Hi,m4m4m44mm44m4
• correct offset: 414
call me back
• correct offset: 414
like that
• tag conflict in this diff
• 00:42:750 - this is a unique vocal rhythm, i suggest you take advantage of it and diverge from the usual 1/2 rhythm if you want
• 00:54:012 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Seems like there's a lack of emphasis on this pattern because of all the similar spacing. The rhythm is also pretty uninteresting compared to the parts before with kicksliders on stronger vocals
• 01:03:915 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Since this buildup is pretty intense why not do something more interesting with rhythm? for example, adding sliders to make it more dynamic or possibly mapping to the drums. I see where you're going with focusing rhythm on the vocals though
• 01:07:264 (2) - 01:11:924 (2) - 01:15:419 (2) - These notes don't have anything underneath them, they're overmapped. THe other circles are all okay because they have the quiet sound under them, such as at 01:06:099 (2) - (the bass) or at 01:16:585 (2) - (the other random percussion)
• 01:15:419 (2) - Consider moving this above the slidertail of 01:14:983 (1) - on the y axis. The movement you have quickly going down then up at 01:14:983 (1,2,3) - isnt consistent with the smoother flow you've used so far
• 00:42:750 - this is a unique vocal rhythm, i suggest you take advantage of it and diverge from the usual 1/2 rhythm if you want
• 00:54:012 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Seems like there's a lack of emphasis on this pattern because of all the similar spacing. The rhythm is also pretty uninteresting compared to the parts before with kicksliders on stronger vocals
• 01:03:915 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Since this buildup is pretty intense why not do something more interesting with rhythm? for example, adding sliders to make it more dynamic or possibly mapping to the drums. I see where you're going with focusing rhythm on the vocals though
• 01:07:264 (2) - 01:11:924 (2) - 01:15:419 (2) - These notes don't have anything underneath them, they're overmapped. THe other circles are all okay because they have the quiet sound under them, such as at 01:06:099 (2) - (the bass) or at 01:16:585 (2) - (the other random percussion)
• 01:15:419 (2) - Consider moving this above the slidertail of 01:14:983 (1) - on the y axis. The movement you have quickly going down then up at 01:14:983 (1,2,3) - isnt consistent with the smoother flow you've used so far
lexis
• 00:01:876 - 00:06:536 - I see how you mapped to guitar, but I still think these notes would be better off clickable because they're on new chords in the chord progression
• 00:28:089 (7,1) - Note is stronger with bass and vocals, increase spacing for emphasis?
• 00:42:798 (3) - this note is unidentifiable int he music, sounds very overmapped
• 00:47:021 (1,2,3,4) - Rhythm choice is strange here because of how you prioritize this note 00:47:895 - vs. these 00:48:041 - Since this is a slow calm part they are better all clickable. A ctrl+g on 00:47:021 (1,2) - would be a better rhythm choice. Same for 00:49:352 (1,2,3,4) - 00:51:973 (2,3,4) - etc.
• 01:07:264 01:11:924 01:15:419 - Same thing as top diff: These notes don't have anything underneath them, they're overmapped. THe other circles are all okay because they have the quiet sound under them, such as at 01:06:099 (the bass) or at 01:16:585 (the other random percussion)
• 01:08:866 (4,5) - 01:09:448 (6,7) - Increast spacing here, sliderheads are close together compared to anything else
• 01:14:400 (7,1) - This is picky, but you should move 1 farther away from 7 for more consistent visual spacing for this area 01:13:526 (4,5,6,7,8,1) -
• 01:17:313 (1) - I dont like this placement. The overlap with 01:16:730 (3,4) - feels forced
• 00:28:089 (7,1) - Note is stronger with bass and vocals, increase spacing for emphasis?
• 00:42:798 (3) - this note is unidentifiable int he music, sounds very overmapped
• 00:47:021 (1,2,3,4) - Rhythm choice is strange here because of how you prioritize this note 00:47:895 - vs. these 00:48:041 - Since this is a slow calm part they are better all clickable. A ctrl+g on 00:47:021 (1,2) - would be a better rhythm choice. Same for 00:49:352 (1,2,3,4) - 00:51:973 (2,3,4) - etc.
• 01:07:264 01:11:924 01:15:419 - Same thing as top diff: These notes don't have anything underneath them, they're overmapped. THe other circles are all okay because they have the quiet sound under them, such as at 01:06:099 (the bass) or at 01:16:585 (the other random percussion)
• 01:08:866 (4,5) - 01:09:448 (6,7) - Increast spacing here, sliderheads are close together compared to anything else
• 01:14:400 (7,1) - This is picky, but you should move 1 farther away from 7 for more consistent visual spacing for this area 01:13:526 (4,5,6,7,8,1) -
• 01:17:313 (1) - I dont like this placement. The overlap with 01:16:730 (3,4) - feels forced
Lilyanna
• 00:16:585 (5) 00:18:915 (5) - Sounds very overmapped to me, idk where you got this rhythm choice from
• 01:01:293 (2,3) - Larger jump here feels random because there's no beat that stands out here. Also why the small spacing on 01:02:749 (9,10) -
• 01:13:235 (2,3) - Why is this spacing so drastically large compared to 01:13:526 (3,4,5,6,7) - , these notes are like just as strong
• 01:01:293 (2,3) - Larger jump here feels random because there's no beat that stands out here. Also why the small spacing on 01:02:749 (9,10) -
• 01:13:235 (2,3) - Why is this spacing so drastically large compared to 01:13:526 (3,4,5,6,7) - , these notes are like just as strong
ezek
• 00:42:361 (1) - The vocal that this reverse looks like it's mapped to is actually on the 1/3 tick at 00:42:750 -
• 00:51:682 (5,1) - this pause feels awkward because you don't really get the chance to use it consistently from here until the build up
• 01:03:623 (2,3) - Rhythm sounds like it would be better ctrl+g, because 01:03:915 - is stronger
• 01:22:264 (1) - really stupid suggestion, but starting this spinner at 01:22:555 - would be pretty cool so it feels more mapped to when the song pitches down
• 00:51:682 (5,1) - this pause feels awkward because you don't really get the chance to use it consistently from here until the build up
• 01:03:623 (2,3) - Rhythm sounds like it would be better ctrl+g, because 01:03:915 - is stronger
• 01:22:264 (1) - really stupid suggestion, but starting this spinner at 01:22:555 - would be pretty cool so it feels more mapped to when the song pitches down
little
• 00:00:420 (1,2) - very weird rhythm choice in general. 00:00:420 - is the only piano you make clickable, and you chose to map a slider to the guitar 00:03:332 - randomly
• 00:47:021 - downbeat and the end of a chord progression here. THis would be better mapped as a circle imo
• 00:47:021 - downbeat and the end of a chord progression here. THis would be better mapped as a circle imo
call me back