fixed all!!!! for soterks too http://puu.sh/uOop2/e30b22d823.rar
Thanks for the check !Nozhomi wrote:
[Take pp Control! :]
- 01:35:683 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Don't work as intended. Your jumps should be placed on strong beats like 01:36:047 (1) - / 01:36:774 (1) - but you did the opposite by placing bigger jumps on offbeats 01:36:047 (1,2) - / 01:36:411 (1,2) - . You're killing the emphasis of the song here. fixed, but tried to keep the same octogonal pattern, tell me if there is a wrong one
- 02:01:138 (5,6) - Feels quite close tbh when rest of this part use mostly a 1.60x spacing. fixed
- 02:51:319 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - No idea why spacing should change between two kiai for the same vocal / drum section 01:35:683 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - i don't really rely on spacing to much, but more like on different patterns, for diversity, but i still try to keep the same spacing overall
- 02:57:138 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1) - Same concept than above. Intensity is quite the same tho spacing goes wild for no reason. That's not how diversity should be done. maybe i don't get it but i think it's okay there ? not that different
- 03:15:228 (1,2,3) - I don't know what you had in mind here, but it would rather stay with smth like https://puu.sh/uOu7J/a309570c5f.png to first keep a regularity on how you map these 1/4 sounds, and second to not transition from a giant spacing on 1/4 to a lower one for 1/2. oh fixed
- 03:33:865 (3,4,5) - Tbh this pattern looks awful and flow killer for not much benefits. Just do https://puu.sh/uOuje/1742c4c478.png . fixd
- 04:33:138 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Why this is the only time you change your concept for this part ? It's not that different from other kiai ends. i really wanted to focus emphasis for 04:33:865 (1,2,1,2) - with a buildup
- Too much weird overlaps. :3
Mukyu~
:iknignth:Musty wrote:
ça serait cool que la map se fasse nuke jpense
edit: drôle je voulais dire
Kin wrote:
cc lé bb
[Arrival]voila.
- 00:27:320 (92) - tu peux le mettre en big note si tu veux emphasis ton build up. tho, en simple d, il est fine Je vais leave en simple
- 00:37:319 (149,150,151,152,153,154,155) - ce choix me semble ok. Le fait de faire le triplet drum. Puis ensuite le k ddk sur la melody. Si tu veux être un peu plus fidèle à la mélodie. Tu peux ignore le triplet est simplement mapper les notes de mélodies içi : 00:37:683 - 00:38:047 - . Ca a un effet que j'aime particulièrement ce triplet d, je vais le garder.
- 00:40:228 (162,163,164) - Je ressens aucun emphasis sur ce triplet full d (surtout sur cette note : 00:40:410 (164) - ). Il fait aussi fade que celui la 00:41:683 (173,174,175) - (sauf que celui la a rien de spécial). Pourtant, je ressens bien le fait que tu veux suivre la mélodie içi : 00:40:592 (165,166) - . Peut être qu'un ddk ou kkd serait mieux. Pas faux, swap en kkd
- si t'as fix précédemment, fix celui la : 00:46:047 (204,205,206) - ^
- 01:17:683 (382) - Au vu du follow que tu fais, mieux vaut bouger cette note içi 01:17:683 (382) - ? T'as mis la même Kappa
- 01:23:865 (409) - Juste moi, mais j'aime bien cette note en big K. Vu que le "ta" du vocal est un peu plus différent du reste. Applied
- 02:22:228 (780,781,782,783,784) - change en ddkdk , ça passe hyper bien avec le vocal. Applied
- 02:39:501 (883) - Si t'as fix pour le "ta" mentionné précédemment, fix celui la aussi. ye
- 03:52:592 - skip cette note me parait assez louche quand même. Oui, et j'ai rework le passage en quelque chose de plus streamy, qui fit mieux.
- 03:52:047 (1288,1289,1290,1291,1292) - J'aurais plutôt vu la dernière note en k, vu la tonalité du synth. Mais du coup, pour pas ruin le flow, autant change le tout en kkddk si tu compte faire en sorte que ça se finisse sur un k. Done
jtm bb t un amour
xfraczynho wrote:
hi! some mod req in-game:p
[Arrival's Inner Oni]
00:36:047 (141) - you should add a note here, i think it breaks the fluent of the song ;; I think it's alright there
00:48:683 (223) - d because pitch I'll try to diversify the map by not using ddk as much as possible.
