1. 00:17:241 (1) - I would remove the red node personally and do a full blanket around instead
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:24:426 - the drumroll sound would sound better if it started here? Try like 30% volume
3. 00:38:618 - I would consider this to be the dominant note and where I honestly think 00:38:798 (3) - should start. Both the vocals and the instruments support this. This applies to almost every single pattern down the line such as 00:41:492 - 00:44:367 -00:47:241 - etc
4. 00:55:684 - circle
5. 00:57:121 - circle. The drums are really active here and it feels odd when going upbeat like this and having a break in the rhythm.
6. 01:00:714 (1) - optional, if you want a break you can easily remove this. making 01:01:792 (1) - feel like an epic hit.
7. 01:05:384 (2,3) - the 3/2 slider like 01:08:259 (2) - would be a better option here to capture the dominant notes.
8. 01:21:911 (1) - I don't think you need the 'ding' whistle in it lol.
9. 01:31:971 (3) - Less of a curve would be super. It feels way too tight.
   SPOILER

   
10. 01:34:486 (2,3,4) - Try balancing these so it flows in a more circular motion. You don't have to blanket the (1) really, but up to you.
    SPOILER

    

1. 00:16:881 (4) - Two circles would suit this better imo. Much easier to play when you have piano notes like these.
2. 00:23:169 (1,1) - This is probably one of my biggest pet peeves in mapping as of now. The whole space inbetween here is completely empty because of the spinner you placed. People should be playing this section, and instead having a gap where the spinner is. Try ending the spinner at 00:24:426 - (maybe delete 00:22:989 (1) - and move the spinner back to it so there's more spin time) and resume mapping at 00:25:864 - Regardless if you take this mod or not, 00:27:301 (1) - is very awkward to play because of the vocals.
3. 00:36:822 (6) - A 1/1 gap is pretty much mandatory here. As lead-in vocals aren't important to map, and they won't ruin your rhythm, try deleting this slider and placing a circle at 00:37:001 -
4. 00:48:319 (6) - pretty much the same as 36 secs, since your rhythm mapping here, it's best to stick to it and skip the lead-in.
5. 01:07:181 (3) - A circle would be better here.
6. 01:05:384 (3,4,5,1) - Probably the most unrankable issue about this map. You change what you follow. You were happily following vocals and then decided to swap to the instrumentals in this spot. It makes it hard to read as well as confusing to follow. The other issue is that when doing this, you map offbeat which only adds to it. Following the previous combos, it would be best simply like this:
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:21:911 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Another major issue. You follow the vocals in the first combo, but ignore them in the second (even if they're fading ones) Again from the second (3->4) feels very uncomfortable to play as players will naturally want to follow the vocals because of your previous combo.
8. 01:24:786 (1,2,3,4) - Try this for vocal emphasis and better matching for your style
   SPOILER

   
9. 01:29:097 (1) - same as the first spinnner, kind of ruins the upcoming notes. 01:31:612 (1) - is a bit odd to come back into the music as well. Maybe delete this if you want to keep the spinner.

1. 00:09:157 (3) - You really don't need the tail end of this slider. Makes the light intro really heavy imo with it. a 1/1 gap here works just fine.
2. 00:09:516 (4,5) - 3 circles for the piano
3. 00:31:073 (5) - try deleting this.
4. 00:32:151 (2,1) - Very very bad transition from vocals to beat. Please pick one or the other. Especially after playing everything before 00:30:714 (4) - this rhythm is confusing. (3,4) are actually very tough to hit because of this.
5. 00:35:744 (1,2,3) - change (1) to two circles (one on the head and tail) This makes hitting the triplet much easier and distinguishes which part of the rhythm the player is playing. You can even swap the new triplet and the 1/4 repeat at 00:36:462 (4) - to make it more adaptable.
6. 00:59:636 (1,2,3) - 4 circles. All of these notes sound the exact same so they shouldn't be different.
7. 01:13:828 (3,4) - 1/1 slider would fit the best here.
8. 01:28:558 (1,2,3) - little bit of a jump would have been cool.
9. 01:29:007 (1,1) - the slider could be a little closer to the middle imo. It's quite a reach to get to.
10. 01:34:486 (5) - ending on the red tick would suit this better, especially since you have 1/4 notes after this. Really no point using a 3/4 here.

1. 00:25:864 (1,2,1) - Make it the same distance, you map extra bits that doesn't follow from the previous notes on the 00:26:582 (1) - and having the gap makes it look like a 1/1.
2. 01:12:570 (1,2,1,2) - Try to even the gaps out a bit. (They feel completely random to me) The jump from (2->1) is a bit much for example.
3. 01:29:007 (1) - Don't see any reason why you can't end this at 01:30:175 - More of a dominant beat there anyways.
4. 01:40:234 (7) - like in hard.. why not at 01:40:414 - where the beat is emphasized more?
5. 01:40:594 (1) - intentionally added in beat on nothing on this end is also pointless.
6. Actually to be honest, all of these 3/4 sliders would fit the song much better as 1/2 instead. No need to create something that isn't in the song itself.
7. 01:43:917 (3) - ? no point, just stick to the main beats imo. you really don't need to be mapping to that 1/4 sound as it's just added unnecessary difficulty. I suggest nerfing this quite a bit. You can still map heavily just following the drum beats anyways.

1. 00:09:516 - piano here would be better as a clickable.
2. 00:20:654 (2) - Just a 1/1 slider? I don't hear anything on the reverse worth putting it on for.
3. 00:25:864 (1) -

   Every slider must have a clear and visible path to follow from start to end. Sliders which overlap themselves in a way that makes any section unreadable or ambiguous (including "burai sliders") cannot be used. This is so that no slider has an appearance that is confusing or impossible for the player to read. Additionally, the slider borders must never be covered up from the slider being packed in too tightly. However, sliders that cross over themselves are fine as long as the borders are clearly visible.

   Yeah.. change this so the beginning part of it doesn't troll. I would personally consider this unrankable, even if it's only a 'little bit' as it makes the slider path nearly impossible to read. Just change this and save yourself a headache later on.
4. 00:46:702 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - whistles like your earlier sliders would have been cool here instead of the chime.

Lanturn wrote:

Add Itou to the tags as her name is also commonly spelled this way. sure

More focused towards the easier diffs, dropped a couple things for the harder ones though.

[Easy]

1. 00:17:241 (1) - I would remove the red node personally and do a full blanket around instead
   SPOILER

   
   kinda like how it looks now more
2. 00:24:426 - the drumroll sound would sound better if it started here? Try like 30% volume done for easy and extra
3. 00:38:618 - I would consider this to be the dominant note and where I honestly think 00:38:798 (3) - should start. Both the vocals and the instruments support this. This applies to almost every single pattern down the line such as 00:41:492 - 00:44:367 -00:47:241 - etc I get what you try to tell me. But current one seems alright and makes for a way simpler rhytm imo
4. 00:55:684 - circle
5. 00:57:121 - circle. The drums are really active here and it feels odd when going upbeat like this and having a break in the rhythm. I considered that but thought it might be too dense, but seems like I'll add them then
6. 01:00:714 (1) - optional, if you want a break you can easily remove this. making 01:01:792 (1) - feel like an epic hit. will consider/color]
7. 01:05:384 (2,3) - the 3/2 slider like 01:08:259 (2) - would be a better option here to capture the dominant notes. [color=#FFBF00]i'd really like to have something on 01:06:103 though
8. 01:21:911 (1) - I don't think you need the 'ding' whistle in it lol. yeah, changed to drum additions for all diffs
9. 01:31:971 (3) - Less of a curve would be super. It feels way too tight.
   SPOILER

   
   changed it
10. 01:34:486 (2,3,4) - Try balancing these so it flows in a more circular motion. You don't have to blanket the (1) really, but up to you.
    SPOILER

    
    redid some stuff here, should be better now and look nice

[Normal]

1. 00:16:881 (4) - Two circles would suit this better imo. Much easier to play when you have piano notes like these.
2. 00:23:169 (1,1) - This is probably one of my biggest pet peeves in mapping as of now. The whole space inbetween here is completely empty because of the spinner you placed. People should be playing this section, and instead having a gap where the spinner is. Try ending the spinner at 00:24:426 - (maybe delete 00:22:989 (1) - and move the spinner back to it so there's more spin time) and resume mapping at 00:25:864 - Regardless if you take this mod or not, 00:27:301 (1) - is very awkward to play because of the vocals.
   makes sense. I decided to delete the spinner and put a liser like easy/extra here. spinner should still be fine for hard/insane as they are so lenient with recovery time
3. 00:36:822 (6) - A 1/1 gap is pretty much mandatory here. As lead-in vocals aren't important to map, and they won't ruin your rhythm, try deleting this slider and placing a circle at 00:37:001 - sure
4. 00:48:319 (6) - pretty much the same as 36 secs, since your rhythm mapping here, it's best to stick to it and skip the lead-in. seems fine here as it nicely follows the background noise too. feels really fitting
5. 01:07:181 (3) - A circle would be better here. really want to kepp sth on 01:07:361 - tbh
6. 01:05:384 (3,4,5,1) - Probably the most unrankable issue about this map. You change what you follow. You were happily following vocals and then decided to swap to the instrumentals in this spot. It makes it hard to read as well as confusing to follow. The other issue is that when doing this, you map offbeat which only adds to it. Following the previous combos, it would be best simply like this:
   SPOILER

   
   remapped this a bit to follow the vocals more
7. 01:21:911 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Another major issue. You follow the vocals in the first combo, but ignore them in the second (even if they're fading ones) Again from the second (3->4) feels very uncomfortable to play as players will naturally want to follow the vocals because of your previous combo. I can't really see a problem with this and the taps on 01:23:349 (1,2) - should be opkay with vocals
8. 01:24:786 (1,2,3,4) - Try this for vocal emphasis and better matching for your style
   SPOILER

   
   sure
9. 01:29:097 (1) - same as the first spinnner, kind of ruins the upcoming notes. 01:31:612 (1) - is a bit odd to come back into the music as well. Maybe delete this if you want to keep the spinner. removed the note

