Fixed these, thanks Melan BlueMelan Blue wrote:
[Beginner][Hard]
- The part at 01:52:729 - untill 01:58:269 - needs more whistles.
00:21:481 (1) - End the spinner at 00:23:064 - , that way it's easier to read the next pattern.
forum
ZUN remixed by LeaF - Resurrection Spell
posted
Total Posts
87
Topic Starter
i love you
M4M from my queue~
[General]
[Beginner]
[Normal]
[Hard]
[Hyper]
[Another]
[VOLCANO]
I can't find too many problem, everything is very well
Good luck
[General]
00:02:064 - Fix Preview Point
[Beginner]
00:10:730 (1) - I don't think this should NC, remove NC??
01:14:062 (1,1,1) - these have same rhythm with 01:08:729 (1,1,1) - . I think keep 1/1 more better
01:40:729 (1) - remove NC more better
01:42:062 (1) - use 1/1 slider + a circle like 01:43:396 (1,2) - ??
01:46:062 (1) - remove NC too, no need
01:51:396 (1) - ^
02:13:782 (2,1) - I think give newbie a spinner more better, slider too long it not good for playing
[Normal]
00:10:730 (1) - remove NC??
00:24:398 (1) - why I think this circle move to 00:24:064 - more better?? Do you think?? (00:24:231 - no sound can follow)
01:32:396 (1) - ^, same rhythm...move to 01:32:062 - ??
01:40:729 (1) - remove NC
02:13:782 (4) - same reason as Beginner, long slider change a spinner
[Hard]
00:10:897 - spinner start here?? I think blue start blue line is fine
00:13:398 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Just my advice, I think this 16 circles are not suitable for music...maybe change 8 circles on white lines more good
00:25:564 - I know here have sound here...but I think remove circle more good. If you don't like, ignore this
00:56:729 (1) - remove NC
01:07:396 (1) - ^
01:51:396 (1) - ^
[Hyper]
00:10:897 - spinner start here??
It's fine to me...but long stream I think too many...
[Another]
01:30:062 (1) - wow...too short spinner, I think this is very dangerous
[VOLCANO]
00:20:594 (2) - Ctrl+G, same 00:21:130 (4) -
01:30:062 (1) - I still think this is too short
I can't find too many problem, everything is very well
Good luck
Topic Starter
fixed these, thanks DreaM117erDreaM117er wrote:
[General]
00:02:064 - Fix Preview Point
[Beginner]
fixed some newcombo
[Normal]
00:10:730 (1) - remove NC??
01:40:729 (1) - remove NC
queueから来ました。m4mお願いします！
Red : Unrankable issue / must fix.
Blue : Should be fixed / highly suggested.
Black : Just suggestion.
[General]
Red : Unrankable issue / must fix.
Blue : Should be fixed / highly suggested.
Black : Just suggestion.
[General]
- BG sizeが1084x768と中途半端なので4:3 or 16:9にしませんか？一応元画像から16:9にしたものを貼っておきますが必須ではないので変えなくてもOKです
- Letterboxのチェックは必要なさそうなので外してもいいと思います。
- BPM180でAR10はもしかするとDQの原因になるかもしれません。ただdiffバランス的には問題なさそうに見えるので何とも言えないところ・・・
- 00:25:231 (3) - ここも1をコピーしたスライダーを使った方が流れや見た目も良いと思うんですがどうでしょう？
- 00:28:396 (11) - ストリームパートのhitsoundが少なく単調に聞こえてしまうので、こういう目立った音があるところにfinish or clapを入れてみては？ 個人的にはfinishが合ってると思います。何個か同じような点があるのでこれ以降は省きます。
- 00:48:396 (6,7,1) - このスペーシングのギャップが叩きづらい感じがしました。7から1へは下にAIMした方が叩きやすいと思うので00:48:729 (1,2) - これをCtrl+Gしてみるのはどうでしょうか。
- 00:25:231 (3) - VOLCANO diffと同じ指摘です。統一感って意味でも直線より合うかなーって思います。
- Fine.
