I'm not convinced this is ready for the qualified section to be honest, it just feels unpolished in places and not really up to the level of quality it should be.
Cup
Many of the same NC inconsistencies as before and some overly long combos such as 00:51:358 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
Same as in the other diffs, some really weird NC choices and combos like 01:04:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) just frustrate the player since the fruit stacks up on the plate and obstructs the player's view
Not gonna repeat myself again, but yeah, NCs.
Cup
- 00:14:531 (7,1) - NC inconsistency
- 00:17:841 (1,2,3,4,5) - This combo should be divided into two on (3) for consistency
- 00:28:186 (1,2,3) - Why is this mapped with 1/2 sliders when the rhythm is exactly the same as 00:29:427 (1,2,3) which is mapped with 1/1 circles (repeats in the following combos as well)
- 00:37:496 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - Far too much reliance on 1/2 patterns for a Cup diff in my opinion, a simpler rhythm would be more appropriate for the difficulty at this bpm
- 00:50:945 (5,1) - 00:54:255 (4,1) - etc. - More NC inconsistencies
- 01:10:807 (1,1) - Insufficient reaction time between note-spinner, especially considering the short length
- 01:14:531 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - These combos are pretty long for a Cup diff imo, dividing into 2 would be more comfortable
Many of the same NC inconsistencies as before and some overly long combos such as 00:51:358 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
- 00:02:945 (1) - This is the only note that requires dash until 00:35:221 and a lot of the notes that you are trying to emphasise with dash such as 00:11:221 (1) - 00:15:048 - etc. are edge-case dash scenarios where the player is uncertain whether dash is required or not. This makes them confusing to read and uncomfortable to play, so slightly more spacing on the "dash" notes would be very welcome
- 00:07:703 (6,7,8) - These feel unnecessary in this diff, it leaves no spread in note density to the higher diffs and a huge gap up from the Cup
- 00:21:565 (1,2,1,2) - This flow just feels really repetitive and unfitting, a smoother flow without the zig-zags would be more appropriate here
- 01:00:048 (3,4,1,2) - The amount of movement required here feels really excessive compared to your other patterns and could catch newer players by surprise
- 01:06:876 (2,3) - 01:09:152 (2,3,1,2) - Underemphasis of prominent notes by giving them zero movement just feels boring to play and doesn't do the song justice
- 01:27:152 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - Same as 00:07:703 (6,7,8) - mapping all of these feels unnecessary in this diff, regardless of the spacing
Same as in the other diffs, some really weird NC choices and combos like 01:04:600 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) just frustrate the player since the fruit stacks up on the plate and obstructs the player's view
- 00:04:600 (1) - Hdash feels unnecessary here since the music is so quiet, a regular dash would be enough
- 00:16:600 (3) - Why is there no hdash here when there's one for an identical sound in an identical rhythm at 00:10:393 (4) - ?
- 00:21:152 - Why is this beat unmapped?
- 00:26:117 (1) - 00:32:738 (1) - These sliders just feel lazy, more movement would be more appropriate for the difficulty
- 00:33:979 (2,3) - I'd swap the order of these, ending a slider on the strong beat feels really weird and a NC here would be more than welcome
Not gonna repeat myself again, but yeah, NCs.
- 00:07:290 (5,6,7,8,1,2) - This feels really stuttered and awkward to play. Making 00:07:703 (6,7,8) curve to the right and Ctrl+H 00:07:910 (1,2) would play much better imo
- 00:19:496 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - This is plainly overmapped, there are no 1/4 beats here at all
- 00:44:738 (4,3) - These sliders are pretty uncomfortable to play, the SV doesn't need to be this high
- 01:10:186 (4) - I'd angle this slider more vertically, or reduce the hdash strength, since it's really easy to overshoot and droplet miss here