-should add "dashyy-" and "imbor" to tags since they gded
-01:32:526 - you could have higher volume here considering it's probably the strongest drum in the song, 85% or 90% would work good.
-you have two points at 00:07:378 - with different volumes, i suggest you turn it into 70% considering the intensity of the part
-00:07:378 - why didn't you just make this x0.25sv like you did at 00:14:437 - pretty unneeded greenline at 00:07:709 -
-nothing is playing at 00:55:687 (1,2,3) - but you have it be the same spacing as spots like 00:18:629 (1,2,3,4) - , even 00:57:452 (2,3,4) - seems stronger than it, i suggest you lower the spacing for it
-01:38:923 - skipping this doesn't seem right, you're skipping the vocals on the sliderend and you could also add a 1/2 slider or 3/4 slider at 01:38:923 - to emphasize 01:39:143 -
-why did you stack 01:01:202 (1,2) - and 01:43:555 (1,2) - differently even though they are the exact same, i suggest you change one of them to look like the other
-01:51:055 (2,3) - was this meant to not be stacked on 01:50:393 (4) - it's pretty noticeable in gameplay imo so i suggest you fix that
-01:57:452 (4,1) - incorrect stack, it should look more like 01:57:121 (2,3) - if that was what you were going for
-you stacked 00:42:231 (2) - onto 00:41:790 (1) - when there was a 1/1 gap, but for the rest of the map you only stack 1/2, i suggest you not stack this considering this is the only one in the entire map
-i suggest in some way you show that 00:59:658 (5,6,7) - are all different. you mapped them as if they were the same, but they arent. you can hear that 00:59:658 (5) - has constant 1/4 playing, 00:59:879 (6) - has just 1/2 beats, and 01:00:099 (7) - also has 1/2, but has a carry type of sound on
01:00:099 - . you could make 00:59:658 (5) - a quad 1/4 repeat and have 00:59:879 (6,7) - just be two 1/2 circles and 01:00:099 (7) - as the 1/2 slider that you mapped. same thing at 01:42:011 (5,6,7) -
-00:58:555 (1) - shouldn't be nced, it's still part of 00:56:790 (1,2) - i suggest you nc 00:59:658 (3) - instead
-00:19:290 (5,6) - is this sort of jump intentional? it's kinda of obvious you aren't following ds for that
-00:30:099 (5,1) - what's with this jump? their isn't anything strong playing at 00:30:540 (1) - , so i suggest you don't add that
-if the jumps were intentional, i would take them out since then it would make the spread from normal to advanced too difficult tbh