- 00:02:730 (3) - Hyperと同じようにN入れてみてはどうでしょう？
- 01:49:396 (7,8) - 恐らく初見でこのレベルのdiffをプレイするプレイヤーにこの音取りと配置は難しいと思います。自分はこういう音取りを推します。
- 01:52:731 (1,2) - 急なBPM変更で混乱する初心者もいると思うのでスライダーで音取りした方が良いと思います。
- 02:13:782 (4) - ストリームではないので青線まで音を拾うよりも手前のドラム音が聞こえる赤線02:16:032 - にsnapした方が自然に聞こえます。現状はやや違和感がありました。もし変更しない場合でもslider endのSamplesetをSoftに変えるだけでも改善されると思います。
- 02:13:782 (4) - Normalと同じ指摘です。
Beginner
00:54:062 (1) - this and the similar following slider 01:04:729 (3) - could be more interesting because of 1/3 drumsound! maybe like this (every 1/3 beat a red node)
I know youjr style is simple but the emphasize something like this goes really cool.
01:19:729 (2,3) - DS error?! or not haha idk
01:38:396 - place a circle here I can hear a strong beat, and turn 01:38:729 (5) - into a slider which goes till 01:39:062 -
Normal
00:15:198 (2,3) - move (3) a bit down for a good blanket
01:52:396 (8,1) - this slowdown is really to hard to notice for a normal player, please map this bpm-change with sliders, that it is not hard to get no 100 or 50. A minimum change would be another ds to emphasize it
Hard
01:33:062 (2,3) - change them into a slider (head and tail) that works better for me on hard because just circles is too much to click for this diff
(change also your copied version 01:36:229 (5,6) - )
01:38:063 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - also too hard (especially the doubles)
Hyper
00:26:396 (5) - change this one into an 1/4 slider because in the gap between the streams is also 1/4 hearable!
00:29:062 (5) - ^
00:31:729 (5) - ^
00:37:062 (5) - ^... and every following
-> perfect diff
Another
00:18:105 (1,3,5,7) - I would emphasize them with sliders because the tone fades out on 1/4 and is different, I would really not map it exactly like in Hyper, please make it more interesting here
02:01:384 - add a circle here ! it is different from 02:03:032 (8,9) -
VOLCANO
sorry I'm not able to mod this >.>
Nice and clear map at all, not many things to find, but a bit to "standard" for my star
00:54:062 (1) - this and the similar following slider 01:04:729 (3) - could be more interesting because of 1/3 drumsound! maybe like this (every 1/3 beat a red node)
I know youjr style is simple but the emphasize something like this goes really cool.
01:19:729 (2,3) - DS error?! or not haha idk
01:38:396 - place a circle here I can hear a strong beat, and turn 01:38:729 (5) - into a slider which goes till 01:39:062 -
Normal
00:15:198 (2,3) - move (3) a bit down for a good blanket
01:52:396 (8,1) - this slowdown is really to hard to notice for a normal player, please map this bpm-change with sliders, that it is not hard to get no 100 or 50. A minimum change would be another ds to emphasize it
Hard
01:33:062 (2,3) - change them into a slider (head and tail) that works better for me on hard because just circles is too much to click for this diff
(change also your copied version 01:36:229 (5,6) - )
01:38:063 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - also too hard (especially the doubles)
Hyper
00:26:396 (5) - change this one into an 1/4 slider because in the gap between the streams is also 1/4 hearable!
00:29:062 (5) - ^
00:31:729 (5) - ^
00:37:062 (5) - ^... and every following
-> perfect diff
Another
00:18:105 (1,3,5,7) - I would emphasize them with sliders because the tone fades out on 1/4 and is different, I would really not map it exactly like in Hyper, please make it more interesting here
02:01:384 - add a circle here ! it is different from 02:03:032 (8,9) -
VOLCANO
sorry I'm not able to mod this >.>
Nice and clear map at all, not many things to find, but a bit to "standard" for my star
[Beginner]
00:20:327 (5) – (nazi) put it at x:172 y:28 for symmetry?
