They used to nominate beatmaps in the past, but nowdays they just vote by clicking a single button :/Gabe wrote:
Beatmap Nominator sounds like what CATs does.
They used to nominate beatmaps in the past, but nowdays they just vote by clicking a single button :/Gabe wrote:
Beatmap Nominator sounds like what CATs does.
So you did got out from the BAT anywaysCDFA wrote:
oh. . .
Sonnyc wrote:
Besides that, something has actually got changed after our opinion lol
It feels so community-driven.
I think that was due to the server cap. peppy said this somewhere, if I remember correctly..Sonnyc wrote:
Any plans for raising the daily qualified cap? Personally 8 feels not enough considering the 100+ BN members..
imo i think the best alternate is the three BN rank suggested by starry.Lust wrote:
As peppy stated, we are going to have to figure this out on our own. I'll be brainstorming some ideas (which I have been for awhile) but we should get everyone together on this. It is a real issue that we'll need to confront, I suppose.
yeah just read that but cap is still being hit, lets observe how it goes as we go through the week.Sakura wrote:
I figured I'd post this here:
That's always how it's been likeCherry Blossom wrote:
That's funny how BNs are being superactive just for BN ranking.
For example, instead of letting the mapper self pop his map for x reason, the BN pop the map and considerably slowdown the ranking process.
I think that BNs should only pop a map's bubble for several unrankable issues or important unrankable issues like wrong timing or diff spread. For small unrankable issue, self popping is fine.
Why ?
Self pop = get the rebubble from the BN who gave the first bubble and then rank.
Pop = get the rebubble and find another BN.
Saying such things means you have no idea how protocols work. If anything hinders a map enough from being qualified (any unrankable issue, no matter how large or small), a BN SHOULD pop it. The popping BN can just rebubble and the original bubbler can come back and qualify. This is how things have been since I have joined, and they will probably continue this way for as long as we are still using the bubble/heart nomination system.Cherry Blossom wrote:
That's funny how BNs are being superactive just for BN ranking.
For example, instead of letting the mapper self pop his map for x reason, the BN pop the map and considerably slowdown the ranking process.
I think that BNs should only pop a map's bubble for several unrankable issues or important unrankable issues like wrong timing or diff spread. For small unrankable issue, self popping is fine.
Why ?
Self pop = get the rebubble from the BN who gave the first bubble and then rank.
Pop = get the rebubble and find another BN.
the original bubbler can come back to qualify?Lust wrote:
Saying such things means you have no idea how protocols work. If anything hinders a map enough from being qualified (any unrankable issue, no matter how large or small), a BN SHOULD pop it. The popping BN can just rebubble and the original bubbler can come back and qualify. This is how things have been since I have joined, and they will probably continue this way for as long as we are still using the bubble/heart nomination system.Cherry Blossom wrote:
That's funny how BNs are being superactive just for BN ranking.
For example, instead of letting the mapper self pop his map for x reason, the BN pop the map and considerably slowdown the ranking process.
I think that BNs should only pop a map's bubble for several unrankable issues or important unrankable issues like wrong timing or diff spread. For small unrankable issue, self popping is fine.
Why ?
Self pop = get the rebubble from the BN who gave the first bubble and then rank.
Pop = get the rebubble and find another BN.