iJinjin wrote:
Abe yuta recently tweeted that Musical Masterpiece shouldn't be used as the artist name because Musical Masterpiece refers to a collaboration of Abe and friends. The correct artist name that should be used is indeed D. Once this mapset becomes dq'd, I will fix the metadata asap and hopefully MANIERA will be back in no time ^^
forum
D(ABE3) - MANIERA [OsuMania]
posted
Total Posts
214
우선, Musical Masterpiece는 다른 작곡가 친구분과 함께 만든 '팀' 단위라고 합니다.
그런데 마니에라 같은 경우엔 아베 유타님 혼자 만드신 곡이라고 하십니다.
트위터에도 언급되었듯이 작곡가님이 원하시는 마니에라의 아티스트 명은 D(ABE3) 입니다.
또한 후에 작곡가님의 곡을 사용해서 랭크할 경우, 작곡가님의 동의 및 허가를 받은 뒤에 사용하도록 요청 하셨습니다.
위의 내용은 작곡가님의 공식적인 블로그에 서술되어 있는 부분들 입니다. ( http://abeyuta.syoyu.net/ )
동의 및 허가 절차는 위의 홈페이지 포스팅에 나와 있으며, 작곡가님은 모든 매퍼분들이 이 과정을 무조건 거치기를 기대 하십니다.
그리고 해당되는 곡들의 랭크맵에는 아티스트님의 정보가 서술되어 있는 http://www.muzie.ne.jp/artist/a044483/
이 홈페이지를 꼭 링크하도록 부탁하셨습니다.
일단 마니에라 같은 경우엔 동의 및 허가 절차를 거칠 필요는 없어 보이고,
위의 두 가지를 시행해주시면 메타데이터 문제는 해결 될 것으로 보입니다.
영어가 서툴기 때문에 정확성을 위해 한국어로 적었습니다. 후의 매퍼들을 위해 누군가 영어로 적어준다면 좋겠군요
p.s. you can ask some japanese modderators for tweet and offical contents what he written if you want to make sure metadata problem 100%.
그런데 마니에라 같은 경우엔 아베 유타님 혼자 만드신 곡이라고 하십니다.
트위터에도 언급되었듯이 작곡가님이 원하시는 마니에라의 아티스트 명은 D(ABE3) 입니다.
또한 후에 작곡가님의 곡을 사용해서 랭크할 경우, 작곡가님의 동의 및 허가를 받은 뒤에 사용하도록 요청 하셨습니다.
위의 내용은 작곡가님의 공식적인 블로그에 서술되어 있는 부분들 입니다. ( http://abeyuta.syoyu.net/ )
동의 및 허가 절차는 위의 홈페이지 포스팅에 나와 있으며, 작곡가님은 모든 매퍼분들이 이 과정을 무조건 거치기를 기대 하십니다.
그리고 해당되는 곡들의 랭크맵에는 아티스트님의 정보가 서술되어 있는 http://www.muzie.ne.jp/artist/a044483/
이 홈페이지를 꼭 링크하도록 부탁하셨습니다.
일단 마니에라 같은 경우엔 동의 및 허가 절차를 거칠 필요는 없어 보이고,
위의 두 가지를 시행해주시면 메타데이터 문제는 해결 될 것으로 보입니다.
영어가 서툴기 때문에 정확성을 위해 한국어로 적었습니다. 후의 매퍼들을 위해 누군가 영어로 적어준다면 좋겠군요
p.s. you can ask some japanese modderators for tweet and offical contents what he written if you want to make sure metadata problem 100%.
So if I'm not mistaken, artist would be "D(ABE3)" with those two links in the description to their works?
Or just D with ABE3 in tags? Little bit confusing, haha
Or just D with ABE3 in tags? Little bit confusing, haha
Artist name should be 'D(ABE3)' as he(composer) wishes. we should respect his opinion, right?Charles445 wrote:
So if I'm not mistaken, artist would be "D(ABE3)" with those two links in the description to their works?
Or just D with ABE3 in tags? Little bit confusing, haha
and for future, he wants to let all mappers must get agreement from him which they can use his song when they try to make ranked map.
we can get agreement from his blog. there has written some ways to get agreement.
also, all maps which has used his songs must have link that is written his info in readme. http://www.muzie.ne.jp/artist/a044483/
i hope someone can translate what i written in korean. and ask me something else if you can't get some.
