forum

ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting

posted
Total Posts
56,297
show more
B1rd
Seems it's a very big coincidence that every black country is poor and destitute, and blacks are poor in every country they are in. It's a fact that race is not just skin deep, races have different physiology, skeletal structures, brain sizes, et cetera. That would explain behavioral differences.

It's also been proven that blacks do poorer in academics and IQ tests in all socio-economic levels.

The answer in not 'mo money for dem programs' which is the leftist and progressive agenda, this is just throwing money away and it's a reason why you have so many blacks in America dependent on welfare. Throw all the money away that you want but you will never achieve equality of outcome.
Railey2

B1rd wrote:

Image boards affect a relatively small amount of the population but their effect on influencing people should not be underestimated. There are other facets of the internet like Reddit that are normie friendly and likely influenced a lot more people. /r/the_donald is very popular and frequently reaches the front page. It's unlikely that memes alone are responsible for Trumps win but who can say, it's hard to quantify such things. Maybe it tipped the balance just enough in a few swing states.
most of the people that are on r/the_donald would have voted trump anyway. The number of people that were swayed by this echochamber of opinions is neglectable, making it's relevance neglectable as well.

As I said, people that think they have an impact with spamming bullshit on reddit are just on a sad, imaginary power-trip. The entirety of 4chan is forgettable, r/the_donald is also forgettable, and so are most parts of the internet.

I refuse to believe that any of these boards had an impact that was visible after rounding.
I can assure you that the overwhelming majority of trump voters never heard of /r/the_donald, and even if they did, it wouldn't have changed their opinion. You're overestimating the importance of boards like reddit, because it happens to be the world you live in. But it's not the world of the majority of americans. And if there is one thing that reddit is incredibly bad at, then it is changing people's opinions to tip any sort of scale.

People voted trump because hillary represents "the system", and they were fed up with being looked down upon. Voting Trump is a fuck you to the system.
What makes people change their mind is being laughed at my liberal media 24/7. That's what won trump the election.
B1rd
I agree with the last part but your entire post before that is just opinion and conjecture.

/r/the_donald is a hugbox, but it's pretty obvious that a board supporting one candidate would be. It's better than the rest of reddit, like /r/politics, /r/australia that don't have a stated political alignment yet are left wing hugboxes.
Mahogany

Jordan wrote:

Everywhere in the world a high black population equals a high crime rate.
Gee that might have something to do with the fact that most black-majority countries have poor education and economic situations due to climate and colonialism and several other reasons.
It's like you don't even think about what you're saying.

Jordan wrote:

Also what the fuck is the racist agenda you're talking about.
Trump+His Supporters

Jordan wrote:

That argument is stupid, as the phenotypic difference between races is not only skin deep.
how fucking racist can you even be lmfao
Railey2

B1rd wrote:

I agree with the last part but your entire post before that is just opinion and conjecture.
As you said, these things are too hard to measure for us to go far beyond opinion and conjecture.

I'm just looking at the average trump voter for the most part. The average trump voter doesn't give a shit about reddit. They care about their job, their children, and their "freedom". Look at what sort of people turned up at trump rallies. Watch him speak to an audience. This is why I don't think that 4chan or reddit or any of these pages were relevant in this election cycle. The vast majority of people just care about other things than browsing memes online.

the people that try to accredit Trump's success to any sort of message or image board online are just trying so hard to feel important from the sideline, and I personally find it hilarious to see.
EneT

Mahogany wrote:

Jordan wrote:

