1. Easy (1.3 stars, 35 notes)
2. Hard (3.02 stars, 89 notes)
3. Insane (4.15 stars, 130 notes)
4. Normal (1.89 stars, 57 notes)

WARNING
Insane difficulty contains some 1/4 patterns due to the vocal.

CookieBite wrote:

random mod

[Hard & Insane]
00:21:508 (1,2) - make it to a slider with arrow because It get confuse when you changed it to the blue tick.

free kudosu confirm

Hazu- wrote:

lul Insane testplay
Solo puse los hitsounds en la Insane, como los copiaste si es que arreglas alguno de los que puse aplícalo a todas las diffs.

:idea: General

1. ¿Es realmente necesario el primer bpm? xD si, ya que un offset negativo solo desincronizara el metronomo y hara conflicto con el modo Nightcore, hay casos en el que es rankeable pero para mi es mejor una linea roja en su lugar uwu
2. Quizá sería mejor agregar "2" en los tags, ya que es el opening de su 2da temporada. komo lo zupo

Party

1. 00:02:416 (3) - No es mas que un capricho, pero muevelo un poco hacia la izquierda, para que siga una linea de acuerdo al slider anterior. ✓
2. 00:10:209 (3) - Lo mismo para este (pero hacia la derecha ahora), si lo haces mueve también 00:09:429 (3) - por que creo que es blanket. ✓
3. 00:12:935 (1) - ¿Por que el finish? yo no escucho nada como para poner un finish. xd escucha nuevamente, hay uno que no se escucha mucho pero esta mas al fondo de la musica y esto es para enfatizarlo
4. 00:08:260 (1) - y 00:09:819 (1) - ¿Finish? Suena bastante parecido a donde pusiste finish. (00:07:481 (1) - y 00:09:040 (1) - ) no son necesarios
5. 00:04:754 (2) - y 00:17:222 (3) - Creo que aquí quedaría bien un finish de acuerdo a que en la canción suena algo diferente (supongo que sabes a que me refiero, no se como explicarlo). los finish tampoco me parecen necesarios aqui
6. 00:18:390 (1) - Aquí suena claramente un platillo xD ¿Finish? ✓

Hard

1. 00:23:066 (1,2,3,4) - Te recomendaría usar los objetos parecidos a los que usaste en Insane, fue la única parte que se me hizo incómoda al jugar. El BPM es 154 y el gap lo encuentro bien, no quiero hacer una diff demasiado dificil de lo que ya es

Normal

1. No tengo inconvenientes con esta diff, a excepción de los ticks azules, no creo que sea lo correcto, pero no se escucha mal, igual pregúntale a algún BN sobre esto. no creo que haya problemas con eso

Easy

1. adsadsadsadassa Holi c: ✓

Good Luck~

Net0 wrote:

Fun song xD . As we discussed, m4m on this: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/502648

[General]

1. All ok
   
   

[Easy]

1. 1. 00:00:662 (1) - This slider here it starts with the whistle sound and ends before the whistle stops. I know that you need the 1/1 gap, but using a 1/2 slider here is dangerous. For me it works fine, but some ppl might not agree using 1/2 measure stuff on easy. I won't, neither can't fix this because converting this into a circle will decrease the drain time and this map would be unrankable. Also 1/2 sliders are rankable on Easy if you use it only on determinated cases
   2. SMALL blanket fix 00:09:819 (4,1) - http://puu.sh/r4wWk.jpg ✓
      
   3. ^ 00:18:390 (3,4) - http://puu.sh/r4x1V.jpg ✓
      
   4. ^ 00:27:546 (1,2,3) - , really nazi to ask you to fix this blankets with DS, so this one works fine, you don't have to fix if you don't want to.http://puu.sh/r4xaB.jpg, but the 2,3 one I really recommendhttp://puu.sh/r4xcY.jpg http://puu.sh/r4x1V.jpg ✓

[Normal]

1. This combo here looks really odd in this diff. The entire first part you've kept combos inside the 1/1, but here 00:10:598 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you have choose to go beyond. I'd recommend nc 00:12:157 (4) - ✓
   
2. Unsnapped sliders 00:06:312 (2) - ;00:10:598 (1) - ; 00:11:183 (2) - ; 00:18:780 (2) - ; 00:21:508 (1) - ; 00:29:494 (4) - . So I've checked each of them, and mostly you were ending on the beats which means you're using slider polarity. However the gap here 00:21:508 (1,2,3) - made this really hard. The player will have a 3/4gap to go back to white polarity and that will be a hitcircle. Consider reworking this combo. You can see that this one is more natural 00:10:598 (1,2,3,4) - because the following object is a slider. About the repeat sliders, you could probably add a hitsound on the whiteticks, to make it work better here:00:06:702 - and 00:19:170 - . snapped some of them
   