[Hard]

1. 00:09:157 (3) - You really don't need the tail end of this slider. Makes the light intro really heavy imo with it. a 1/1 gap here works just fine.
2. 00:09:516 (4,5) - 3 circles for the piano
   applied both
3. 00:31:073 (5) - try deleting this. sure, made 00:30:714 (4) - a 1/1 slider since that felt to empty without it
4. 00:32:151 (2,1) - Very very bad transition from vocals to beat. Please pick one or the other. Especially after playing everything before 00:30:714 (4) - this rhythm is confusing. (3,4) are actually very tough to hit because of this.
5. 00:35:744 (1,2,3) - change (1) to two circles (one on the head and tail) This makes hitting the triplet much easier and distinguishes which part of the rhythm the player is playing. You can even swap the new triplet and the 1/4 repeat at 00:36:462 (4) - to make it more adaptable.
   I redid some stuff for the whole part, including those you mentioned
6. 00:59:636 (1,2,3) - 4 circles. All of these notes sound the exact same so they shouldn't be different. sure
7. 01:13:828 (3,4) - 1/1 slider would fit the best here. think this fits better with the vocals and beat
8. 01:28:558 (1,2,3) - little bit of a jump would have been cool. sure, added some more spacing
9. 01:29:007 (1,1) - the slider could be a little closer to the middle imo. It's quite a reach to get to. 1/1 gap and I'd expect people that play hards to have a little bit of control over their spinning and not just flail their mouse like on lower diffs :v
10. 01:34:486 (5) - ending on the red tick would suit this better, especially since you have 1/4 notes after this. Really no point using a 3/4 here.feels nice for me + having it like that follow that other osund really well on 01:34:486 (5,1) -

[Insane]
More 1/1s please! This whole map is pretty much 1/2 spam. You don't need to map every single 1/2 note you know! ;_; I'll consider sth, but I really like how it plays and it's only 168 bpm and also an Insane after all

1. 00:25:864 (1,2,1) - Make it the same distance, you map extra bits that doesn't follow from the previous notes on the 00:26:582 (1) - and having the gap makes it look like a 1/1. k
2. 01:12:570 (1,2,1,2) - Try to even the gaps out a bit. (They feel completely random to me) The jump from (2->1) is a bit much for example. rearranged them
3. 01:29:007 (1) - Don't see any reason why you can't end this at 01:30:175 - More of a dominant beat there anyways. sure, did same on extra
4. 01:40:234 (7) - like in hard.. why not at 01:40:414 - where the beat is emphasized more? same reasoning
5. 01:40:594 (1) - intentionally added in beat on nothing on this end is also pointless.
6. Actually to be honest, all of these 3/4 sliders would fit the song much better as 1/2 instead. No need to create something that isn't in the song itself. removed them until 01:41:672 (6) - where they seem pretty fitting to me
7. 01:43:917 (3) - ? no point, just stick to the main beats imo. you really don't need to be mapping to that 1/4 sound as it's just added unnecessary difficulty. those 1/4 seem strong enough to have them here imo, should be fine for insane plays fine I suggest nerfing this quite a bit. You can still map heavily just following the drum beats anyways.it's already a pretty easy insane anyways

[Extra]

1. 00:09:516 - piano here would be better as a clickable. sure
2. 00:20:654 (2) - Just a 1/1 slider? I don't hear anything on the reverse worth putting it on for. sure
3. 00:25:864 (1) -

   Every slider must have a clear and visible path to follow from start to end. Sliders which overlap themselves in a way that makes any section unreadable or ambiguous (including "burai sliders") cannot be used. This is so that no slider has an appearance that is confusing or impossible for the player to read. Additionally, the slider borders must never be covered up from the slider being packed in too tightly. However, sliders that cross over themselves are fine as long as the borders are clearly visible.

   Yeah.. change this so the beginning part of it doesn't troll. I would personally consider this unrankable, even if it's only a 'little bit' as it makes the slider path nearly impossible to read. Just change this and save yourself a headache later on.
   guess I'll change it then since you'Re not the first to complain, even though I'm yet to see someone having problems with it while testplaying
4. 00:46:702 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - whistles like your earlier sliders would have been cool here instead of the chime. most seem fine but I changed it slightly

Hope something helps. Good luck o/

1. 00:34:486 (2,3) - try to ctrl +g these, it emphasis the music better, you may need to move 00:35:025 (5) - if you do this though since this could create some nasty flow. something like this
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:46:702 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - this whole thing looks really sloppy, reconsider re working the entire pattern ,and possibly even the rhythm.
3. 01:01:432 (1,2,3,4) - - this is not snapped correctly, well this whole part actually sounds like a snapping nightmare, so good luck with that, I ham actually not good with this, but I can tell something here is very wrong.
4. 01:12:929 (1,2) - hmmmm i definitely dont hear anything on the blue ticks here. actually you try to cover up alot of overmapping with hitsounds throughout the whole map

Setz wrote:

quick mod for 1 of your diffs as requested.

[Insane]

1. 00:34:486 (2,3) - try to ctrl +g these, it emphasis the music better, you may need to move 00:35:025 (5) - if you do this though since this could create some nasty flow. something like this did sth here
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:46:702 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - this whole thing looks really sloppy, reconsider re working the entire pattern ,and possibly even the rhythm. rhythm seems fine, redid the pattern more cleanly
3. 01:01:432 (1,2,3,4) - - this is not snapped correctly, well this whole part actually sounds like a snapping nightmare, so good luck with that, I ham actually not good with this, but I can tell something here is very wrong. Have to agree that esp. 01:01:522 (2) - sound a bit off, but 1/4 is pretty much the most playble here while still somehow fitting and the other version got through with this snapped to 1/4, lol
4. 01:12:929 (1,2) - hmmmm i definitely dont hear anything on the blue ticks here. actually you try to cover up alot of overmapping with hitsounds throughout the whole map seems fine, epsecially on the second blue the drum and other sound are audible enough. also what part sounded overmapped? lol

uhh yeah that's all I have, sorry for the short mod, good luck with the map!

moonlightleaf wrote:

[Easy]

01:16:881 (2) - centre rotate 20°? sure

[Normal]

00:36:283 (5,1) - overlap fixed

00:43:828 (3,4,5) - try

SPOILER

overlaps the sliders too much imo and current one has a nice and more interesting movement

00:51:372 (7) - i prefer (244,132) ruins 00:50:115 (4,5,6,7) - pattern

[Hard]

00:16:522 (3,4) - try each ctrl+g once really like how it plays

00:45:265 (4) - ctrl+g plays fine and I don't want to abuse slider leniency too much on hard

01:19:217 (2) - i prefer (280,80) like the current one more, has a really nice movement

[Insane]

00:16:522 (3) - ctrl+g bad spacing or ruins symmetry, current is fine

00:23:079 (1,1) - too close I think it is fine for Insane and goes better with the music. the next note is close to the center and a slider so it plays fine. if more complain I could shorten the spinner though :/

00:56:043 (1,2,3) - stack wtf happened here? fixed

[Expert]

00:05:744 (1,2) - stack them slight change

00:37:001 (6,7) - ctrl+g nah, current fits better, but I fixed the spacing

00:41:313 (5,6,1,2,3) - i prefer pentagon I don't, lol. also ruins overlap pattern

SPOILER

00:53:528 (3) - ctrl+g ,like as 01:14:367 (5,6,1) - sure

[ -Scarlet- ] wrote:

Hello there Lasse

[Extra]

• General

1. I'm not sure why don't get why you use a high SV of 2.08 when you never even adjust the SV multiplier over x1.0 . There's no need to have an SV as low as x0.25 when you can just the general Slider Velocity to 1.50 instead. But, is not big of an issue though. I doesn't make a difference for gameplay or anything anyways, just different ways to achieve the same thing
   