[Normal]
00:54:062 (4) – I would suggest the following pattern instead
because the first three sounds have same pitch while the last is different
Same goes for 01:04:729 (4) -
[Hard]
00:32:396 (1,2) – NC should be placed on 00:32:729 (2) -? I think? Same goes for 00:43:062 (1,2) –
01:04:729 (1) – I think it is ok to use 4 circles instead of this slider for hard, since these four notes are “heavy”
01:38:563 (5,6,7,8) – I would use two 1/4 sliders instead because I think it’s too much for hard
01:49:396 (7,8) – try this? easier I think
[Hyper]
I think AR9 is really too high for this diff… lower it slightly at least ?
00:48:312 - – add note here ? for the bass drum sound, same goes for 00:53:646 -, 00:58:979 – etc
[Another]
00:50:729 (3) – change it to a 1/4 repeated slider to fit the drum?
Same goes for 01:01:396 (3) -,01:06:729 (3) –
02:12:882 (7,8) – imo ctrl+G on this flow better
[VOLCANO]
I mod this at AR9.6
01:49:395 (7,8,9,10) – I suggest NC on this to show that this is 1/3
Good luck
Edit: forgotten to apply the image function
00:20:327 (5) – (nazi) put it at x:172 y:28 for symmetry?
[Normal]
00:54:062 (4) – I would suggest the following pattern instead
because the first three sounds have same pitch while the last is different
Same goes for 01:04:729 (4) -
[Hard]
00:32:396 (1,2) – NC should be placed on 00:32:729 (2) -? I think? Same goes for 00:43:062 (1,2) –
01:04:729 (1) – I think it is ok to use 4 circles instead of this slider for hard, since these four notes are “heavy”
01:38:563 (5,6,7,8) – I would use two 1/4 sliders instead because I think it’s too much for hard
01:49:396 (7,8) – try this? easier I think
[Hyper]
I think AR9 is really too high for this diff… lower it slightly at least ?
00:48:312 - – add note here ? for the bass drum sound, same goes for 00:53:646 -, 00:58:979 – etc
[Another]
00:50:729 (3) – change it to a 1/4 repeated slider to fit the drum?
Same goes for 01:01:396 (3) -,01:06:729 (3) –
02:12:882 (7,8) – imo ctrl+G on this flow better
[VOLCANO]
I mod this at AR9.6
01:49:395 (7,8,9,10) – I suggest NC on this to show that this is 1/3
Good luck
Edit: forgotten to apply the image function
M4M from your Q
c:
c:
Beginner
00:09:397 (2,3) - move this up a little to perfectly catch 1? It's pretty minor, but I think it'd overall improve playability a bit :c
00:30:729 (4,5) - might want to fix the spacing between these (1.06) if you feel like it. Not sure if you're bothered by this at all
00:33:396 (4,5,1) - why not form a triangle here? if that's what you were going for, it' off
00:35:396 (3) - could rotate this a bit like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3245619 for better looks + slightly improved flow since the transition into the next slider feels smoother if it is above the silders tail instead of below
00:44:062 (4,5,1) - a triangle like this http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3245632 feels nicer :c
01:01:395 (2,4) - feels a bit weird not to have these look the same to me :c
01:21:729 (5,2) - why not put these on the same y-axis too?
01:24:062 (2,3,1) - might want to tidy up the spacing here
01:43:396 (2) - said something similar before, but it feels like the player would expect this slider to be curved deeper to go along with how the previous slider was curved.
Normal
00:15:198 (2,3) - just going to point out this blanket because it's an easy fix without having to re-arrange anything c:
00:24:398 (1) - I think removing this would make the rythm feel a lot more intuitive
00:52:562 (7) - perhaps move this down a little bit for a curve that'll play a little smoother? having an actual bump between these instead of something that plays like a smooth curve is a bit odd I think
00:55:229 (6) - I personally feel like the sound on this is rather weak, so having this speedup before the actual strong beats feels a bit odd to me
01:05:729 (5,6) - ^
01:07:229 (4) - pretty sure adding a circle here would work nicely
01:33:062 (4,3) - would it be to much of a bother to have these stack?:c
01:48:729 (3,4,5,6) - the curve these are forming looks a bit..uneven I think..err I'm bad at wording this ><
01:55:961 (8) - perhaps just put a circle here and get red if the slider?
