Everyone can show their opinion and give suggestions if they are actually valid
Left wrote:
i hated this map before, but now i support this map lol
Mentai wrote:
Left wrote:
i hated this map before, but now i support this map lol
brain damage wrote:
my name is what im getting from you guys here
wtf are you stating he never said something like that in the first placeGokateigo wrote:
This map sucks tbh, you shitmapped a huge part because you think metal is disgusting
I don't think he wanted to make it ugly, but more something weird, fast and tricky, as the song would be. As I said before, it's his POV on this song.Gokateigo wrote:
If you make a contrast with beautiful/ugly mapping you obviously think one part is ugly and the other one is beautiful, seems obvious. He can make a contrast with difficulty, like Mazzerin did with PK, it'll be way better than this
i know you love Mazzerin a lot but the mapper here is Monstrata and not Mazzerin, why would he map like him.Gokateigo wrote:
He can make a contrast with difficulty, like Mazzerin
You're right, Monstrata maps a lot of things like alien right ?Linada wrote:
i know you love Mazzerin a lot but the mapper here is Monstrata and not Mazzerin, why would he map like him.Gokateigo wrote:
He can make a contrast with difficulty, like Mazzerin
I think it is perfectly reasonable to map it this way yet not think metal is ugly. The "beautiful part" is calm and structured with a progression and typical chords so it is mapped in an ordered way. The "metal part" has a lot going on with many seemingly random spikes of intensity, thus it is mapped in the same fashion. It doesn't mean Monstrata likes nor dislikes metal, it just means he was mapping the song.Gokateigo wrote:
If you make a contrast with beautiful/ugly mapping you obviously think one part is ugly and the other one is beautiful, seems obvious.
Telling him to map like mazzerin won't change anything, because this song is quite different to the stuff that mazzerin maps.Gokateigo wrote:
my opinionThis map sucks tbh, you shitmapped a huge part because you think metal is disgusting, Mazzerin maps death metal and thinks song representation is more important than aesthetics. His maps are NOT ugly af, they are a bit ugly sometimes (with really ugly sounds, not everything) but his style fits very well to metal, you should map something similar to his style in the "ugly" part and map ugly sliders when they are in the middle of the calm part because you can't change your style for 2 objects. If you map something like this I'll bee happy if it's ranked, it's just a random shit map atm for me
Tbh I never actually hated it but I can sort of understand that.Left wrote:
i hated this map before, but now i support this map lol
gSinnoh wrote:
why not just convert the map to ctb then rank and call it a day
shouldn't have cheated retard lolzM a r v o l l o wrote:
I think everyone can make mistake, so imo Kagetsu should remove his veto because he didn't provide any really valid reason. Sad that I amn't a member of BNG, I would nominate this.And yeah, 800th post hooray
but you need to be able to taste it to judge whether it's bad or not. if someone don't like eating vegetables, they would mostly say that every vegetable dishes taste badSeni wrote:
You don't have to be a chef to know the dish is bad.
yes please get more opinions because imo this is the only thing i really dislike about the mapMonstrata wrote:
I have a possible alternative in mind for it, i'll push a quick update tomorrow though after confirming with some players. I like how it plays currently because its arranged in a way where its possible for players to try alternating it instead of single tapping, but essentially the structure is set up to cause really fast counterclockwise flowing movements that break down into rotating/tornado based jumps afterwards.fufu- wrote:
00:38:356 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) no pLEASE bring back the old jumps these pentagons are so hard to play and snap to
Meanwhile, Promethean Kings is ranked :thinking:Kagetsu wrote:
i'm vetoing this because i think it doesn't fit the ranked section, this map has proven to be unplayable while being in the loved section and it's pretty clear that even though people can pass it, its playability is far from being acceptable.
This is rankable. Actually, if you buy the album, the mp3 on the album actually has the applause at the end. Everyone's just meme'ing that I added the sound effect there and now people are believing it xD. Santa San, Nandemo Nai ya, True Blue, EOS (kamome sano rmx) Arashi no Atode all use the same techniques, and those are just my maps. I've also edited mp3's for a variety of ranked mapsets. The mp3 issue was brought up in a recent Ranking Criteria draft discussion, found at: t/602728 but it was shot down. You can check for people's arguments there if you wish, but thanks for checking .Qapitol wrote:
Hi guys, I'm just gonna leave this here.
DISCLAIMER I DONT ACTUALLY KNOW IF THIS IS UNRANKABLE I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THE FILE IS STRETCHED IN MULTIPLE PLACES.
pls no hate mnstrato ily
osu! is a community based game, if a huge part the community doesn't like a map (obvious in this cse, seiously look at the user rating) the map shouldn't be ranked, especially when it uses such a controversial mappingGasai wrote:
If you're going to bubble or veto it, give good reasons that the mapper can actually consider and implement to make the map better and that 'better' being the 'better' in your opinion and not necessarily the thousands of people playing the game.
I mentioned nothing about the map being ranked or not. I'm not a fan of the the map, nor do I hate it. I am just saying when making decisions, it's good to give your reason/s because what you have to add might be unique to you or a general collection of users who haven't bothered to give input. Also, I wouldn't sit on the user rating too much since everyone has the power to alter that.Gokateigo wrote:
osu! is a community based game, if a huge part the community doesn't like a map (obvious in this cse, seiously look at the user rating) the map shouldn't be ranked, especially when it uses such a controversial mappingGasai wrote:
If you're going to bubble or veto it, give good reasons that the mapper can actually consider and implement to make the map better and that 'better' being the 'better' in your opinion and not necessarily the thousands of people playing the game.
GUYS PLEASEE!!Monstrata wrote:
That said, lets await Kagetsu's reply now and give this thread a break. Thanks everyone for participating
This is completely wrong, the only thing that is considered when getting a map ranked is the ranking criteria, user rating means absolutely nothing in terms of rankability. There are BN's for a reason, if everyone in the community had the ability to affect the ranking process then it wouldn't work as wellGokateigo wrote:
osu! is a community based game, if a huge part the community doesn't like a map (obvious in this cse, seiously look at the user rating) the map shouldn't be ranked, especially when it uses such a controversial mapping