   Some mods
2. Maybe start the song with a spiner start from here 00:00:355 then ends at 00:02:690?DOn't feel that this is needed for that sound
3. 00:05:744 (1) - The slider tail is not properly stack with the head of 00:05:025 (5) slider. Adjust the tail right in the middle of the 00:05:025 (5) slider head would be nice this is such a pain, remade it
4. 00:06:283 (2) - I really don't like the idea of stacking this slider with 00:05:744 (1) slider at all. Making symmetrical like this plays well enough b-but I like it :'(
5. 00:12:570 (5) - Since the song at 00:11:492 and 00:12:031 is similar to this, why not just use 1/4 slider like you did at 00:11:492 (1,3) ? there is way better on audible piano on 00:12:750 than on the others, so I the single repeat here is to focus on that, while the otehrs are more focused on background since there is no piano on the repeats
6. 00:14:367 (1) - Use a DS of x0.1 to keep the spacing constant with 00:13:648 (2,3) fixed
7. 00:17:780 (2) - Guess this isn't blanketed well with the slider tail of 00:17:241 (1) fixed
8. Hitsound suggestion here. Add clap at 00:17:780 (2,3) , 00:19:396 (2) , 00:22:271 (5) , and 00:21:193 (3) would sound pretty nice here added some more claps in this part for all diffs
9. 00:22:271 (5,1) - Swap NC. NC at 00:22:271 (5) indicates the start of change in rhythm here makes sense
10. 00:23:349 - Move the 2nd node of this slider a bit upward to make it somewhat similar to 00:25:504 changed a bit
11. 00:22:989 (2) - I think ending the slider at 00:25:684 sounds nicer and would be more appropriate sound is still held on the blue tick, so I preder to keep it
12. 00:29:277 (2) - Ugly slider, don't like how you stacks the slider at the head of 00:28:738 (1) at all. Looks terrible in the gameplay fixed the stack and I think it looks fine during gameplay tbh
13. 00:29:995 - An obvious vocal here. Move the 00:29:816 (3) here sounds a lot nice actually I just added a note on 00:29:995 (4) - and kept 3, goes fine with vocals and all
14. 00:36:822 (5,6,7) - The jumps here should a larger than 00:36:283 (2,3,4) due to the loud vocal here right, respaced a bit
15. 00:27:121 (1) - Wrong additional sampleset. Change it to Normal no, this pattern 00:26:582 (1,1,1,1) - is supposed to be n-s-n-s which it is
16. 00:37:361 (1,4) - These sliders aren't blanket very well fixed
17. 00:47:420 (1,2,3,4) - Small suggestion here, maybe make the SV gradually becomes smaller and smaller? Like from x0.5 > x0.45 > x0.4 > x0.35 or something similar that is too much sv change spam for my taste here, one change on the nc is fine enough
18. 00:51:732 (1) - I don't think there's any significance with this circle that it needs a larger spacing than 00:51:552 (5,6)
19. 00:54:606 (1) - If you want to keep this kind of pattern, sure. Make sure the spacing is similar to 00:56:043 (1) as well
    I fixed it for the second one,i t was a bit too low. I think those are fine since the third tick is way stronger, louder and sounds different
20. 00:59:636 (1,2,1,2) - Doesn't sound good at all spamming claps here. Just 00:59:636 (1) and 00:59:995 (1) sounds good enough seems fine with the music for me
21. 01:02:869 (5,6,7,8) - I don't get this 1/4 at all. This doesn't follows anything, felt really forced here huh? Delete the notes and you can clearly hear the 1/4, even at 100% playback rate
22. 01:08:977 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Try not to spam all these circles with claps here. Sounds really noisy for me. Just at claps at 01:09:157 (2,4,6,8) following the vocal sounds really great here I removed some and did some other hitosund stuff here for all diffs
23. 01:03:229 (1,2,3) - Actually I would prefer if you map this part similar to 01:14:726 (1,2,3,4,5,6) vocals on both "progress" differently, seems better like it is
24. 01:28:917 (1) - This jump is really ridiculous and forced if you ask me. There's nothing really special in the song or louder beat that you need to have an extremely big jump here nerfed it again
25. 01:39:157 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - These stream here is weirdly mapped. Try to improve the pattern hereremapped those a bit
26. 01:43:468 (1) - The fast pace from 01:42:121 (2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) followed by big jump to 01:43:468 (1) plays awkwardly here. The players automatically think this slider would be fast because of the 1/4 slider jumps. I misread this part in my first testplay because I aimed at the 01:43:738 (2) too fast thinking that 01:43:468 (1) slider would be fast too. did some sv stuff here

I'll continue to mod other difficulties a bit later. Got some things to do first beforehand. Stay tune!

General
I feel like you are trying way too hard to make every burst/every slider special, I'd highly reccommend only making 00:28:738 (1,2) - stuff like this when it clearly makes sense in the song. It just doesnt look good nor polished at all.
00:51:552 (5,6,1) - example, this looks like you placed shit randomly, even in the editor. There are ways to make a map special while still keeping it clean. This is in my opinion the biggest issue with the map currently.

NC issue. Im not going to point these out in the mod because they're literally everywhere. You NC at strong downbeats (big white lines) without ANY regard of whether or not it actually fits the song/your map/patterns. If a player sees a new combo they expect the rhythm/spacing to change. Keep that in mind
Id honestly reccommend taking a look at all your diffs and changing it, because its a pretty glaring issue.
like this for example 00:31:073 (5) - why the hell is this continuing from the last one if there's a new pattern and a break?

General tidyness. mostly in jumps. 00:57:480 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - if you highlight this section and scroll to the star you can see that you stack the notes that makes sense. Sometimes. This makes it look ugly. If you are going to try and make it look good in the editor you have to go all the way, halfassed just looks random.
This is pretty much everywhere in your map, giving the impression that you just stacked notes when available instead of making an actual effort for it to look good.
These three things all really need to be worked on imo

I'm not the best hitsounder but the intros hitsounding felt pretty off while playing

oorgnoc ysp le

00:08:618 (1) - any reason for making this a repeatslider? The music only supports 1/2 rhythm here
00:10:414 (1) - same
00:11:492 (1,3) - yeah
00:48:678 (4) - I feel like this should be a long slider instead, fits better with vocals
00:49:576 (4) - why isnt the middle part here clickable, clearly a strong beat
00:54:426 (7,8,1) - 00:55:864 (8,9,1) - i highly dislike these triples, they look unpolished more than anything else, even if i see where you are coming from. A lot of them in the map
01:01:432 (1,2,3,4) - is there a reason for these to look like this? the down down pattern dont make any sense in the music and a normally spaced quint would look better. This looks like you are trying too hard to make something unique
01:06:283 (2) - NC issue i talked about. It clearly fits the song better to NC at the 2 instead of the 1 here as its a new part of the song, and the 1 is part of the jump pattern earlier. Dont just NC at downbeats, NC where it fits the song.
01:31:971 (1) - ok fo real though why isnt this a slider when you mapped the two sounds before as a slider. Extremely confusing and doesnt fit at all. Yes its not as loud but its still the most audiable part of the song at that point.
01:37:720 (1) - same
01:39:157 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,1,1,1) - you CANNOT follow the sound you are currenly following here, as it slows down at first and then speeds up. As it is now its simply timed incorrectly and thus unrankable.
I also personally feel like the jumpstreams are extremely forced, but since this part needs to be changed anyways it doesnt matter.

Rapthorn wrote:

Trashy mod queue les go 3 weeks late or smth idk

Suggestion
Very highly suggested
Unrankable

player view
It looks much much clunkier while playing than it does in editor, keep in mind that what makes sense in editor might just look like randomly placed notes while playing

Jumps feel nice to hit, no big issue in that sense.

General
I feel like you are trying way too hard to make every burst/every slider special, I'd highly reccommend only making 00:28:738 (1,2) - stuff like this when it clearly makes sense in the song. It just doesnt look good nor polished at all.
00:51:552 (5,6,1) - example, this looks like you placed shit randomly, even in the editor. There are ways to make a map special while still keeping it clean. This is in my opinion the biggest issue with the map currently."randomly", whatever since people keep complaining I'll change those

NC issue. Im not going to point these out in the mod because they're literally everywhere. You NC at strong downbeats (big white lines) without ANY regard of whether or not it actually fits the song/your map/patterns. If a player sees a new combo they expect the rhythm/spacing to change. Keep that in mind
Id honestly reccommend taking a look at all your diffs and changing it, because its a pretty glaring issue.
like this for example 00:31:073 (5) - why the hell is this continuing from the last one if there's a new pattern and a break?
eh, I nc based on patterns when it is needed for readability, otherwise on new measures, it nc follows mainly the drums i

General tidyness. mostly in jumps. 00:57:480 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - if you highlight this section and scroll to the star you can see that you stack the notes that makes sense. Sometimes. This makes it look ugly. If you are going to try and make it look good in the editor you have to go all the way, halfassed just looks random.
This is pretty much everywhere in your map, giving the impression that you just stacked notes when available instead of making an actual effort for it to look good.
If you tried to actually look which of those overlaps are visible during gameplay and which not it might make more sense to you
These three things all really need to be worked on imo

I'm not the best hitsounder but the intros hitsounding felt pretty off while playing

oorgnoc ysp le

00:08:618 (1) - any reason for making this a repeatslider? The music only supports 1/2 rhythm here
00:10:414 (1) - same
00:11:492 (1,3) - yeah
already explained this in another mod, if you can't hear the background stuff it fits to then idk
00:48:678 (4) - I feel like this should be a long slider instead, fits better with vocals and totally ignore the really strong next beat?
00:49:576 (4) - why isnt the middle part here clickable, clearly a strong beat
really? this clickable but not 00:48:858 (1) - ? doesnt make any sense to me
00:54:426 (7,8,1) - 00:55:864 (8,9,1) - i highly dislike these triples, they look unpolished more than anything else, even if i see where you are coming from. A lot of them in the map I made some of them "normal" and slightly changed the others for now
01:01:432 (1,2,3,4) - is there a reason for these to look like this? the down down pattern dont make any sense in the music and a normally spaced quint would look better. This looks like you are trying too hard to make something unique follows the stronger high pitched sounds on 1/3 better
01:06:283 (2) - NC issue i talked about. It clearly fits the song better to NC at the 2 instead of the 1 here as its a new part of the song, and the 1 is part of the jump pattern earlier. Dont just NC at downbeats, NC where it fits the song. see reasoning before, nc on the strongest drum beats is fine and that is clearly 01:06:103 (1) -
01:31:971 (1) - ok fo real though why isnt this a slider when you mapped the two sounds before as a slider. Extremely confusing and doesnt fit at all. Yes its not as loud but its still the most audiable part of the song at that point.
01:37:720 (1) - same
you basically answered it yourself, it gets way harder to hear so switching focus to the other stuffs fits nicer after those
01:39:157 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,1,1,1) - you CANNOT follow the sound you are currenly following here, as it slows down at first and then speeds up. As it is now its simply timed incorrectly and thus unrankable. not rly sure tbh
I also personally feel like the jumpstreams are extremely forced, but since this part needs to be changed anyways it doesnt matter.[s[/color]

MouseCheeseW wrote:

M4M~

Normal

01:04:486 (4) - remove. place a note here.