Hard
00:24:064 (3,4,1) - movement between these is a bit wiggly instead of being nice and curvy :c would play nicer if 4 was above 3's tail
00:25:397 (2) - might want to fix the spacing, it's actually quite noticeable with how close the notes are
00:35:396 (1) - it really feels like this slidertail should be clickable with how strong the sound feels
01:19:729 (3,3) - why not just copy the first slider?:c a slightly deeper curve here feels nicer
01:33:229 (3,4,5) - straighten this out + tidy up the spacing? just for the extra neatness ><
02:02:818 (3,4,5) - feels like this would feel a bit nicer if it was moving downwards instead of upwards..though I don't really know why I'm bothered by this haha, so feel very free to just ignore this one
02:05:650 (2,3,4) - again, should probably tidy up the spacing here :c it's quite noticeable with how close the notes are
02:08:519 (2,3) - ^
Hyper
01:03:896 (2,3,4) - a curve like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3245755 feels a tad bit nicer :c
01:34:562 (3,4) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3245764 try this perhaps? very minor difference, but it feels a bit less clunky to me
01:56:423 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - <3
02:03:675 (1,2) - missing a note between these?
02:05:275 (1,2) - ^
Another
00:32:062 (6,7,8,9) - tidy up the spacing here? it looks a bit messy towards the end of this one
00:39:396 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - I feel like the curve of these looks a big jagged when compared to this 00:45:062 (2,3,4,5,6) - very minor and a bitch to fix, so I guess feel free to ignore this
00:49:896 (8,1) - feels a bit like 1 is lacking impact to me.. I think it should stand out a bit against the previous pattern instead of being a part (as in feeling as intense as the rest of it), since it does feel stronger
01:00:562 (8,1) - ^
01:16:729 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - curve here could look a bit smoother I thnk :c (sorry, I think i have a thing for curved looking jagged/uneven ><)
01:58:038 (8,1) - b-blanket ><
VOLCANO
I don't feel like I'm the right person to properly give feedback on this :/ and since just going ''slightly adjust spacing here - slightly adjust spacing there'' would be as bad as '' blanket dis/NC dis'' I'll skip this one, sorry :c
Good luck o3o
00:09:397 (2,3) - move this up a little to perfectly catch 1? It's pretty minor, but I think it'd overall improve playability a bit :c
00:30:729 (4,5) - might want to fix the spacing between these (1.06) if you feel like it. Not sure if you're bothered by this at all
00:33:396 (4,5,1) - why not form a triangle here? if that's what you were going for, it' off
00:35:396 (3) - could rotate this a bit like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3245619 for better looks + slightly improved flow since the transition into the next slider feels smoother if it is above the silders tail instead of below
00:44:062 (4,5,1) - a triangle like this http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3245632 feels nicer :c
01:01:395 (2,4) - feels a bit weird not to have these look the same to me :c
01:21:729 (5,2) - why not put these on the same y-axis too?
01:24:062 (2,3,1) - might want to tidy up the spacing here
01:43:396 (2) - said something similar before, but it feels like the player would expect this slider to be curved deeper to go along with how the previous slider was curved.
Normal
00:15:198 (2,3) - just going to point out this blanket because it's an easy fix without having to re-arrange anything c:
00:24:398 (1) - I think removing this would make the rythm feel a lot more intuitive
00:52:562 (7) - perhaps move this down a little bit for a curve that'll play a little smoother? having an actual bump between these instead of something that plays like a smooth curve is a bit odd I think
00:55:229 (6) - I personally feel like the sound on this is rather weak, so having this speedup before the actual strong beats feels a bit odd to me
01:05:729 (5,6) - ^
01:07:229 (4) - pretty sure adding a circle here would work nicely
01:33:062 (4,3) - would it be to much of a bother to have these stack?:c
01:48:729 (3,4,5,6) - the curve these are forming looks a bit..uneven I think..err I'm bad at wording this ><
01:55:961 (8) - perhaps just put a circle here and get red if the slider?