3. Blanket 00:17:612 (3,1) - those aren't intended for blanket

[Hard]

1. 0,08x of spacing increase here 00:09:429 (2) - . It's odd because everything is quite the same spacing, and this here is bigger. I don't quite see a reason, so maybe a fix? ✓
   
2. ^ but in this case really smaller spacing 00:14:495 (3,4) - , it goes from 1,30x to 1,22x. No fix, reason is that without circle stacking DS for this slider is fine: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6047507 so this is caused by stacking circles and not cause the distance
   
3. ^00:25:209 (3) - goes up to 1,36x. In this case I'd let it pass since it's the main chorus part, but again, I think it wasn't your original intention to leave it bigger, specially upbeat. ✓
   
4. Blanket 00:02:416 (6,1) - , really small this one http://puu.sh/r4yvJ.jpg ✓
   
5. Is this 00:02:222 (4,5,6) - vocal 1/4 triple? Because I can't hear the beats xD , if it's than totally fine o/ no fix then
   
6. 00:10:598 (1,2,3,4) - Try to make 1 a slider that leads into the blue polarity. Something like this to improve both suggestions ✓
   
   
   

[Party]

1. Blanket 00:17:027 (2,5) - ✓
   
2. Woudl you blanket this 00:19:754 (4,1,1) - ? Not needed, just personal taste xD no fix then
   
3. Not much to say, this diff is really polished, good job o/

Cool song man, hopefully you can find more mods to this

Nyantiaz wrote:

ok

Easy:
00:00:662 - maybe remove this slider? explained reasons above

Normal:
nothing wrong with this! very nice job

Hard:
nothing wrong with this either! awesome!

Insane (or party WHATEVER):
00:12:936 - space this stream a little less ok

and nice! Very few issues, pretty awesome map! liar

Whirl wrote:

hi underforest

omg 'party'


this is a nice mapset I like it, no GDs, it would be your first ranked map with no GDs if you get this ranked, right?

Whirl wrote:

(you fricking killed me in pm)

Whirl wrote:

hi underforest

omg 'party' nm mod for follower on instagram DO IT


this is a nice mapset I like it, no GDs, it would be your first ranked map with no GDs if you get this ranked, right?

well nm because so short why not


--Easy--

00:05:923 (3,4) - this angel change is quite intense for an easy is not very very hard xd

look at this if you don't know what the frick i'm talking about

or you could just move (4) up idk but do something please

00:07:481 (1,2) - curve these two for nazi aesthetical flow reasons is not nazi, i don't found nothing wrong here
00:19:949 (1,2) - ^ same
00:25:403 (4,1) - I know there's quite a bit of spacing between these notes but still don't stack maybe idk stack is allowed for this case
00:27:546 (1) - starting on a red tick in easy HMMM IRREGULAR RYTHYM WHY DON'T YOU CHECK PISHIFATS CHANNEL YOU NOOB i'm following vocal
00:27:546 (1,2) - holy shet more irregular rythym nope
00:27:546 (1) - start this slider on 00:27:351 - here please no need

--Normal--

00:00:662 (1) - maybe I wouldn't suggest mapping the whistle in the beginning, if you are just make it one circle please explained reasons of why I can't do this
00:02:806 (1) - omg, curve this for flow and aesthetics more nazi suggestions fixed
00:05:144 (3,1) - this flow and look why so many nazi suggestions is going rectal so no problem with it
00:17:612 (3,1) - MORE NAZI SUGGESTIONS THIS FLOW IS HARD fixed
00:21:508 (1,2,3) - make 1 and 3 the same shape ok



--Hard--

00:00:662 (1,2) - again I just don't like the idea of mapping this whistle, and if your gonna map it make it one circle 00:00:662 - here and make 00:00:857 (2) - that a 1/2 slider please it doesn't fit for it
00:06:605 (3,4) - more spacing? i'll think about it
00:08:260 (3,4) - curve this please PLEASE PLEASE ok
00:11:183 (2) - put the middle anchor in the middle of the slider and MORE IRREGULAR RYTHYM YOU NOOB o... k
00:19:073 (3,4) - again curve these please no need
00:23:845 (3,4) - again curve these it plays so WEIRD same
00:25:403 (4,5) - more sv on this maybe? i'll think about it


--Party--

I honestly don't think 'party' is a good name but maybe 'loli' or 'kawaii' would fir better because of the bg and song idk resolved via irc

