Yeah, in that next post, try to explain why you put Germany above China and Taiwan, cuz I'm really curious.
Basically: China has a lot of all-around players, but no particular strength. If you have a team that will perfectly play a single mod while being also good at another one, they can overplay them with no issues.Gigo wrote:
Yeah, in that next post, try to explain why you put Germany above China and Taiwan, cuz I'm really curious.
They have given easy wins to Ukraine and Brazil in past OWCs, while teams like Germany, Korea and Japan wouldn't have done that.Didn't Japan lose to Sweden last year?
I think that was his point - they were missing all their key players in the first place.Gigo wrote:
Roster is the same as previous years? Do you mind checking what Taiwan's roster was when they lost that match to Ukraine? They were missing all of their key players! You really can't give that match as an example of how they (supposedly) underperform in tournaments.
I think that having your key players missing on account of them being banned due to policy infractions is a bit different than your key players missing because they can't be asked to show up. And I'm not sure how accurate of a metric an owc from 2 or 3 years ago would be, considering the rate of improvement that's been occurring.Minhtam wrote:
I think that was his point - they were missing all their key players in the first place.Gigo wrote:
Roster is the same as previous years? Do you mind checking what Taiwan's roster was when they lost that match to Ukraine? They were missing all of their key players! You really can't give that match as an example of how they (supposedly) underperform in tournaments.
People tend to overlook the fact that a team is only as strong as the players that show up on that weekend. A team that is unable to commit to competing each and every single week will not have the consistency to keep up with teams that do. After all, how can you be consistent gameplay wise if you're not consistent attendance wise?
It is pretty relevant if we're talking about the exact same players :pAlpha_00 wrote:
I think that having your key players missing on account of them being banned due to policy infractions is a bit different than your key players missing because they can't be asked to show up. And I'm not sure how accurate of a metric an owc from 2 or 3 years ago would be, considering the rate of improvement that's been occurring.Minhtam wrote:
I think that was his point - they were missing all their key players in the first place.
People tend to overlook the fact that a team is only as strong as the players that show up on that weekend. A team that is unable to commit to competing each and every single week will not have the consistency to keep up with teams that do. After all, how can you be consistent gameplay wise if you're not consistent attendance wise?
we will beat em all this year as well, dw :^)Gigo wrote:
Do you mind checking what Taiwan's roster was when they lost that match to Ukraine? They were missing all of their key players!
You do realize Germany almost has a completely different (and less skilled) roster right?Blue Dragon wrote:
Basically: China has a lot of all-around players, but no particular strength. If you have a team that will perfectly play a single mod while being also good at another one, they can overplay them with no issues.Gigo wrote:
Yeah, in that next post, try to explain why you put Germany above China and Taiwan, cuz I'm really curious.
Taiwan should be S-Tier, but the fact that they tilt in almost every OWC to date is really a factor. They have given easy wins to Ukraine and Brazil in past OWCs, while teams like Germany, Korea and Japan wouldn't have done that. Past may not be a factor, but the roster is almost the exact same as the other years. They're great players, but they don't seem to be able to perform as well in tournaments.
I wish you luck, but... I'm afraid motivation alone isn't gonna cut it. I'd love to be proved wrong though.Aka wrote:
we will beat em all this year as well, dw :^)
that just gave me some motivation, anyway. thank you
You do realize Germany almost has a completely different (and less skilled) roster right?
if by "less skilled" you mean that Germany is the only team in the entire tournament with their 8 players being in the top 200 worldwide, then yes, they are less skilled.Xayne wrote:
You do realize Germany almost has a completely different (and less skilled) roster right?Blue Dragon wrote:
Basically: China has a lot of all-around players, but no particular strength. If you have a team that will perfectly play a single mod while being also good at another one, they can overplay them with no issues.
Taiwan should be S-Tier, but the fact that they tilt in almost every OWC to date is really a factor. They have given easy wins to Ukraine and Brazil in past OWCs, while teams like Germany, Korea and Japan wouldn't have done that. Past may not be a factor, but the roster is almost the exact same as the other years. They're great players, but they don't seem to be able to perform as well in tournaments.
1. One of their players is rank 250.Blue Dragon wrote:
if by "less skilled" you mean that Germany is the only team in the entire tournament with their 8 players being in the top 200 worldwide, then yes, they are less skilled.
My point still stands. In theory they are showing to be a much more consistent team than Taiwan, and it's just a prediction.Gigo wrote:
1. One of their players is rank 250.Blue Dragon wrote:
if by "less skilled" you mean that Germany is the only team in the entire tournament with their 8 players being in the top 200 worldwide, then yes, they are less skilled.