01:04:666 - place a slider, end at 01:05:025 . good idea

Hard

01:15:983 (1) - slider end at 01:16:163 . place a note at 01:16:343 this follows vocals better

01:39:157 (1,2,3,4) - i think slider should reduce 1/4 beat.(end at red line)

01:43:468 (1,2,3,4) - ↑ current ones are fine

Insane

00:26:582 (1,2,3,4) - 4 nots's distance should as same as each other. (2 ~ 3 different from others)

00:32:331 (3,4,5,6) - ↑(3 ~ 4)

01:31:253 (4,5,6) - ↑

01:33:408 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ↑

01:36:283 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ↑

01:38:438 (5,6) - ↑

Extra

00:22:989 (3) - remove. place a spinner, end at 00:25:684. sldier is fine too

00:29:995 (4) - place this away from the previous circle.

00:30:714 (4) - closer to previous circle.

00:31:073 (5,6,7) - 3 nots's distance should as same as each other

00:34:486 (1,2,3,4) - ↑

00:37:001 (6) - closer to previous circle.

00:41:313 (5) - ↑

00:41:672 (1,2,3,4) - distance should as same as each other

01:43:738 (1) - 01:44:097 (1) - 01:44:456 (1) - remove. huh? they are fine with the music and play well

no spacing changes (see below)

i think, in one color, distance should as same as each other.(except kiai time & some part the music is special)
uh, that's not how spacing/emphasis works lol, basically the reasoning why I denied all spacing suggestions in this mod

and, my english isn't well, hope you can understand.

FCL wrote:

m4m from your q

• [Extra]

1. 00:26:402 (2) - the circle feels cramped, recommend to make more extensive blanket ruins the pattern/spacing
2. 00:38:618 (6,1) - a bit inconvenient the flow, suggest to ctrl+j 00:38:798 (1) - and move to 228 352 just simple back and forth, seems fine
3. 00:49:396 (3) - don't like such a low spacing here, since (3) have strong vocal beat. Stack him with (1) will good vocals are not even main focus here and it looks worse :/
4. 00:59:636 (1,2,1,2) - claps here are more stronger than ever before, so why not to do spacing more? It is already? 00:59:636 (1,1) - have bigger jumps, and even more would feel overdone
5. 01:01:073 (1,2) - given the fact that the piano (?) sound starts to fade you could be reduce slider velocity like 00:47:420 (1,2,3,4) - that works
6. 01:01:432 (1,2,3,4) - don't understand why so? lol. claps are not changed sounding seems fine with drums
7. 01:03:229 (1,2,3,4,5) - when i listening the previous time i thought that rhythm will have roughly like this http://puu.sh/mFfYR/d1b2904829.jpg. Red ticks have strong vocal and probably could be mapped to circles. You not should to create full screen jumps here, think my option will be fine http://puu.sh/mFggq/25c4c99cf5.jpg. probably it's just obtrusion of my mapping style, but I really think that this model of mapping will better
   sliders are fine here, lol. not too much singletap spam
8. 01:11:852 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - claps are started at 01:12:613 - so i think that kick-slider like 01:00:714 (1,2,1,2) - will be better since continue stream when changed him causes a bit weird spacing change does the job too and it fits so nice here
9. 01:27:660 (1,1,2,1,2,1) - too much unnecessary nc's lol. remove it on 01:27:660 (1) - and 01:28:917 (1) - because so it will more follow to vocal. sure
10. 01:27:480- this beat have sound and should be clikable. U can replce (4) to slider, will be good takes away emphasis from vocals
11. 01:34:846 (1) - don't use 1/1 here, red tich should be clikable this has soem weird snapping, sure there is sth on the red tick, but making that clickable would feel so weird to play with all the other sounds with weird snapping
12. 01:40:504 (4) - rly hard for reading, recommend to rewok it to standart model seemed fine for me and people that testplayed
13. 01:40:594 (1,1,1,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - probably it's my preferences but if rotate this to +-5 degrees will look better perfextly vertical/horizontal is nicer for the sliders imo
14. 01:45:624 (1) - nc is not necessary since u don't use clap here fits the pattern better
15. 01:46:432 (1) - move end to white tick lol song ends on blue though

FCL wrote:

• [Insane]

1. ar 8.4 and od 7.5 . Not bad for pp
2. 00:02:870 (1) - just my preferences, but sliderwawes like this looks more neatly http://puu.sh/mFhku/ec26cee896.jpg
3. 00:20:654 (2) - blanket here will be nice huh, it is blanketed like I wantit already
4. 01:18:678 (7) - probably a bit confusing, make it less closely would make the overlapping inconsistent and it plays fine
5. 01:27:660 (1,2,3) - 90 degrees flow will be nice http://puu.sh/mFhDX/8918f1637e.jpg current is nicer imo
6. 01:35:025 - should be clickable, as and in Extra same as extra

• [Hard]

1. 00:39:337 (3) - blanket not intended to
2. 01:00:714 (1,1,1) - nc's haven't reason for this easier to read imo
3. 01:11:852 (1,1,1,1) - ^

• [Normal]

1. 00:44:367 (4) - 1/1 slider instead circle will be better for rhythm imo 00:44:546 (5) - not clickable would be weird
2. 01:28:558 (3,4,5) - probably 3 1/2 circles are unrankabled in Normal since i tryed to rank The Monk with same patterns, but BN's said me to remove it lol
3. 01:45:624 (2,3,4) - ^I nerfed them a bit, even though they cold be fine

• [Easy]

1. idk, can't find something

Lami wrote:

[Easy]

01:29:097 (2) - missing hitsound? clap

[Normal]

00:34:307 - recommend to remove rhythm.
For reason, don't you think 00:33:768 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - is too long train.
00:37:361 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^,
Slightly reduced first one. second one seems fine as it is very 1/1 slider heavy and there is also an easy diff, so normal can be a bit harder
01:17:959 - is more important than 01:17:780 - following vocals and 01:17:780 - is pretty strong vocal
if 01:17:780 - is follow vocal, 01:16:881 (3) - should be follow vocal too.
right, changed rhythm a bit

[Hard]

01:16:163 - why don't you fill up in here. it's quite major rhythm for me.
01:20:474 - ^ donwbeats aren't that strong here, so using 1/1 vocal slider is fine imo

[Insane]

00:55:864 (7,1,2,3) - are you sure about this rhythm
changed it to 1/4 on extra instead :v
01:35:205 (2) - add clap on head instead of tail. according to music. sure

[Extra]

if you use same DS in 00:26:582 (1,1,1,1,1) -
you should be use same DS in 00:32:331 (1,1,1,1,1) - , too. patterns are different and the ds within both patterns are consistent, seems fine and looks nice

00:41:852 (2,3,4) - seem to unnatural flow for playing. works fine the way most people I watched play this (and me) play the slider at 00:42:211 (4) -

01:05:564 (4,6) - remove claps cuz seem to heavy hitsound, compare with music.
01:15:624 (6,8) - ^
fine

01:06:283 (2,3) - add clap in tail instead of head k

01:07:450 - add note? not needed, it's not that strong and I'd rather get a jump for the vocal without using a kickslider

01:20:384 - maybe add note or 01:20:205 - not needed

01:44:905 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - if you use accelerator effect in previous partten 01:43:468 (1,1,1,1) -
not fit to growing smaller DS here.
how to do)
- 01:45:264 (1,2) - is bigger than 01:44:905 (1,2) -
- 01:45:624 (1,2) - is bigger than 01:45:264 (1,2) -
etc
added more pp
fixed

Rumia- wrote:

M4M reply ~
[General]
fine.

[Easy]
fine.