I personally think the artist should be "D" seeing as that is the artist name he used in the BMS for the song when he submitted it, which basically makes me see that as the official artist of the song.
However if he wishes the artist name to be "D(ABE3)" or whatever I guess that is fine, albeit kinda weird to me.
I'm not a master of song policies but I think a song doesn't actually have an official artist unless copyrighted, if it isn't copyrighted however I believe osu! as a rhythm game should label the artist as whatever name the artist submitted the song as...if there is no confirmed artist in the source you'd probably have to ask the artist if possible or stick to "Unknown Artist".
Just posting my personal opinion here, by my logic the artist should be "D" but I do not think we should disregard the artists wish for this.
However if he wishes the artist name to be "D(ABE3)" or whatever I guess that is fine, albeit kinda weird to me.
I'm not a master of song policies but I think a song doesn't actually have an official artist unless copyrighted, if it isn't copyrighted however I believe osu! as a rhythm game should label the artist as whatever name the artist submitted the song as...if there is no confirmed artist in the source you'd probably have to ask the artist if possible or stick to "Unknown Artist".
Just posting my personal opinion here, by my logic the artist should be "D" but I do not think we should disregard the artists wish for this.
Topic Starter
I personally contacted Abe Yuta and he gave me permission to use MANIERA as long as I fix the artist name (to D) and mention the link that suwako has provided
_S u w a k o_ wrote:
http://www.muzie.ne.jp/artist/a044483/
http://abeyuta.syoyu.net/
i 'personally' think you can post above homepage which is his blog to let people read his song use condition (?)
i 'personally' think you can post above homepage which is his blog to let people read his song use condition (?)
Topic Starter
Yeah I guess I can do that too. Thanks for your help suwako <3_S u w a k o_ wrote:
http://abeyuta.syoyu.net/
i 'personally' think you can post above homepage which is his blog to let people read his song use condition (?)
iJinjin wrote:
Yeah I guess I can do that too. Thanks for your help suwako <3_S u w a k o_ wrote:
http://abeyuta.syoyu.net/
i 'personally' think you can post above homepage which is his blog to let people read his song use condition (?)
Good Luck <3
But be aware that this map will be dq-ed soon since composer requested to change the artist name as soon as possible.
At least the composer doesn't take down the map...
Something I see for the first time...
#respect
Good Luck jinjin
Something I see for the first time...
#respect
Good Luck jinjin
gl for rerank~
rip pp record lol
rip pp record lol
how many days until 6th day? :U
Disqualification Notice
Hello!
Unfortunately, the Quality Assurance Team has decided to disqualify this beatmap. The following is a list of reasons and examples for the disqualification. We do not outline every issue in detail, so make sure to take the idea behind each reason and apply it to the entire beatmap as issues might be found in more than the spots mentioned below. If you have any questions, please reply to this post and we will do our best to clarify any misunderstandings.
General
Metadata
Metadata
Currently the Artist field of the metadata is incorrect. It should be "D(ABE3)" instead of "Musical Masterpiece", as confirmed by the song's Artist themselves.
As a result it is recommended to add "abe yuta DWMω" into the tags as well.
A few sections in the Hyper difficulty should be changed to make it play less awkward and more friendly for newer players. For example,
- 00:40:181 - This section with the double chords can be very tricky for newer players. We recommend reducing the chord structure (from 2-2-2-2-2 to 2-1-2-1-2, for example), or making the patterns more easier to play (symmetrical, for example).
- 01:10:757 - This section becomes really difficult as it combines LNs on one hand with jacks on another, making things like 01:12:343 (72343|5,72488|4,72488|1,72632|1,72632|3,72776|2,72776|0) - really awkward to play depending on the playstyle considering this is for newer players.
- In the Masterpiece difficulty:
- 00:06:720 - to 00:11:335 -, 01:41:621 - to 01:46:237 - These additional notes layered into this section are very awkward to press whilst also keeping track of the continuous jacks at the same time. We suggest you to limit the layering in this section - keep the double note chord jacks for the piano (and the LNs for the bass), whilst ignoring all other instruments for example, to make everything less awkward and provide better and clearer emphasis on the jacks in these parts. (Also allows for a better spread, since Another only layers the piano and is fairly easy to hit in these parts)
If you happen to have concerns about this disqualification, you can contest the decision with this form. Before using this form, please read the instructions carefully.