Hard
00:24:064 (3,4,1) - movement between these is a bit wiggly instead of being nice and curvy :c would play nicer if 4 was above 3's tail
00:25:397 (2) - might want to fix the spacing, it's actually quite noticeable with how close the notes are
00:35:396 (1) - it really feels like this slidertail should be clickable with how strong the sound feels
01:19:729 (3,3) - why not just copy the first slider?:c a slightly deeper curve here feels nicer
01:33:229 (3,4,5) - straighten this out + tidy up the spacing? just for the extra neatness ><
02:02:818 (3,4,5) - feels like this would feel a bit nicer if it was moving downwards instead of upwards..though I don't really know why I'm bothered by this haha, so feel very free to just ignore this one
02:05:650 (2,3,4) - again, should probably tidy up the spacing here :c it's quite noticeable with how close the notes are
02:08:519 (2,3) - ^
Hyper
01:03:896 (2,3,4) - a curve like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3245755 feels a tad bit nicer :c
01:34:562 (3,4) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3245764 try this perhaps? very minor difference, but it feels a bit less clunky to me
01:56:423 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - <3
02:03:675 (1,2) - missing a note between these?
02:05:275 (1,2) - ^
Another
00:32:062 (6,7,8,9) - tidy up the spacing here? it looks a bit messy towards the end of this one
00:39:396 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - I feel like the curve of these looks a big jagged when compared to this 00:45:062 (2,3,4,5,6) - very minor and a bitch to fix, so I guess feel free to ignore this
00:49:896 (8,1) - feels a bit like 1 is lacking impact to me.. I think it should stand out a bit against the previous pattern instead of being a part (as in feeling as intense as the rest of it), since it does feel stronger
01:00:562 (8,1) - ^
01:16:729 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - curve here could look a bit smoother I thnk :c (sorry, I think i have a thing for curved looking jagged/uneven ><)
01:58:038 (8,1) - b-blanket ><
VOLCANO
I don't feel like I'm the right person to properly give feedback on this :/ and since just going ''slightly adjust spacing here - slightly adjust spacing there'' would be as bad as '' blanket dis/NC dis'' I'll skip this one, sorry :c
Good luck o3o
Good map as always. ^_^
Topic Starter
Guy
Guyさんありがとう
これらを修正しましたGuy wrote:
[General][VOLCANO]
- BG sizeが1084x768と中途半端なので4:3 or 16:9にしませんか？一応元画像から16:9にしたものを貼っておきますが必須ではないので変えなくてもOKです
- Letterboxのチェックは必要なさそうなので外してもいいと思います。
[Hard]
- 00:28:396 (11) - ストリームパートのhitsoundが少なく単調に聞こえてしまうので、こういう目立った音があるところにfinish or clapを入れてみては？ 個人的にはfinishが合ってると思います。何個か同じような点があるのでこれ以降は省きます。
[Normal]
- 00:02:730 (3) - Hyperと同じようにN入れてみてはどうでしょう？
- 01:49:396 (7,8) - 恐らく初見でこのレベルのdiffをプレイするプレイヤーにこの音取りと配置は難しいと思います。自分はこういう音取りを推します。
[Easy]
- 01:52:731 (1,2) - 急なBPM変更で混乱する初心者もいると思うのでスライダーで音取りした方が良いと思います。
- 02:13:782 (4) - ストリームではないので青線まで音を拾うよりも手前のドラム音が聞こえる赤線02:16:032 - にsnapした方が自然に聞こえます。現状はやや違和感がありました。もし変更しない場合でもslider endのSamplesetをSoftに変えるだけでも改善されると思います。