That argument is stupid, as the phenotypic difference between races is not only skin deep.
how fucking racist can you even be lmfao
That isn't racist, that's fact. Come on man, you're acting like a stereotypical leftist.
winber1
Yet biologically, we are still the same species. Inter-racial intercourse still yields viable babies. You can't argue because they are "different" (brain, skeletal, and phsilogical differences, etc.) that that fully explains behavioral differences. The brain is not a simple thing, and no one has yet to understand it fully it. The learning process is highly dependent on its environment social and physical (including what they see and how people around them speak, act, and communicate), parenting (including how they interact with their children and the amount of the time they interact with them), and etc. Just stating that it is fact that black people and black countries are generally worse in academic tests and are in lower socio-economic levels is actually racist in itself as it does imply that they do not have the ability to achieve higher. Of course, outliers exist, but if we talk about the main population, there is much more than just giving them more money. If we truly wanted to give convincing evidence that there is truly a difference between the minds of black people and other races, you would literally have to raise them in nearly identical environments and introduce them to nearly identical people. The culture of black families are just drastically different than other races and even more so with all the media surrounding them, also generally making them feel "worse" than the rest of the people.

I agree, more money does not solve jack shit, but that also doesn't imply anything since there is much more to human intelligence then just having the opportunity to attend higher education.

holy why is everyone posting before me feelsbadman
Jordan
Yeah, how racist can nature be to give sub-saharan africans prognathism, a wide nasal cavity, higher incidence of sickle cell disease, higher bone density, higher metabolic rate, shorter gestation periods, higher maturation rate, more free testosterone, a different skull shape, a higher ratio of fast twitch / slow twitch muscle and a thousand other typical traits that are only common in them.

OY VEY!
Mahogany

Jordan wrote:

OY VEY!
I'm sorry you're incapable of holding a forum about this but it's not like I could've expected any better from someone like you
Jordan

winber1 wrote:

Yet biologically, we are still the same species. Inter-racial intercourse still yields viable babies. You can't argue because they are "different" (brain, skeletal, and phsilogical differences, etc.) that that fully explains behavioral differences. The brain is not a simple thing, and no one has yet to understand it fully it. The learning process is highly dependent on its environment social and physical (including what they see and how people around them speak, act, and communicate), parenting (including how they interact with their children and the amount of the time they interact with them), and etc. Just stating that it is fact that black people and black countries are generally worse in academic tests and are in lower socio-economic levels is actually racist in itself as it does imply that they do not have the ability to achieve higher. Of course, outliers exist, but if we talk about the main population, there is much more than just giving them more money. If we truly wanted to give convincing evidence that there is truly a difference between the minds of black people and other races, you would literally have to raise them in nearly identical environments and introduce them to nearly identical people. The culture of black families are just drastically different than other races and even more so with all the media surrounding them, also generally making them feel "worse" than the rest of the people.

I agree, more money does not solve jack shit, but that also doesn't imply anything since there is much more to human intelligence then just having the opportunity to attend higher education.

holy why is everyone posting before me feelsbadman
I would love, for once, to see a successful country with mostly black people in it but I don't think it's ever going to happen. Africa is never going to fix itself as long as africans keep living in it.
Razzy
I didn't know Moon Man browsed this forum
EneT

Railey2 wrote:

B1rd wrote:

I agree with the last part but your entire post before that is just opinion and conjecture.
As you said, these things are too hard to measure for us to go far beyond opinion and conjecture.

I'm just looking at the average trump voter for the most part. The average trump voter doesn't give a shit about reddit. They care about their job, their children, and their "freedom". Look at what sort of people turned up at trump rallies. Watch him speak to an audience. This is why I don't think that 4chan or reddit or any of these pages were relevant in this election cycle. The vast majority of people just care about other things than browsing memes online.

the people that try to accredit Trump's success to any sort of message or image board online are just trying so hard to feel important from the sideline, and I personally find it hilarious to see.
I agree with German boy here. I don't visit either 4chan or Reddit so I find it hard to believe they would have a massive impact on the outcome of any vote.
Endaris

Jordan wrote:

Yeah, how racist can nature be to give sub-saharan africans prognathism, a wide nasal cavity, higher incidence of sickle cell disease, higher bone density, higher metabolic rate, shorter gestation periods, higher maturation rate, more free testosterone, a different skull shape, a higher ratio of fast twitch / slow twitch muscle and a thousand other typical traits that are only common in them.