00:07:092 (2,1) - I think blanket here would be too hard why? it haves a really good flow imo
00:25:793 (6) - would play better if middle anchor was taken out intentional




Good Luck

1. 00:02:319 (2,3) - ctrl+h/make it face the direction the slider is going. feels weird it went the other way around.
2. 00:05:825 (5,1) - this one however, tilt it some 20 degrees ccw so it doesn't look wonky.... or prolly that's just me
3. actually these two^ applies to all the slider+2 1/4 circles you have but i dun wanna tell all of them one-by-one.
4. 00:21:508 (1,2,1,2,3) - not sure how can i best explain this but this section feels bizarre and it took me a few tries to process it right. this kind of "vacancy" when the entire diff has been mostly dense(esp in 00:10:598 (1,2,3,4,5) - where the music is also just as bumpy) feels weird. maybe turn 00:21:508 (1) - into a 1/2 slider, pull the end of 00:21:799 (2) - back to the blue tick before it and then, put a 1/4 slider(or 2 circles?) on 00:22:092 - ....or prolly that's just me as well

1. 00:08:650 (4) - nothing necessary but maybe move this wee bit up to level it with (3)
2. 00:11:183 (2,3) - mayb NC this separately as well since they land on similarly strong beats.
3. and speaking similar beats remove the clap on 00:11:767 (3) -
4. 00:22:286 (2) - kinda doubt this since there's nothing in the music that suggest for a 1/4 but wtvr
5. 00:28:131 (3,5) - maybe you could also NC these as well

domSaur wrote:

meni


[Party]

1. 00:02:319 (2,3) - ctrl+h/make it face the direction the slider is going. feels weird it went the other way around. intended
2. 00:05:825 (5,1) - this one however, tilt it some 20 degrees ccw so it doesn't look wonky.... or prolly that's just me ok
3. actually these two^ applies to all the slider+2 1/4 circles you have but i dun wanna tell all of them one-by-one.
4. 00:21:508 (1,2,1,2,3) - not sure how can i best explain this but this section feels bizarre and it took me a few tries to process it right. this kind of "vacancy" when the entire diff has been mostly dense(esp in 00:10:598 (1,2,3,4,5) - where the music is also just as bumpy) feels weird. maybe turn 00:21:508 (1) - into a 1/2 slider, pull the end of 00:21:799 (2) - back to the blue tick before it and then, put a 1/4 slider(or 2 circles?) on 00:22:092 - ....or prolly that's just me as well intended too

[Hard]

1. 00:08:650 (4) - nothing necessary but maybe move this wee bit up to level it with (3) not fix cause rhythm dense
2. 00:11:183 (2,3) - mayb NC this separately as well since they land on similarly strong beats. it doesn't look nice
3. and speaking similar beats remove the clap on 00:11:767 (3) - intended too
4. 00:22:286 (2) - kinda doubt this since there's nothing in the music that suggest for a 1/4 but wtvr listen on 25-50% playback
5. 00:28:131 (3,5) - maybe you could also NC these as well intended

dunno if these are of any help but eh ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

KuranteMelodii wrote:

Man i didn't expect you did very well on insanes, even you said that you're inexperienced with it

1. 00:00:662 (1) - isn't opening with 1/2 slider a bit too surprise for beginner ?
2. 00:29:494 (2,3) - I think doing something like this work better for beginner
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:09:819 (3) - I think place this right after (2) tail would make flow better , try move to around x188 y56
2. 00:29:494 (4) - nc cus 2nd downbeat so it consistent with your nc pattern previously ?

1. 00:09:819 (3,4) - why not try this rhythm so it can cover the snare beat there too ?
   SPOILER

   
   
   looks solid but can add some jumps to make better spread with insane
   

1. 00:03:195 (2,3,4) - kinda hard to catch with the current structure , try move to around x408 y288 ? i think that would make flow better
2. 00:05:533 (4,5,1) - the thing you do at the tail is a bit off imo lol , try adjust like this ?
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:07:871 (2,3) - a bit to much spacing for the low vocal there , i think maybe move 00:08:066 (3) - to around x188 y24 would be better also would make 00:08:066 (3,1) - has higher spacing than 00:07:871 (2,3) - which make more sense with the song here
4. 00:09:819 (1,2,3) - huh? ctrl+h and readjust so it will flow better ? current feel a bit off imo
5. 00:10:209 (3,4) - can reduce spacing here a bit so it make 00:10:403 (4,1) - a bit bigger spacing which will make the impact on (1) feel better

CelsiusLK wrote:

[easy]

1. 00:00:662 (1) - isn't opening with 1/2 slider a bit too surprise for beginner ? it isn't and actually I can't convert this to a circle or drain time will drop to 29 seconds (unrankable)
   