- 02:13:782 (4) - Normalと同じ指摘です。
Guyさんありがとう
yugijedi
fixed this, thanks yugijediyugijedi wrote:
Normal
01:52:396 (8,1) - this slowdown is really to hard to notice for a normal player, please map this bpm-change with sliders, that it is not hard to get no 100 or 50. A minimum change would be another ds to emphasize it
Hard
01:38:063 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - also too hard (especially the doubles)
Mio_chan
fixed these thanks Mio_chan-chanMio_chan wrote:
[Beginner]
00:20:327 (5) – (nazi) put it at x:172 y:28 for symmetry? some changed
[Hard]
00:32:396 (1,2) – NC should be placed on 00:32:729 (2) -? I think? Same goes for 00:43:062 (1,2) –
-Hakurei-
fixed this, thanks -Hakurei--Hakurei- wrote:
[Hard]
- 01:38:563 (5,6,7,8) - i'd prefer slider for this
Peachtrees
fixed these, thanks PeachtreesPeachtrees wrote:
Beginner
00:30:729 (4,5) - might want to fix the spacing between these (1.06) if you feel like it. Not sure if you're bothered by this at all
00:33:396 (4,5,1) - why not form a triangle here? if that's what you were going for, it' off
Hard
00:24:064 (3,4,1) - movement between these is a bit wiggly instead of being nice and curvy :c would play nicer if 4 was above 3's tail
00:25:397 (2) - might want to fix the spacing, it's actually quite noticeable with how close the notes are
00:35:396 (1) - it really feels like this slidertail should be clickable with how strong the sound feels
01:33:229 (3,4,5) - straighten this out + tidy up the spacing? just for the extra neatness ><
thanks again guys
The last quarter of that VOLCANO difficulty is amazing.
Love the choice of BG too.
Love the choice of BG too.
Topic Starter
added normal-hitwhistle
plz redl
plz redl
Hi Muya san ~ :3
[Beginner]
Call me Back.
before mod log
2015-06-04 00:07 Satellite: t/241019
2015-06-04 00:08 Satellite: ちなみにBeginnerのほうは３箇所全てだめみたいです・・・
2015-06-04 00:08 Satellite: Normalは確認はとってないですが00:10:897 (1,1) - ここはbpm100なのでおそらくsafeになると思います
2015-06-04 00:08 Satellite: ただ、おそらくですが 00:21:564 (1,1) - こちらはアウトになると思います
2015-06-04 00:09 Satellite: Hardでも 00:21:481 (1,1) - こちらは167msしかないので375ms前後は必要になると思います
2015-06-04 00:09 Satellite: かなり面倒なRuleですが、頑張ってください・・・。
2015-06-04 00:08 Satellite: ちなみにBeginnerのほうは３箇所全てだめみたいです・・・
2015-06-04 00:08 Satellite: Normalは確認はとってないですが00:10:897 (1,1) - ここはbpm100なのでおそらくsafeになると思います
2015-06-04 00:08 Satellite: ただ、おそらくですが 00:21:564 (1,1) - こちらはアウトになると思います
2015-06-04 00:09 Satellite: Hardでも 00:21:481 (1,1) - こちらは167msしかないので375ms前後は必要になると思います
2015-06-04 00:09 Satellite: かなり面倒なRuleですが、頑張ってください・・・。
[Beginner]
- 00:34:062 (1,2) - Slider終点にも似たような音があるのでadd whistleどうですか？
- 00:44:729 (1,2) - 上記同様にadd whistleの提案
- 01:04:729 (3) - add Nc それか 00:54:062 (1) - こちらをremove Nc
- 01:30:062 (1) - Slider始点でNormalのhitsoundが鳴っているのは少し不自然に思いました。Sampleset : S もしくは D で始点の音を調整してみてはどうでしょう
- 01:44:396 (3) - add whistle ? それっぽい音があるので
- 01:46:062 (3) - 上記同様の理由で add whistleどうでしょうか
- 02:13:782 (4) - 個人的にはここのSliderにNew Comboが欲しいです。どちらでも
- 00:24:398 (1) - add whistle ? それらしい音があるので
