*^* <3Natsu wrote:
Hi
General
[]you're probably referring to the romanization, right? Since the original metadata can be found here as you can see. I'll ask for how I should capitalize things.
- Can you provide an official metadata source or confirm it with some QAT?
EDIT: alacat's answer
Everlasting Snow
[][]
- 00:15:432 (3) - I usually don't complain much about this, but the melody in this song is so nice, that the wrong rhythm you have trigger me alot, the slider is ending in an active beat, it have to beat a clickable object, just make 00:15:432 (3) - two circles, like you did in 00:14:020 (3,4) - and 00:16:844 (3,4) - true. I managed something there with circles instead.
- 00:37:314 (1) - Use a 1/2 slider instead? it fit better the music, like you did with 00:34:491 (1) - I feel like vocals are making 3 notes there, or at least the one on the repeat is there :/ There's also the beat on the slider end which would be wasted with a simple 1/2 slider
- 00:43:667 (3,4,5) - 1/4 jumps are totally fine, but the spacing between 4 an 5 being lower is really confuse, increase the spacing or use a stack, since 5 is not a weak beat to justify it with that. true. Reduced spacing on 4
- 00:44:373 (7) - no NC? I think the music is really different from the before part, personally I'd NC it. yeah, looks nice. I dunno why I didn't use it before tbh.
- 01:23:109 (2) - the sound is so low that I can barely hear it and at normal speed sounds bad, do you mind removing this beat for better rhythm? I must admit it was intentional, but I don't remember why and without that feels good anyway, so sure, removed.
- 01:29:903 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - is really hard to understand the logic behind this combos, I mean they don't make much sense with the song, my suggestion is to remove this NC 01:30:432 (1) - to group them 01:29:903 (1,2,3,1,2) - and add a NC at 01:30:785 (3) - then remove it from 01:30:961 (1) - so you can group the vocals 01:30:785 (3,1,2) - in a single combo, that fit the song better. That will be consistent with 01:32:197 (1,2,3) - 01:36:432 (1,2,3) - etc. holy, you're totally right here. I firstly planned those based on pattern but no one pointed them out even if I did it myself elsewhere LOL.
- 01:53:373 (1,2,3) - The music have a slow part here, but you are using a larger spacing than the fast part 01:53:903 (1,2) - reduced ~
- 02:17:020 (2,3,4) - this is a bit similar, 2 and 3 have more spacing than 3 and 4, but 3 is a weak beat and 4 is a strong beat here I have a good explanation for it. It's a build-up emphasis. What you said it is true, but I did that in order to increase emphasis on (5). This came out mostly on the need to make up for the strong beat on (1)'s slider end which I happened to waste.
PS: I have the feeling I just made it more complex here...- 03:00:256 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - same as 01:29:903 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - yep pt.2
- 03:23:726 (1,2,3,1,2) - same as 01:53:373 (1,2,3) - fixed too
- 04:24:609 (3) - NC? uh, I wanted to actually let the players the help of the follow points to understand how the pattern works there, since if I put a NC there I should keep the back and forth movement consistent, right?
- 04:30:609 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - same as 01:29:903 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - yep pt.3