rhythm, but you've changed it to doubles as well. Which seems pretty weird. (It'd be nice to know your reasoning behind that if you decide to not do anything about it/you think it's fine as is.) That's something I was thinking about previously as well. While I don't believe the patterns itself are a problem, as they are evenly and coherently placed, I rather believe it is the impact of this part compared to previous one. Previous one had way more finishers, so upcoming one is losing a lot of emphasize here, which loss I tried to minimize by having harder / more 1/4, but looks like it didn't turn that convincingly. Will check that again.
01:40:058 - Decrease the volume here. (Refer to Muzukashii.) It is possible, but I don't really see a reason to do so, as it doesn't really disturb the song itself. I would even say that keeping it is the more proper move here, since the patterns are improvised and hence, should give a clear feedback how it is played.
03:19:058 - Change to D, and remove 03:18:970 - there's a finish sound here. Yeah, I agree. Especially because finisher at 03:07:764 (1) - was standing pretty much alone.
03:51:528 - I can honestly say I dislike ending on a slider. I think it would be more impactful to shorten the slider to end at 03:52:587 - and have a finisher at 03:52:940 - (D or K. Up to you, if you agree.) Good suggestion. Yeah, I kinda had the same issue here. Changed it and expanded slider even a bit futher.
Thank god finally ^^OnosakiHito wrote:
Finally I can check it.Thank you for your mod!Ayyri wrote:
Ono's OniI think this is my favorite difficulty.
00:16:941 - You might want to have the volume a bit quieter here. (I've said this for all the other difficulties too.) Refer to Futsuu for the timestamps, if you need them. Yeah, I think we can do that. Accelerating the volume up from part to part.
00:40:941 - Change to D. There's a finish sound in the background here, as well as the rhythm is changing. (Also you followed it at 01:03:529 - ) Possible, but normaly I do not use finishers at the beginning at a stanza as I use them (as the name indicates) to rather finish a stanza instead of starting it. In the kiai I used it because, it is coherent with the upcoming finishers and scattered through the whole kiai.
I don't really agree with your use of K's at like 00:52:588 - or 00:53:293 - the kicks aren't that emphasized. (I'd still suggest a D at 00:52:235 - and removing 00:52:323 - but that isn't exactly following with your K's. But you did follow this type of sound at 01:03:529 - ) The thing is, I do not follow the song strictly as I am improvising a lot in general. Yes, I can go for a normal k instead of finishers, but without, the 1/4 dons are not really set in retribution. The finishers in the kiai belong to another part of the song, and make it be more emphasized, as D are louder than the previous K.
Within the second half of the first kiai (01:14:823 - to 01:26:117 - ) You've changed how many finishers you're using it's the same rhythm, but you've changed it to doubles as well. Which seems pretty weird. (It'd be nice to know your reasoning behind that if you decide to not do anything about it/you think it's fine as is.) That's something I was thinking about previously as well. While I don't believe the patterns itself are a problem, as they are evenly and coherently placed, I rather believe it is the impact of this part compared to previous one. Previous one had way more finishers, so upcoming one is losing a lot of emphasize here, which loss I tried to minimize by having harder / more 1/4, but looks like it didn't turn that convincingly. Will check that again.
01:40:058 - Decrease the volume here. (Refer to Muzukashii.) It is possible, but I don't really see a reason to do so, as it doesn't really disturb the song itself. I would even say that keeping it is the more proper move here, since the patterns are improvised and hence, should give a clear feedback how it is played.
03:19:058 - Change to D, and remove 03:18:970 - there's a finish sound here. Yeah, I agree. Especially because finisher at 03:07:764 (1) - was standing pretty much alone.
03:51:528 - I can honestly say I dislike ending on a slider. I think it would be more impactful to shorten the slider to end at 03:52:587 - and have a finisher at 03:52:940 - (D or K. Up to you, if you agree.) Good suggestion. Yeah, I kinda had the same issue here. Changed it and expanded slider even a bit futher.
Download: http://puu.sh/q9aIb/a8421b670f.7z
Yeah, would be nice if our names are into the tags.
thank you Mod, Updated.Ayyri wrote:
Hello~
NM requested via discord by _DT3.
Keep in mind, these are my suggestions, don't change something I mentioned unless it seems good to you!
If I didn't make a box for something, that doesn't mean I didn't look at it. It just means I didn't find anything wrong with it.GeneralMake sure the tags match up in all of the difficulties. (Be it standard or taiko.)
I'm skipping Kantan since I've already modded that.Pw's MuzukashiiFrom 00:05:647 - to 00:28:235 - check Futsuu for what I said about volume in these parts.
00:24:529 - , 00:24:882 - , and 00:25:235 - sound like they've been accidentally moved back two ticks. They aren't following anything, so I would move those three notes to the previous white ticks. (00:24:352 - , 00:24:705 - , and 00:25:058 - )
00:27:352 - Remove, there's a move important note to be following at 00:27:529 - Since you've been following it up until now.
00:27:529 - Add a d.
00:27:705 - Remove. Same reason as above.
00:28:058 - Move to 00:27:882 - same reasoning as before.
00:28:764 - , 00:29:117 - , and 00:29:470 - move forward to the previous white ticks.
00:29:646 - Remove this finisher. Nothing really calls for this here. (At 00:28:235 - it was justified. But here, no.)
00:30:176 - , 00:30:529 - , and 00:30:882 - Same point as before.
00:31:058 - Same point as before.
00:31:588 - Move to 00:31:411 - same reason as all the other times. (The rhythm that these moves are following, is a lot stronger than what you seem(?) to be trying to follow.)
00:31:764 - Same point as before here too.
00:32:294 - , 00:32:646 - , and 00:32:999 - You know what I'm going to say.
00:33:176 - Here too.
If you apply all of the above removals, you might want to remove some notes within 00:27:529 - to 00:33:176 - to it's not just tedious 1/1 tapping.
01:38:117 - Decrease the volume here, since the sounds are rather quiet. (25/50%)
01:49:058 - Increase the volume here. (50/75%)
You're skipping an important note at 01:49:058 - (Which is where the background noises kick in.) So you might want to consider having a pattern like moving 01:48:705 - to 01:49:058 -
01:59:999 - Increase the volume here. (75/100%)
02:11:029 - Move to 02:11:117 - You've never used a double until now, so this seems like a rather odd pattern. (Also it sounds a lot better at 02:11:117 - )
02:32:293 - Remove the finisher here. Nothing really calls for it here.
02:36:705 - , 02:37:234 - , 02:38:117 - 02:38:646 - , 02:39:529 - , 02:42:881 - , 02:43:764 - , and 02:44:293 - Nothing calls for these finishers. Remove them.(You even broke your finish pattern at 02:38:999 - , 02:40:940 - , and 02:44:646 - )
02:45:176 - Change to D. There's a actual finish sound in the background here, and you've mapped to this before.
02:54:529 - Remove for a small break in the long pattern here. (Since you have two triplets in it.)
03:19:058 - Change to D. There's a finish sound here, and you've mapped this previously.
03:29:999 - and 03:30:175 - ctrl+g. This follows the rhythm better, and follows your other patterns of d-d-k before the two k-d-k's.
I am gonna revive it sometime early next year with a completely remapped versiondestroyerwilly wrote:
Will this be further mapped, it would probably be really loved when it's rnaked
Will be finished soon and might be harder by thenNikitane0 wrote:
Insane toooooooo easy.