OY VEY!
All clearly traits that have a massive impact on life situation and social behaviour. Not.
EneT

Raspberriel wrote:

I didn't know Moon Man browsed this forum
who dat. Anyways it's common knowledge that everyone in forums lurks ITT.
Railey2

Endaris wrote:

Jordan wrote:

Yeah, how racist can nature be to give sub-saharan africans prognathism, a wide nasal cavity, higher incidence of sickle cell disease, higher bone density, higher metabolic rate, shorter gestation periods, higher maturation rate, more free testosterone, a different skull shape, a higher ratio of fast twitch / slow twitch muscle and a thousand other typical traits that are only common in them.

OY VEY!
All clearly traits that have a massive impact on life situation and social behaviour. Not.
this.
Railey2

Jordan wrote:

I would love, for once, to see a successful country with mostly black people in it but I don't think it's ever going to happen. Africa is never going to fix itself as long as africans keep living in it.
it's absolutely mind-boggling how someone can reduce such a complex issue as "why Africa is less prosperous" to "lul it has black people".
BrokenArrow
its jordan what did you expect
EneT
I don't know why but that made me laugh.
Jordan

Endaris wrote:

Jordan wrote:

Yeah, how racist can nature be to give sub-saharan africans prognathism, a wide nasal cavity, higher incidence of sickle cell disease, higher bone density, higher metabolic rate, shorter gestation periods, higher maturation rate, more free testosterone, a different skull shape, a higher ratio of fast twitch / slow twitch muscle and a thousand other typical traits that are only common in them.

OY VEY!
All clearly traits that have a massive impact on life situation and social behaviour. Not.
It is completely illogical to assume that with thousands of years of phenotypic adaptation and change, various genes and brain structure would've also gone through change and adaptation, amirite?

Also, among what I mentioned, higher maturation rate and higher free testosterone do influence social behaviour, lol.
EneT
Some of the things Jordan says are the truth yet at the same time a lot of it are just him being his radical self and being plain racist. I don't completely disagree with him, it's not education that's the problem, black people are responsible for their own behaviour and shortcomings.
Railey2

EneT wrote:

Some of the things Jordan says are the truth yet at the same time a lot of it are just him being his radical self and being plain racist. I don't completely disagree with him, it's not education that's the problem, black people are responsible for their own behaviour and shortcomings.
education is the single biggest factor responsible for poverty, crime rates, mortality and so on. If you grow up without a chance to get a proper education, you're almost guaranteed to be fucked, regardless of the color of your skin.
EneT
But there's no denying the fact that certain races have more aggressive behaviour regardless of education. Back in my school, despite being one of the most prestigious schools in the country; who were the drug dealers; who were the ones that frequently stole; who were the most ill-behaved?
All hands point to one specific racial group. Granted it wasn't specifically black people and I was among the people included in that group despite not being black, the majority of them were black.
B1rd
What's racist about what Jordan is saying? He's just explaining that the behavioural differences of blacks is caused by genetic and physiological differences. Just like it is for every race, since they are all different in some way. Blacks are obviously are superior in a lot of athletic disciplines, it's always blacks who are the champion sprinters, yet they are never the champion chess masters.

People just have serious confirmation bias. They might be ok with saying blacks are better at athletics, but intelligence is off limits. People have serious confirmation bias, and they want to believe in the blank slate theory even though it doesn't hold up under logical scrutiny.

Railey2 wrote:

education is the single biggest factor responsible for poverty, crime rates, mortality and so on. If you grow up without a chance to get a proper education, you're almost guaranteed to be fucked, regardless of the color of your skin.
Then how do you explain whites in low sociology-economic levels outscoring blacks in school tests who are from high socio-economic levels?

If you want to disprove the evidence you have to do more than ridicule it, you have to actually provide counter evidence.
Hika
I have cancer here
Mahogany

B1rd wrote:

What's racist about what Jordan is saying?
well...