CelsiusLK wrote:

yea

wajinshu wrote:

Some nazi :d
~Hard~
00:28:910 (4,5) - A little overlap with the accuracy meter (if enabled) :d

1. Es bastante innecesario tener dos Timing Points al inicio, ya que la única razón por la cual los haz añadido es debido a los cambios de SV en la ultima dificultad, esto se soluciona fácilmente con un Offset negativo.
   En este caso lo mas factible seria usar: -4985 para evitar que con el modo Nightcore suene de manera de-sincronizada, recuerda re-colocar todo de nuevo ya que con el cambio del Offset es probable que algunas lineas y notas queden Unsnapped. (Así que ya sabes que hacer).
2. 00:08:260 - Que te parece añadir un Finish aquí en todas las dificultades para mantener la consistencia, ya que en el fondo se escucha un sonido de énfasis ademas de que la voz es bastante notable en este punto en especifico.
3. 00:09:819 - Lo mismo.
4. 00:00:662 - En realidad no me molestan en absoluto los sonidos Soft pero estoy bastante seguro de que estas notas sonarían mucho mejor con el Whistle Normal, así que podrías usar la herramienta Addtions para eso sin necesidad de cambiar a Sampleset Normal.

1. 00:27:351 - En lo personal no es gran cosa, pero al parecer estas siguiendo el segundo sonido en esta parte cuando en la canción sucede lo contrario, ya que estas ignorando el sonido anterior lo cual puede ser un poco confuso para los jugadores no experimentados, así que me gustaría que intentaras algo como esto en su lugar. (Un cambio de patrón tampoco seria mala idea.)

1. 00:26:183 (5) - Se te olvido añadir un combo en este circulo, es la única dificultad la cual ignora completamente el cambio de estrofa.

• 00:03:585 (3,4,5) - 00:06:702 (4,5,6) - 00:12:741 (2,3) - 00:16:053 (4,5,6) - 00:19:170 (4,5,6) - Te aconsejo reducir el Spacing de estas notas un poco debido a que no hay necesidad de resaltar o crear Mini-Jumps en una dificultad como esta, ademas de que es un poco incomodo de mover el Mouse por el cambio repentino entre esas notas.

1. 00:01:149 - ¿Que te parece silenciar el final de este Slider? Suena mucho mejor con el volumen bajo en esta parte. (Volumen de 5% o 10% quedarían perfecto).
2. 00:02:514 - Al revisar la dificultad varias veces me he percatado de que en algunas partes eres consistente al seguir las líricas pero en algunas no lo cual es un poco extraño ¿No lo crees? ¿Que opinas sobre usar este ritmo aquí?
3. 00:25:793 (6) - Si escuchas con atención te daras cuenta que el sonido 1/6 sigue siendo constante despues de haberlo terminado un poco antes, así que te recomiendo aumentar una repetición mas a este Slider.
4. 00:02:709 - Aquí esta siendo ignorada completamente la voz cuando 00:05:825 - en esta parte si fue asignada.
5. 00:05:144 - De hecho en esta parte podrias añadir un Stream sin problema alguno, hay sonidos bastantes notables en 1/4 si escuchas con cuidado.
6. 00:12:449 - Tal vez un triple encajaría perfecto aquí. (Creo que ya entendiste a lo que me refiero.)
7. 00:10:598 (1,2,3,4,5) - Genial.

Gero wrote:

Mod incoming.

Gero wrote:

In this case the offset can fit in -4985 so Nightcore Mod won't desynchronize.

1. 00:09:820 (4,1) - Blanket could be improved here ;w;
2. 00:12:157 (2) - This shape can be made softer if the first point were moved a bit to the left, something like that: http://puu.sh/rA0kG/ef05f1148e.jpg
3. 00:27:352 (1,2) - Would feel so better if they were aligned in the grid symmetrically http://puu.sh/rA03q/0173d9db5c.jpg Apart from that, I feel that 00:29:495 (3) - would feel better as an 3/4 slider with/without a reverse, while with the reverse would probably break your consistency of finish the diff in the same spot while withotu would feel questionable as the gap to (4). It would get something like that and I am honestly not sure about it XD http://puu.sh/rA0el/4f9eea156f.jpg.

1. 00:29:495 (1) - Same issue about the Easy, but on Normal, it can be made with no worries. I recommend you short this slider to 3/4 as it feels a pretty much weird rhythm ignoring that strong beat in the blue tick.

Hazu- wrote:

Revisa bien los hitsounds en 00:10:599 - No coinciden en Normal, Hard e Insane
/me hides

Underforest wrote:

Hazu- wrote:

Revisa bien los hitsounds en 00:10:599 - No coinciden en Normal, Hard e Insane
/me hides

yo veo bien todo

Gero wrote:

~ Bubbled ~

1. バージョン should be romanised as Version, any other references?
2. Why Kyoko Narumi? Surname should be Narumi.
3. Why not MeniMeni ManiMani? As shown in p/5516651 .

1. 00:21:508 (1,2) - The rhythms around here seem to be following vocals mostly as what I've understood. Leaving 00:21:800 in the slide and expressing 00:21:898 didn't felt natural accordingly, even there is a real beat over there. If you intended a transition of rhythm, then 00:21:898 could've been done along a hitsound to support the music. But actually I think there could be a better way to express the vocal lines better without creating some polarity issues.

1. 00:12:157 (1,2) - The beat of (2) feels pretty weak. Are you sure about this jump?

1. official romanised can't be found so i think バージョン can be romanised as ver. cus TVversion make it looks somewhat silly , that was all my assumption
2. i didn't care about the surname name so that was my mistake , https://twitter.com/narumi_kyoko should be narumi kyoko tbh
3. no space for menimenimanimani cus i stick with what said at the song list on album cover , not the album title

CelsiusLK wrote:

1. no space for menimenimanimani cus i stick with what said at the song list on album cover , not the album title

CelsiusLK wrote:

1. official romanised can't be found so i think バージョン can be romanised as ver. cus TVversion make it looks somewhat silly , that was all my assumption

1. 00:29:495 (2) - Fairly speaking, having two completely different sounds on the same object is not the best idea when it comes to mapping. I do get the idea of simplifying rhythms due to this being the lowest difficulty in the set, although I find it weird. Might just be, though, but using a different rhythm is recommended.

1. 00:10:599 (1,2,3) - Clicking this perfectly can be a bit tricky for newbie players as you only use it once throughout the whole difficulty. I'd find it more suitable if you make (1) a repeat slider and then adding a circle on 00:11:378 - . I doubt someone will tell you anything about not mapping the other hit on the blue tick.

1. 00:22:287 (2) - Really weird to see that being mapped as a 1/4 repeat slider when on the highest difficulty it's just a common 1/2 slider without any repeat. Taking the idea of the Insane wouldn't actually be bad and it'd make it consistent throughout the difficulties mentioned.

1. 00:02:417 (3,4,1) - Mostly something personal, but the flow here seems a tad linear. As I stated, it's really personal, although here are some variations that will work a bit better and will add some emphasis/less clunkiness to the current pattern: one two. That's, of course, without changing the current placement of the following patterns, because you can do soooo many things with this haha.
2. 00:03:781 (1,2,3,1) - Tip: Whenever you do a back-and-forth, try to make it according to the song. Right there, what would've made sense is stacking/overlapping 00:03:781 (1,3) - for vocals instead of the rhythm change on 00:03:976 (2,1) - . Also, now that we are in this pattern, visually speaking, 00:05:729 (6,1,2) - that flow is not that good. Why "visually", though? In a way it does affect gameplay, you know... players will most likely expect (2) to be on the top-right-side of the screen rather than linearly snapped to (6). Try placing (2) on x292 y34 (for example) and see the difference! Or even x429 y88.
3. 00:05:534 (5,6,1) - This is linear as well, even more linear than the very first pattern I mentioned. Although, with the current placement I can only suggest you to place (1) on top of (5).
4. 00:08:164 - Adding a circle there would fit both vocals and the little audible drum.
5. 00:21:508 (1,2) - Since you hadn't really used any variation like this in the whole map (maybe I'm mistaken), it'd be cool to make (1) a 1/2 slider in order to avoid players from hitting 100s on (2).
6. 00:29:495 (1,2,3) - Oh, minor, placing NCs on (2) and (3) might work to indicate they are no longer 1/2 patterns.

CelsiusLK wrote:

idk why the japanese tiltle メニメニマニマニ (TVバージョン) doesn't use the space but if the japanese title doesn't use space I would not use the space for romanised too to make them consistent
well if the romanised use space , should the japanese title use space too or ?

anyways what would be the best metadata to use ?

1. First object on Easy since it started on a very weird angle.
2. Hitsounds across difficulties for consistency.
3. A pattern in Normal, rhythm was kind of vague.
4. Couple of things on Insane, some distances to make it less overdone-y.

HappyRocket88 wrote:

Congratulations for first insane ranked! \w/

Sotarks wrote:

HappyRocket88 wrote:

Congratulations for first insane ranked! \w/

half tv size tho xd