2. Rank and skill are two different things (which is something we all should know extremely well by now).
Fair enough. I guess I am a little biased since I like Taiwan's team, but whatever... we'll see what happens.Blue Dragon wrote:
... and it's just a prediction.
Wait... what?! You're not gonna cheer for Australia?Athrun wrote:
P.S. I want my banner to cheer for Hong Kong
Hong Kong is where I was born, so I'll cheer for Hong Kong.Gigo wrote:
Wait... what?! You're not gonna cheer for Australia?Athrun wrote:
P.S. I want my banner to cheer for Hong Kong
Yay! Chaoslitz is in the tournament and also one of my good friends! Let's hope Hong Kong can make it after group stage \:D/sables48 wrote:
I also support Hong Kong and my friend -N a n a k o-
Oh ok, my bad.Athrun wrote:
Hong Kong is where I was born, so I'll cheer for Hong Kong.
VnSoul wrote:
You do realize Germany almost has a completely different (and less skilled) roster right?
Thats quite a bold statement. I would claim that thier roster this year is at at least as strong as last year. Germany's roster last year was pretty much very strong in NoMod/DT , but kinda weak what it came to HR/HD. The roster this year looks a lot more balanced and I somehow have a feeling that they are even stronger this year, but its all up to the performance/consistency of the new players
Who are you going for this year, putting aside the differencesGigo wrote:
Oh ok, my bad.Athrun wrote:
Hong Kong is where I was born, so I'll cheer for Hong Kong.![]()
Actually, sayo and Dungeon are gone for militaryMinhtam wrote:
I just want a country to win the osu! World Cup for the first time ever. i.e. anybody but South Korea and Japan.
Fortunately, judging by the makeup of their teams, it looks like most of the top South Korea and Japan players have this "been there, done that" attitude and are allowing some other top players a chance to play. We'll see if that comes back to haunt them.
It's been for a greater good, I'm sure the shoe was tastyElscar wrote:
sure tom is a really weak HD player... he only fc'd the tiebreaker with HD against us last year (#2 score back then)
You didnt understand my point. What I meant was that the team is more balanced know in terms of mods. In Germany's roster last year Tom was pretty much the only one who did well on the Hidden picks.Elscar wrote:
sure tom is a really weak HD player... he only fc'd the tiebreaker with HD against us last year (#2 score back then)
Looks good, gives a bit of comparison. Luckily in the end it doesn't come down to just rankings, so looking forward to the group stages!Aoiyuuki- wrote:
I made a Google Sheets based on the roster of this year's OWC along with their ranking, right here: OWC 2015 Roster by PP
Good job.Aoiyuuki- wrote:
I made a Google Sheets based on the roster of this year's OWC along with their ranking, right here: OWC 2015 Roster by PP
I'll add more clarification on to it later and maybe improvement on it.
Edit: Based on this Google Sheets from last year: OWC 2014 Roster by PP Rankings
Just to clarify, I believe you're referring to my roster ranking which averages all of the players of the team. Japan has players that rank as low as 3k, dropping the average of the Japanese teams slightly lower than Greece and Ukraine.Gigo wrote:
Good job.Aoiyuuki- wrote:
I made a Google Sheets based on the roster of this year's OWC along with their ranking, right here: OWC 2015 Roster by PP
I'll add more clarification on to it later and maybe improvement on it.
Edit: Based on this Google Sheets from last year: OWC 2014 Roster by PP Rankings
Greece and Ukraine with higher average ranking than Japan. FailFish
My bad D:. Guess I just ignored its existence since its seriously hard to use imoCXu wrote:
?
HONG KONG HAS A CHANCE THIS YEARMakan1 wrote:
Hong Kong pls get out of group stage this year! orz
We all know that Canada will crush Poland Kappa[Taiga] wrote:
Poland vs Canada
Rigged!
welp much dilemma on who to support now lelKaruta- wrote:
Finally Malaysia vs Australia again after 3 years
So I guess we'll just spam maprelated issues in here?Nwolf wrote:
other world cups also had none and tbh I didn't see why they had a seperate thread/people didn't use it the intended way
Well the OWC from the previous years always got a seperate thread to discuss the mappools so you are wrongNwolf wrote:
other world cups also had none and tbh I didn't see why they had a seperate thread/people didn't use it the intended way
there has been only one for 2014 and I assume that they had reasons to not continue it for the other world cups and this one. Check your facts pleaseVnSoul wrote:
Well the OWC from the previous years always got a seperate thread to discuss the mappools so you are wrongNwolf wrote:
other world cups also had none and tbh I didn't see why they had a seperate thread/people didn't use it the intended way
But it's sooooo slow and easy to aim so misses shouldn't be a problem? It's not like you 100% die when having SSfartownik wrote:
Clumsy Thoughts as a HR is a bad pick. The HP drain without HR is already 7.5, with HR one miss combined with slow pace of the map almost guarantees that you won't revive until the end of the match. This shouldn't really happen and people will be either banning this map or just not picking it since it's really random.