B1rd wrote:

the behavioural differences of blacks is caused by genetic and physiological differences.
Yeah, that. That's the part that's racist.
Hika
I'm gonna help you out here a bit;
In order to be racist is if you said the ENTIRE race was problematic
like obviously for example is if you said all blacks do drugs and all of them score low on tests cause of their skin complexion.
EneT

Mahogany wrote:

B1rd wrote:

the behavioural differences of blacks is caused by genetic and physiological differences.
Yeah, that. That's the part that's racist.
No that's not racist though. You're being an idiot and getting your definition of racist wrong. What's racist is he's saying Africa's less prosperous because of black people, which isn't entirely wrong either.
Mahogany

EneT wrote:

No that's not racist though.
It is though

EneT wrote:

What's racist is he's saying Africa's less prosperous because of black people, which isn't entirely wrong either.
That is wrong though
Have you never considered the implications of the continent's geography and history?
Skin color doesn't factor into it
B1rd
Rest in peace Rhodesia :(

EneT wrote:

Raspberriel wrote:

I didn't know Moon Man browsed this forum
who dat. Anyways it's common knowledge that everyone in forums lurks ITT.
This is Moon Man

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeZXDconu0w
EneT

Mahogany wrote:

EneT wrote:

No that's not racist though.
It is though
It isn't.

Mahogany wrote:

EneT wrote:

What's racist is he's saying Africa's less prosperous because of black people, which isn't entirely wrong either.
That is wrong though
Have you never considered the implications of the continent's geography and history?
Skin color doesn't factor into it
That's why I said it's not entirely wrong, hello? Are you reading? Did you not see the fact that I did say it was racist?
The continent's geography and history play a massive part as to why Africa isn't prosperous but it's people hasn't really advanced to begin with has it?
Kappa FrankerZ
y'all are just jelly cuz black people run faster, jump higher, and have bigger dicks than you white plebs.
Railey2
if there are some statistical difference that cause the statistical average to tilt on way or another that's totally fine, buy saying that black societies are inherently doomed is just trivializing the issue beyond belief.
There are definitely genetic differences between the races, nobody is contesting that. But these differences aren't big enough to account between the huge societal gap between the races within countries, or seen on a world wide scale.
Faust
Doctor Strange is good. Go watch it guys.
Mahogany

EneT wrote:

That's why I said it's not entirely wrong, hello? Are you reading? Did you not see the fact that I did say it was racist?
what, apart from the fact that you didn't?

EneT wrote:

No that's not racist though.

EneT wrote:

The continent's geography and history play a massive part as to why Africa isn't prosperous but it's people hasn't really advanced to begin with has it?
It's people haven't been pushed to advance is because Africa is such a vast continent with a low density of people

One of the main Europe became the spearhead of the modern world is because of its density, feudalism, wars, and a need to innovate, advance and create new weapons to fight with - something that didn't exist in Africa.

This is part of what I'm referring to when I talk about geography. And you complain about me not reading?
EneT
Shall I quote myself?

EneT wrote:

What's racist is he's saying Africa's less prosperous because of black people, which isn't entirely wrong either.
uhm yeah, you're arguing with me about how it's racist when I clearly do find it racist. hmmm...........
Hika
idk it's pretty racist if you ask me too lol.
Mahogany

Hika wrote:

idk it's pretty racist if you ask me too lol.
You'd be right though, because it is! :3
Endaris
Not to mention that Africa has been systematically surpressed and exploited for the last 400 years.
Calling it on genetical differences is a poor excuse to keep this two-world-system up when Africa never really had a chance in the first place.
Jellyblob
x
EneT
That is racist but this isn't.

Mahogany wrote:

B1rd wrote:

the behavioural differences of blacks is caused by genetic and physiological differences.
Yeah, that. That's the part that's racist.
That is not racist.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply