Appreciate the 'mod' but it feels like most of what was pointed out was really nitpicky. In my opinion, mods should look to improve what the mappers have established, not say that something is bad without understanding why the mapper did what they did.
Extreme
00:22:947 (1,2,1) - kinda weird you do such small spacing here compared to 00:22:143 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ,the extremely small spacing isnt reasonable Was intended for structural output. New measure can be emphasized or not emphasized I chose not to, would rather it let it flow while looking aesthetic.
00:28:572 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - 00:30:715 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - such big spacing difference as well This is okay...
01:39:286 (1,2,3,4) - i dont think they deserve big jumps tbh,no vocal and drum isnt really clear and strong/ Compared to 01:39:822 (1,2,3,4) - the first 4 notes are out of place imo. This is just music theory about 4th measures being stronger than previous measures which is something I do thematically in this diff.
02:12:902 (3,4) - same concern about ds Same
02:38:215 (1,2,3,4) - same,they dont deserve same spacing as 02:38:750 (1,2,3,4) - thematic phrasing ive mentioned before
03:25:625 (3) - No NC for this??? this one was kind of toss-up. it wasn't NCd because the kicks were already NC'd and using too many I felt didn't look pretty regardless of the reading which I think is capable for the player since the slider is very slow.
03:29:643 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - same,,copy paste here is dumb imo cuz it doesnt follow music at all kinda personal bias on your part, I'd say it fits well for me music theory 2/4s last measure of phrase stuff.
03:43:304 (2) - obviously you should use same 1/8 slider as 03:42:500 (1,2,1) - the repeat to capture a different feel for the instruments. repeat softs make it agreeable with the other sliders I didnt want that.
03:52:143 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - jumps just for aesthetics but nothing with music...strongly feel they are out of place here. You should follow music but not just 1/2 spamming. these patterns are a thematic approach like I did with the star pattern in the 2nd chorus.
Extreme
00:22:947 (1,2,1) - kinda weird you do such small spacing here compared to 00:22:143 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ,the extremely small spacing isnt reasonable Was intended for structural output. New measure can be emphasized or not emphasized I chose not to, would rather it let it flow while looking aesthetic.
00:28:572 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - 00:30:715 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - such big spacing difference as well This is okay...
01:39:286 (1,2,3,4) - i dont think they deserve big jumps tbh,no vocal and drum isnt really clear and strong/ Compared to 01:39:822 (1,2,3,4) - the first 4 notes are out of place imo. This is just music theory about 4th measures being stronger than previous measures which is something I do thematically in this diff.
02:12:902 (3,4) - same concern about ds Same
02:38:215 (1,2,3,4) - same,they dont deserve same spacing as 02:38:750 (1,2,3,4) - thematic phrasing ive mentioned before
03:25:625 (3) - No NC for this??? this one was kind of toss-up. it wasn't NCd because the kicks were already NC'd and using too many I felt didn't look pretty regardless of the reading which I think is capable for the player since the slider is very slow.
03:29:643 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - same,,copy paste here is dumb imo cuz it doesnt follow music at all kinda personal bias on your part, I'd say it fits well for me music theory 2/4s last measure of phrase stuff.
03:43:304 (2) - obviously you should use same 1/8 slider as 03:42:500 (1,2,1) - the repeat to capture a different feel for the instruments. repeat softs make it agreeable with the other sliders I didnt want that.
03:52:143 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - jumps just for aesthetics but nothing with music...strongly feel they are out of place here. You should follow music but not just 1/2 spamming. these patterns are a thematic approach like I did with the star pattern in the 2nd chorus.