from queue, sorry for delay, stuff came up.
Also, something with the timing. Timing should be 782, vocals are off on the current timing.
litoluna's Insane:
Hard:
(I modded the other diffs because they had some stuff that were questionable, so take a look into that. If you don't, thats completely fine, but I suggest you do it anyways. It totally wasnt because I forgot to only mod advanced and hard)
Now I get why you wanted me to only mod the Advanced and Hard. orz
Also, something with the timing. Timing should be 782, vocals are off on the current timing.
litoluna's Insane:
- 00:08:583 (2,3,4,1) - Looks really awkward. Just make one slider and rotate it 90 degrees in a square orientation. Should help aesthetic wise.
- 00:41:457 - Wouldnt there be a note here, since theres one 00:38:494 (6) - here? For the snare, since there was one 00:38:494 (6) - here.
- 00:45:624 (1) - Really don't think you should end on a big white tick, since a vocal is also there including the instrument.
- 01:13:957 (1,2) - I see no real reason to not make it a slider, nothing much changes other than a change of measure.
- 02:07:846 - missed snare.
- 02:08:587 (3) - again, I strongly suggest you don't end a slider on a big white tick in this case. It ruins the instrument's momentum from the beginning of the section.
- 02:10:253 (1,2) - Guitar doesn't change much, so I don't know why the pattern should. Make it a slider with the rest?
- 02:16:920 (3) - The slider ends on the guitar's note point, which makes it sound very awkward when you play it. I suggest you make 02:17:105 - where the slider starts or at least make it distinct so the guitar is properly emphasized here.
- 02:42:290 (5) - why the extra snare here?
- 03:22:661 (8) - Again, a slider ends on another vocal and instrument point. Avoid these.
- 00:10:991 (1) - Curve to blanket 00:09:694 (1) - ?
- 00:19:235 (8) - you should stack it over 00:19:327 (1) - , would be a bit cleaner
- 00:23:401 (1) - I really don't think you should end on the big white tick here. Just make it a 3/4 slider and add a note 00:23:772 - . Would be a bit smoother.
- 00:42:198 - Dunno about this, I understand the pause here, but you're still missing the taps here. I suggest a double or triple, really up to you if you consider this.
- 00:58:216 (3) - Missed snare
- 01:03:772 - Please add a note here, the instruments played here. If it were just the vocals, that'd be fine. But in this case, a note is necessary.
- 01:03:772 (1) - I feel like spinner should end 01:04:883 - here. 01:05:068 - Has too big of an impact to just end a spinner on.
- 01:09:698 (1,2) - Should be a slider if we're going to follow the pattern you've been following.
- 01:20:439 (3,4,5) - Slider starts too early on the vocal part, which made it sound weird. I suggest you rearrange the pattern to make it follow the vocal better.
- 01:21:179 (7) - Should this slider start on 01:20:994 - because of the vocals?
- 01:35:253 (3,4,5) - A similar situation as above.
- 02:00:994 (4,5,6) - The transition to instruments here start too early. I suggest you make 02:00:994 (4) - a slider, removing 02:01:179 (5) - . This should smooth out the transition from vocal to instruments in the build up. I really hope you consider this.
- 02:03:309 - Guitar here, Don't know if you intentionally missed it, but I suggest you try your best to include this one.
- 02:08:587 (7) - Make it a 3/4 slider? Just to get that guitar strum.
- 02:09:883 (4,5) - Why not make it a slider? Nothing changes, there aren't two guitar notes here.
- 02:13:957 (5,6,7,8,9) - Sits in an awkward position in terms of pattern and focus wise, since you mapped 02:11:920 (1,2,3,4) - 's guitar, which is transitioning onto the next section, but completely ignored it 02:13:401 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - here. You didn't map the drums 02:11:920 (1,2,3,4) - here, so why start now?
- 02:17:105 (4,5) - I think there should be a slider here following the guitar, or at least 02:17:476 (6) - here.
- 02:44:513 (1,2,3,4) - You should start off with sliders like you did earlier, would make more sense.
- 02:57:476 (6,7) - I think these should be a slider instead.
- 03:14:698 - This part feels severely under mapped since you missed a ton of instruments you were mapping along with earlier. I don't think you should do this, since the transition should start 03:15:624 - .
