I already mentioned it. There is no rule about which romanisation to use, but why don't we use the one which is most similar to modified hepburn and the Chinese romanization we use. Isn't it insensible to use this system. I explained it a bit more here: p/4144722/
Why should we use types of romanisation which are not read the same way as the others we used so far?
Problem of romanisation you use is that Е is romanised the same way as Ё while it is pronounced a bit different - E = E, but Ё is something between E and O, it shouldn't be the same.
Anyway gratz for a bubble
Why should we use types of romanisation which are not read the same way as the others we used so far?
Problem of romanisation you use is that Е is romanised the same way as Ё while it is pronounced a bit different - E = E, but Ё is something between E and O, it shouldn't be the same.
Anyway gratz for a bubble