Hi
General
[]
[]
General
[]
- Can you provide an official metadata source or confirm it with some QAT?
[]
- 00:15:432 (3) - I usually don't complain much about this, but the melody in this song is so nice, that the wrong rhythm you have trigger me alot, the slider is ending in an active beat, it have to beat a clickable object, just make 00:15:432 (3) - two circles, like you did in 00:14:020 (3,4) - and 00:16:844 (3,4) -
- 00:37:314 (1) - Use a 1/2 slider instead? it fit better the music, like you did with 00:34:491 (1) -
- 00:43:667 (3,4,5) - 1/4 jumps are totally fine, but the spacing between 4 an 5 being lower is really confuse, increase the spacing or use a stack, since 5 is not a weak beat to justify it with that.
- 00:44:373 (7) - no NC? I think the music is really different from the before part, personally I'd NC it.
- 01:23:109 (2) - the sound is so low that I can barely hear it and at normal speed sounds bad, do you mind removing this beat for better rhythm?
- 01:29:903 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - is really hard to understand the logic behind this combos, I mean they don't make much sense with the song, my suggestion is to remove this NC 01:30:432 (1) - to group them 01:29:903 (1,2,3,1,2) - and add a NC at 01:30:785 (3) - then remove it from 01:30:961 (1) - so you can group the vocals 01:30:785 (3,1,2) - in a single combo, that fit the song better. That will be consistent with 01:32:197 (1,2,3) - 01:36:432 (1,2,3) - etc.
- 01:53:373 (1,2,3) - The music have a slow part here, but you are using a larger spacing than the fast part 01:53:903 (1,2) -
- 02:17:020 (2,3,4) - this is a bit similar, 2 and 3 have more spacing than 3 and 4, but 3 is a weak beat and 4 is a strong beat
- 03:00:256 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - same as 01:29:903 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) -
- 03:23:726 (1,2,3,1,2) - same as 01:53:373 (1,2,3) -
- 04:24:609 (3) - NC?
- 04:30:609 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - same as 01:29:903 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) -