The Beatmap Nominators may handle this mapset after the issues have been addressed.
Good luck!
###B
It was only 2 days lmaoExUsagi wrote:
how many days until 6th day? :U
Jin, call me back when everything's ready. Let's give this another shot!
The tweet in question for the Artist is here: https://twitter.com/abe_yuta/status/624172688936796161 - The link provided does not give a valid proof lol
RIP all the twenty new 10KPP players
00:06:720 - 01:41:621 -
sectionwat
RIP all the twenty new 10KPP players
This mapset is for elder players.Quality Assurance Team wrote:
really awkward to play depending on the playstyle considering this is for newer players.
but.. its ranked so it was for everyone whether senior or beginner player..NlHIL wrote:
This mapset is for elder players.Quality Assurance Team wrote:
really awkward to play depending on the playstyle considering this is for newer players.
EDIT : "considering this is for newer players" nevermind then
when you're ready call me again jiiinnnnn
EDIT>> also someone move this thread in the WIP section?
EDIT>> also someone move this thread in the WIP section?
Online_old_1
"A few sections in the Hyper difficulty should be changed to make it play less awkward and more friendly for newer players. For example,"Quality Assurance Team wrote:
Disqualification Notice
Hello!
Unfortunately, the Quality Assurance Team has decided to disqualify this beatmap. The following is a list of reasons and examples for the disqualification. We do not outline every issue in detail, so make sure to take the idea behind each reason and apply it to the entire beatmap as issues might be found in more than the spots mentioned below. If you have any questions, please reply to this post and we will do our best to clarify any misunderstandings.General
MetadataAwkward Gameplay Elements
Currently the Artist field of the metadata is incorrect. It should be "D(ABE3)" instead of "Musical Masterpiece", as confirmed by the song's Artist themselves.
As a result it is recommended to add "abe yuta DWMω" into the tags as well.
A few sections in the Hyper difficulty should be changed to make it play less awkward and more friendly for newer players. For example,
- 00:40:181 - This section with the double chords can be very tricky for newer players. We recommend reducing the chord structure (from 2-2-2-2-2 to 2-1-2-1-2, for example), or making the patterns more easier to play (symmetrical, for example).
- 01:10:757 - This section becomes really difficult as it combines LNs on one hand with jacks on another, making things like 01:12:343 (72343|5,72488|4,72488|1,72632|1,72632|3,72776|2,72776|0) - really awkward to play depending on the playstyle considering this is for newer players.
- In the Masterpiece difficulty:
- 00:06:720 - to 00:11:335 -, 01:41:621 - to 01:46:237 - These additional notes layered into this section are very awkward to press whilst also keeping track of the continuous jacks at the same time. We suggest you to limit the layering in this section - keep the double note chord jacks for the piano (and the LNs for the bass), whilst ignoring all other instruments for example, to make everything less awkward and provide better and clearer emphasis on the jacks in these parts. (Also allows for a better spread, since Another only layers the piano and is fairly easy to hit in these parts)
If you happen to have concerns about this disqualification, you can contest the decision with this form. Before using this form, please read the instructions carefully.
The Beatmap Nominators may handle this mapset after the issues have been addressed.
Good luck!
###B
Just contest the DQ, it's really unjustified.
"Newer players", every top50 player should be able to get a good score on the chart. This isn't a mapset for noobs but for good players who can play BMS overjoys
gezo you forgot the colon which is critical there kek
also why should only top50 players be able to play hyper efficiently, it's a diff for mid-tier players lmao
also why should only top50 players be able to play hyper efficiently, it's a diff for mid-tier players lmao
That's why it has a Normal difficulty at 1.95* and a Hyper difficulty at 3.10*. For the elder players. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)NlHIL wrote:
This mapset is for elder players.
Also, the metadata was wrong anyway; can't contest a DQ for a metadata problem, especially one where the artist explicitly said themselves it was wrong.
If these people who got their 1000+ pp plays on Masterpiece diff. truly deserved it, then they can do get them again when/if it gets requalified/ranked.
Topic Starter
Thanks for the additional modding, updatedQuality Assurance Team wrote:
Disqualification Notice
Hello!
