This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.

Especially when looked upon from far away. Looking at it up close doesn't have the same effect. So, you may see violently floating wood grain floors.Saturos wrote:
Hair texture looks like wood grain.
I agree. Maybe the textures should be replaced with highlights instead...Saturos wrote:
Hair texture looks like wood grain.
well Longiner did say to copy the style of the original, so if you don't like it try one yourself and see if it looks better.YoshiKart wrote:
I'm irritated at the eyes. The "eyelash" sticking out to the sides bothers me.
As for the eyes, I posted an image similar to the chibi model - hang on, I'll go dig the links up againawp wrote:
it looks a bit like wood grain.
Wouldn't that make it look exactly like wood grain? :/Loofah wrote:
You could make it layer down staight >.>
Well, her back is flat. I should probably fix that too. I don't think she's too thin, though; Making the torso thicker than the thigh would just look weird.awp wrote:
Belt buckle's a tad small and something about the shape of the upper torso doesn't quite sit right with me, but I can't pinpoint it. She might be a little too thin, as well.
asking as well.Rolled wrote:
Also may I ask whats up with the shoes?
The profile on the boots is too low. It just looks a bit like thick socks with platform-soles; it wouldn't take much to fix.Rolled wrote:
Also may I ask whats up with the shoes?
I concur with this. I thought this was supposed to be a specific style you were aiming for Loginer, but apparently if someone is complaining about it I might as well too.awp wrote:
My biggest issue is with the eyes and the overall shape of the face. Given how flat it is (absence of cheekbones is one major player in this) the face looks almost alien, like those classic huge-black-eyed-bald-with-very-round-head type aliens. Seriously, the eyes are still a bit dark and not vibrant enough. Don't make me hotlink my avatar again >=(Rolled wrote:
Also may I ask whats up with the shoes?
Behind the hair, don't you see them?Starrodkirby86 wrote:
Oh, and where's the ears...?
Oh, don't misunderestimate me~LuigiHann wrote:
I think once you give her a mouth, she'll look like a person, and people won't nitpick the face as much.
Those boots are a pretty good example, actually. At first I was like "well, not quite" but then I looked at it again and went "oh yes".LuigiHann wrote:
As for the boots, the soles should be more solid; right now it looks like each boot is sitting on two discs. Something like this would look better, I think. http://www.whitesboots.com/assets/img/categories/boots.jpg
If you mean the soles being too "round" at the bottom, I think I've solved the problem. Or is it something else?LuigiHann wrote:
As for the boots, the soles should be more solid; right now it looks like each boot is sitting on two discs.
Ah, now I get it. Should be easy to add.LuigiHann wrote:
You fixed one issue with the boots, but not the main problem I have. Hope this illustrates it a bit better.
Look at the bottom of any pair of shoes or boots. The sole is all one piece, even though it's thickest at the heel.
The face only looks like it's flat because of the lighting, and I'm working on the definition. I'll see what I can do with the chin, though. And yes, I know about modeling stuff that way, but no one was up for the job of drawing references back when I started modeling Pippi.lukewarmholiday wrote:
face is too triangular, flat and doesn't have much definition whatsoever, adding a mouth wont change those problems and people will still nitpick the face.
I'm about to just draw what I think would fix it since I'm terrible at describing. the hair also doesn't cover enough of the head. but i think you already mentioned that needed to be fixed. One immediate thing I noticed was the chin. In fact I think ill just bring up the original picture.
Img
The chin doesn't start closing until below the eyes.
From what i've seen from more accomplished modelers is that they try to form the body right from a profile view, then they try to make it look correct from a side view and then clean it up.(but this process would require a profile pic and a side view pic)
I really hated making this post because I have next to 0 experience with 3D modeling.
Fixed.Starrodkirby86 wrote:
But looking at the drawing over there, it doesn't seem the buttons should be that large.
The star was originally supposed to have a hole in the middle, but that was removed from the design at some point. The hole on the CtB Pippi is not supposed to be there.Starrodkirby86 wrote:
EDIT: Curiosity question. I noticed in the Saramaru drawing and in the Catch the Beat picture Pippi has a cleavage at where the star is on her chest. Though there's other images of her (Most notably the famous chibi of her I think and your model) with the cleavage not apparent and no skin showing at the star area...I never been long enough to see the creation of her so I'm a bit confused with this matter. Regardless, nice model...nice model...
That reminds me: You'll be able to modify Pippi's textures.devkit4384 wrote:
with the release of my updated oto2 theme i give you:
*combo.png*
The majority of the community seem to like the head like this, so no. And the head might as well face to the right, it won't matter in the end when I apply a biped. Fun fact: The legs are pointing forward by about 10 degrees.Loofah wrote:
The head could do to be a bit smaller.Maybe only a teensy bit bigger than the old head, plus, when it's in a t-pose shouldn't it face forward instead of up a little?
that or you could increase the size of here limbs.
No, I actually agree with you about the head. It feels too.... round? I don't know. But yea, she really doesnt have a Pippi feeling to her...Rolled wrote:
Great pippi pose but man, it really makes me notice how much that head just doesn't feel like Pippi :/
This post is not constructive in the least bit. I apologize
I've already fixed the hand, but thanks.Rolled wrote:
stuff
pix or it din't hapenLoginer wrote:
I've already fixed the hand, but thanks.Rolled wrote:
stuff
Fraeon wrote:
pix or it din't hapenLoginer wrote:
I've already fixed the hand, but thanks.Rolled wrote:
stuff
Yeah I'm definitely not the person you'd want to get anatomy references from, trust meLoginer wrote:
...That's not going to be very useful, I'm afraid. I'm after something like this:
...
I dunno, you seem like the type of person who'd have a detailed knowledge of female anatomy, what with your large collection of reference pictures...awp wrote:
Yeah I'm definitely not the person you'd want to get anatomy references from, trust me
Is there something to explain?devkit4384 wrote:
awp your avatar..........
........please explain this situation
Are you kidding? That's why I started the James fan clubneo@lex wrote:
God dammit awp.
I thought you were against :pookie: avatars >.>