[Normal]
00:19:756 (6) - i think removing this is better , to emphasis the new beat and the bass is quite strong as well made it a sliderend instead since removing creates a weird 2/1 gap
00:29:816 (3) - for me , i would move this to 00:29:995 - for the vocal whole combo follow the piano as clickable part, see 00:30:714 (5,6) - vocals just happen to be on the same tick most of the time
00:44:546 (5) - there is no cymbal here , remove finish removed for all diffs
00:59:636 (5,6) - both of these sliderend change to sample N:C2 supposed to sound like thatbut you made me notice that I need to silence normal-sliderslide, lol
01:04:486 (4) - nc here maybe? since the vocal sounds just like 01:16:163 (1) - sure
[Hard]
00:21:193 (3) - nc , people could misread this as a 1/2 especially this diff is meant for average players fine
00:29:995 (1,2) - why is this ds is not the same with others around this part literally no idea, fixed but kept jump to 00:31:612 (1) -
00:31:612 (1,2) - this one as well changed a bit
01:38:438 (4) - what does this slider mapped to ? it is clearly not the same as 01:44:007 (2) - , suggest you change it to 2 circles instead made a 1/2 slider

[Insane]
00:13:109 (1) - since this is a continous piano unlike the earlier part , NC isnt necessary here from a musical point it isn;t needed, but since I used it every downbeat before I'll keep it for a conistent nc pattern
00:18:319 (3,1,2) - move these up a little so the blanket 00:17:780 (2,3) - would be the same as 00:17:061 (5,1) - tried
00:32:869 (6) - x:448 y:64 is better imo would make the spacing of this overlap inconsitent with all other ones and the map is abses around those
01:02:331 (3,4) - instead of circle>slider , try slider>circle would express the vocal and the music better at the same time
01:08:977 (1,2) - this one as well
changed first one, second one follow it better as it is imo, same for extra
01:15:265 (3) - remove clap?didnt hear any clap sound here sure for all diffs
01:21:103 (4) - same as above ^
01:25:953 (6) - this triple should be 01:26:133 - can barely hear anything there, while 6 is much stronger so this seems better
01:29:007 (1) - extend spinner to red tick? k


[Extra]
i think there is no reason to put ar 9.1? ar9 already suits this diff much better imo decimals are love :v
00:02:870 (1,2) - move this few grids up so distance between 00:03:408 (2,3) - and 00:06:283 (2,3) - could be unified moved 00:03:947 (3) - instead
00:08:618 (1) - i think its better to just change this to circle and highlight the piano here? there is no 1/4 sounds like 00:10:414 (1) - and onwards made them all into 1/2 sliders
00:18:319 (3,1) - swap nc fine
00:22:989 (3) - add nc , because this slow sv could drop high amount of hp with hr It's fine, I also just increased hp to 6.5, this is how much hp you have left after the slider if you fc with really low acc before on hardrock: http://i.imgur.com/mQsHOzL.jpg considering this is the easiest part of the map I'd expect everyone who has a chance at getting a decent hr play on this to be able to do well enough on the start to not fail here
00:42:031 (3) - move this a bit to left so the overlap between 00:40:414 (2,4,3) - looks nicer ( just editor purpose) didnt affect gameplay tho was overlapped with wrong ds anyways, fixed
00:54:426 (7,8,1) - weird spacing ? i dont see the music could have any intention to do so changed
01:01:073 (1) - think this is a bit spammy ncs couldve be remove . also the sv change doesnt really do anything tbh makes it better to read instead of just filling everything with followpoints, keeps the 1/1 nc pattern and has the nice effect of only drawing down-left followpoints until 01:02:151 (2) -
01:14:546 (6) - suggest you move thos to x:180 y:220 is better overlap imo moved, but not there as that would make the spacing unfitting
01:15:804 (7) - 2 grids left 2 grids up so it looks straight with the slider tried
01:24:426 (7,8) - imo the bass is strong here , couldve have a higher spacing changed this part a bit
01:31:612 (2,3,1) - i recommend you to map this as a 5plets to express this part better , since the sounds are obvious not what I want to follow here :/
01:46:432 (1) - spinner end mistaken snap?see below

MikasaSerket wrote:

Mod for Mod, I already posted on your forum //
I pointed out small easy stuff

Easy
01:16:163 (1) - Rotate 10 degrees, it looks less slanted that way ;w; rotated slightly

01:03:947 (4) - Instead of making this lean, why not just make it straight>? fine

Normal
00:40:235 (1,2) - Try making these slightly curved then blanketing them, it makes it different than 00:51:732 (1,2,3) - which has a similar pattern but reversed but they are pretty much the same musically, so using the same pattern works fine


Why not make 01:05:384 (3) - the same as 01:05:744 (4) - >? They provide a similar pattern and provide contrast to the straight slider in 01:06:103 (1) -
sure

01:18:139 (2) - You should do a beat similar to the one below, it matches the vocals of the singer a lot better than the long slider.
current works fine for vocal-melody-vocal

Hard

00:02:870 (1,2,3,4) - Why not shift this entire section more towards the middle? It provides contrast for the fact that the pattern is very symmetrical like. sure

00:27:840 (4) - Add more of a curve so that it blankets a lot better with 00:28:378 (5) - not my intention here, I'd rather keep the shape consistent with before

00:36:103 (2,3,4) - I am not really feeling a good flow with this triple right here whenever I testplay it, I would suggest making it similar to 00:36:462 (5) - and how it is a repeating slider. It plays with a nicer flow that way. Kept the triple but changed stacking and pattern

01:09:875 (3) - I personally do not like how it is going straight forward, it looks a bit >? Awkward>? When playing I mean, I would suggest moving it towards a teensie bit to the left so that it is not directly on top of 01:10:414 (1) - 's slider end.works fine

Insane

The blankets on this difficulty are very nice <3

00:19:396 (2) - Why not just make this straight instead of slanted? Not really any reason, just personal preference. current is nicer for me/color]

00:31:253 (5) - Remove the slider and add a hitcircle to 00:31:253 - This provides a small pause on the red tick which matches to the vocals of the singer, and also this way, the beat is not being continuous. [color=#FFBF00]would completely ignore the piano on 00:31:432 -

Some of the jumps I do not like visually, such as 01:16:522 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - however, they do play well so there is not really a problem with that ;w;pls no hate on simple polygons ;_;

Extra

00:05:744 (1,2) - Make these like 00:02:870 (1,2) - and how they blanket eachother (Something similar to the one down below)
don't see a reason for that and current one works fine

Other than that, I honestly did not find anything wrong with extra, it is well mapped, this entire map is well mapped, that's why I couldn't mod it very easily.

Hopefully you were able to find anything useful, if you did not, don't kudos. Good luck with mapping!

1. 00:09:516 (2) - I think this rhythm sound better and a bit easier to play
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:15:265 (2) - sound like the 1/1 beat here 00:15:444 - sound a bit more noticable more than 1/2 so I guess I would map this 1/1 slider instead
3. 00:26:762 - why not map this vocal beat ? it kinda make the rhythm a bit more consistent imo
4. 01:17:959 - place clap here ? sound nice imo

1. 00:07:899 (3) - idk lol but reverse slider just sound weird for me here I think normal 1/2 slider would just sound better
2. 01:03:947 (3,1) - I think this rhythm would work better
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:06:103 (1) - this play pretty weird imo same with having a short pause here 01:06:462 - , I would just use 1/1 slider here instead since it sound better and will make good transition with the next note
4. 01:45:624 (2,3) - mmm little inconsistent spacing

1. 00:09:875 (6,1,2) - rhythm here sound weird , I'm not sure what you're following here but I guess I would do this rhythm instead cus it sound nice with the music
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:21:193 (3) - the nc should start here 00:21:193 (3) - instead of 00:21:732 (1) - , doesn't it ? (the spacing difference)
3. 00:22:271 (2) - I don't think this need nc lol since without nc it still easy read and notice spacing chaning thing there
4. 01:00:714 (1,1,1) - not really need to nc so much imo the main spacing for all 4 notes is like in form of 1/4 spacing so without nc it still easy to read it
5. 01:12:211 (1,1,1) - same
6. 01:17:420 (1) - I guess downbeat for sliderend here doesn't work that much like the previous one cus I think the next beat just doesn't sound strong enough to do the emphasis thing for the downbeat there so I guess this rhythm would just work a lots better
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:18:498 (3) - sound weird here imo idk , this rhythm might sound better imo
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:20:474 - imo this downbeat sound a bit strong and would make a rhythm sound better if you map it
9. 01:22:450 (2) - , 01:23:887 (2) - so mmm just my opinion so you intend to emphasis only the two notes there with the hitsound then leave another one sound unemphasized I just think that it would make a bit more sense if you would also emphasis the two notes that you hitsounded them by making it clickable too so yea lol

1. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Snapping
   01:02:333 (3) - Unsnapped slider (start).