Hopefully they fix drain before v2 goes live. At least with v1 the maps where SS'ing barely keeps up/stays ahead of HP10 aren't overly common. As much as group stages are already going to be acc battles from the looks of things it will be sad to see failures without combo breaking.KevEz wrote:
ive died everysingle time on the HR picks using score v2 :C
A 4.25 stars map can be as difficult as a 5.25 stars map, it just depends on the mapping style itself.a loli wrote:
why is there a 4* map in hd pool?
Sorry we cant all be perfect like you. HP drain 2 stronkchainpullz wrote:
Just played the HR pool sv2. You'd have to be garbage not to pass tsubomi or mangekyou. Unless they literally changed something in past day that I'm unaware of sv2 doesn't appear to have anything to do with it.
The discussion is about Clumsy Thoughts only.chainpullz wrote:
Just played the HR pool sv2. You'd have to be garbage not to pass tsubomi or mangekyou. Unless they literally changed something in past day that I'm unaware of sv2 doesn't appear to have anything to do with it.
Yeah, I agree with that one. Was mostly directing my comment at KevEz tossing the other two in with it. You can get below 90% accuracy with misses and still pass the other two. Clumsy Thoughts is hard enough to pass in sv1. I think its the map and not sv2.fartownik wrote:
The discussion is about Clumsy Thoughts only.chainpullz wrote:
Just played the HR pool sv2. You'd have to be garbage not to pass tsubomi or mangekyou. Unless they literally changed something in past day that I'm unaware of sv2 doesn't appear to have anything to do with it.
it's 4.08 actually. The only thing this map has for difficulty is its low AR on hd, the map itself is easy compared to the other picksCherry Blossom wrote:
A 4.25 stars map can be as difficult as a 5.25 stars map, it just depends on the mapping style itself.a loli wrote:
why is there a 4* map in hd pool?
For example 0108's maps like with a dance number or scarlet rose which are mostly under 5.25 stars are difficult to play or FC, because it requires technical skills.
Just keep in mind that star rating doesn't really mean anything in terms of difficulty for many cases.
ftfy, sorry, could not resista loli wrote:
and I don't see the problem with clumsy thought. Who doesn't like knowing they're dying a fast death as soon as they miss or hit multiple 100s in a row?
It's less of a "oh, we're better than the others at this, lets pick this so that we win!" but more of a "so, either we ban this and do us and our enemies a favour or hope that noone picks it - because we can fail even if we FC this". Kinda more risky than it's worth.[TaikoTori] wrote:
In my opinion, its a very strategical pick and adds a little more flavour into the mappool. Just my 2 cents, i could be very far off.
So if you're russia you leave it open and if you're anyone else you ban it?Yauxo wrote:
It's less of a "oh, we're better than the others at this, lets pick this so that we win!" but more of a "so, either we ban this and do us and our enemies a favour or hope that noone picks it - because we can fail even if we FC this". Kinda more risky than it's worth.[TaikoTori] wrote:
In my opinion, its a very strategical pick and adds a little more flavour into the mappool. Just my 2 cents, i could be very far off.
Or well, maybe youre playing the shit out of the map so that youre confident enough to play and not fail after a few 100s (and hope that the others fail).
Gotta play that roulette mang. But honestly i love sseeing some acc battles, maybe we're going to see multiple FCs... so what? It's a rhythm game after all. (Just waiting for someone to SS that dang HR map).chainpullz wrote:
So if you're russia you leave it open and if you're anyone else you ban it?
It's a strategical pick. It's 100% about reading and managing changes of pace. Hidden enforces this specific difficulty further which is why this map becomes hard enough(for HR/nomod/freemod this would be a joke indeed). Maybe I'm leaning out a bit far but I'm very sure that we won't see 8 and probably not even 4 FCs on it when it gets picked and it might even draw bans from teams that consider themselves bad at Hidden as it is the map that attacks weaknesses in reading HD the most due to its style.a loli wrote:
it's 4.08 actually. The only thing this map has for difficulty is its low AR on hd, the map itself is easy compared to the other picks
Doesn't even need to be 7*. Just toss save the queen into the map pool. LOLa loli wrote:
Why not add a 7* map to the pool too. I don't see the problem, teams can just ban it if they can't play it!
Having vetos is not an excuse to put gimmick map picks into the pool.
second this, the competition has increased a ton over the span of a year. The group stage map picks are still the same difficulty as last years.chainpullz wrote:
Was hoping the group stage pool difficulty would increase this year to reflect the increase in skill level of players since last year tbh.