Beatmap Nominator sounds like what CATs does.
forum
Current system revision and new system changes
posted
Total Posts
313
Maybe they should be combinedGabe wrote:
Beatmap Nominator sounds like what CATs does.
jk
"Group" sounds not good imo, so I prefer the one without "Group".
This is just my opinion.
I prefer current one(Beatmap Appreciator) or Beatmap Nominator.
This is just my opinion.
I prefer current one(Beatmap Appreciator) or Beatmap Nominator.
They used to nominate beatmaps in the past, but nowdays they just vote by clicking a single button :/Gabe wrote:
Beatmap Nominator sounds like what CATs does.
Thumbs up to the new name!
All hail BNs!
So you did got out from the BAT anywaysCDFA wrote:
oh. . .
Besides that, something has actually got changed after our opinion lol
It feels so community-driven.
It feels so community-driven.
Looks better
Sonnyc wrote:
Besides that, something has actually got changed after our opinion lol
It feels so community-driven.
whoa
Topic Starter
I hope you are happy with that adjustments! I will look into newBNs now. may take a while ;_;
We are biscuits now.
Yay they're finally coming!
I'm happy \:D/
god damn it cb 
Rip BA, you weren't that bad ;(
You still are CtB Champion, you could care less :p
CtB Champion should just get out. /jk At least now this is not resembles to BAT at all. :3
oh it got removed? at least it's better than nothing c:
poke me when we have our color back hue
poke me when we have our color back hue
secretpipe what
''BNG'' sucks, but ''Beatmap Nominator'' sounds cool enough. So, I'll call you as Beatmap Nominator, without any kind of abreviation..
*runs*
*runs*
I guess this should be reworded too
Any plans for raising the daily qualified cap? Personally 8 feels not enough considering the 100+ BN members..
Topic Starter
Make a feature request thread?
I think that was due to the server cap. peppy said this somewhere, if I remember correctly..Sonnyc wrote:
Any plans for raising the daily qualified cap? Personally 8 feels not enough considering the 100+ BN members..
so it won't "possible" to raise it..
Lets see how the feature request goes.
lol Everybody are like CDFA
CDFA spirit
CDFA spirit
Keeping it alive
As peppy stated, we are going to have to figure this out on our own. I'll be brainstorming some ideas (which I have been for awhile) but we should get everyone together on this. It is a real issue that we'll need to confront, I suppose.
As for me, i guess i'll just get my icons from bubbles, not worth it to try to rush at reset to qualify something.
imo i think the best alternate is the three BN rank suggested by starry.Lust wrote:
As peppy stated, we are going to have to figure this out on our own. I'll be brainstorming some ideas (which I have been for awhile) but we should get everyone together on this. It is a real issue that we'll need to confront, I suppose.
as we approach the new system. the quality of BNs, I'd hate to admit, would probably be worse and worse since the requirements are MUCH lower. making it require 3 BNs to rank stuff will limit the # of qualified maps and also make the general quality of the map better.
I figured I'd post this here:
Well that'll stop habiholic for now but I can see 8 different bn's quickly filling the cap
That's funny how BNs are being superactive just for BN ranking.
For example, instead of letting the mapper self pop his map for x reason, the BN pop the map and considerably slowdown the ranking process.
I think that BNs should only pop a map's bubble for several unrankable issues or important unrankable issues like wrong timing or diff spread. For small unrankable issue, self popping is fine.
Why ?
Self pop = get the rebubble from the BN who gave the first bubble and then rank.
Pop = get the rebubble and find another BN.
For example, instead of letting the mapper self pop his map for x reason, the BN pop the map and considerably slowdown the ranking process.
I think that BNs should only pop a map's bubble for several unrankable issues or important unrankable issues like wrong timing or diff spread. For small unrankable issue, self popping is fine.
Why ?
Self pop = get the rebubble from the BN who gave the first bubble and then rank.
Pop = get the rebubble and find another BN.
yeah just read that but cap is still being hit, lets observe how it goes as we go through the week.Sakura wrote:
I figured I'd post this here:
but anyway all ive been doing is bubbling LOL.
That's always how it's been likeCherry Blossom wrote:
That's funny how BNs are being superactive just for BN ranking.
For example, instead of letting the mapper self pop his map for x reason, the BN pop the map and considerably slowdown the ranking process.
I think that BNs should only pop a map's bubble for several unrankable issues or important unrankable issues like wrong timing or diff spread. For small unrankable issue, self popping is fine.
Why ?
Self pop = get the rebubble from the BN who gave the first bubble and then rank.
Pop = get the rebubble and find another BN.