00:58:410 (274) - k since you're following vocals Done
01:22:592 (407) - I think this is even nicer https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7786910 Overmapping the vocals here defeat the purpose of this part which is just a build up towards the kiai. But I changed a note to K which differs from what I did before.
you should move 01:29:410 (445) - to 01:29:319 (445) - to not making these breaks during kiai (or making a triplet maybe) These breaks are done by purpose !
01:34:501 (482) - ^
01:35:501 (489) - you can try something like it: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7786919 (maybe not these colours) Doing that would break any kind of flow.
01:37:410 (503) - same as above
01:38:138 (508) - ^
same suggests for doubles on second and third kiai, i feel everything nice from here to next comment
03:15:047 (1104) - you should change it to k (main sounds) Sticking the drum sounds here
03:15:774 (1112,1113) - ctrl+g (^) ^
03:27:683 (1172) - maybe from here add some little triplets to make a difference between the first part of this and make this one more fun (03:29:228 (1181) - adding k for example) Done
04:44:773 (57) - personal opinion: i don't like this break :/ you can make it a little harder and fun I'm not aiming at making a hard map !
I think that's all Good luck on your mapset! Thanks ! :)
OzzyOzrock wrote:
[A river]
- DELETE COMBO COLORS HEATHEN.
Rest is fine! yay !
- 01:07:138 (324,325,326) - Triplet better placed around 01:12:501 - so that the second happening is tougher, no? Okay
- 01:25:319 (418) - Kill, and make previous not K for OH! emphasis? Drums don't even hit here, so double k seems odd. Done
- 01:38:047 - Kinda just wondering why the break, nothing else has had it and it makes less sense in the middle of kiai. Tried a sort of rhythm but nvm
- 02:51:865 (971,972,973,974,975,976) - d kkddk? Some emphasis on what vocals do here would be nice. Done
- 03:37:683 (1230,1231) - Swap these, I think it seperates the vocals better. Applied
- 03:52:138 (1296) - d? kdddk makes the kat heavy streams a bit nicer. Alright
- 03:58:228 - This is a copy of the first happening at 01:13:865 - , which is lame because 02:29:501 - is harder etc. Made the last one harder
- 04:09:531 - SV anything? Underwhelming to keep this the same. Alright put x1.3
- 04:15:683 - 04:18:410 (1458,1459) - Swap these, the vocal emphasis switches up here. Done
- 04:21:501 - Can't help but feel that this part is mapped cooler in 2nd kiai. Changed to be like the 2nd kiai
was off by 2 pixels lul fixedMBmasher wrote:
take control: 01:26:228 (4,6) -
not meant to be blanketed or what?
don't ever do this wRealazy wrote:
02:19:047 (6) - lol why is this snapped on 1/3
almost all of my "abusive" NCs are to emphasize the next vocal to its fullest, and since i follow ONLY the vocals, if the vocals are getting stronger i NC each time, the only part where i could remove NCs are 01:20:774 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - and 04:05:138 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - but i wanted to express the buildup[Taiga] wrote:
Few questions:
Take controll diff:
Ar9.2 intentional or there is something behind this considering it's a slow song? yes it's intentionnal, and there is a lower diff on the map,
so it's just a spread
01:20:774 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - This could be a one pattern, why "1-2-1-2" when nothing in music/vocals fits this specific pattern?
01:35:683 (1,2,1,2) - ^ - one pattern without "1-2-1-2" fits way better
01:36:411 (1,2,1,2) - ^
02:51:319 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^ (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4 works better imo)
04:05:138 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^
04:21:501 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^ (1-2-3-4-1-2-3-4)
04:34:410 (2) - extend with slider, connect to 04:34:956 (1) - ? i don't understand what you mean here
04:46:228 (1,2,1,2) - 1-2-3-4, remove new combo
04:57:138 (1,2,1,2) - one combo, one pattern, inconsistent towards what is earlier i could have but you can see the buildup to the last pattern easily lol
04:58:774 (2,1,2) - could you explain why earlier you either doesn't map this part / make it a slider towards vocals, here make it like that? i mapped it earlier ???? and if you mean here 04:34:410 (2) - then you must listen to the song before please because there is no beats or neither vocals here while there is at the part you mentionned
Sorry for lack of formatting etc, mods in the morning on good song are hard *hides*
Overall besides in my personal opinion abusement of 1-2 it's solid, i definitely see myself farming this.
thanksIrohas wrote:
gratz!!