2. 00:18:319 (3) - same as 00:21:193 (3) - in hard
3. 00:21:193 (3) - nc for anti jump ?
4. 01:11:133 (5) - I think if you place this at around x424 y100 it would make flow here 01:11:133 (5,6) - a bit better
   
   a I just think that low spacing like 00:26:402 (2,1,2,3,4) - , 00:41:313 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - , etc can't express the feeling or impact or w/e that much lol Ifeeling like higher spacing would just make those thing express the song better

1. 00:26:582 (1,1,1,1) - ,00:32:331 (1,1,1,1) - somehow I don't think 1/4 slider like this would work clearly the 1/4 sound there aren't exist the music then yea I guess that why you silence sliderend here but still it's just sound really weird the music doesn't call for any kind of 1/4 pattern here imo so I guess that why it make thing here sound weird for me , using a circle just feel a lots better since it consist with the music better
2. 00:34:846 (3,4) - the spacing keep decrasing for the cymbal at (4) that make the spacing here looks weird , I guess give a bit higher spacing to (4) would make thing play better , try placing (4) at around x480 y284
3. 00:55:864 (8,9,1) - flow is kinda derp at 00:55:953 (9,1) - imo , why not just just use curve or straight pattern for that triplet
4. 01:08:798 (6,1) - mmm why a sudden drop in spacing when the beat sound similiar to each other I think increase spacing for (1) just make thing play better
5. 01:10:325 - ,01:10:145 - ,01:09:247 - ,01:09:606 - these are place where you can put a 1/4 note which can make the diff play a bit more like extra

CelsiusLK wrote:

from q

[easy]

1. 00:09:516 (2) - I think this rhythm sound better and a bit easier to play
   SPOILER

   
   kept this but changed rhythm after a bit
2. 00:15:265 (2) - sound like the 1/1 beat here 00:15:444 - sound a bit more noticable more than 1/2 so I guess I would map this 1/1 slider instead feels pretty much equal to me, so I'll keep it
3. 00:26:762 - why not map this vocal beat ? it kinda make the rhythm a bit more consistent imo done
4. 01:17:959 - place clap here ? sound nice imodone

[normal]

1. 00:07:899 (3) - idk lol but reverse slider just sound weird for me here I think normal 1/2 slider would just sound better goes really well with background stuff on the tick and you don't click more anyways
2. 01:03:947 (3,1) - I think this rhythm would work better
   SPOILER

   
   current follows vocals fine and gives a nice lower density
3. 01:06:103 (1) - this play pretty weird imo same with having a short pause here 01:06:462 - , I would just use 1/1 slider here instead since it sound better and will make good transition with the next note same here
4. 01:45:624 (2,3) - mmm little inconsistent spacing fixed

[hard]

1. 00:09:875 (6,1,2) - rhythm here sound weird , I'm not sure what you're following here but I guess I would do this rhythm instead cus it sound nice with the music
   SPOILER

   
   redid rhythm to follow piano better
2. 00:21:193 (3) - the nc should start here 00:21:193 (3) - instead of 00:21:732 (1) - , doesn't it ? (the spacing difference)
3. 00:22:271 (2) - I don't think this need nc lol since without nc it still easy read and notice spacing chaning thing there yes., fixed both
4. 01:00:714 (1,1,1) - not really need to nc so much imo the main spacing for all 4 notes is like in form of 1/4 spacing so without nc it still easy to read it
5. 01:12:211 (1,1,1) - same
   think it's okay for hard since it makes it a bit better to read than just having alle those low spaced same colored things
6. 01:17:420 (1) - I guess downbeat for sliderend here doesn't work that much like the previous one cus I think the next beat just doesn't sound strong enough to do the emphasis thing for the downbeat there so I guess this rhythm would just work a lots better
   SPOILER

   
   current follows vocals fine and that is what I want to do here :/
7. 01:18:498 (3) - sound weird here imo idk , this rhythm might sound better imo
   SPOILER

   
   yes, that works
8. 01:20:474 - imo this downbeat sound a bit strong and would make a rhythm sound better if you map it done
9. 01:22:450 (2) - , 01:23:887 (2) - so mmm just my opinion so you intend to emphasis only the two notes there with the hitsound then leave another one sound unemphasized I just think that it would make a bit more sense if you would also emphasis the two notes that you hitsounded them by making it clickable too so yea lol removed some claps, should be better

[insane]

1. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Snapping
   01:02:333 (3) - Unsnapped slider (start).

   fixed
2. 00:18:319 (3) - same as 00:21:193 (3) - in hard sure
3. 00:21:193 (3) - nc for anti jump ? dont think that is needed as the same spacing antijump is introduced before and it should be fine to read
4. 01:11:133 (5) - I think if you place this at around x424 y100 it would make flow here 01:11:133 (5,6) - a bit better moved 6 instead, changing 5 would ruin the pattern
   
   a I just think that low spacing like 00:26:402 (2,1,2,3,4) - , 00:41:313 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - , etc can't express the feeling or impact or w/e that much lol Ifeeling like higher spacing would just make those thing express the song better

[extra]

1. 00:26:582 (1,1,1,1) - ,00:32:331 (1,1,1,1) - somehow I don't think 1/4 slider like this would work clearly the 1/4 sound there aren't exist the music then yea I guess that why you silence sliderend here but still it's just sound really weird the music doesn't call for any kind of 1/4 pattern here imo so I guess that why it make thing here sound weird for me , using a circle just feel a lots better since it consist with the music better Got your point, but the sliders imo go really well with the "beep" sounds there.
2. 00:34:846 (3,4) - the spacing keep decrasing for the cymbal at (4) that make the spacing here looks weird , I guess give a bit higher spacing to (4) would make thing play better , try placing (4) at around x480 y284 lol I feel stupid now, seems like I accidentally ctrl-g'd 00:34:666 (2,3) - , swapped them made the spacing right again
3. 00:55:864 (8,9,1) - flow is kinda derp at 00:55:953 (9,1) - imo , why not just just use curve or straight pattern for that triplet changed this
4. 01:08:798 (6,1) - mmm why a sudden drop in spacing when the beat sound similiar to each other I think increase spacing for (1) just make thing play better balanced spacing a bit better
5. 01:10:325 - ,01:10:145 - ,01:09:247 - ,01:09:606 - these are place where you can put a 1/4 note which can make the diff play a bit more like extra sure there are sounds there, but they don't feel strong on a "has to be mapped" level and using jumps works fine too :v

aa spacing spacing spacing re re checking spacing ~ and also I find that some slider pattern can improve like make it looks better and creative but that just a my opinion lol

good luck

1. 00:16:163 (2,3) - - Maybe curve the sliders like the ones on 00:14:367 (1,2,3) - ?
2. 00:31:612 (1) - I think a finish at the start and a clap at the end would be more powerful and fitting
3. 00:52:091 (3,4) - Curve them inwards?
4. 01:00:714 (1,2,3,4) - Those sliders play a bit too awkwardly due to the streams being too close and the slider starts too far. I would say to turn all of them towards the left so that it plays and looks like 01:12:570 (1,2,1,2) -
5. 01:45:983 (1) - Seems out of place and a bit too far compared to the other jumps. Try moving it to 289/253?

Dasvi wrote:

Hey, from the queue!

[Insane]

1. 00:16:163 (2,3) - - Maybe curve the sliders like the ones on 00:14:367 (1,2,3) - ? current looks nicer here
2. 00:31:612 (1) - I think a finish at the start and a clap at the end would be more powerful and fitting changed some hitsounding here, there was a wrong finish anyways
3. 00:52:091 (3,4) - Curve them inwards? both work due to leniency and this looks better to me
4. 01:00:714 (1,2,3,4) - Those sliders play a bit too awkwardly due to the streams being too close and the slider starts too far. I would say to turn all of them towards the left so that it plays and looks like 01:12:570 (1,2,1,2) - changed 01:00:893 (2,4) -
5. 01:45:983 (1) - Seems out of place and a bit too far compared to the other jumps. Try moving it to 289/253? spacing is okay and moving it would ruin the whole 01:44:905 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2) - pattern

And a general (and brave) suggestion. I think after 01:45:983 (1) - you should constanly increase the SV in par with the elevating helicopter like sound.
Also great hitsounds!

Extra

Reana wrote:

random mod

Extra

00:29:277 (2) - didn't stack properly on 00:28:738 (1) - fixed
00:36:822 (5,6) - maybe put some more distance for highlight vocal? remade pattern to work better with vocals
00:42:031 (3,4) - same as above keep it like that since the vocals are way weaker than the others
01:07:181 (5,6,7) - imo replace with 2 circles might be better that works
01:46:343 (1) - x 287 y 345?moved a bit, but not exactly there, as it should have the normal overlap distance to 01:45:444 (2) - I used throughout the map

1. 00:22:271 (3) - add normal-whistle and remove normal-whistle on tail
2. 00:31:253 - remove normal-whistle? following vocal.
3. 00:50:295 (3) - remove finish. considering 00:38:798 -
4. remove finish at 01:03:229 - and 01:06:103 - . less finishes are used after here.
5. 01:20:115 (3) - move it left a bit and make regular triangle with 01:20:474 (4,5) - . it will looks better imo.
6. 01:29:097 (2) - add finish?
7. 
   
   1. 01:39:157 - remove finish
   2. 01:39:516 - add finish
   3. 01:40:235 - add finish
8. 01:46:343 (3) - I like better like this.
   
   image

   

1. 00:09:696 (2,3) - why not putting whistles?
2. 00:27:301 (2,1) - stack left-down side will be better I think.
   
   image

   
3. from 01:01:792 - to 01:30:534 - , you should use clap on upbeats carefully. It can bereave beat of the song. so I suggest…
   
   1. 01:07:001 - remove clap
   2. 01:08:438 - remove clap
   3. 01:08:798 - remove clap
   4. 01:13:828 - remove clap
4. remove finish at 01:03:229 - and 01:06:103 - . less finishes are used after here.
5. 01:26:582 (2,3,4) - remove clap. bass-drums stops here.
6. 
   