- 00:34:062 (1,3) - Slider終点にも似たような音があるのでadd whistleどうですか？
- 00:44:728 (1,3) - 上記同様にadd whistleの提案
- 00:54:062 (4) - 読みづらいです。特に低難易度では読みやすさを考慮したほうがいいと思います、そのためにも1/3スライダーを2つにしてこのような音取りはどうでしょう？
- 01:04:729 (4) - 上記と同様で、読みづらいです。
- 01:20:562 (4) - 01:23:229 (4) - 01:25:896 (4) - 01:28:562 (4) - ちょっと音の拾いすぎだと思いました。remove noteして間をとったほうが好ましいと思います。
- 01:44:062 (5) - add whistle ? それっぽい音があるので
- 01:46:729 (2) - 上記同様の理由で add whistleどうでしょうか
- 01:51:229 (4) - 01:20:562 (4) - と、同様に間をとったほうがいいです。remove noteはどうでしょうか
- 02:13:332 (2) - remove note. ここはかなり詰めこんでいるので、間をとったほうがいいです。
- 02:13:782 (3) - 個人的にはここのSliderにNew Comboが欲しいです。どちらでも
- 00:24:064 (3) - add whistle ? Slider終点にも似たような音があるので
- 00:34:062 (1,3) - Slider終点にも似たような音があるのでadd whistleどうですか？
- 00:44:729 (1,3) - 上記同様にadd whistleの提案
- 01:33:396 (5) - Clap入れ忘れです。
- 01:37:396 (4,5,6,7) - Normalとの差も考慮してここは4連打を置くのではなくSliderのリバースした形でフォローしたほうが好ましいと思いました。
- 01:44:396 (5) - add whistle ? それっぽい音があるので
- 01:47:062 (5) - 上記同様の理由で add whistleどうでしょうか
- 02:12:431 (4) - 02:13:632 (4) - bpm200の単発を5個連続で置くのはNormalと比較して差が大きすぎると思いました。remove noteしてはどうでしょうか
- 00:23:397 (3,6) - add whistle ? Slider終点にも似たような音があるので
- 00:34:396 (2,7) - Slider終点にも似たような音があるのでadd whistleどうですか？
- 00:45:062 (2,7) - 上記同様にadd whistleの提案
- 01:44:396 (7) - 01:47:063 (7) - Sliderの始点にadd whistle ? それっぽい音があるので
- Hitsoundの指摘はHyperと同じなのでそちらを参照してください
- Hitsoundの指摘はHyperと同じなのでそちらを参照してください
- 01:06:729 (5,6,7) - 提案ですが、私個人の流れとしては以下のほうが綺麗かなって思いました
- 01:07:396 (1,2,3) - 上記指摘を修正した場合のみ見てください。同様に引き続きの流れです
Call me Back.
Topic Starter
SPOILER
Satellite wrote:
[Beginner][Normal]
- 00:54:062 (1) - こちらをremove Nc
- 01:30:062 (1) - Slider始点でNormalのhitsoundが鳴っているのは少し不自然に思いました。Sampleset : S もしくは D で始点の音を調整してみてはどうでしょう
[Hard]
- 00:54:062 (4) - 読みづらいです。特に低難易度では読みやすさを考慮したほうがいいと思います、そのためにも1/3スライダーを2つにしてこのような音取りはどうでしょう？
- 01:04:729 (4) - 上記と同様で、読みづらいです。
- 01:20:562 (4) - 01:23:229 (4) - 01:25:896 (4) - 01:28:562 (4) - ちょっと音の拾いすぎだと思いました。remove noteして間をとったほうが好ましいと思います。
- 01:51:229 (4) - 01:20:562 (4) - と、同様に間をとったほうがいいです。remove noteはどうでしょうか
- 02:13:332 (2) - remove note. ここはかなり詰めこんでいるので、間をとったほうがいいです。
[Hyper]
- 01:33:396 (5) - Clap入れ忘れです。
- 01:37:396 (4,5,6,7) - Normalとの差も考慮してここは4連打を置くのではなくSliderのリバースした形でフォローしたほうが好ましいと思いました。
- 01:44:396 (5) - add whistle ? それっぽい音があるので
- 01:47:062 (5) - 上記同様の理由で add whistleどうでしょうか
- 02:12:431 (4) - 02:13:632 (4) - bpm200の単発を5個連続で置くのはNormalと比較して差が大きすぎると思いました。remove noteしてはどうでしょうか
[Another]
- 00:23:397 (3,6) - add whistle ? Slider終点にも似たような音があるので
- 00:34:396 (2,7) - Slider終点にも似たような音があるのでadd whistleどうですか？
- 00:45:062 (2,7) - 上記同様にadd whistleの提案
- 01:44:396 (7) - 01:47:063 (7) - Sliderの始点にadd whistle ? それっぽい音があるので
[VOLCANO]
- Hitsoundの指摘はHyperと同じなのでそちらを参照してください
- 01:06:729 (5,6,7) - 提案ですが、私個人の流れとしては以下のほうが綺麗かなって思いました
- 01:07:396 (1,2,3) - 上記指摘を修正した場合のみ見てください。同様に引き続きの流れです
を修正しました
Satelliteさんありがとう
offsetも修正しました
gl
Topic Starter
thanks ＾＿＾／
oh wow this song
gogogogogogogogogo
gogogogogogogogogo
ohhh thank you yuko chan 
call me back
Edit : reb
call me back
Edit : reb
Topic Starter
thanks Kodora
i wish all maps look like this one
Disqualification Notice
Hello!