- 03:31:550 - missed snare.
- 03:36:364 (1,2,3,4,5) - Weird transition, I suggest you keep going with what you had before, but this one is up to you.
- 03:37:661 - Drums here.
- 03:40:068 (4) - NC?
Hard:
- 00:06:176 (7) - Why not just stack this under 00:05:991 (6) - ? It'd fit with 00:02:657 (5) - . (kind of)
- 00:35:439 (5) - NC here, also, You should try and make this more distinct in terms of field arrangement. Like, distance it a bit more.
- 00:38:587 (5,6) - Stands out because theres no note between it (00:39:142 - ) like 00:41:550 (5,6,7) - , etc.
- 01:05:994 (3,4,5,6) - Might be a bit difficult to read since it's overlapped by 01:05:068 (1) - .
- 01:10:624 (4) - Woah, broke pattern consistency here. This just sounded weird since you missed 01:10:809 - .
- 01:15:809 - Following 01:12:661 - 's pattern, shouldn't 01:15:624 (1,2) - be a slider? That way you can add a note 01:15:994 - here and let 01:16:179 (3) - be a 1/1 slider. Keeping consistency in terms of pattern is important.
- 01:17:476 - Add a note here since the note density is dense anyways.
- 01:23:587 (7) - Why should this be a 1/1 slider when 01:20:624 (6,7) - is this? Makes no sense.
- 01:25:809 (5,6,7) - Awkward pattern, tad weird to play tbh,
- 01:39:327 - I think you should add a spinner, doesn't hurt to add it here, since theres nothing after it that makes it difficult.
- 02:35:068 (1) - Avoid landing on big white tick here, just makes playing 02:35:809 (2) - more awkward.
- 02:41:550 (2) - NC here.
- 03:09:698 (4) - Feels underwhelming now because you mapped something similar (03:06:735 - ), so it also feels inconsistent.
- 03:12:476 (5,6) - Same case, why should it be 2 notes? Nothing much changes.
- 03:31:179 (7,8) - I think these would fit better as sliders, considering you've done it in the intro too (00:15:624 (7) - ) in which case they're pretty similar.
- 00:21:364 (5,6) - I think you should stick to what you did on 00:15:439 (6,7,8) - , but with 00:21:920 - being a single circle note.
- 00:35:439 (4) - Make this a bit more distinct, like adding an NC or distancing it a bit more.
- 00:38:587 (5,6) - Quite questionable since you didnt add a note in between, but you did 00:44:513 (1,2,3) - here and 00:39:327 (6,7,1) - here.
- 01:28:772 (4,7) - Not sure about the reading here, but I think it should be ok.
- 02:07:105 - Missed snare.
- 02:07:846 - Missed another snare here.
- 02:11:550 - Snare should be here.
- 02:42:290 - Unnecessary snare here?
- 00:19:327 (1,2) - why the change of pattern? It just threw off 00:19:883 (2,3) - and made it sound really weird, especially when you missed 00:20:624 - .
- 00:40:809 (2,3) - Yes, it might be redundant, but I still think this should be a repeat, since it's really the only pattern in that part.
- 00:43:772 (2) - Shouldn't this be a repeat since you did a repeat for 00:37:846 (2) - ?
- 00:51:920 (1,2,3) - Why put this pattern here, but not 00:48:957 (1,2) - here? Just seems very inconsistent.
- 01:09:698 (1,2) - The single note should be between these two, not 01:10:439 (2,3,4) - .
- 01:24:142 - Missed snare
- 01:51:179 - to 02:00:068 - feels like it rhythmically made no sense. It didn't follow the vocals very consistently (01:54:142 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - compared to 01:51:179 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - , etc.) and should be fixed.
- 02:32:661 (1,2) - I suggest this should be a repeat. These are usually pretty weird to play in a normal. Besides, aside from that one point, this kind of pattern isn't used that much throughout this diff.
- 02:52:476 - and 02:52:846 - I think you should stick to vocals here.
- 03:31:550 - Missed snare.
- 03:36:735 - Missed another snare.
(I modded the other diffs because they had some stuff that were questionable, so take a look into that. If you don't, thats completely fine, but I suggest you do it anyways. It totally wasnt because I forgot to only mod advanced and hard)
Now I get why you wanted me to only mod the Advanced and Hard. orz