   1. 01:39:157 - remove finish
   2. 01:39:516 - add finish
   3. 01:40:235 - add finish
7. 01:46:343 (1) - I like better like this.
   
   image

   

1. 00:31:253 - remove normal-whistle? following vocal.
2. 01:07:001 - remove clap
3. from 01:01:792 - to 01:30:534 - , you should use clap on upbeats carefully. It can bereave beat of the song. so I suggest…
   
   1. 01:07:001 - remove clap
   2. 01:08:438 - remove
   3. 01:08:618 - add
   4. 01:08:798 - remove
   5. 01:19:935 - remove
   6. 01:20:115 - add
   7. 01:22:450 - remove
   8. 01:22:630 - add
   9. 01:23:887 - remove
   10. 01:24:067 - add
4. 01:26:582 (2,3,4) - remove clap. bass-drums stops here.

1. 00:34:127 (1) - I prefer to make it zig-zag like Hard and Insane.
2. 01:05:744 (5,6) - this decreasing distance feels weird for me. how about move 01:05:923 (6) - to (330,251)?
3. 01:17:780 - remove clap
4. 01:17:959 - add clap
5. 01:18:139 - remove clap
6. 01:19:935 - remove clap
7. 01:19:935 - add clap
8. 01:20:295 - remove clap

1. 00:27:301 (1) - how about to put normal-sliderwhistle?
2. 00:33:049 (1) - ^
3. 00:46:702 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - add normal-whistles?
4. 01:08:438 - remove clap
5. 01:08:618 - add clap
6. 01:08:798 - remove clap
7. 01:35:205 (2) - add clap

thzz wrote:

hi~
many suggestion about hitsounds again

[Easy]

1. 00:22:271 (3) - add normal-whistle and remove normal-whistle on tail
2. 00:31:253 - remove normal-whistle? following vocal. piano
3. 00:50:295 (3) - remove finish. considering 00:38:798 -
4. remove finish at 01:03:229 - and 01:06:103 - . less finishes are used after here.
5. 01:20:115 (3) - move it left a bit and make regular triangle with 01:20:474 (4,5) - . it will looks better imo. changed it, but in a different way thats easier to read for new players
6. 01:29:097 (2) - add finish?
7. 
   
   1. 01:39:157 - remove finish
   2. 01:39:516 - add finish
   3. 01:40:235 - add finish
   changed all of those
8. 01:46:343 (3) - I like better like this. current angle puts a bit more pressure on it which is nice since it's a really strong sound
   
   image

   

[Normal]

1. 00:09:696 (2,3) - why not putting whistles?
2. 00:27:301 (2,1) - stack left-down side will be better I think.
   
   image

   
   not noticeable during gameplay and it makes the other part of the pattern look worse since I won't break ds here
3. from 01:01:792 - to 01:30:534 - , you should use clap on upbeats carefully. It can bereave beat of the song. so I suggest…
   
   1. 01:07:001 - remove clap
   2. 01:08:438 - remove clap
   3. 01:08:798 - remove clap
   4. 01:13:828 - remove clap
4. remove finish at 01:03:229 - and 01:06:103 - . less finishes are used after here.
5. 01:26:582 (2,3,4) - remove clap. bass-drums stops here.
6. 
   
   1. 01:39:157 - remove finish
   2. 01:39:516 - add finish
   3. 01:40:235 - add finish
   changed most
7. 01:46:343 (1) - I like better like this. same angle thing as easy
   
   image

   

[Hard]

1. 00:31:253 - remove normal-whistle? following vocal.
2. 01:07:001 - remove clap
3. from 01:01:792 - to 01:30:534 - , you should use clap on upbeats carefully. It can bereave beat of the song. so I suggest…
   
   1. 01:07:001 - remove clap
   2. 01:08:438 - remove
   3. 01:08:618 - add
   4. 01:08:798 - remove
   5. 01:19:935 - remove
   6. 01:20:115 - add
   7. 01:22:450 - remove
   8. 01:22:630 - add
   9. 01:23:887 - remove
   10. 01:24:067 - add
4. 01:26:582 (2,3,4) - remove clap. bass-drums stops here.

[Insane]

1. 00:34:127 (1) - I prefer to make it zig-zag like Hard and Insane. current fits fine imo
2. 01:05:744 (5,6) - this decreasing distance feels weird for me. how about move 01:05:923 (6) - to (330,251)? made a star
3. 01:17:780 - remove clap
4. 01:17:959 - add clap
5. 01:18:139 - remove clap
6. 01:19:935 - remove clap
7. 01:19:935 - add clap
8. 01:20:295 - remove clap

why you can stack objects so beautiful?

[Extra]

1. 00:27:301 (1) - how about to put normal-sliderwhistle?
2. 00:33:049 (1) - ^
   pitch is different from the kicksliders and it would feel too much
3. 00:46:702 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - add normal-whistles? sound differernt and would be too spammy here imo
4. 01:08:438 - remove clap
5. 01:08:618 - add clap
6. 01:08:798 - remove clap
7. 01:35:205 (2) - add clap

I like the dif.

It is just my own thinking but…
High sound like vocal makes just “melody” for the song.
Bass-drum is low sound, so it makes “beat”. It should not be ring in same rhythm with high sound.
All bass-drums on down-beats makes listeners comfortable imo. On the other hand, bass-drums on up-beats is weird for me, there’re some exception though.

good luck~

Kaitjuh wrote:

Hi! From your queue~

Smol Mod

Easy

1. 00:22:989 (4,1) - maybe adjust so the sliderend also gets blanketed properly, might be tricky though tried sth
2. 01:11:852 (3,2) - Blanket space is uneven. Maybe adjust the red point and slider end of 01:13:648 (2) - like surethis
3. 01:39:875 (2) - looks kinda stubby xD. Maybe just make it a straight slider. cute :c
4. Other than that the difficulty seems fine and plays well

Normal

1. 00:22:989 (1) - align the last "bump" with the slider tick prefer current one tbh
2. 00:27:301 (2,1) - Stack fine
3. 01:27:301 (4,4) - Stack? This one seems kinda far fetched tbh xD doesnt really make a difference but that works too

Hard

1. 00:09:875 (1,2,3,4) - space evenly
2. 00:10:774 (3,1) - avoid overlap cleaned that part up a bit
3. 00:43:828 (3) - x368 y288 might be a better placement current 90° is fine
4. 00:56:043 (1) - angle this so it blankets 00:55:325 (3) - better not necessary and makes it too curved
5. 01:23:349 (1) - angle by -6° so it looks more even fine

Insane

1. 00:27:301 -Maybe make this part a little like this? current rhythm here focuses on those noises and not vocals
2. 01:14:007 (3,5) -move to x372 y200 ruins whole structure and the overlap with the slider is not visible during gameplay
3. 01:23:349 (1) - Improve Blanket?no blanket intended and a lslider which is this curved would look bad here

Extra

1. 01:05:384 (3,4,5,6,1) - Maybe make this more pentagon shaped like 01:08:977 (1,2,3,4,5) - ? 01:05:025 (2,3,4,5,6) - is a perfect star already
2. I'm struggling to find anything in this difficulty. Holy moly this is a fun diff

A very promising mapset. Had a lot of fun playing and modding it, since well made maps are kinda challenging to find flaws in.

Good Luck ^^

1. 00:17:241 (1) - Pretty sure we went over this before, but.. remove clap from head and put on tail, this way it is consistent with 00:16:881 (4) - and 00:18:319 (1) -
2. I don't really understand the usage of the whistle normal from 00:07:899 (5) -, it seems a bit weird.. I understand it at 00:09:875 (6) - because it is the last piano note in the sequence and it is held. Therefore one would fit at 00:13:109 (1) -, but why at 00:14:007 (3) - ? If anything, it should've been at 00:13:648 (2) - as it is stronger. Yeah, I can't really understand the next ones too.. It seems too random for me to understand. So please revise those.
3. 01:17:780 (2) - Literally the only slider of this kind in the whole diff, limits the movement and it might be playable as a static slider, unlike everything else in the kiai which is pretty straight forward in terms of movement so I'd advise changing this one.
4. Hitsound stuff applies to all diffs relevant.

1. 00:21:193 (1,2,3) - Equal spacing would be cool.