Unfortunately, the Quality Assurance Team has decided to disqualify this beatmap. The following is a list of reasons and examples for the disqualification. We do not outline every issue in detail, so make sure to take the idea behind each reason and apply it to the entire beatmap as issues might be found in more than the spots mentioned below. If you have any questions, please reply to this post and we will do our best to clarify any misunderstandings.
(A) General Technical Errors
- 00:12:730 - duplicate green line in Easy and Normal diffs. Please remove either one.
If you happen to have concerns about this disqualification, you can contest the decision with this form. Before using this form, please read the instructions carefully.
The Beatmap Nominators may handle this mapset after the issues have been addressed.
Good luck!
###A
Topic Starter
Done
thanks QAT
thanks QAT
Go Muya
Hey just a suggestion. For the Star patrern at he end, it ends with a stack that fits perfectly to compete it when played ingame. However with HR it completely breaks as a star patrern. Maybe do the stacks manually so it'll work with HR.
oh yeah, i don't know if this is really important, but these sliders in [VOLCANO] are snapped to the wrong beats, ...
00:02:730 (1) - should take off a reverse
00:05:397 (1) - should just be 1/8 triplet
don't kd
00:02:730 (1) - should take off a reverse
00:05:397 (1) - should just be 1/8 triplet
don't kd
Topic Starter
handsome:
I know but this is not like a offscreen problem
also feel playable when HR
so I can keep this pattern
thanks for comment
toybot:
I rechecked these
but rhythm are right now
thanks for checking
I know but this is not like a offscreen problem
also feel playable when HR
so I can keep this pattern
thanks for comment
toybot:
I rechecked these
but rhythm are right now
thanks for checking
Checked everything and looks fine
Congratulations again
I really love the song ;D Great job Muya
Congratulations again
Great map crazy streams :0
Disqualification Notice
Hello!
Unfortunately, the Quality Assurance Team has decided to disqualify this beatmap. The following is a list of reasons and examples for the disqualification. We do not outline every issue in detail, so make sure to take the idea behind each reason and apply it to the entire beatmap as issues might be found in more than the spots mentioned below. If you have any questions, please reply to this post and we will do our best to clarify any misunderstandings.
General
The difficulty gap between Hard and Hyper is way too big in its current state.
The difficulty gap between Hard and Hyper is way too big in its current state.
We think that the usage of triplets and streams in Hyper is way too excessive compared to Hard. Hard is mainly just 1/2 along with few 1/4 patterns, whereas Hyper contains patterns such as 00:28:727 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - or even 02:13:780 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - . An option to fix that could be to add an additional difficulty between those two difficulties, but this is up to you.
If you happen to have concerns about this disqualification, you can contest the decision with this form. Before using this form, please read the instructions carefully.
The Beatmap Nominators may handle this mapset after the issues have been addressed.
Good luck!
###D
I don't get why the issue wasn't addressed in the first dq...