yea, will take that in mind when ill attempt to rank some other stuff
thanks again
thanks again
i'd just like to add that this kind of attitude towards emphasis ("it's not mapping correctly if you're not putting proper spacing emphasis") is causing a lot of unnecessary DQs lately. for the BNs/modders who are doing this kind of thing, i'd strongly advise to check whether these suggestions aren't actually going against the own principles of the mapping style you're attempting to mod (and also, as Monstrata says, the map feels much more fun for the player exactly because the spacing emphasis is different than usual).Monstrata wrote:
Respecting emphasis can also make patterns feel boring because of how predictable they are. 01:53:536 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Are fun to play imo, but part of that is because they don't respect white-tick emphasis. 02:47:257 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,1) - Same idea here . These are good precisely because emphasis isn't respected imo.
It's not good to say "a map that isn't following proper emphasis is not mapping the song correctly". There is no correct way to map the song to begin with. You can advise a mapper to emphasize certain sounds, but a mapper can also tell you their objective was not emphasis control .
Have fun mapping~
Venix wrote:
btw shouldn't be "FREDERIC" instead of "Frederic" in title? official name of site http://frederic-official.com/ is "フレデリック FREDERIC OFFICIAL SITE"
or you've another resource?
nvm yt
redl, i changed the mp3Wendy-chan wrote:
Uhh headsup, offset is broken in latest update
then what's the point of romaniaromanian artist if it makes no sense to write uppercase or lowercase.Delis wrote:
that's the exception that you may use Frederic as artist since THE ARTIST for this song officially capitalized its first letter.
IamKwaN wrote:
yes, i can try my best to help
Unicode Title: オドループ
Romanised Title: oddloop
Unicode Artist: フレデリック
Romanised Artist: Frederic
References:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCp2iXA1uLE