Unfortunately, the Quality Assurance Team has decided to disqualify this beatmap. The following is a list of reasons and examples for the disqualification. We do not outline every issue in detail, so make sure to take the idea behind each reason and apply it to the entire beatmap as issues might be found in more than the spots mentioned below. If you have any questions, please reply to this post and we will do our best to clarify any misunderstandings.General
MetadataAwkward Gameplay Elements
Currently the Artist field of the metadata is incorrect. It should be "D(ABE3)" instead of "Musical Masterpiece", as confirmed by the song's Artist themselves.
As a result it is recommended to add "abe yuta DWMω" into the tags as well.
A few sections in the Hyper difficulty should be changed to make it play less awkward and more friendly for newer players. For example,
- 00:40:181 - This section with the double chords can be very tricky for newer players. We recommend reducing the chord structure (from 2-2-2-2-2 to 2-1-2-1-2, for example), or making the patterns more easier to play (symmetrical, for example).
Agreed, I changed the patterns to be mirrored / symmetrical to be easier to hit- 01:10:757 - This section becomes really difficult as it combines LNs on one hand with jacks on another, making things like 01:12:343 (72343|5,72488|4,72488|1,72632|1,72632|3,72776|2,72776|0) - really awkward to play depending on the playstyle considering this is for newer players.
Agreed, changed the overall pattern to be easier + eliminated the ln use here
- In the Masterpiece difficulty:
- 00:06:720 - to 00:11:335 -, 01:41:621 - to 01:46:237 - These additional notes layered into this section are very awkward to press whilst also keeping track of the continuous jacks at the same time. We suggest you to limit the layering in this section - keep the double note chord jacks for the piano (and the LNs for the bass), whilst ignoring all other instruments for example, to make everything less awkward and provide better and clearer emphasis on the jacks in these parts. (Also allows for a better spread, since Another only layers the piano and is fairly easy to hit in these parts)
I honestly do not think that I have to limit the layering here to only piano. By making the jacks and the ln independent by putting them on separate hands, it makes it very possible to hit the percussion notes (and also provides clear visualization on which note represents which instrument. In addition, the Collab Another diff does layer in a bit of the drums (but not everything).
If you happen to have concerns about this disqualification, you can contest the decision with this form. Before using this form, please read the instructions carefully.
The Beatmap Nominators may handle this mapset after the issues have been addressed.
Good luck!
###B
Ok here we go
Topic Starter
Thanks harby ^^Harbyter wrote:
Ok here we go
Now waiting for expew & blocko
come on blocko, re-hype the train \:D/
OOT..
i think the final equation should be i(ijn)²
idk but i³=-i seems ok..
i think the final equation should be i(ijn)²
idk but i³=-i seems ok..
1000pp is back?
Normal:
01:58:442 (118442|0,118442|2) - ?
Seems like the other diffs place it differently.
01:58:442 (118442|0,118442|2) - ?
Seems like the other diffs place it differently.
Topic Starter
Woops, lemme check on that later when I do the irc mod with expewCharles445 wrote:
Normal:
01:58:442 (118442|0,118442|2) - ?
Seems like the other diffs place it differently.
Thanks Charles ^^
lmaoOvnize wrote:
people are taking this game way too seriously
Kuki wrote:
lmaoOvnize wrote:
people are taking this game way too seriously
the peepees are still saved_Gezo_ wrote:
RIP all the twenty new 10KPP players
Here's a higher quality MP3 if you want: http://puu.sh/jayy4.mp3
this is one of impressive map which has contained extremely insane + pretty fun pattern at the same time!
good luck ijinjin, after re-qualify, this map will be got ranked state directly!
good luck ijinjin, after re-qualify, this map will be got ranked state directly!
Jhlee will be mad...
Topic Starter
I've considered for a while whether to use the remastered mp3, but I think I will keep the current bms version. There are a lot of differences between the current mp3 file and the remastered file that it's not really possible to say that this is just a "better quality". The music itself has a bit of a different feel, and some of the parts of the remastered version doesn't seem to be very coherent with the way I mapped parts. In addition, the elongated petals in the piano seems to drown some of the parts of music, as well as the accented emphasis created at some parts of the music. Finally, I've noticed that some of the snaps are different since it is not limited to the snaps of bmse. Therefore, I cannot be too sure about most of the snaps. But thanks ^^Fullerene- wrote:
Here's a higher quality MP3 if you want: http://puu.sh/jayy4.mp3