1. What's that diff name mean, I don't really get it, care to explain?
2. The beat on 00:12:929 - better to be more clickable, try this rhythm http://puu.sh/od0Wc/4d72a2e5d6.jpg ?
3. 00:27:301 (1) - and 00:28:019 (1) - I think you can add soft whistle sound on its slider body for both slider, for a better emphsized on electronic sound?
4. 00:31:073 (5) - and 00:35:384 (5) - Try to add nc for a better readability on the anti jump
5. 00:47:420 (1,2,3,4) - I don't think using 0.5 sv multiplier is a good choice on that part, the music itself literally constant, so by using 0,75 sv like you did on first one is way more reasonable to be played imo
6. 00:56:313 (2) - Delete that? imo there's no beat to be emphsized
7. 00:57:480 - Try to add whistle there to make the hitsound pattern more consistent?
8. 01:45:085 (2) - Delete the whistle? it makes the whole sound not harmonized

1. 00:22:271 (1,2) - Swap nc? to make the slowdown slider easier to distinguished
2. 00:27:301 (1) - and 00:28:019 (1) - I think you can add soft whistle sound on its slider body for both slider, for a better emphsized on electronic sound?
3. 00:35:384 (6) - NC for anti jump
4. 00:46:343 (2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - After several testplay, that pattern too confusing because of its placement
5. 00:56:313 (2) - Delete that? imo there's no beat to be emphsized
6. 00:57:480 - Add whistle? same reason as on fg204

1. The beat on 00:10:055 - can be more clickable, so at least maybe you can try this rhythm http://puu.sh/od2OX/55e5eff73c.jpg
2. 00:48:319 (1,2) - Swap nc? misplacing I guess
3. 00:57:480 - Add whistle?
4. 01:15:983 (1,2) - You can try to ctrl+g those, to cover a better vocal and music

1. 00:57:480 - Add whistle?
2. 01:40:594 (1) - and 01:46:343 (1) - why nc? I thought you are gonna follow making nc on every two downbeat like on first part 00:02:870 - , yet on this part 01:31:971 - your nc rather not consistent
3. Some of 1/2 rhythm usement kinda too long imo e.g. 01:14:726 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - and etc, I think it would be good if you tone down the density on this diff a bit, so it can help balaning the spread

1. 00:22:989 (4) - Nc due to measurement
2. 00:57:480 - Add whistle?
3. 01:29:007 - On that part, I'm not sure why you decide to mapping that part, yet on another diffs you just simply insert a spinner there. Maybe at least you can make it more consistent?

Mako Sakata wrote:

Hello
Sugestion,

FG204 things
What's that diff name mean, I don't really get it, care to explain?

Mako Sakata wrote:

Hello
Sugestion,

FG204 things

1. What's that diff name mean, I don't really get it, care to explain? p/5000568 should explain it
2. The beat on 00:12:929 - better to be more clickable, try this rhythm http://puu.sh/od0Wc/4d72a2e5d6.jpg ? current works way better with piano imo ./
3. 00:27:301 (1) - and 00:28:019 (1) - I think you can add soft whistle sound on its slider body for both slider, for a better emphsized on electronic sound? soft sliderwhistle sounds bad imo and normal would be too much, I prefer to only emphasize the short ones
4. 00:31:073 (5) - and 00:35:384 (5) - Try to add nc for a better readability on the anti jump fine
5. 00:47:420 (1,2,3,4) - I don't think using 0.5 sv multiplier is a good choice on that part, the music itself literally constant, so by using 0,75 sv like you did on first one is way more reasonable to be played imo electronic sounds get a bit more quiet with each repeat, which is why spacing and sv decrease
6. 00:56:313 (2) - Delete that? imo there's no beat to be emphsized sound on blue tick abd 00:56:402 (3) - is pretty strong, so this is fine
7. 00:57:480 - Try to add whistle there to make the hitsound pattern more consistent? done for all diffs
8. 01:45:085 (2) - Delete the whistle? it makes the whole sound not harmonized sure

Insane

1. 00:22:271 (1,2) - Swap nc? to make the slowdown slider easier to distinguished yes
2. 00:27:301 (1) - and 00:28:019 (1) - I think you can add soft whistle sound on its slider body for both slider, for a better emphsized on electronic sound? like above
3. 00:35:384 (6) - NC for anti jump sure
4. 00:46:343 (2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - After several testplay, that pattern too confusing because of its placement I already got several opinions on this and it seemed fine for everyone :/ I put lots of thought behind the pattern and it fits really well, would hurt to change it...
   Also the whole "overlaps and a bit harder to read than most insanes" is pretty much the idea of the difficulty, which is why I also went with a little lower than average ar
5. 00:56:313 (2) - Delete that? imo there's no beat to be emphsized see extra
6. 00:57:480 - Add whistle? same reason as on fg204 yes

Hard

1. The beat on 00:10:055 - can be more clickable, so at least maybe you can try this rhythm http://puu.sh/od2OX/55e5eff73c.jpg works well with piano and keeps clicking density a bit lower
2. 00:48:319 (1,2) - Swap nc? misplacing I guess both work, so I changed it
3. 00:57:480 - Add whistle? yes
4. 01:15:983 (1,2) - You can try to ctrl+g those, to cover a better vocal and music dont want vocal on sliderend here, current follow held vocal => strong vocal well

Normal

1. 00:57:480 - Add whistle? done
2. 01:40:594 (1) - and 01:46:343 (1) - why nc? I thought you are gonna follow making nc on every two downbeat like on first part 00:02:870 - , yet on this part 01:31:971 - your nc rather not consistent oh, remade nc to 8/1 for this part like before
3. Some of 1/2 rhythm usement kinda too long imo e.g. 01:14:726 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - and etc, I think it would be good if you tone down the density on this diff a bit, so it can help balaning the spread gap to both other diffs is ~80 objects and the density difference seems fine
   I renamed the lower difficulties to normal and advanced though to better indicate actual difficulty

Easy

1. 00:22:989 (4) - Nc due to measurement yes
2. 00:57:480 - Add whistle? done
3. 01:29:007 - On that part, I'm not sure why you decide to mapping that part, yet on another diffs you just simply insert a spinner there. Maybe at least you can make it more consistent? made it a spinner like other diffs

Sotarks wrote:

tbh FG204 diff doesn't play so well .. anyway thats your style
gratz

1. Not sure how the mapper thinks, but I personally feel the comboing before the kiai was a little messed up. 01:34:846 (3) - 01:37:720 (3) - 01:40:594 (3) - 01:43:468 (3) these having a new combo feels more natural along the song, as you've done at advanced.

1. 01:22:630 - It feels quite weird to get ignored since you were mostly focusing on vocals for the rhythms around here.

1. 01:15:983 (1) - This rhythm was a little disappointing since it was hard to catch what this rhythm was following while ignoring the strong beat and the vocal of 01:16:163. Also considering most of your rhythm structure was based on drums, leaving that place empty really felt weird.
2. 01:42:031 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - Not sure how you interpreted the song, but since the spacing increased started here, patterns with a distinct hitsound starting from 01:44:905 had less emphasis. Basically 1.6x is really similar with 1.7x, it didn't made a meaningful difference.

1. 01:01:073 (3) - You'll wanted to add a new combo here for a better readability and a consistency with 01:12:929 (1). Besides, I think 01:01:343 having a hitsound for all diffs would fit the song better.

1. 00:46:702 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Are these supposed to have no normal-whistle sound?

Sonnyc wrote:

[Normal]

1. Not sure how the mapper thinks, but I personally feel the comboing before the kiai was a little messed up. 01:34:846 (3) - 01:37:720 (3) - 01:40:594 (3) - 01:43:468 (3) these having a new combo feels more natural along the song, as you've done at advanced.
   either way of comboing works here, normal just starts the pattern 4/1 later. normal pattern puts more emphasis on those high pitched sounds 01:36:283 (1) - don't really see an issue here, except if you see "different nc usage for different diffs" as an issue, lol

[Advanced]

1. 01:22:630 - It feels quite weird to get ignored since you were mostly focusing on vocals for the rhythms around here. yeah, I focused on vocals, which is why this is a held slider on the held vocal...

[Hard]

1. 01:15:983 (1) - This rhythm was a little disappointing since it was hard to catch what this rhythm was following while ignoring the strong beat and the vocal of 01:16:163. Also considering most of your rhythm structure was based on drums, leaving that place empty really felt weird. 01:16:163 - still belongs to the held vocal from the sliderhead and the slider is used to shift emphasis more towards vocals
2. 01:42:031 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - Not sure how you interpreted the song, but since the spacing increased started here, patterns with a distinct hitsound starting from 01:44:905 had less emphasis. Basically 1.6x is really similar with 1.7x, it didn't made a meaningful difference. I don't really see your point. 01:42:031 (1) - here it changes from ~1.4x base ds so ~1.6x while removing the "jump on nc/downbeat" thing from before since the part os a bit different. Then a jump and base spacing increase on 01:44:905 - where it gets more intense. also the slight ds increase is noticeable enough http://i.imgur.com/hshRC6u.jpg and more would feel a bit much here for hard since I already had 2x ds jumps on 1 and the next combo

[Insane]

1. 01:01:073 (3) - You'll wanted to add a new combo here for a better readability and a consistency with 01:12:929 (1). Besides, I think 01:01:343 having a hitsound for all diffs would fit the song better. both work :d I chose the "nc every 4 objects" pattern for this diff and "nc every 1/1" for the extra. also it looks better that way to me xd and 01:12:570 (1,2,1,2) - has nc cause it looks nice that way to me with the changing slider directions, while on the first one the sliders are all the same.

[FG204]

1. 00:46:702 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Are these supposed to have no normal-whistle sound? mentioned in my last post

Not bad, but I think you can consider trying to make patterns interacting each other for your future mapping. 01:21:193 (5,6,1) for example in Insane, (1) is a horizontally flipped form of (5), and (6) is a -120˚ rotated form of (5). However seeming the way how these sliders were placed, it is pretty hard to interprete that these sliders are the same shape, resulting in a lack of pattern organization. I believe this isn't the only case on this mapset.don't really see any issue with this kind of pattern

Lasse wrote:

wish it was this easy finding bn for my pending maps : d