mom bought chocolate chip cookies but they were fucking raisins.
fuck.
fuck.
#FREAKINGRELATABLEFEELSkai99 wrote:
mom bought chocolate chip cookies but they were fucking raisins.
fuck.
ooooOOOOHHHHHHH :100: k_hand: :clap:B1rd wrote:
Here's a conceited one, thinking you're worth the effort of bullyingMilkshake wrote:
that's the least offensive thing you could've told me and you know it :<
Very nice.Comfy Slippers wrote:
My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard, And they're like. It's better than yours, Damn right, It's better than yours, I can teach you, But I have to charge
exactly :3B1rd wrote:
pfft what a casual. Fantasy series bring back memories though, nothing like dozens of hours of joyous escapism.
oh shitStefan wrote:
Oh this guy again. Find your way here to leave your shit: https://www.reddit.com/r/osugame/ I am sure the community will give you a warm welcome.
can I use this in my sig?kai99 wrote:
You have to fight for it.Kisses wrote:
can I use this in my sig?kai99 wrote:
I mean, well, sure.Kisses wrote:
can I use this in my sig?kai99 wrote:
That's interesting because apart from the increased immigration I would think that republics would be seen as highly appealing in the common working class, at least from this brief description.B1rd wrote:
One of the two major political parties in the US. The Republicans are considered conservative, while the Democrats are considered liberal. Trump is part of the Republican party.Kisses wrote:
can someone give me a quick tl;dr on what a republican is?
To go over some of the differences of the policy in theory that is,
R - D
pro second amendment - pro gun control
low taxes - high taxes
more economic freedom - more welfare and regulation
pro free speech - anti free speech
more immigration control - less immigration control
anti-abortion - pro-abortion
etc
I didn't even see that you were already using it :v wMilkshake wrote:
I mean, well, sure.
noAllmynamestaken wrote:
Threesome is better.
wow, this sig is even better now, niceKisses wrote:
can I use this in my sig?kai99 wrote:
Calling every single one of his critics "fake news," to the point where he blacklisted some news agencies from press conferences, and also doing many of the things he called out Obama of doing, but on a much more frequent scale (see: the golfing trips, which he's often criticized Obama for, because of "wasteful spending," when at this rate, he'll surpass Obama on that by a lot). Also, another recent one was the administration's budget, that cut a lot of programs, like the National Endowment for the Arts, for example, and decreased funding to many Cabinet departments, but still increased Obama's already massive defense budget (which, by the way, is more than the next seven largest defense budgets in the world combined). But that last point seems more like a USA problem than a Trump problem, to be honest.Kisses wrote:
That's interesting because apart from the increased immigration I would think that republics would be seen as highly appealing in the common working class, at least from this brief description.
Is there anything else to trump that make people dislike him so heavily?
Despite being a supposed "left-wing" alternative, a lot of them are still as easily bought with lobby money as Republicans. The relationship between the Democrats and the mainstream media is also pretty ridiculous a lot of the time, especially with regards to the Clintons. Not to mention a foreign policy of indiscriminate drone strikes. And here's a problem with the left-wing in general, not just Dems -- refusing to let people engage with certain viewpoints, even if that would let people refute them, especially on college campuses (see: Berkeley before a Milo Yiannopoulos event). Like, I despise a lot of the Milo, Richard Spencer, etc. provocateur types, but their events shouldn't be met with censorship/violent responses. Here's the precedent from the main civil liberty group in the US, the ACLU.Kisses wrote:
I feel like I've become 50x smarter in the field of american politics as of today, wow! w
What are the downsides to democrats; if this is hard to view then what about extreme/hardcore democrats?
In general, there isn't any inherent integrity to democrats. Politicians are politicians, and politicians can always be bought. You need to find the people with principles and stick with them, regardless of which party they're a part of. Don't vote for a Dem just because you support the idea behind the party: Vote on a candidate-by-candidate basis, and purge the whole "sports team" attitude so that progress can be made.Raspberriel wrote:
Despite being a supposed "left-wing" alternative, a lot of them are still as easily bought with lobby money as Republicans. The relationship between the Democrats and the mainstream media is also pretty ridiculous a lot of the time, especially with regards to the Clintons.
You can't claim to be tolerant while at the same time allowing intolerant people to spread their ideology. This is actually a thing called the Paradox of Intolerance. I condemn violence as much as anyone else, but peacefully protesting and refusing to allow someone to speak in that matter is actually freedom of speech working as intended. Nobody is entitled to be given a platform.Raspberriel wrote:
And here's a problem with the left-wing in general, not just Dems -- refusing to let people engage with certain viewpoints, even if that would let people refute them, especially on college campuses (see: Berkeley before a Milo Yiannopoulos event). Like, I despise a lot of the Milo, Richard Spencer, etc. provocateur types, but their events shouldn't be met with censorship/violent responses. Here's the precedent from the main civil liberty group in the US, the ACLU.
lolRaspberriel wrote:
idk though, I think B1rd should sound off on this, he sees things that I don't.
yumFuZ wrote:
chicken wing