02:51:268 (2) - but its kinda the same as 01:46:559 (1,2,3) -, dont you think? imo making this clickable isnt really needed, since the vocals are not that strong..
as for 00:55:454 (2,1) - i agree with you, but i think its better to keep the spacing low since this is the one whole part of the vocals and should be mapped with the same concept imo
thanks for taking a look
as for 00:55:454 (2,1) - i agree with you, but i think its better to keep the spacing low since this is the one whole part of the vocals and should be mapped with the same concept imo
thanks for taking a look